The safety of respiratory positive pressure support immediately following pediatric tonsillectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Adenotonsillectomy is the first-line treatment for pediatric obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). The postoperative course may be complicated by hypoxia, requiring intervention. Positive pressure respiratory support (PPS) could be used to bridge the postoperative period and avoid invasive mechanical ventilation; however, the safety of PPS following tonsillectomy has not been established. Objective To review the incidence of complications and risk factors associated with PPS use immediately after tonsillectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2020 of patients who underwent tonsillectomy and were admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit at a single healthcare system. RESULTS: Seven hundred eighty patients met inclusion criteria, including 101 patients treated with PPS immediately following surgery. A similar number of patients were diagnosed with severe OSA in each group prior to surgery. One patient in the PPS cohort developed pneumomediastinum and pneumothorax. Eleven patients (12%) in the PPS group and 18 patients (2%) in the non-PPS group developed life-threatening complications, defined as pneumothorax/pneumomediastinum, re-intubation, post-tonsillectomy bleeding that required surgical intervention, pulmonary edema and death, and all occurred in patients who had not used PPS at baseline. Regression analysis identified body mass index, surgical technique, and PPS use to be associated with increased odds of life-threatening complications. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that PPS is generally safe to use. New-onset PPS is associated with increased odds of life-threatening complications, likely reflecting a severe post-surgical clinical course.

Incidence and Risk Factors Associated with Respiratory Compromise in Planned PICU Admissions Following Tonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Review the incidence and factors associated with respiratory compromise requiring intensive care unit level interventions in children with planned admission to the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) following tonsillectomy or adenotonsillectomy (T/AT). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Review of all patients with PICU admissions following T/AT from 2015 to 2020 at a tertiary care pediatric hospital. Patient demographics, underlying comorbidities, operative data, and respiratory complications during PICU admission were extracted. RESULTS: Seven hundred and seventy-two patients were admitted to the PICU following T/AT, age 6.1 ± 4.6 years. All children were diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea or sleep-disordered breathing (mean pre-operative apnea-hypopnea index 29 ± 26.5 and O2 nadir 77.1% ± 11.1). Neuromuscular disease, enteral feed dependence, and obesity were common findings (N = 240 (31%), N = 106 (14%), and N = 209 (27%) respectively). Overall, 29 patients (3.7%) developed respiratory compromise requiring PICU-level support, defined as new-onset continuous or bilevel positive airway pressure support (n = 25) or reintubation (n = 9). Three patients were diagnosed with pulmonary edema. Multivariable regression analysis demonstrated pre-operative oxygen nadir and enteral feed dependence were associated with respiratory compromise (OR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, P = .04; OR = 6.3, 95% CI 2.36-52.6, P = .001 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study found respiratory compromise in 3.7% of patients with planned PICU admissions following T/AT. Oxygen nadir and enteral feeds were associated with higher respiratory compromise rates. Attention should be given to these factors in planning for post-operative disposition.

What Affects an Orthopaedic Surgeon's Online Rating? A Large-Scale, Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: In the past decade, online physician review websites have become an important source of information for patients, with the largest and most popular being Healthgrades.com. Our study aims to investigate demographic and volume-based trends for online reviews of every Healthgrades-listed orthopaedic surgeon through a nationwide, retrospective analysis. METHODS: All available demographic and rating information for orthopaedic surgeons (n = 28,713; Healthgrades.com) was analyzed using one-way Analysis of Variance, Tukey Studentized Range (Honestly Significant Difference), linear regression, and Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The mean rating for all surgeons was 3.99 (SD 0.92), and the mean number of ratings was 13.43 (SD 20.4). Men had a greater mean rating at 4.02 compared with women at 3.91 (P < 0.0001), and DO surgeons had greater mean rating at 4.11 compared with MD surgeons at 3.90 (P < 0.0001). The correlation between rating and age had a significant negative correlation (P < 0.0001). The correlation between average online rating and number of reviews had a significant positive correlation (P < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: Our analysis suggests that greater online ratings are associated with the male sex and DO degrees. In addition, our study discovered that the number of ratings was positively correlated with greater mean online ratings, whereas older age was negatively correlated with greater mean online ratings.