IMU-Based Kinematics Estimation Accuracy Affects Gait Retraining Using Vibrotactile Cues.

Wearable sensing using inertial measurement units (IMUs) is enabling portable and customized gait retraining for knee osteoarthritis. However, the vibrotactile feedback that users receive directly depends on the accuracy of IMU-based kinematics. This study investigated how kinematic errors impact an individual's ability to learn a therapeutic gait using vibrotactile cues. Sensor accuracy was computed by comparing the IMU-based foot progression angle to marker-based motion capture, which was used as ground truth. Thirty subjects were randomized into three groups to learn a toe-in gait: one group received vibrotactile feedback during gait retraining in the laboratory, another received feedback outdoors, and the control group received only verbal instruction and proceeded directly to the evaluation condition. All subjects were evaluated on their ability to maintain the learned gait in a new outdoor environment. We found that subjects with high tracking errors exhibited more incorrect responses to vibrotactile cues and slower learning rates than subjects with low tracking errors. Subjects with low tracking errors outperformed the control group in the evaluation condition, whereas those with higher error did not. Errors were correlated with foot size and angle magnitude, which may indicate a non-random bias. The accuracy of IMU-based kinematics has a cascading effect on feedback; ignoring this effect could lead researchers or clinicians to erroneously classify a patient as a non-responder if they did not improve after retraining. To use patient and clinician time effectively, future implementation of portable gait retraining will require assessment across a diverse range of patients.

Fusion of video and inertial sensing data via dynamic optimization of a biomechanical model.

Inertial sensing and computer vision are promising alternatives to traditional optical motion tracking, but until now these data sources have been explored either in isolation or fused via unconstrained optimization, which may not take full advantage of their complementary strengths. By adding physiological plausibility and dynamical robustness to a proposed solution, biomechanical modeling may enable better fusion than unconstrained optimization. To test this hypothesis, we fused video and inertial sensing data via dynamic optimization with a nine degree-of-freedom model and investigated when this approach outperforms video-only, inertial-sensing-only, and unconstrained-fusion methods. We used both experimental and synthetic data that mimicked different ranges of video and inertial measurement unit (IMU) data noise. Fusion with a dynamically constrained model significantly improved estimation of lower-extremity kinematics over the video-only approach and estimation of joint centers over the IMU-only approach. It consistently outperformed single-modality approaches across different noise profiles. When the quality of video data was high and that of inertial data was low, dynamically constrained fusion improved estimation of joint kinematics and joint centers over unconstrained fusion, while unconstrained fusion was advantageous in the opposite scenario. These findings indicate that complementary modalities and techniques can improve motion tracking by clinically meaningful margins and that data quality and computational complexity must be considered when selecting the most appropriate method for a particular application.