IMPACT OF BODY COMPOSITION ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE OF PREMENOPAUSAL PATIENTS WITH EARLY STAGE BREAST CANCER DURING CHEMOTHERAPY.

Body composition has been studied relatively recently as part of oncology trials in different types of tumors. There are numerous studies that define the impact of chemotherapy side effects on the quality of life (QoL) of breast cancer patients, however, there are few studies that analyze the impact of body composition on the QoL of premenopausal patients in the course of cytotoxic treatment. The study was performed on a sample of premenopausal patients treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant AC chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer at Day Hospital of the Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital for Tumors in Zagreb. The study included 68 patients, median age 46.6 years. Analysis of the QoL questionnaires and their association with body composition indicated several interesting results. At the beginning of treatment, most pronounced was the connection between body composition and physical and sexual functioning and hair loss, while in subsequent treatment cycles the effect on other QoL subdomains, in particular fatigue and diarrhea, was more pronounced. In conclusion, we found body composition to have a significant impact on certain QoL subdomains during treatment.

Difference in Estimation of Side Effects of Chemotherapy between Physicians and Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer: The Use of Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in the Evaluation of Toxicity in Everyday Clinical Practice.

Knowledge about the patient's experience and perception of side effects and their impact on daily life is crucial for the adequate planning of interventions to provide the highest attainable levels of quality of life during oncology treatment. We conducted a study on consecutive samples of 69 early breast cancer patients treated with four cycles of neoadjuvant or adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy. Patients completed the questionnaire about side effects experienced after the previous cycle of chemotherapy. The questionnaire was a modified PRO for the evaluation of treatment toxicity consisting of 18 questions related to the very common and common side effects of doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide, valued from 0 to 3 according to the subjective assessment of the patient. During the same cycles of therapy, data were also collected by the physician who completed a questionnaire consisting of the same questions as the questionnaire for patients, on the same scale. Most of the side effects reported by patients were mild to moderate in intensity, while physicians reported side effects much less frequently. The results also indicated a disproportionate reporting, in which physicians reported statistically significantly fewer side effects than patients. This study reported a level of disagreement between patients and physicians in the experience of therapy toxicity. In conclusion, use of PRO in clinical practice can help us avoid physician subjectiveness in the estimation of side effects and determine the group of patients who can benefit from additional and individualized supportive care measures, which could lead to better adherence to therapy and ultimately best outcomes.