Outcomes of CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy for Patients with Reduced Renal Function Including Dialysis.

Patients with renal impairment (RI) are typically excluded from trials evaluating chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapies. We evaluated the outcomes of patients with RI receiving standard of care (SOC) CAR T cell therapy for relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In this retrospective, single-center cohort study of patients with R/R DLBCL treated with SOC axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) after 2 or more prior lines of therapy, renal and survival outcomes were compared based on RI and fludarabine dose reduction (DR) status. RI was defined by an estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 as determined by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease equation using day -5 creatinine (Cr) values. Acute kidney injury (AKI) was identified and graded using standard Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Renal recovery was considered to occur if Cr was within .2 mg/mL of baseline by day +30. Fludarabine was considered DR if given at <90% of the recommended Food and Drug Administration label dose. Among 166 patients treated with CAR T cell therapy were 17 patients (10.2%) with baseline RI and 149 (89.8%) without RI. After CAR T cell infusion, the incidence of any grade AKI was not significantly different between patients with baseline RI and those without RI (42% versus 21%; P = .08). Similarly, severe grade 2/3 AKI was seen in 1 of 17 patients (5.8%) with baseline RI and in 11 of 149 patients (7.3%) without RI (P = 1). Decreased renal perfusion (28 of 39; 72%) was the most common cause of AKI, with cytokine release syndrome (CRS) contributing to 17 of 39 AKIs (44%). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not differ between patients with RI and those without RI or between those who received standard-dose fludarabine and those who received reduced-dose fludarabine. In contrast, patients with AKI had worse clinical outcomes than those without AKI (multivariable PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 3.7; OS: HR, 3.9; 95% CI, 2.1 to 7.4). Notably, peak inflammatory cytokine levels were higher in patients who experienced AKI. Finally, we describe 2 patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on dialysis who received lymphodepletion and CAR T cell therapy. Baseline renal function did not affect renal or efficacy outcomes after CAR T cell therapy in DLBCL. On the other hand, patients with AKI went on to experience worse clinical outcomes. AKI was commonly related to CRS and high peak inflammatory cytokine levels. CAR T cell therapy is feasible in patients with ESRD and requires careful planning of lymphodepletion.

Impact of Total Body Irradiation-Based Myeloablative Conditioning Regimens in Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is a curative treatment option for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Both total body irradiation (TBI)-based and chemotherapy only-based myeloablative transplantation conditioning regimens have been applied, but the optimal regimen remains unclear. We performed a systematic review to assess the efficacy of TBI-based versus chemotherapy only-based myeloablative conditioning regimens. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases and meeting abstracts for all studies comparing TBI-based and chemotherapy only-based conditioning regimens in patients who underwent allo-HCT for ALL. Two authors independently reviewed all studies for inclusion and extracted data related to overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse, and acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Eight studies were included in the final analysis. The overall methodological quality of the included studies was optimal. TBI-based regimens showed evidence of benefit compared with chemotherapy only-based conditioning regimens in terms of relapse (relative risk [RR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 0.94; 6 studies, 5091 patients), OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.89; 7 studies, 4727 patients), and PFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.85; 7 studies, 4727 patients). The TBI-based regimen did not increase the likelihood of grade II-IV acute GVHD (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.36; 5 studies, 4996 patients) or chronic GVHD (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.00 to 1.21; 5 studies, 4490 patients), or NRM (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.69 to 1.28; 6 studies, 4522 patients). However, TBI-based regimens were associated with an increased risk of grade III-IV acute GVHD (RR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.63; 3 studies, 3675 patients). A subgroup comparison of patients age ≥16 years showed similar results. This systematic review represents evidence supporting the use of TBI-based conditioning regimen in patients undergoing allo-HCT for ALL who are candidates for myeloablative conditioning, as it offers better OS, PFS, and less relapse with acceptable NRM.