Background Children undergoing cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy may require over 30 treatments within a six-week period. Facilitating these many treatments with the patient under anesthesia presents a significant challenge, and the most preferred anesthetic methods remain unknown. The primary goal of this study was to determine the most preferred anesthetic methods and agents for children undergoing daily cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy. Methods An 83-item web-based survey was developed. An introductory email was sent to 505 physicians and child-life specialists with expertise in pediatric anesthesia and/or affiliated with pediatric radiation oncology departments. Results The response rate was 128/505 (25%) and included specialists from Africa (5, 4%), Asia (18, 14%), Australia/Oceania (5, 4%), Europe (45, 35%), North America (50, 39%), and South America (5, 4%). The 128 respondents included 91 anesthesiologists (71%), 20 physicians who were not anesthesiologists (16%), 14 child life/social education specialists (11%), one radiotherapist, one pediatric radiation nurse, and one non-specified medical professional (all = 2%). Of the 128 respondents, 95 (74%) used anesthesia or sedation to facilitate repetitive cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy. Overall, total intravenous anesthesia without intubation was preferred by 67 of 95 (71%) specialists during one or more forms of radiotherapy. During photon-based radiotherapy, total intravenous anesthesia without intubation was the preferred anesthetic method with the patient in the supine (57/84, 68%) and prone positions (25/40, 63%). Propofol was the most used anesthetic agent for both supine (73/84, 87%) and prone positions (38/40, 95%). For proton radiotherapy, total intravenous anesthesia without intubation was the most preferred anesthetic method for the supine (32/42, 76%) and prone treatment positions (11/18, 61%), and propofol was the most used anesthetic (supine: 40/43, 93%; prone: 16/18, 89%). Conclusions In this survey of 95 specialists responsible for anesthesia or sedation of children undergoing repetitive cranial or craniospinal radiotherapy, propofol-based total intravenous anesthesia without intubation was the preferred anesthetic technique.
ABSTRACTOBJECTIVE: The bispectral index (BIS) is a parameter derived by electroencephalography (EEG) which provides a direct measurement of the effects of sedatives and anesthetics on the brain and offers guidance on the adequacy of anesthesia. The literature lacks studies on BIS monitoring in pediatric patients with congenital brain disease undergoing general anesthesia.CLINICAL FEATURES: A 13-year-old child weighing 32 kg, suffering from lobar holoprosencephaly, underwent surgery in which the bispectral index (BIS) monitoring the depth of anesthesia showed an abnormal response. Detailed analysis of the trends of BIS values in the different observation times demonstrated sudden falls and repetitive values of BIS likely related to repetitive epileptiform electrical activity caused by sevoflurane.CONCLUSION: The BIS is a very useful monitoring tool for assessing the degree of depth of anesthesia and to analyze the electroencephalographic variations of anesthetics. Particular attention should be given to patients with congenital disorders of the central nervous system in which the BIS may give abnormal responses that do not reflect an accurate assessment of the depth of anesthesia.
RESUMOOBJETIVO: O índice bispectral (BIS) é um parâmetro derivado por eletroencefalografia (EEG) que fornece uma medida direta dos efeitos de sedativos e anestésicos no cérebro e orientação sobre a adequação da anestesia. A literatura carece de estudos sobre a monitoração do BIS em pacientes pediátricos com doença cerebral congênita submetidos à anestesia geral.CARACTERÍSTICAS CLÍNICAS: Criança de 13 anos de idade, pesando 32 kg, com holoprosencefalia lobar, foi submetida à cirurgia em que a monitoração da profundidade da anestesia com o uso do BIS mostrou uma resposta anormal. A análise detalhada das tendências dos valores do BIS nos diferentes tempos de observação mostrou quedas súbitas e valores repetitivos do BIS, provavelmente relacionados à atividade elétrica epileptiforme repetitiva causada por sevoflurano.CONCLUSÃO: O BIS é uma ferramenta de monitoração muito útil para avaliar o grau de profundidade da anestesia e as variações eletroencefalográficas dos anestésicos. Atenção especial deve ser dedicada aos pacientes com doenças congênitas do sistema nervoso central nos quais o BIS pode apresentar respostas anormais que não refletem a avaliação precisa da profundidade da anestesia.
Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult , Models, Biological , Sleep/physiology , Computational Biology , Electroencephalography , Task Performance and Analysis , Wakefulness
OBJECTIVE: The bispectral index (BIS) is a parameter derived by electroencephalography (EEG) which provides a direct measurement of the effects of sedatives and anesthetics on the brain and offers guidance on the adequacy of anesthesia. The literature lacks studies on BIS monitoring in pediatric patients with congenital brain disease undergoing general anesthesia. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 13-year-old child weighing 32kg, suffering from lobar holoprosencephaly, underwent surgery in which the bispectral index (BIS) monitoring the depth of anesthesia showed an abnormal response. Detailed analysis of the trends of BIS values in the different observation times demonstrated sudden falls and repetitive values of BIS likely related to repetitive epileptiform electrical activity caused by sevoflurane. CONCLUSION: The BIS is a very useful monitoring tool for assessing the degree of depth of anesthesia and to analyze the electroencephalographic variations of anesthetics. Particular attention should be given to patients with congenital disorders of the central nervous system in which the BIS may give abnormal responses that do not reflect an accurate assessment of the depth of anesthesia.
Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacokinetics , Electroencephalography , Holoprosencephaly/physiopathology , Methyl Ethers/pharmacokinetics , Monitoring, Physiologic , Adolescent , Humans , Sevoflurane
OBJECTIVE: The bispectral index (BIS) is a parameter derived by electroencephalography (EEG) which provides a direct measurement of the effects of sedatives and anesthetics on the brain and offers guidance on the adequacy of anesthesia. The literature lacks studies on BIS monitoring in pediatric patients with congenital brain disease undergoing general anesthesia. CLINICAL FEATURES: A 13-year-old child weighing 32kg, suffering from lobar holoprosencephaly, underwent surgery in which the bispectral index (BIS) monitoring the depth of anesthesia showed an abnormal response. Detailed analysis of the trends of BIS values in the different observation times demonstrated sudden falls and repetitive values of BIS likely related to repetitive epileptiform electrical activity caused by sevoflurane. CONCLUSION: The BIS is a very useful monitoring tool for assessing the degree of depth of anesthesia and to analyze the electroencephalographic variations of anesthetics. Particular attention should be given to patients with congenital disorders of the central nervous system in which the BIS may give abnormal responses that do not reflect an accurate assessment of the depth of anesthesia.
Complications in pediatric anesthesia can happen, even in our modern hospitals with the most advanced equipment and skilled anesthesiologists. It is important, albeit in a tranquil and reassuring way, to inform parents of the possibility of complications and, in general, of the anesthetic risks. This is especially imperative when speaking to the parents of children who will be operated on for minor procedures: in our experience, they tend to think that the anesthesia will be a light anesthesia without risks. Often the surgeons tell them that the operation is very simple without stressing the fact that it will be done under general anesthesia which is identical to the one we give for major operations. Different is the scenario for the parents of children who are affected by malignant neoplasms: in these cases they already know that the illness is serious. They have this tremendous burden and we choose not to add another one by discussing anesthetic risks, so we usually go along with the examination of the child without bringing up the possibility of complications, unless there is some specific problem such as a mediastinal mass.
