Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study to evaluate erenumab-specific central effects: an fMRI study.

OBJECTIVE: Given the findings of central effects of erenumab in the literature, we aimed to conduct a rigorous placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study to elucidate whether the observed changes are directly attributable to the drug. METHODS: We recruited 44 patients with migraine, randomly assigning them to either the erenumab 70 mg or the placebo group. 40 patients underwent fMRI scanning using a trigeminal nociceptive paradigm both, pre- and four weeks post-treatment. Participants kept a headache diary throughout the whole study period of two months in total. A clinical response was defined as a ≥30% reduction in headache frequency at follow-up. Details of this study have been preregistered in the open science framework: https://osf.io/ygf3t . RESULTS: Seven participants of the verum group (n=33.33%) and 4 of the placebo group (21.05%) experienced improvements in migraine activity, characterized by a minimum of 30% reduction in monthly headache frequency compared to baseline. The imaging data show an interaction between the verum medication and the response. Whilst numbers were too small for individual analyses (Verum vs. Placebo and Responder vs. Non-Responder), the variance-weighted analysis (Verum vs Placebo, scan before vs after weighted for response) revealed specific decrease in thalamic, opercular and putamen activity. INTERPRETATION: The central effects of erenumab could be reproduced in a placebo randomized design, further confirming its central role in migraine modulation. The mechanism, whether direct or secondary to peripheral mode of action, needs further exploration. It is important to note that the response rate to erenumab 70mg in this study was not as substantial as anticipated in 2019, when this study was planned. This resulted in a too small sample size for a subgroup analysis based on the responder status was associated with both the verum drug and the relative reduction in headache days.

Migraine prodromes and migraine triggers.

Migraine is characterized by a well-defined premonitory phase occurring hours or even days before the headache. Also, many migraineurs report typical triggers for their headaches. Triggers, however, are not consistent in their ability to precipitate migraine headaches. When looking at the clinical characteristics of both premonitory symptoms and triggers, a shared pathophysiological basis seems evident. Both seem to have their origin in basic homeostatic networks such as the feeding/fasting, the sleeping/waking, and the stress response network, all of which strongly rely on the hypothalamus as a hub of integration and are densely interconnected. They also influence the trigeminal pain processing system. Additionally, thalamic and hormonal mechanisms are involved. Activity within all those networks is influenced by various endogenous and external factors and might even cyclically change dependent on physiological internal rhythms. This might affect the threshold for the generation of migraine headaches. Premonitory symptoms thus appear as the result of an already ongoing alteration within those networks, whereas triggers might in this special situation only be able to further stress the system over the threshold for attack generation as catalysts of a process already in motion.

Management of cluster headache: Treatments and their mechanisms.

BACKGROUND: The management of cluster headache is similar to that of other primary headache disorders and can be broadly divided into acute and preventive treatments. Acute treatments for cluster headache are primarily delivered via rapid, non-oral routes (such as inhalation, nasal, or subcutaneous) while preventives include a variety of unrelated treatments such as corticosteroids, verapamil, and galcanezumab. Neuromodulation is becoming an increasingly popular option, both non-invasively such as vagus nerve stimulation when medical treatment is contraindicated or side effects are intolerable, and invasively such as occipital nerve stimulation when medical treatment is ineffective. Clinically, this collection of treatment types provides a range of options for the informed clinician. Scientifically, this collection provides important insights into disease mechanisms. METHODS: Two authors performed independent narrative reviews of the literature on guideline recommendations, clinical trials, real-world data, and mechanistic studies. RESULTS: Cluster headache is treated with acute treatments, bridge treatments, and preventive treatments. Common first-line treatments include subcutaneous sumatriptan and high-flow oxygen as acute treatments, corticosteroids (oral or suboccipital injections) as bridge treatments, and verapamil as a preventive treatment. Some newer acute (non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation) and preventive (galcanezumab) treatments have excellent clinical trial data for episodic cluster headache, while other newer treatments (occipital nerve stimulation) have been specifically tested in treatment-refractory chronic cluster headache. Most treatments are suspected to act on the trigeminovascular system, the autonomic system, or the hypothalamus. CONCLUSIONS: The first-line treatments have not changed in recent years, but new treatments have provided additional options for patients.

Migraine triggers in Asian countries: a narrative review.

Background: Migraine is one of the most common neurological disorders worldwide. Clinical characteristics of migraine may be somewhat different across ethnic groups. Although factors such as stress, lack of sleep, and fasting are known as migraine triggers, the discussion about geographical differences of migraine triggers in Asia is lacking. Methods: In this study, we performed a narrative review on migraine triggers in Asia. We searched PubMed for relevant papers published between January 2000 and February 2022. Results: Forty-two papers from 13 Asian countries were included. Stress and sleep are the most frequently reported migraine triggers in Asia. There were some differences in migraine triggers in Asian countries: fatigue and weather common in Eastern Asia and fasting common in Western Asia. Conclusion: Majority of the common triggers reported by patients with migraine in Asia were stress and sleep, similar to those reported globally, thus showing they are universally important. Some triggers linked to internal homeostasis are influenced by culture (e.g., alcohol, food/eating habit), and triggers related to environmental homeostasis, such as weather, are highly heterogenous between regions.

Update in the understanding of new daily persistent headache.

Background Accumulating evidence suggests various specific triggers may lead to new daily persistent headache (NDPH)-like presentations, suggesting that new daily persistent headache is a heterogenous syndrome, and challenging the concept that new daily persistent headache is a primary headache disorder.Method We searched the PubMed database up to August 2022 for keywords including persistent daily headache with both primary and secondary etiologies. We summarized the literature and provided a narrative review of the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-ups, possible pathophysiology, treatment response, and clinical outcomes.Results and conclusion New daily persistent headache is a controversial but clinically important topic. New daily persistent headache is likely not a single entity but a syndrome with different etiologies. The issue with past studies of new daily persistent headache is that patients with different etiologies/subtypes were pooled together. Different studies may investigate distinct subsets of patients, which renders the inter-study comparison, both positive and negative results, difficult. The identification (and removal) of a specific trigger might provide the opportunity for clinical improvement in certain patients, even when the disease has lasted for months or years. Nonetheless, if there is a specific trigger, it remains unknown or unidentified for a great proportion of the patients. We need to continue to study this unique headache population to better understand underlying pathogenesis and, most importantly, to establish effective treatment strategies that hopefully resolve the continuous cycle of pain.

Characterization of trigeminal C-fiber reactivity through capsaicin-induced release of calcitonin gene-related peptide.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that the response of trigeminal dermal blood flow (DBF) in the trigeminal system and consecutive expansion of flare response to capsaicin would differ from the somatosensory system (arm). We also investigated whether there are differences between patients with migraine and healthy controls (HC). BACKGROUND: Functional differences between the trigeminal and extracephalic somatosensory systems may partly explain the susceptibility for headaches in patients with migraine. Capsaicin-induced activation of nociceptive C-fibers in the skin is mainly mediated by calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and induces cutaneous vessel dilatation and flare response. METHODS: Female patients with migraine (n = 38) and age-matched HC (n = 35) underwent DBF measurement at baseline and after topical capsaicin administration using laser speckle imaging. DBF before and after capsaicin stimulation was analyzed over ophthalmic nerve/maxillary nerve/mandibular nerve (V1/V2/V3) dermatomes and the forearm as an extracephalic control. RESULTS: Capsaicin-induced DBF increased more in the trigeminal dermatomes than on the forearm. The V1 dermatome showed a smaller increase of DBF in patients with migraine compared to HC. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that the trigeminovascular system reacts differently from extracephalic areas, which may explain the trigeminal susceptibility to CGRP-mediated pain attacks. By demonstrating a different reactivity of the V1 dermatome in patients with migraine, our finding suggests that the first trigeminal branch is functionally different from the second and third branches; however, only in patients with migraine.

Debate: Are cluster headache and migraine distinct headache disorders?

Cluster headache and migraine are regarded as distinct primary headaches. While cluster headache and migraine differ in multiple aspects such as gender-related and headache specific features (e.g., attack duration and frequency), both show clinical similarities in trigger factors (e.g., alcohol) and treatment response (e.g., triptans). Here, we review the similarities and differences in anatomy and pathophysiology that underlie cluster headache and migraine, discuss whether cluster headache and migraine should indeed be considered as two distinct primary headaches, and propose recommendations for future studies. Video recording of the debate held at the 1st International Conference on Advances in Migraine Sciences (ICAMS 2022, Copenhagen, Denmark) is available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUimmnDVTTE .

Sumatriptan prevents central sensitization specifically in the trigeminal dermatome in humans.

BACKGROUND: The exact mechanism and site of action of triptans in aborting migraine attacks remain under debate. We hypothesized that the clinical efficacy of triptans lies in aborting central sensitization and focused on the question of why triptans are headache specific, that is highly effective in migraine and cluster headache and ineffective in extracephalic pain. METHODS: Forty healthy participants were enrolled in this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study. The effect of sumatriptan (n = 20) versus placebo (n = 20) was investigated in a trigeminal (V1) versus an extracephalic dermatome (forearm) using a topical capsaicin sensitization model. Capsaicin-induced primary and secondary hyperalgesia were evaluated using quantitative sensory testing. RESULTS: After capsaicin application, primary hyperalgesia developed in both the sumatriptan and placebo groups in both dermatomes. However, sumatriptan exclusively prevented secondary hyperalgesia in the V1 dermatome but not on the forearm. Placebo exerted no effects on secondary hyperalgesia in both trigeminal and extracephalic dermatomes. Additionally, sumatriptan reduced the flare size exclusively in the V1 dermatome. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that sumatriptan reduces central sensitization (secondary hyperalgesia) without modulating peripheral sensitization (primary hyperalgesia) in a human pain model of capsaicin-induced sensitization. Moreover, despite a systemic administration of sumatriptan, the modulatory effects are trigeminal specific, echoing the clinical effect of triptans in aborting headaches, but not extracephalic pain. SIGNIFICANCE: Our data suggest that triptans exert their efficacy by suppressing central sensitization. By revealing a dermatome-specific modulation, our study demonstrates a previously unrecognized interaction between the pharmacodynamics of triptans and the trigeminal nociceptive system that provides new insight into how triptans may work in aborting headache attacks.

Galcanezumab modulates Capsaicin-induced C-fiber reactivity.

BACKGROUND: The vasodilatory calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) is understood as pivotal mediator in migraine pathophysiology. Blocking CGRP with small molecules or monoclonal antibodies (CGRP-mAb) reduces migraine frequency. However, prescription of CGRP-mAbs is still regulated and possible predictive measures of therapeutic success would be useful. METHODS: Using standardized capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow model, 29 migraine patients underwent a laser speckle imaging measurement before and after administration of galcanezumab. At both sessions dermal blood flow before and after capsaicin stimulation as well as flare size were analyzed over all three trigeminal branches and the volar forearm for extracranial control. Long-term measures were repeated in 14 patients after continuous treatment ranging from 6 to 12 months. RESULTS: Resting dermal blood flow remained unchanged after administration of galcanezumab. Capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow decreased significantly after CGRP-mAb in all tested areas compared to baseline and this was consistent even after 12 months of treatment. However, following galcanezumab administration, the flare size decreased only in the three trigeminal dermatomes, not the arm and was therefore specific for the trigemino-vascular system. None of these two markers distinguished between responders and non-responders. CONCLUSION: CGRP-mAb changed blood flow response to capsaicin stimulation profoundly and this effect did not change over a 12-month application. Neither capsaicin-induced flare nor dermal blood flow can be used as a predictor for treatment efficacy. These data suggest that the mechanism of headache development in migraine is not entirely CGRP-mediated.

High-Density Electroencephalography-Informed Multiband Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Reveals Rhythm-Specific Activations Within the Trigeminal Nociceptive Network.

The interest in exploring trigeminal pain processing has grown in recent years, mainly due to various pathologies (such as migraine) related to this system. However, research efforts have mainly focused on understanding molecular mechanisms or studying pathological states. On the contrary, non-invasive imaging studies are limited by either spatial or temporal resolution depending on the modality used. This can be overcome by using multimodal imaging techniques such as simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electroencephalography (EEG). Although this technique has already been applied to neuroscientific research areas and consequently gained insights into diverse sensory systems and pathologies, only a few studies have applied EEG-fMRI in the field of pain processing and none in the trigeminal system. Focusing on trigeminal nociception, we used a trigeminal pain paradigm, which has been well-studied in either modality. For validation, we first acquired stand-alone measures with each imaging modality before fusing them in a simultaneous session. Furthermore, we introduced a new, yet simple, non-parametric correlation technique, which exploits trial-to-trial variance of both measurement techniques with Spearman's correlations, to consolidate the results gained by the two modalities. This new technique does not presume a linear relationship and needs a few repetitions per subject. We also showed cross-validation by analyzing visual stimulations. Using these techniques, we showed that EEG power changes in the theta-band induced by trigeminal pain correlate with fMRI activation within the brainstem, whereas those of gamma-band oscillations correlate with BOLD signals in higher cortical areas.

A Review of Current Perspectives on Facial Presentations of Primary Headaches.

Orofacial pain (OFP) has recently been classified and subdivided into a number of groups, similar to headache disorders in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD). A novel group of OFP has been established whose major feature is that they resemble primary headache disorders occurring in the V2 or V3 dermatomes. These follow the clinical criteria and associated symptoms of the eponymous headache syndromes. Following the recent International Classification of Orofacial Pain (ICOP), three types are differentiated: Headache which spread into the face (type 1), facial pain which replaced headache but maintained the same characteristics and associated symptoms of the former headache (type 2), and de-novo orofacial pain that resembles primary headache types without any involvement of the ophthalmic trigeminal branch (type 3). The epidemiology is unclear: type 1 and 2 are not exactly common, they certainly exist in a notable proportion of headache patients, whereas type 3 may be rather rare. Since effective treatment options are available, it is important for clinicians to recognize such syndromes early to avoid misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment, which most of these patients still experience. This review gives an up-to-date summary of diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment of attack-like non-dental facial pain disorders.

Cycling multisensory changes in migraine: more than a headache.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Research on migraine usually focuses on the headache; however, accumulating evidence suggests that migraine not only changes the somatosensory system for nociception (pain), but also the other modalities of perception, such as visual, auditory or tactile sense. More importantly, the multisensory changes exist beyond the headache (ictal) phase of migraine and show cyclic changes, suggesting a central generator driving the multiple sensory changes across different migraine phases. This review summarizes the latest studies that explored the cyclic sensory changes of migraine. RECENT FINDINGS: Considerable evidence from recent neurophysiological and functional imaging studies suggests that alterations in brain activation start at least 48 h before the migraine headache and outlast the pain itself for 24 h. Several sensory modalities are involved with cyclic changes in sensitivity that peak during the ictal phase. SUMMARY: In many ways, migraine represents more than just vascular-mediated headaches. Migraine alters the propagation of sensory information long before the headache attack starts.

Migraine monoclonal antibodies against CGRP change brain activity depending on ligand or receptor target - an fMRI study.

Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against calcitonin gene-related peptides (CGRP) are novel treatments for migraine prevention. Based on a previous functional imaging study which investigated the CGRP receptor mAb (erenumab), we hypothesized that (i) the CGRP ligand mAb galcanezumab would alter central trigeminal pain processing; (ii) responders to galcanezumab treatment would show specific hypothalamic modulation in contrast to non-responders; and (iii) the ligand and the receptor antibody differ in brain responses. Methods: Using an established trigeminal nociceptive functional magnetic imaging paradigm, 26 migraine patients were subsequently scanned twice: before and 2-3 weeks after administration of galcanezumab. Results: We found that galcanezumab decreases hypothalamic activation in all patients and that the reduction was stronger in responders than in non-responders. Contrasting erenumab and galcanezumab showed that both antibodies activate a distinct network. We also found that pre-treatment activity of the spinal trigeminal nucleus (STN) and coupling between the STN and the hypothalamus covariates with the response to galcanezumab. Conclusions: These data suggest that despite relative impermeability of the blood-brain barrier for CGRP mAb, mAb treatment induces certain and highly specific brain effects which may be part of the mechanism of their efficacy in migraine treatment. Funding: This work was supported by the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) of ERA-Net Neuron under the project code BIOMIGA (01EW2002 to AM) and by the German Research Foundation (SFB936-178316478-A5 to AM). The funding sources did not influence study conduction in any way. Clinical trial number: The basic science study was preregistered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/m2rc6).

Trigeminal sensory modulatory effects of galcanezumab and clinical response prediction.

ABSTRACT: Galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody against calcitonin gene-related peptide, is an emerging migraine preventative. We hypothesized that the preventive effects are conveyed via the modulation of somatosensory processing and that certain sensory profiles may hence be associated with different clinical responses. We recruited migraine patients (n = 26), who underwent quantitative sensory tests over the right V1 dermatome and forearm at baseline (T0), 2 to 3 weeks (T1) and 1 year (T12) after monthly galcanezumab treatment. The clinical response was defined as a reduction of ≥30% in headache frequency based on the headache diary. Predictors for clinical response were calculated using binary logistical regression models. After galcanezumab (T1 vs T0), the heat pain threshold (°C, 44.9 ± 3.4 vs 43.0 ± 3.3, P = 0.013) and mechanical pain threshold (log mN, 1.60 ± 0.31 vs 1.45 ± 0.26, P = 0.042) were increased exclusively in the V1 dermatome but not the forearm. These changes were immediate, did not differ between responders and nonresponders, and did not last in 1 year of follow-up (T12 vs T0). However, baseline heat pain threshold (OR: 2.13, 95% CI: 1.08-4.19, P = 0.029) on the forearm was a robust predictor for a clinical response 3 months later. In summary, our data demonstrated that galcanezumab modulates pain thresholds specifically in the V1 dermatome, but this modulation is short-lasting and irrelevant to clinical response. Instead, the clinical response may be determined by individual sensibility even before the administration of medication.

Update of New Daily Persistent Headache.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The diagnostic criteria of new daily persistent headache (NDPH) have been revised since 2013. The current review focused on the progress of NDPH research over the last few years. RECENT FINDINGS: Various new triggers and different NDPH mimics have been reported. The association with both cephalic and extracephalic pathologies suggests that NDPH is rather a syndrome with more than one disease mechanism. Recent clinical studies confirmed that migrainous headache remained the most prominent phenotype of NDPH, echoing the change of the diagnostic criteria in 2013. Diagnostic workup, including imaging studies, was unremarkable, except serving to exclude secondary etiologies. Studies on treatment options have yet shown promising targets, and randomized clinical trials are still lacking. Multiple mechanisms, both cranial and systemic, may be involved synergically in the generation of NDPH-like headaches. The search for effective treatment options should base on better understanding of disease mechanisms.

Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation modulates trigeminal but not extracephalic somatosensory perception: functional evidence for a trigemino-vagal system in humans.

ABSTRACT: Noninvasive vagus nerve stimulation (nVNS) is effective in several types of headache disorders. We sought to unravel the mechanism of how nVNS exhibits this efficacy. This study used a randomized, single-blind, sham-controlled, crossover design and comprised 3 projects with 3 independent cohorts of healthy participants. Project I (n = 15) was explorative. Six quantitative sensory test parameters, including mechanical pain threshold (MPT), were measured over the left V1 dermatome and forearm and compared before and after unilateral nVNS. Projects II (n = 20) and III (n = 21) were preregistered online ( https://osf.io/r4jb9 ). Quantitative sensory test parameters were compared over the left (Project II) or bilateral V1 and V3 dermatomes (Project III), respectively, in addition to the left forearm as a control. A secondary analysis of heart rate variability (HRV) using a historical control group was used to control for systemic effects of nVNS. Verum-nVNS induced trigeminal-specific modulation of pain threshold (ie, MPT) over the left V1 in Project I, left V1 and V3 in Project II, and bilateral V1 and V3 in Project III. Data pooled from Projects II and III demonstrated a greater increase in MPT in the V1 vs V3 dermatome. There were no differences associated with sham-nVNS in any projects. Heart rate variability parameters did not change after nVNS. Our results provide functional evidence of a long hypothesized functional trigemino-vagal system in humans and may explain why nVNS is effective in some headache disorders but not in somatic pain disorders. Because unilateral nVNS modulated the trigeminal thresholds bilaterally, this effect is probably indirect through a central top-down mechanism.

Aura in trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia is probably mediated by comorbid migraine with aura.

OBJECTIVE: The presence of aura is rare in cluster headache, and even rarer in other trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias. We hypothesized that the presence of aura in patients with trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias is frequently an epiphenomenon and mediated by comorbid migraine with aura. METHODS: The study retrospectively reviewed 480 patients with trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia in a tertiary medical center for 10 years. Phenotypes and temporal correlation of aura with headache were analyzed. Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia patients with aura were further followed up in a structured telephone interview. RESULTS: Seventeen patients with aura (3.5%) were identified from 480 patients with trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia, including nine with cluster headache, one with paroxysmal hemicrania, three with hemicrania continua, and four with probable trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia. Compared to trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia patients without aura, trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia patients with aura were more likely to have a concomitant diagnosis of migraine with aura (odds ratio [OR] = 109.0, 95% CI 30.9-383.0, p < 0.001); whereas the risk of migraine without aura remains similar between both groups (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.14-8.59, p = 0.931). Aura was more frequently accompanied with migraine-like attacks, but not trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia attacks. INTERPRETATION: In most patients with trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia, the presence of aura is mediated by the comorbidity of migraine with aura. Aura directly related to trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia attack may exist but remains rare. Our results suggest that aura may not be involved in the pathophysiology of trigeminal autonomic cephalalgia.