Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
J Crohns Colitis ; 18(2): 204-211, 2024 Feb 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37586091

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Randomised controlled trials historically under-represent marginalised racial and ethnic populations. As incidence and prevalence of Crohn's disease in these groups rise, it is important to characterise their inclusion in randomised controlled trials on first-line and pipe-line medications. METHODS: PubMed was searched systematically for randomised controlled trials of biologic and small molecule inhibitor [SMI] medications, with a primary outcome related to efficacy following PRISMA guidelines. We used descriptive statistics to summarise demographic variables and meta-regression analyses to estimate temporal trends in racial inclusion. RESULTS: More than a half of trials did not report any racial/ethnic demographics [53.7%] and several reported racial demographics for only one race [20.9%]. When racial data were reported, Whites made up 90.2% of participants. Percentages of Black, Asian, Native American/Pacific Islander, and participants considered 'Other' averaged 2.9%, 11.6%, 0.5%, and 1.6% out of the total sample sizes of 3901, 3742, 828 and 4027, respectively. Proportional representation of White participants decreased over time [p <0.01] and proportional representation of Asian participants increased over time [p = 0.047]. In ordinal logistic regression, mean year of trial enrolment significantly increased the number of racial groups reported [p <0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Half of published randomised controlled trials in Crohn's disease contain no racial or ethnic demographics, and the remaining often only have limited inclusion of Black, Native American/Pacific Islander, and Hispanic patients. Further work should characterise representation in observational and prospective trials. Researchers should work to: 1] increase reporting of racial and ethnic demographics; and 2] improve recruitment and retention of marginalised populations.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Crohn , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Enfermedad de Crohn/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Etnicidad , Hispánicos o Latinos , Grupos Raciales
2.
Gastro Hep Adv ; 2(6): 860-872, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39130122

RESUMEN

There remains a paucity of data on the efficacy of nutritional interventions in luminal gastrointestinal disorders. This review appraises the evidence supporting dietary modification in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), irritable bowel syndrome, Celiac disease, and inflammatory bowel disease. Alhough the use of elimination diets; high fat/low carb; low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols; and lactose-free diets in GERD have been studied, the evidence supporting their efficacy remains weak and mixed. Patients with GERD should avoid eating within 3 hours of lying recumbent. Studied dietary interventions for disorders of gut-brain interaction include low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols and gluten-restricted and lactose-free diets. While all can be effective in carefully, individually selected patients, the evidence for each intervention remains low. In patients with inflammatory bowel disease, enteral nutrition is established in pediatric populations as useful in reducing inflammation and partial enteral nutrition has a growing evidence base for use in adults and children. Specific carbohydrate diets and the Crohn's disease exclusion diet show promising evidence but require further study to validate their efficacy prior to recommendation. Overall, the evidence supporting nutritional therapy across luminal gastrointestinal disorders is mixed and often weak, with few well-designed randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrating consistent efficacy of interventions. RCTs, particularly cross-over RCTs, show potential to compare dietary interventions.

3.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 30(8): 105877, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34102552

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cerebrovascular prevalence is high in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, whether racial disparities exist among this population have not been systematically explored. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study to assess the prevalence of stroke stratified by race among patients aged 18 years or older with COVID-19 who visited emergency department (ED) up to August 13, 2020 in the United States (US). We used multivariable logistic regression to compare the odds of stroke in Black patients with COVID-19 compared to their non-Black counterparts while adjusting for the major potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 8815 patients with ED visits with COVID-19, 77 (0.87%), 95% confidence interval CI (95% CI): 0.69% to 1.10%) had ischemic stroke. The mean age of patients with stroke was 64 years (SD: 2 years); 28 (43%) were men, 55 (71%) had hypertension, and 29 (50%) were Black. The prevalence of ischemic stroke in Blacks, non-Hispanic Whites and Hispanics was 1.26% (95% CI: 0.86% to 1.83%), 0.84% (95% CI: 0.51% to 1.37%) and 0.49% (95% CI: 0.26% to 0.88%) respectively. After adjustment for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, drinking and smoking, the likelihood of stroke was higher in Black than non-Black patients (adjusted odds ratio, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.13 to 7.15, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities in the prevalence of stroke among patients with COVID-19 exist, higher in Black population.


Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , COVID-19/etnología , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/etnología , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Factores Raciales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
4.
Gen Psychiatr ; 34(2): e100247, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33912798

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: People living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) must contend with a significant burden of disease. However, current studies of this demographic have yielded wide variations in the incidence of suicidality (defined as suicidal ideation, suicide attempt and suicide deaths). AIMS: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the lifetime incidence and prevalence of suicidality in PLWHA. METHODS: Publications were identified from PubMed (MEDLINE), SCOPUS, OVID (MEDLINE), Joanna Briggs Institute EBP and Cochrane Library databases (from inception to before 1 February 2020). The search strategy included a combination of Medical Subject Headings associated with suicide and HIV. Researchers independently screened records, extracted outcome measures and assessed study quality. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. Subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to explore the associated risk factors and to identify the sources of heterogeneity. Main outcomes were lifetime incidence of suicide completion and lifetime incidence and prevalence of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt. RESULTS: A total of 185 199 PLWHA were identified from 40 studies (12 cohorts, 27 cross-sectional and 1 nested case-control). The overall incidence of suicide completion in PLWHA was 10.2/1000 persons (95%CI: 4.5 to 23.1), translating to 100-fold higher suicide deaths than the global general population rate of 0.11/1000 persons. The lifetime prevalence of suicide attempts was 158.3/1000 persons (95%CI: 106.9 to 228.2) and of suicidal ideation was 228.3/1000 persons (95%CI: 150.8 to 330.1). Meta-regression revealed that for every 10-percentage point increase in the proportion of people living with HIV with advanced disease (AIDS), the risk of suicide completion increased by 34 per 1000 persons. The quality of evidence by Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations for the suicide deaths was graded as 'moderate' quality. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of suicide death is 100-fold higher in people living with HIV than in the general population. Lifetime incidence of suicidal ideation and attempts are substantially high. Suicide risk assessments should be a priority in PLWHA, especially for those with more advanced disease.

5.
Ann Epidemiol ; 56: 26-33.e1, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33775279

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Contact tracing has proven successful at controlling coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) globally, and the Center for Health Security has recommended that the United States add 100,000 contact tracers to the current workforce. METHODS: To address gaps in local contact tracing, health professional students partnered with their academic institution to conduct contact tracing for all COVID-19 cases diagnosed onsite, which included identifying and reaching their contacts, educating participants, and providing social resources to support effective quarantine and isolation. RESULTS: From March 24 to May 28, 536 laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 cases were contacted and reported an average of 2.6 contacts. Contacts were informed of their exposure, asked to quarantine, and monitored for the onset of symptoms. Callers reached 94% of cases and 84% of contacts. Seventy-four percent of cases reported at least one contact. Household members had higher rates of reporting symptoms (odds ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-2.28). The average test turnaround time decreased from 21.8 days for the first patients of this program to 2.3 days on the eleventh week. CONCLUSIONS: This provides evidence for the untapped potential of community contact tracing to respond to regional needs, confront barriers to effective quarantine, and mitigate the spread of COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Trazado de Contacto/métodos , Pandemias , Estudiantes , Centros Médicos Académicos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Humanos , Cuarentena , Estados Unidos
6.
BMJ Open ; 11(2): e037154, 2021 02 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33550223

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of HIV/AIDS is high and is associated with psychiatric morbidity and suicide risk. The objective of this study will be to assess the rates of suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and suicide deaths in people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We present a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the suicidality outcomes (suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and suicide deaths) in PLWHA. PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, OVID (HEALTH STAR), OVID (MEDLINE), Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database, Web of Science and PsychINFO databases will be searched from their inception until 1 January 2020. The primary outcome of interest will be the incidence of suicidality in PLWHA. In addition, we will delineate risk factors associated with suicidality in PLWHA. Citations, full-text articles and abstracts will be screened by four reviewers independently. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion. The study methodological quality (or bias) will be appraised using an appropriate tool. Random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted if we find that the studies are very heterogenous. For the suicidality outcome, probability of suicide risk will be reported. Relative risk ratios (with 95% CIs) will be reported for the effects of the risk factors. Potential publication bias will be assessed by conducting Egger's test and creating funnel plots. We will conduct additional analyses to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity (eg, age, sex and geographical location). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics clearance is required as no primary data will be collected. The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be presented at scientific conferences and published in a peer-reviewed journal. The results may inform clinical management of PLWHA and may guide future population-specific interventions.We will search PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, OVID (HEALTH STAR), OVID (MEDLINE), Joanna Briggs Institute EBP Database, Web of Science and PsychINFO from their inception until 1 January 2020. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020161501.


Asunto(s)
Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio , Humanos , Incidencia , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Prevalencia , Factores de Riesgo , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA