[Role of radiotherapy in haematology]. / Place de la radiothérapie en hématologie.

The management of myeloid and lymphoid disease is essentially based on chemotherapy and targeted therapies. Since radiotherapy could be responsible for severe late toxicities, essentially due to conventional bidimensional irradiation techniques, many trials have attempted to omit radiotherapy or to scale down the dose in their therapeutic strategy. Nevertheless, radiotherapy still plays a role for curative or symptomatic purposes.

[Extreme hypofractionated radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer]. / Radiothérapie hypofractionnée extrême du cancer du pancréas.

Pancreatic cancer has poor prognosis and a continuously growing incidence. By 2030, it should become the second cause of death by cancer worldwide and in France. The only curative treatment is surgery that is achievable in only 20% of patients at the time of initial diagnosis, with a high rate of incomplete resection. Neoadjuvant treatments using chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy are more often admitted to play an important role by selecting non-progressing cases who will benefit from surgery, by increasing the number of complete resection, and by making locally advanced and borderline tumours accessible to resection. However, the role of radiotherapy is still debated. Because of its dosimetric advantages, its short total duration, and its good tolerance with reduced volumes of irradiation, stereotactic radiotherapy has been largely studied. Compared to chemoradiotherapy, this technique could improve the therapeutic index helping to preserve the general status of patients in order to give them access to secondary surgery. It remains a promising technique still under evaluation, to be delivered ideally, as part of a clinical trial, or within an experimented team.

[Lung cancer and pulmonary metastasis treated by stereotactic radiosurgery: Evaluation of the relevance of realisation of 3 4D CT by the RPM technique]. / Cancers et métastases bronchiques traités par irradiation stéréotaxique pulmonaire : évaluation de la pertinence de réalisation de trois scanographies quadridimensionnelles par la technique RPM.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic lung radiosurgery has been carried out in the team at the Georges-François-Leclerc centre (CGFL) in Dijon since 2008 on a Truebeam® accelerator (Varian®) with the RPM technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients with primary T1-T2 stage lung cancer (n=30) or lung metastasis (n=20) were included in the study. Since 2014, 3 successive 4D scanners on D1, D2 and D3, have been produced in order to ensure the reproducibility of ITV (Internet Target Volume). The 3 ITVs are contoured (ITV 1, 2 and 3) from the MIP (Maximum Intensity Projection) of each of the 3 scanners. A global ITV is created from the ITV volumes of the 3 scanners (MIP 2 and 3 merged with MIP 1). A CBCT (Cone Beam Computerised Tomography) is performed at the start of each irradiation session to position the patient. The study consisted in analysing the relevance of the realisation of 3 different scanners before dosimetry to define the ITV and in comparing the volumes contoured on the different CBCT to the ITV to make sure that the tumour volume is well included in the ITV during the sessions. RESULTS: There is a strong correlation between the different ITVs 1, 2, 3 and global, as well as between the volumes obtained on the different CBCTs. The correlation coefficient between the different ITVs and the volumes contoured on CBCT was high for upper lobar lesions. In terms of tolerance, the FEV1 (Maximum volume expired during the first second) did not seem to be a significant factor influencing the correlation between the ITV and the volumes bypassed on CBCT. CONCLUSION: Performing a single 4D planification CT is sufficient to consider stereotactic lung irradiation, regardless of the location of the lung lesions. The correlation coefficient between ITV and CBCT was high for upper lobar lesions.

Outcomes of concurrent radiotherapy with weekly docetaxel and platinum-based chemotherapy in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the outcomes of concurrent weekly docetaxel and platinum-based drug doublet in association with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (TR) in the curative treatment of stage III locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IIIA/B NSCLC were retrospectively included. Patients received weekly docetaxel and either cisplatin or carboplatin intravenous injections during concurrent TR (60 to 66Gy). Patients who received induction chemotherapy with the same drug doublet were also included. The endpoints were: disease control rate (DCR), overall recurrence rate, survival rates [disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS)] and toxicity. RESULTS: Eighty-nine consecutive patients treated with this association were included. Median follow-up time was 57.8 months. DCR was 76.5% at the first follow-up CT scan (6 to 12 weeks after the end of concurrent treatment). Median DFS and OS was 14.3 and 29.9 months respectively. Three-year survival was 43%. The overall recurrence rate was 65.9%. During overall treatment, grade 3 to 4 adverse events occurred in 29.2% of patients, the most common being esophagitis (12.4% of patients). Only 13.5% of patients presented with a grade 3 or higher adverse event after the end of concurrent treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Weekly docetaxel and platinum-based drug doublet combined with TR yielded promising results in stage III NSCLC, with high survival rates. The toxicity of this association is acceptable, with mainly manageable esophagitis. These findings warrant validation in a prospective study before considering this association for standard of care.

Salvage brachytherapy as a modern reirradiation technique for local cancer failure: The Phoenix is reborn from its ashes.

The treatment of local recurrence of a previously irradiated cancer or a second cancer arising in-field remains challenging. Ultimately, the objective of salvage therapy is to control disease while ensuring minimal collateral damage, thereby optimizing both cancer and toxicity outcomes. Reirradiation has historically been associated with unacceptable toxicity and a limited benefit. Brachytherapy offers the best dose distribution and a high radiation dose to the target volume while better protecting surrounding previously irradiated healthy tissues. The management of local cancer recurrence in irradiated areas should be planned through multidisciplinary discussions and patients should be selected carefully. This overview of the literature describes brachytherapy as a reirradiation treatment in local recurrences of previously irradiated prostate, breast, head and neck and rectal cancers, or second primary cancers occurring in-field. For these cancers, the prognosis and therapeutic challenges are quite different and depend on the type of primary cancer. However, current data confirm that brachytherapy reirradiation is feasible and has acceptable toxicity.

[Surgery alone or in association with preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy for stage IB1 cervical cancer: Toxicities profiles]. / Chirurgie exclusive ou curiethérapie utérovaginale préopératoire pour cancer du col utérin de stade IB1 : profil des toxicités.

OBJECTIVE: To assess toxicity profile in two stage-IB1 cervical cancer treatment strategies: surgery with and without preoperative uterovaginal pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy. METHODS: A retrospective study included 45 patients presenting stage-IB1 cervical cancer without pelvic lymph-node invasion, between 2009 and 2011: 25 treated by colpohysterectomy alone (group A) and 20 with preoperative uterovaginal pulsed dose-rate brachytherapy (group B). The median follow-up was 45 and 39 months (group A and B). RESULTS: Groups were comparable for age (median, 46.9 vs 47.6 years), histologic type (52% vs 65% squamous cell carcinoma) and tumor size (68% vs 60%, <2cm). In postoperative year 1, rates of urinary, digestive and gynaecological disorder were 39.1%, 8.7% and 15% respectively in group A versus 36.8%, 5.3% and 31.6% in group B and in year 2, 5.9%, 8.4% and 15% versus 5.6%, 5.1% and 27.8%. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The present study comparing two stage-IB1 cervical cancer treatment strategies found no significant difference in early or late complications. In 2 months, there was greater grade-3 urinary toxicity (21.1%) and sexual disorder (15.8%) with preoperative brachytherapy but no significant difference. Exclusive surgery is probably preferable for the patient's quality of life.

[Radiological evaluation of the tumour response after lung stereotactic radiotherapy]. / Évaluation radiologique de la réponse tumorale après radiothérapie pulmonaire en conditions stéréotaxiques.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the treatment of choice for medically non-operable T1-T2 N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer or for slowly growing lung metastases with no evolutive primary tumour. Lung stereotactic radiotherapy provides an excellent local control rate, higher than 80%. Nevertheless, although the clinical toxicity rate is less than 5%, postradiation radiological reactions surrounding the tumour, called "radiological radiation pneumonitis", are very frequent, which makes it difficult to evaluate the tumour response. Firstly, this review describes the lesions of acute and chronic radiation pneumonitis and the CT images suggesting a local recurrence. Then, we evaluated the place of PET after stereotactic body radiotherapy in the follow-up period. Finally, we suggest an algorithm helping physicians in the follow-up of such treated patients.

Image-guided IMRT for localized prostate cancer with daily repositioning: inferring the difference between planned dose and delivered dose distribution.

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the dosimetric impact of daily on-line repositioning during a full course of IMRT for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients were treated with image-guided IMRT. Each pre-treatment plan (Plan A) was compared with a post-treatment plan sum (Plan B) based on couch shifts measured. The delivered dose to the prostate without a daily repositioning was inferred by considering each daily couch shift during the whole course of image-guided IMRT (i.e., plan B). Dose metrics were compared for prostate CTV (P-CTV) and PTV (P-PTV) and for organs at risk. Ten patients were treated with a 5 mm margin and 10 patients with a 10 mm margin. RESULTS: For plan A vs. plan B: the average D95, D98, D50, D mean and EUD were: 76.4 Gy vs. 73.9 Gy (p = 0.0007), 75.4 Gy vs. 72.3 Gy (p = 0.001), 78.9 Gy vs. 78.4 Gy (p = 0.014), 78.7 Gy vs. 77.8 Gy (p = 0.003) and 78.1 Gy vs. 75.9 Gy (p = 0.002), respectively for P-CTV, and 73.2 Gy vs. 69.3 Gy (p = 0.0006), 70.7 Gy vs. 66.0 Gy (p = 0.0008), 78.3 Gy vs. 77.5 Gy (p = 0.001), 77.8 Gy vs. 76.4 Gy (p = 0.0002) and 74.4 Gy vs. 69.2 Gy (p = 0.003), respectively for P-PTV. Margin comparison showed no differences in dose metrics between the two plans except for D98 of the rectum in plan B which was significantly higher with a 10 mm margin. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of daily image-guided IMRT resulted in a significantly less uniform and less homogeneous dose distribution to the prostate. A reduction in PTV margin showed neither a lower target coverage nor a better spare of OAR with and without daily image-guided IMRT.