Randomised clinical trial: efficacy and safety of H. pylori eradication treatment with and without Saccharomyces boulardii supplementation.

BACKGROUND: Standard triple therapy is commonly prescribed Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen in Europe. However, the world is witnessing declines in eradication success. It is crucial to find better treatment options. AIMS: To evaluate efficacy, compliance and side effects of H. pylori eradication treatment by adding Saccharomyces boulardii . METHODS: We conducted a randomized clinical trial within the GISTAR cohort, consisting of healthy individuals aged 40-64 years. Participants were administered clarithromycin-containing triple therapy (clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, esomeprazole 40 mg) twice daily. Randomization was applied based on two factors: 1)addition of Saccharomyces boulardii CNCM I-745 500 mg BID or not; 2)treatment duration of 10 or 14 days. Treatment completion and adverse events were assessed via telephone interview 21-28 days after medication delivery. The efficacy was evaluated using a 13C-urea breath test (UBT) six months after treatment. RESULTS: Altogether 404 participants were enrolled; data on adverse events were available from 391. Overall, 286 participants received follow-up UBT. Intention-to-treat analysis revealed higher eradication rates for 10-day probiotic treatment (70.8% vs. 54.6%, P  = 0.022), but not for 14-day. Probiotic subgroups combined showed non-significantly higher efficacy in per-protocol analysis (90.6% vs. 85.0%, P  = 0.183). S. boulardii reduced the frequency of adverse events ( P  = 0.033) in 14-day regimen, particularly treatment-associated diarrhea ( P  = 0.032). However, after the adjustment to control Type I error, results lost their significance. CONCLUSION: Addition of S. boulardii to 14-day clarithromycin-containing triple regimen non-significantly lowers the likelihood of diarrhea and does not increase the eradication rate.

Randomised clinical trial: comparison of efficacy and adverse effects of a standard triple clarithromycin-containing regimen with high-dose amoxicillin and bismuth therapy in Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: The clarithromycin-based triple therapy is the most prescribed Helicobacter pylori eradication regimen in Europe; it causes adverse effects in a significant proportion of subjects, leading to discontinuation. Alternative therapies are required because of increasing clarithromycin resistance or to decrease the adverse effects. AIMS: We compared the efficacy and spectrum of adverse effects of clarithromycin-based triple therapy with the high-dose amoxicillin/bismuth regimen. METHODS: A randomised clinical trial enrolled healthy individuals aged 40-64 years. H. pylori was assessed with a 13C-urea breath test. In total 579 H. pylori-positive subjects were randomly allocated in two groups: group 1: clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, esomeprazole 40 mg, all twice daily; group 2: bismuth subcitrate 240 mg twice daily, amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily, esomeprazole 40 mg twice daily. Regimens were administered for 14 days.Information on treatment completion and adverse effects were collected via a telephone interview at 21-28 days after medication delivery. The efficacy was assessed by UBT 6 months after the treatment. RESULTS: We analysed 483 subjects for adverse effects (248 vs. 235 respectively). Furthermore, 316 subjects were analysed for efficacy. In per-protocol analysis, a higher efficacy was seen in group 1 (88.4 vs. 77.0%; P < 0.001); no difference was observed in compliance (90.3 and 91.2%). Therapy-related adverse effects were more common in group 1 (56.9 vs. 40.0%; P < 0.01). In intention-to-treat analysis no statistical difference in efficacy was revealed. CONCLUSIONS: Bismuth-based high-dose amoxicillin therapy showed a lower efficacy but was less frequently associated with adverse effects. Further research is required to examine the high-dose amoxicillin and bismuth-containing regimens in various populations to maximise eradication efficacy.