An Analysis of American Urological Association Census Trends: Earlier Planned Retirement and Practice Pattern Changes May Exacerbate the Urology Workforce Shortage.

OBJECTIVE: To explore how changes in planned retirement age, practice setting, and physician productivity may impact the workforce shortage in urology. METHODS: We compared data between the 2015 and 2022 American Urological Association census, a specialty-wide annual survey which collects data on demographics, practice patterns, and procedures from a representative sample of U.S. urologists. Workforce productivity was measured by the self-reported number of hours worked per week and patients seen per week. A novel formula was developed to demonstrate how planned retirement age and productivity impact the workforce's production capacity. RESULTS: The total number of practicing urologists increased during the period from 2015 to 2022 (11,990 to 13,976), while the mean age of practicing urologists decreased slightly (55.0 to 54.5years; P < .002). During this period, the mean planned age of retirement for all urologists decreased from 68.9years to 67.7 (P < .001). Urologists in solo practice had a significantly higher planned age of retirement at 71.9years (P < .001) as compared to all other practice models. The number of patients seen per week for all urologists decreased from 78.7 to 72.9 (P < .001). The amount of hours worked per week remained relatively constant between the study periods. The maximum possible number of patients seen by the workforce prior to retirement increased by only 2.4% during the study interval. CONCLUSION: Though the U.S. urology workforce is growing and the mean age is decreasing, decreases in planned retirement age and productivity may offset these gains and intensify the physician shortage for U.S. urologists.

Early and late implications of COVID-19 on male reproductive health: 3 years of data.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019), caused by SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2), has significantly affected global health. Research has shown that the virus can be found at high concentrations in male gonadal tissue. Yet, the virus's long-term implications on male reproductive health remains relatively unclear. OBJECTIVE: A comprehensive narrative review of published literature regarding COVID-19's short- and long-term implications on male reproductive health. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed for articles ranging from November 2019 to August 2022. Studies that focused on the impact of COVID-19 on male reproductive health were selected for review. Studies were included if they were written in English and reported semen analyses, pathologic gonadal tissue analyses, serum androgen assays, or a combination of these in patients with COVID-19. Moreover, literature was included on COVID-19 vaccinations' impacts on male reproductive health. Case reports and other narrative reviews were excluded from this review. RESULTS: SARS-CoV-2 has been detected in cadaveric testicular tissue during the initial stages of infection in fatal cases of the disease, demonstrating marked inflammatory changes and decreased spermatogenesis in patients with COVID-19. Several studies have revealed a negative impact on androgens during acute illness and in the ensuing months, but data on the recovery of androgen levels are confounding and limited in scope. COVID-19 does have significant negative impacts on bulk semen parameters, as confirmed in studies comparing pre- and post-COVID-19 semen samples. Vaccination is a valuable tool for protecting patients from the negative impacts of the virus and has been shown to have no negative impact on male reproductive potential. CONCLUSION: Given the virus's impacts on testicular tissue, androgens, and spermatogenesis, COVID-19 can negatively affect male reproductive health for an extended period. Therefore, vaccinations should continue to be recommended to all eligible patients.