Drug development and the process of transitioning to team-based learning in a qualitative way.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The North American Pharmacist Licensure Examination and the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment are two standardized tests that evaluate students' preparedness to progress into pharmacy practice. Pharmacy educators are responsible for ensuring individual learners are engaged in course material and take appropriate steps to succeed in meeting learning outcomes. Whenever a new pedagogy is adopted in a previously existing course, understanding the impact on learners is critical. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: Team-based learning (TBL) was implemented within a novel Drug Discovery and Development course to measure the impact in active participation and student performance within the second year of pharmacy school. Survey data was collected to gather pharmacy students' perspectives regarding the pedagogy change. Examination competency scores and active participation were tracked to measure student engagement. FINDINGS: Survey results revealed students agreed or strongly agreed that Drug Discovery and Development was enjoyable when taught with a TBL model, created a conductive learning environment, and improved their perceived knowledge, communication skills, and confidence. Average attendance scores were > 90% in a TBL setting. No change in block exam competency scores were noted across the three academic cohorts. SUMMARY: Students agreed that Drug Discovery and Development was enjoyable when taught using TBL, created a conductive learning environment, and improved their perceived knowledge, communication skills, and confidence. Additional research should be conducted to quantify student engagement and active attendance within similar courses. Similar styles of TBL implementation could be incorporated at other colleges of pharmacy to measure its potential benefits.

Considerations in training student pharmacists to perform physical assessment.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patient assessment skills are an integral component of pharmacy education. Fostering a realistic learning experience requires simulated interaction with standardized patients (SPs). Cost, student performance, and student preference are important factors to consider when selecting a SP option. The study objective was to compare student peer SPs (SPSPs) and manikins for training student pharmacists to perform physical assessment skills. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITY AND SETTING: First-year student pharmacists were taught five physical assessment techniques and practiced on both a manikin and SPSPs. An examination was administered to assess student knowledge and technique performance. Student preference was assessed via survey. A cost utility analysis compared the costs of a SimMan manikin with SPSPs. FINDINGS: All enrolled student pharmacists met competency during the final exam. Students strongly agreed or agreed: practicing on a live simulated patient enhanced my ability to perform physical assessment skills (95%); practicing on SimMan enhanced my ability to perform physical assessment skills (88%); I am interested in incorporating physical assessments in my future pharmacy (88%); and I believe future practice will support implementing physical assessments (85%). The cost utility analysis determined a utility of 4.74 with student peer SPs and 4.49 with SimMan. SUMMARY: Student pharmacists were successfully trained to perform physical assessment techniques utilizing both SPSPs and a manikin. Understanding differences in instructional methods allows educators to determine best practices when teaching physical assessment.