Knowledge, attitude, and practices of parents regarding the red flags of developmental milestones in children aged 0-5 years in Karachi, Pakistan: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Developmental delays in children are assessed in four basic domains: gross motor, fine motor, social, and language. Early years of life are crucial in a child's development, so it is imperative that parents be aware of developmental milestones to facilitate early diagnosis and treatment in case of a developmental delay. This study assessed parental knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding children's developmental milestones and associated "red flags". METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Department of Pediatrics at Liaquat National Hospital, Karachi. 390 parents, who had at least one child under 5 years of age, with no diagnosed developmental delay, were interviewed during outpatient clinic visits. The questionnaire consisted of three components to assess parental knowledge, attitude, and practices. RESULTS: 59% and 54% of parents had poor knowledge of gross and fine motor milestones respectively; In the social domain, 56% of the respondents had inadequate knowledge. 42% had inadequate knowledge of language milestones; 29% of parents strongly agreed that their pediatricians provide satisfactory information regarding red flags of developmental milestones. 60% of parents strongly agreed that their child's developmental delay would be a cause of concern for them. In the case of developmental delay, 55% of parents said they would consult a general pediatrician, 11% preferred a pediatric neurologist, 21% opted for a developmental pediatrician and 13% opted for a family physician. Residence and family systems were found to be associated with language-related milestones with significantly higher odds of knowledge among urban residents than rural ones and a significantly lower likelihood of language milestones knowledge among joint families than nuclear families. Female gender was found to be significantly associated with positive attitude. CONCLUSION: The majority of our respondents showed considerably poor knowledge regarding developmental milestones. This highlights the need to devise ways to educate parents on this subject to enable them to vigilantly monitor their child's developmental status and any associated abnormalities and ultimately facilitate the right course of action.

Frequency and predictors of depression among the elderly population of Karachi.

Context: Depression among the elderly is falsely considered as a normal part of aging and hence remains un-diagnosed in the majority. Elderly people are at a high risk of depression, which may produce a negative impact on their quality of life. Depression is a potentially treatable condition; hence, it is worthwhile to explore its burden in order to ensure its timely evaluation and management. Aims: To determine the frequency and predictors of depression among the elderly population of Karachi. Settings and Design: The current study was a cross-sectional study, conducted in out-patient clinics of a tertiary care hospital and its out-reach centers located in different areas of Karachi. Methods and Material: Patients aged 60 years and above were enrolled in the study. Demographic profiles and physical health conditions were investigated. Depression was assessed using Geriatric Depression Scale-15. Statistical Analysis: Data were entered in SPSS version 21 for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 232 participants were enrolled into the study with a median age of 65.8 [inter-quartile range = 61-69] years. Out of 232 participants, 186 (80.2%) were found to be depressed. In the multi-variable model, employment status, financial issues, and peer groups were left as independent predictors of depression. Conclusion: The current study found a significant burden of depression among elderly people in Karachi. Employment status, financial problems, and relationship with peers have been identified as risk factors of depression. There might be over-reporting of depression as the data collection was conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 first wave. Hence, further community-based research is warranted to confirm the findings.