A New Predictive Nomogram for the Risk of Delayed Incision Healing After Open Posterior Lumbar Surgery: A Retrospective Study.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a primary research study. OBJECTIVE: A risk nomogram was established and externally validated by exploring the related risk factors for delayed incision healing in patients undergoing open posterior lumbar surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The use of a nomogram model to predict prognosis in patients with delayed incision healing is an evolving field given the complex presentation of patients with this condition. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study reviewed 954 patients with data collected from January 2017 to December 2021 who were randomized into a training set and a validation set (7:3). We built a prediction model based on a training set of 616 patients. The "least absolute shrinkage and selection operator" regression model was applied to screen out the optimal prediction features, and binary logistic regression was used to develop a prediction model. The discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability of the prediction model were assessed by using the area under the curve, C -index, calibration curve, and decision curve analysis. RESULTS: Postoperative delayed incision healing occurred in 214 (24.4%) patients. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model showed that smoking, white blood cell count, infection, diabetes, and obesity were involved in delayed incision healing ( P ≠ 0). A binary logistic regression model confirmed that smoking [odds ratio (OR) = 3.854, 95% CI: 1.578~9.674, P = 0.003], infection (OR = 119.524, 95% CI: 59.430~263.921, P < 0.001), diabetes (OR = 3.935, 95% CI: 1.628~9.703, P = 0.003), and obesity (OR = 9.906, 95% CI: 4.435~23.266, P < 0.001) were predictors of delayed incision healing, and a nomogram model was established. The area under the curve was 0.917 (95% CI: 0.876-0.959). The calibration curve showed good consistency. Decision curve analysis showed that when the risk threshold of delayed incision healing was >5%, the use of this nomogram was more clinically valuable. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking, infection, diabetes, and obesity are risk factors for delayed incision healing. The nomogram model could be used to predict the risk of delayed incision healing and could provide a reference for early clinical intervention.

Effect of remimazolam tosilate on the incidence of hypoxemia in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy: A bi-center, prospective, randomized controlled study.

Background: Remimazolam tosilate is a new ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative medicine. In this study, we evaluated the effect of remimazolam tosilate on the incidence of hypoxemia during sedation in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy. Methods: Patients in the remimazolam group received an initial dose of 0.1 mg/kg and a bolus dose of 2.5 mg of remimazolam tosilate, whereas patients in the propofol group received an initial dose of 1.5 mg/kg and a bolus dose of 0.5 mg/kg of propofol. Patients received ASA standard monitoring (heart-rate, non-invasive blood pressure, and pulse oxygen saturation) during the entire examination process. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate hypoxemia (defined as 85%≤ SpO2< 90%, >15s) during the gastrointestinal endoscopy. The secondary outcomes included the incidence of mild hypoxemia (defined as SpO2 90%-94%) and severe hypoxemia (defined as SpO2< 85%, >15s), the lowest pulse oxygen saturation, airway maneuvers used to correct hypoxemia, patient's hemodynamic as well as other adverse events. Results: 107 elderly patients (67.6 ± 5.7 years old) in the remimazolam group and 109 elderly patients (67.5 ± 4.9 years old) in the propofol group were analyzed. The incidence of moderate hypoxemia was 2.8% in the remimazolam group and 17.4% in the propofol group (relative risk [RR] = 0.161; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.049 to 0.528; p < 0.001). The frequency of mild hypoxemia was less in the remimazolam group, but not statistically significant (9.3% vs. 14.7%; RR = 0.637; 95% CI, 0.303 to 1.339; p = 0.228). There was no significant difference in the incidence of severe hypoxemia between the two groups (4.7% vs. 5.5%; RR = 0.849; 95% CI, 0.267 to 2.698; p = 0.781). The median lowest SpO2 during the examination was 98% (IQR, 96.0%-99.0%) in patients in the remimazolam group, which was significantly higher than in patients in the propofol group (96%, IQR, 92.0%-99.0%, p < 0.001). Patients in the remimazolam group received more drug supplementation during endoscopy than patients in the propofol group (p = 0.014). There was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of hypotension between the two groups (2.8% vs. 12.8%; RR = 0.218; 95% CI, 0.065 to 0.738; p = 0.006). No significant differences were found in the incidence of adverse events such as nausea and vomiting, dizziness, and prolonged sedation. Conclusion: This study explored the safety of remimazolam compared with propofol during gastrointestinal endoscopy in elderly patients. Despite the increased supplemental doses during sedation, remimazolam improved risk of moderate hypoxemia (i.e., 85%≤ SpO2 < 90%) and hypotension in elderly patients.

Intraoperative use of low-dose dexmedetomidine for the prevention of emergence agitation following general anaesthesia in elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the effect of an intraoperative low-dose dexmedetomidine infusion on emergence agitation following general anaesthesia in elderly patients. METHODS: Eighty elderly patients (> 64-years-old) following elective general anaesthesia for radical cancer surgeries were randomly allocated into two groups (n = 40 each): the dexmedetomidine group (Group D) and the normal saline group (Group C). Anaesthesia was maintained with continuous intravenous infusion of dexmedetomidine at - 0.2 µg kg-1 h-1 in Group D, and an equal volume of normal saline (0.5 ml kg-1 h-1) was given in Group C. All patients were observed for 30 min in the post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU), AFPS and NRS were recorded every 2 min, and the total doses of nalbuphine and fentanyl were calculated in the PACU. MAP and HR were recorded at the time of 10 min (T1), 20 min (T2), 30 min (T3) after dexmedetomidine or saline pumping, and before extubation (T4), immediately after extubation (T5), and 5 min after extubation (T6). We also documented some durations, including anaesthesia duration (D1), surgery duration (D2), duration from the end of surgery to extubation (D3), and emergence agitation duration (D4). RESULTS: The MAP in Group C was significantly higher than that in Group D (P < 0.05), and there were no significant changes between the two groups in HR and MAP within each time point and D1, D2, D3, and D4. The incidence of agitation, NRS score and total dose of nalbuphine and fentanyl were all lower in Group D than in Group C (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: An intraoperative low-dose dexmedetomidine continuous infusion can reduce emergence agitation following general anaesthesia in elderly patients (> 64-years-old), remain stable in terms of haemodynamics, and not lead to delays in anaesthesia recovery time and extubation time.