Alternative dolutegravir dosing strategies with concurrent rifapentine utilized for latent tuberculosis treatment.

We present a case of a 53-year-old person living with human immunodeficiency virus and a new diagnosis of latent tuberculosis. The patient had baseline suppressed HIV viral load on fixed dose combination dolutegravir/abacavir/lamivudine when once-weekly rifapentine 900 mg/isoniazid 900 mg/pyridoxine 25 mg was initiated for 12 weeks. An additional 50 mg dolutegravir dose, administered in the evenings, was added to the daily antiretroviral regimen for treatment duration secondary to rifapentine uridine diphosphate glucuronsyl transferase induction. Dolutegravir trough concentrations decreased during concurrent therapy with noted slight HIV viral load rebound. Upon completion of rifapentine use, and a return to dolutegravir 50 mg daily dose, the trough concentrations increased with a return to an undetectable viral load. We provide suggested dolutegravir dosing considerations with concomitant rifapentine use, not currently addressed in recommended guidelines.

A retrospective evaluation of highly active antiretroviral therapy simplification in patients with end-stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis.

Antiretroviral (ARV) therapy in people living with HIV (PLWH) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis (HD) is complicated, requiring renally adjusted nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) and daily administration of non-renally eliminated agents. Recent data in PLWH with ESRD on HD demonstrate maintenance of viral suppression (82% with viral loads (VLs) <50 copies/mL) and favorable safety/tolerability profiles after ARV simplification with a fixed dose combination single tablet [elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (E/C/F/TAF)]. Extrapolation of these data to all F/TAF formulations would allow ARV simplification to most PLWH with ESRD receiving HD. The objective of this retrospective study was to identify if ARV-experienced PLWH with ESRD on HD receiving renally adjusted NRTIs may be simplified to once daily ARV formulations without adverse effects while maintaining viral suppression. This single-center retrospective analysis assessed virologic control (3-12 months) and ARV tolerability post-regimen simplification (primarily NRTI once-daily dose adjustment) in PLWH with ESRD on thrice weekly HD receiving human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) care in an ambulatory clinic. Seventeen PLWH with ESRD on HD were included after documented ARV simplification. At 12 months, 12 patients (71%) remained undetectable (HIV VL <50 copies/mL) with two additional maintaining viral suppression (<200 copies/mL). One patient remained undetectable at month eight but became non-adherent with viral rebound. Two patients did not complete the 6- and 12-month evaluation after documented nonadherence (N = 1) and an adverse effect (pruritus) (N = 1). At 12 months, virologic suppression and tolerability resulted after a simplified ARV regimen including once daily F/TAF was initiated in PLWH with ESRD on thrice weekly HD with a reduction in pill burden.

Acute Care Management of the HIV-Infected Patient: A Report from the HIV Practice and Research Network of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy.

OBJECTIVE: Patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) admitted to the hospital have complex antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens with an increased medication error rate upon admission. This report provides a resource for clinicians managing HIV-infected patients and ART in the inpatient setting. METHODS: A survey of the authors was conducted to evaluate common issues that arise during an acute hospitalization for HIV-infected patients. After a group consensus, a review of the medical literature was performed to determine the supporting evidence for the following HIV-associated hospital queries: admission/discharge orders, antiretroviral hospital formularies, laboratory monitoring, altered hepatic/renal function, drug-drug interactions (DDIs), enteral administration, and therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: With any hospital admission for an HIV-infected patient, a specific set of procedures should be followed including a thorough admission medication history and communication with the ambulatory HIV provider to avoid omissions or substitutions in the ART regimen. DDIs are common and should be reviewed at all transitions of care during the hospital admission. ART may be continued if enteral nutrition with a feeding tube is deemed necessary, but the entire regimen should be discontinued if no oral access is available for a prolonged period. Therapeutic drug monitoring is not generally recommended but, if available, should be considered in unique clinical scenarios where antiretroviral pharmacokinetics are difficult to predict. ART may need adjustment if hepatic or renal insufficiency ensues. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of hospitalized patients with HIV is highly complex. HIV-infected patients are at high risk for medication errors during various transitions of care. Baseline knowledge of the principles of antiretroviral pharmacotherapy is necessary for clinicians managing acutely ill HIV-infected patients to avoid medication errors, identify DDIs, and correctly dose medications if organ dysfunction arises. Timely ambulatory follow-up is essential to prevent readmissions and facilitate improved transitions of care.

Effect of tenofovir on didanosine absorption in patients with HIV.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between tenofovir and didanosine when used in combination as a highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen. DATA SOURCES: Literature retrieval was accessed through MEDLINE (1966-January 2003) using the terms tenofovir and didanosine. Abstracts from recent meetings, including the International AIDS Society, Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, were reviewed for relevant abstracts and poster presentations. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pharmacokinetic studies evaluating the concurrent use of tenofovir and didanosine have been performed in healthy volunteers. Tenofovir 300 mg administered concurrently with 400 mg didanosine results in a 48-64% increase in the didanosine maximum plasma concentration and AUC with no significant alterations in the tenofovir pharmacokinetic parameters. Tenofovir 300 mg and didanosine 250 mg has been compared with didanosine 400 mg alone. The results demonstrated equivalent didanosine AUCs. CONCLUSIONS: When used concurrently, tenofovir significantly increases the maximum plasma concentration and the AUC of didanosine. Additional data in HIV-infected patients are needed to determine the long-term toxicities of this combination therapy. Didanosine dose reduction should be considered when these 2 agents are used concurrently.