Electroencephalography (EEG) has been a fundamental technique in the identification of health conditions since its discovery. This analysis specifically centers on machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) methodologies designed for the analysis of electroencephalogram (EEG) data to categorize individuals with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) into two groups: Moderate or Advanced Alzheimer's dementia. Our study is based on a comprehensive database comprising 668 volunteers from 5 different hospitals, collected over a decade. This diverse dataset enables better training and validation of our results. Among the methods evaluated, the CNN (deep learning) approach outperformed others, achieving a remarkable classification accuracy of 97.45% for patients with Moderate Alzheimer's Dementia (ADM) and 97.03% for patients with Advanced Alzheimer's Dementia (ADA). Importantly, all the compared methods were rigorously assessed under identical conditions. The proposed DL model, specifically CNN, effectively extracts time domain features from EEG data in time, resulting in a significant reduction in learnable parameters and data redundancy.
BACKGROUND: In pursuit of diagnostic tools capable of targeting distinct stages of Alzheimer's disease (AD), this study explores the potential of electroencephalography (EEG) combined with machine learning (ML) algorithms to identify patients with mild or moderate AD (ADM) and advanced AD (ADA). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the classification accuracy of six classical ML algorithms using a dataset of 668 patients from multiple hospitals. METHODS: The dataset comprised measurements obtained from 668 patients, distributed among control, ADM, and ADA groups, collected from five distinct hospitals between 2011 and 2022. For classification purposes, six classical ML algorithms were employed: support vector machine, Bayesian linear discriminant analysis, decision tree, Gaussian Naïve Bayes, K-nearest neighbor and random forest. RESULTS: The RF algorithm exhibited outstanding performance, achieving a remarkable balanced accuracy of 93.55% for ADA classification and 93.25% for ADM classification. The consistent reliability in distinguishing ADA and ADM patients underscores the potential of the EEG-based approach for AD diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: By leveraging a dataset sourced from multiple hospitals and encompassing a substantial patient cohort, coupled with the straightforwardness of the implemented models, it is feasible to attain notably robust results in AD classification.
