ImmunoDip: an improved screening method for microalbuminuria.

BACKGROUND: It is important to test for microalbuminuria in patients with diabetes, hypertension and possible insulin resistance syndrome. Current screening methods are suboptimal. This study evaluates a new office screening test for microalbuminuria that utilizes a monoclonal antibody against human serum albumin (ImmunoDip). METHODS: 182 urine samples were collected from patients attending diabetes, nephrology or hypertension clinics. The ImmunoDip screening test was carried out in the 182 samples after which albumin and creatinine concentrations were measured quantitatively in a reference laboratory. RESULTS: Screening the 182 patient samples with ImmunoDip and designating an albumin:creatinine ratio of > or =30 microg/mg as positive yielded a sensitivity of 96%, a specificity of 80%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 66% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 98%. The reduced specificity and PPV were not due to an intrinsic inaccuracy with ImmunoDip screening of these samples, but rather was shown to be due to the discordance between the accepted upper limits of normal for the albumin:creatinine ratio (30 microg/mg) and the albumin concentration (20 mg/l), the latter corresponding to a ratio of 20 microg/mg. In 35 samples with albumin concentrations of 20-50 mg/l, ImmunoDip screening yielded only one false negative (FN) result. CONCLUSIONS: ImmunoDip is an excellent screening tool for microalbuminuria.

Impact of adjunctive thiazolidinedione therapy on blood lipid levels and glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the effect of pioglitazone hydrochloride and rosiglitazone maleate on blood lipid levels and glycemic control when these drugs are used as adjunctive therapy in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin and/or sulfonylurea (n = 829) were evaluated in this national, multicenter, retrospective study. Medical records from 318 endocrinology practices in the USA were randomly selected and screened for study inclusion. Data related to patient demographics and laboratory data were extracted from medical records and analyzed for primary and secondary outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary study outcome was the mean change in plasma rosiglitazone was associated with no significant triglyceride (TG) levels. Secondary outcome measures included mean changes in total cholesterol (TChol), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) concentrations and hemoglobin A1C levels. RESULTS: With pioglitazone, TG levels declined by a mean of 51.5 mg/dl (P < 0.001), HDL-C levels rose by 3.3mg/dl (P < 0.001), and no change was seen in LDL-C or TChol. Treatment with change in TG levels and a 1.5mg/dl mean increase in HDL-C (P < 0.001). Furthermore, rosiglitazone therapy was associated with an 8 mg/dl mean increase in TChol (P < 0.001), and a 5.8 mg/dl mean increase in LDL-C (P < 0.001). Hemoglobin A1C levels were significantly reduced by approximately 1% within thiazolidinedione (TZD) cohorts (P < 0.001), but were not significantly different between study groups (P = 0.257). CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that pioglitazone has a more favorable effect on lipid profiles of patients with type 2 diabetes compared with rosiglitazone. In particular, differences were observed in TG and LDL-C levels. Both TZDs were equivalent at reducing hemoglobin A1C levels. These differences in lipid effects may have an impact on cardiovascular outcomes. The full clinical importance of these lipid alterations must be further assessed in prospective trials.

The insulin resistance syndrome and coronary artery disease.

Insulin resistance is an increasingly common metabolic abnormality characterized by an impaired physiological response to insulin. The constellation of insulin resistance and several other metabolic and vascular disorders is known as the insulin resistance syndrome. The characteristic features of the insulin resistance syndrome include central obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, glucose intolerance and specific abnormalities of both endothelial cell and vascular function. Although insulin resistance can arise in response to aging, obesity and inactivity, there is a clear genetic component. Insulin resistance is not generally attributable to a single genetic defect. Indeed, it is very likely to be a polygenic disorder in most individuals. A genetic predisposition is suggested to be the demonstration of increased insulin resistance in first-degree relatives of patients with diabetes and by a high incidence of insulin resistance in specific populations. Epidemiological data have demonstrated a strong association between a clustering of specific factors and the risk of cardiovascular disease. The diagnosis of the insulin resistance syndrome remains a significant clinical challenge. At present, clinicians are faced with establishing a clinical diagnosis despite varying definitions of the disorder and controversy regarding how many components presage clinical events. A proposed approach to the management of patients with the insulin resistance syndrome is discussed.

Atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes mellitus: the role of insulin resistance.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with a marked increase in the risk of atherosclerotic diseases, including coronary heart disease, peripheral arterial disease, and cerebrovascular disease. Insulin resistance is a key factor in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin resistance and its attendant metabolic abnormalities may cause much of the increased cardiovascular risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Among the abnormalities associated with insulin resistance are dyslipidemia, hypertension, systemic inflammation, and a prothrombotic state. This review discusses the role that each of these disorders plays in the cardiovascular risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus.