Single- and dual-energy CT of the abdomen: comparison of radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT.

OBJECTIVES: To compare single-energy (SECT) and dual-energy (DECT) abdominal CT examinations in matched patient cohorts regarding differences in radiation dose and image quality performed with second- and third-generation dual-source CT (DSCT). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 200 patients (100 male, 100 female; mean age 61.2 ± 13.5 years, mean body mass index 27.5 ± 3.8 kg/m2) equally divided into four groups matched by gender and body mass index, who had undergone portal venous phase abdominal CT with second-generation (group A, 120-kV-SECT; group B, 80/140-kV-DECT) and third-generation DSCT (group C, 100-kV-SECT; group D, 90/150-kV-DECT). The radiation dose was normalised for 40-cm scan length. Dose-independent figure-of-merit (FOM) contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated for various organs and vessels. Subjective overall image quality and reader confidence were assessed. RESULTS: The effective normalised radiation dose was significantly lower (P < 0.001) in groups C (6.2 ± 2.0 mSv) and D (5.3 ± 1.9 mSv, P = 0.103) compared to groups A (8.8 ± 2.3 mSv) and B (9.7 ± 2.4 mSv, P = 0.102). Dose-independent FOM-CNR peaked for liver, kidney, and portal vein measurements (all P ≤ 0.0285) in group D. Subjective image quality and reader confidence were consistently rated as excellent in all groups (all ≥1.53 out of 5). CONCLUSIONS: With both DSCT generations, abdominal DECT can be routinely performed without radiation dose penalty compared to SECT, while third-generation DSCT shows improved dose efficiency. KEY POINTS: • Dual-source CT (DSCT) allows for single- and dual-energy image acquisition. • Dual-energy acquisition does not increase the radiation dose in abdominal DSCT. • Third-generation DSCT shows improved dose efficiency compared to second-generation DSCT. • Dose-independent figure-of-merit image contrast was highest with third-generation dual-energy DSCT. • Third-generation DSCT shows improved dose efficiency for SECT and DECT.

Optimization of window settings for virtual monoenergetic imaging in dual-energy CT of the liver: A multi-reader evaluation of standard monoenergetic and advanced imaged-based monoenergetic datasets.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate optimal window settings for display of virtual monoenergetic reconstructions in third-generation dual-source, dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) of the liver. METHODS: Twenty-nine subjects were prospectively evaluated with DECT in arterial (AP) and portal venous (PVP) phases. Three reconstructed datasets were calculated: standard linearly-blended (LB120), 70-keV standard virtual monoenergetic (M70), and 50-keV advanced image-based virtual monoenergetic (M50+). Two readers assessed optimal window settings (width and level, W/L), establishing a mean for each reconstruction which was used for a blinded assessment of liver lesions. RESULTS: The optimal W/L for M50+ were significantly higher for both AP (W=429.3 ± 44.6 HU, L=129.4 ± 9.7 HU) and PVP (W=376.1 ± 14.2HU, L=146.6 ± 7.0 HU) than for LB120 (AP, W=215.9 ± 16.9 HU, L=82.3 ± 9.4 HU) (PVP, W=173.4 ± 8.9 HU, L=69.3 ± 6.0 HU) and M70 (AP, W=247.1 ± 22.2 HU, L=72.9 ± 6.8 HU) (PVP, W=232.0 ± 27.9 HU, L=91.6 ± 14.4 HU). Use of the optimal window setting for M50+ vs. LB120 resulted in higher sensitivity (AP, 100% vs. 86%; PVP, 96% vs. 63%). CONCLUSIONS: Application of dedicated window settings results in improved liver lesion detection rates in advanced image-based virtual monoenergetic DECT when customized for arterial and portal venous phases.

Application of an Advanced Image-Based Virtual Monoenergetic Reconstruction of Dual Source Dual-Energy CT Data at Low keV Increases Image Quality for Routine Pancreas Imaging.

PURPOSE: To compare image quality on contrast-enhanced dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) during the pancreatic parenchymal phase of pancreatic masses between linearly-blended simulated 120 kVp images (routine) and advanced image-based virtual monoenergetic reconstructions at 55 keV. METHODS: This was a retrospective evaluation of 24 nonconsecutive adults found to have a focal pancreatic mass on a multiphasic abdominal dual-source DECT (12 adenocarcinoma, 5 neuroendocrine, 7 cystic tumors). For pancreatic-parenchymal phase images, subjects had routine and 55 keV images reconstructed at the time of clinical evaluation. Quantitative evaluation by contrast-to-noise ratio and qualitative evaluations of image quality by (1) direct comparison of image pairs (preference) and (2) blinded assessment of image quality measures based on Likert scores were performed. RESULTS: Mean patient weight was 205.8 ± 26.6 lbs. Mean pancreatic lesion contrast-to-noise ratio was significantly higher at 55 keV (6.8 ± 4.1) compared to the routine image series (5.8 ± 3.8; P = 0.0002). All 3 readers preferred the 55-keV images over routine blended images in 70.1% to 95.8% of cases. No significant differences were observed for subjective sharpness of the mass, visualization of internal mass structures, or image noise. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a single advanced image-based virtual monoenergetic reconstruction at 55 keV in pancreatic DECT showed improved objective image quality and reader preference compared to routine images. As this image reconstruction can be incorporated into the scan protocol, this technique should be considered for routine clinical use.

Increased renal cyst density on abdominal CT at 100-kVp compared with 120-kVp: a preliminary evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the radiographic density of renal cysts on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) scans performed at tube voltages of 100 versus 120 kVp. METHODS: Thirty-six renal cysts from contrast-enhanced CT performed on 21 subjects at both 120 kVp and 100 kVp were compared by Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical testing. RESULTS: The radiographic density (mean+/-standard deviation in Hounsfield units) of cysts was greater on 100-kVp than on 120-kVp CT scans for both 5-mm and 2-mm reconstructed slice thicknesses: 16.6+/-5.6 versus 10.9+/-4.9 and 14.1+/-5.6 versus 8.5+/-3.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Decrease in tube voltage significantly increases measured radiographic density of renal cysts on CT. Further studies are indicated to assess the clinical impact of lower-tube-voltage CT.