RESUMEN
AIM: Tailgut cysts are rare congenital lesions typically presenting as presacral masses. A variable clinical presentation often leads to misdiagnosis and unsuccessful operations. METHOD: A retrospective analysis was performed of tailgut cysts presenting to one surgeon at St Mark's hospital between 2003 and 2013. The patient demographic data and clinicopathological and radiological features, together with perioperative details and recurrence, were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients (15 women) with a median age of 35 (21-64) years were included in the study. The mean duration of symptoms before referral was 40 months, with sepsis predominating in 12 cases. Fifteen of the patients had previously undergone surgery (mean 2.9 procedures). A posterior surgical approach was adopted in all patients with a coccygectomy performed in 13. A loop colostomy was formed in three patients. Two of them went on to have a secondary pull-through operation after an initial failed local repair of rectal injury. One case was reported to show malignant degeneration on histological examination. There was one recurrence during a median follow-up period of 13 (3-36) months. CONCLUSION: Tailgut cysts are an uncommon yet important cause of chronic perianal sepsis. Suspicion should be raised in a patient, usually female, presenting with a history of unsuccessful procedures. Diagnosis can be made by clinical assessment and MRI. Complete excision usually resolves the problem.
Asunto(s)
Quistes/cirugía , Hamartoma/cirugía , Enfermedades del Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Quistes/congénito , Quistes/patología , Femenino , Hamartoma/congénito , Hamartoma/patología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades del Recto/congénito , Enfermedades del Recto/patología , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Región Sacrococcígea , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: Pull-through with colo-anal sleeve anastomosis may be used as a last resort to avoid permanent diversion in patients with complex rectal conditions. This procedure allows the preservation of intestinal continuity by minimizing the hazards of deep dissection in an inflamed and fibrosed pelvis. METHOD: A retrospective study was performed of colo-anal pull-through procedures carried out between January 1998 and December 2012 at St Mark's Hospital by one surgeon. Patients were identified from operative logbooks and their case notes were reviewed. Thirty-four patients (21 women) with a median age of 54 (21-75) years underwent the pull-through operation for complex rectal conditions involving fistulae and/or a hostile pelvis as a final attempt to restore intestinal continuity. RESULTS: The median length of hospital stay was 7.5 (5-45) days. Median follow-up was 23 (3-71) months. There was no peri-operative mortality. There were two (6%) outright failures. Early complications occurred in 14 (41%) patients and late complications in 10 (29%). Fistulae recurred in seven (25%) of 28 patients but with further treatment four healed, giving an overall healing rate of 89%. Normal continence was achieved in 19 (79%) of 24 patients who were evaluated. CONCLUSION: In clinically difficult rectal situations the colo-anal pull-through procedure is a suitable salvage procedure to restore intestinal continuity before considering a permanent stoma.