RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: A shift in midline brain structure indicates raised intracranial pressure (ICP), thereby a sign of compromised perfusion to brain tissues or a mass effect. Early diagnosis can help in planning timely neurosurgical interventions that could prevent further neuron loss. Also, this may aid in neuroprognostication. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to find the accuracy of bedside assessment of brain midline shift (MLS) using transcranial sonography (TCS) in comparison to a computed tomography (CT) scan of the brain for patients presenting with suspected intracranial pathology to the emergency department (ED). METHODS: This prospective observational study was carried out for one year in an ED. A total of 124 patients with suspected intracranial pathology were included in the study. Transtemporal scanning along the orbitomeatal line was performed to image the third ventricle. The distance between the third ventricle and the internal side of the temporal bone was measured on both sides as A and B. The MLS was then calculated using the following formula: midline shift = (A-B)/2. The data were entered and analyzed using a Microsoft Excel worksheet (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA). RESULTS: Out of the total 124 patients enrolled in this study, adequate views for 12 patients were not obtained and, hence, they were excluded from the study. The time to perform a TCS assessment of brain MLS was around 22 minutes (range: 15-30 minutes). In our study, out of 112 analyzed patients, 33 (29.5% of our study) had a significant MLS in the brain (defined by an MLS of more than 5 mm) diagnosed by TCS. Analyzing CT brain results revealed that out of the total 112 patients under study, 27 had a significant brain MLS (24.1% of the total population under study) as defined above. CONCLUSION: A TCS is a promising alternative to a brain CT in an emergency for brain MLS detection.
RESUMEN
Background and objectives Ultrasound-guided femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve blocks are useful adjuncts for many below-knee procedures like debridement, amputation, etc. The objectives of the study were to find the efficacy and feasibility of the ultrasound-guided combined femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve block for below-knee procedures in the Emergency Medicine Department (ED). Methodology This prospective clinical study was carried out over three months in ED. A total of 30 patients undergoing below-knee procedures were included in the study. Femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve blocks were administered to each patient using the high-frequency linear ultrasound probe by emergency physicians trained in ultrasound. The effect of blocks, amount of local anesthetic (LA) used, duration of the procedure, and post-block analgesia were recorded. Patients were monitored for possible complications, if any. Data were entered and analyzed using a Microsoft Excel worksheet. Results The average volume of LAs required was around 34.5 cc for both blocks combined. No complications like vascular puncture or nerve injury were reported during the study. The time taken to complete the procedure was around 33 minutes, and the average time to achieve sensory block was around 9 minutes after completing the procedure. Conclusions An ultrasound-guided combined femoral and popliteal sciatic nerve block is an effective and feasible procedure and thus should be considered in ED for below-knee procedures.
RESUMEN
Background Organophosphorus (OP) compound poisoning is the most common toxicological medical emergency in India, where the majority of the population lives on agriculture. The Peradeniya Organophosphorus Poisoning (POP) scale can be a simple and effective system to determine the need for ventilatory support early in the course of admission. The objective of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of the clinical parameters of the POP scale in predicting the severity of organophosphorus compound poisoning, by comparing early predicted patient prognosis evaluated by the POP scale on admission with the patient outcome. Methods This was a prospective observational study of acute organophosphorus compound poisoning presenting to the emergency department of Sir Sayajirao General (SSG) Hospital and Medical College, Baroda. We included patients over 12 years of age with a history of, or symptoms suggestive of, acute OP poisoning. The patients received initial resuscitation according to airway, breathing, circulation, disability, and exposure simultaneously with decontamination and gastric lavage by Ryle's tube. They also received the standard antidotes of atropine and pralidoxime immediately. We applied the POP scale to each patient upon admission and graded the poisoning severity as mild (a POP scale score of 0-3), moderate (4-7), or severe (8-11). This scale assessed the patients' need for mechanical ventilation and ICU management and their final clinical outcome. Results We enrolled 60 patients in the study. Most of them were under 20 years of age, and 65% of them were male. Social laborers were the major population, and most of them had suicidal intention. Monocrotophos was the most commonly consumed OP compound. Most of the patients were brought to the hospital within two to six hours of consumption. Vomiting and profuse secretions were the primary presenting symptoms. A majority of the patients (47) fell into the mild POP scale range. None of the patients had severe poisoning. Out of 60 patients, 49 patients improved and 11 patients died. Seven patients (15%) with mild POP scale scores and four patients (31%) with moderate scores died. Overall, 61.7% of patients with mild POP scale scores and 100% of patients with moderate scores needed mechanical ventilation. Conclusion The POP scale is an effective tool to measure severity and make a prognosis in patients with acute OP compound exposure. It may be a simple, inexpensive tool that may help predict the need for ventilatory support at admission. Early identification of danger signs may help in the reduction of mortality and morbidity when resources are limited. However, we found incorporating other clinical parameters and biochemical markers provides better prognostication than using the POP scale alone.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Delivering early diagnosis of shock in resource-limited setting is challenging, especially with limited availability of point-of-care laboratory and radiological diagnostic facilities. There is growing urgency to provide point-of-care diagnosis and treatment for time-sensitive condition like shock. AIMS: We tried to evaluate the application of point-of-care ultrasound (Rapid Ultrasound for Shock and Hypertension [RUSH] protocol) considering different disease cohort and practice realities in our setup. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This study was a single-center prospective diagnostic study to check the diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound (RUSH protocol). This study was approved by the ethics committee. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted at the emergency medicine department of a tertiary care government hospital in Central Gujarat from November 16 to October 17. All adult patients with clinical features of shock with systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg and shock index >1 presenting to emergency department were included as participants. The results of point-of-care ultrasound (RUSH protocol) were compared with the diagnosis given by consultants of respective department as per standard departmental practices. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were enrolled in this study. Mean time taken to examine by the point-of-care Ultrasound (RUSH protocol) was 12 min (range 11-14 min). Kappa index was 0.860. This protocol was able to correctly diagnose 100% of obstructive shock, 96.3% of cardiogenic shock, 94.4% of hypovolemic shock, 80.9% of mixed type of shock, and 75% of distributive type of shock. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the role of point-of-care ultrasound (RUSH protocol) for early diagnosis of the shock etiology in emergency medicine department. Diagnosis using point-of-care ultrasound (RUSH protocol) significantly agreed with medical diagnosis. It showed good efficacy of point-of-care ultrasound (RUSH protocol) to differentiate causes of shock with good accuracy except distributive shock.