Effect of stereotactic body radiotherapy on regional metabolic liver function investigated in patients by dynamic [18F]FDGal PET/CT.

PURPOSE: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly used for treatment of liver tumors but the effect on metabolic liver function in surrounding tissue is largely unknown. Using 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-galactose ([18F]FDGal) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT), we aimed to determine a dose-response relationship between radiation dose and metabolic liver function as well as recovery. PROCEDURES: One male subject with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and five subjects (1 female, 4 male) with liver metastases from colorectal cancer (mCRC) underwent [18F]FDGal PET/CT before SBRT and after 1 and 3 months. The dose response was calculated using the data after 1 month and the relative recovery was evaluated after 3 months. All patients had normal liver function at time of inclusion. RESULTS: A linear dose-response relationship for the individual liver voxel dose was seen until approximately 30 Gy. By fitting a polynomial curve to data, a mean TD50 of 18 Gy was determined with a 95% CI from 12 to 26 Gy. After 3 months, a substantial recovery was observed except in tissue receiving more than 25 Gy. CONCLUSIONS: [18F]FDGal PET/CT makes it possible to determine a dose-response relationship between radiation dose and metabolic liver function, here with a TD50 of 18 Gy (95% CI 12-26 Gy). Moreover, the method makes it possible to estimate metabolic recovery in liver tissue.

A phase I study on stereotactic body radiotherapy of liver metastases based on functional treatment planning using positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The galactose analog 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-galactose (FDGal) is used for quantification of regional hepatic metabolic capacity by functional positron emission tomography computerized tomography (PET/CT). In the present study, FDGal PET/CT was used for functional treatment planning (FTP) of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of liver metastases with the aim of minimizing radiation dose to the best functioning liver tissue. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fourteen patients referred for SBRT had FDGal PET/CT performed before and one month after the treatment. The planning CT and the FDGal PET/CT images were deformable co-registered. RESULTS: A reduction in the mean dose of approximately 2 Gy to the best functioning sub-volumes was obtained. One patient developed grade 2 acute morbidity and no patients experienced grade 3 or higher acute morbidities. The regional hepatic metabolic function post-treatment was linearly correlated to the regional radiation dose and for each 10-Gy increase in dose (γ10Gy), the metabolic function was reduced by 12%. A 50% reduction was seen at 22.9 Gy in 3 fractions (CI 95%: 16.7-30.4 Gy). CONCLUSION: The clinical study demonstrates the feasibility for FTP in patients with liver metastases and it was possible to minimize the radiation dose to the best functioning liver tissue.

Residual rotational set-up errors after daily cone-beam CT image guided radiotherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer.

PURPOSE: Due to the often quite extended treatment fields in cervical cancer radiotherapy, uncorrected rotational set-up errors result in a potential risk of target miss. This study reports on the residual rotational set-up error after using daily cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) to position cervical cancer patients for radiotherapy treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Twenty-five patients with locally advanced cervical cancer had daily CBCT scans (650 CBCTs in total) prior to treatment delivery. We retrospectively analyzed the translational shifts made in the clinic prior to each treatment fraction as well as the residual rotational errors remaining after translational correction. RESULTS: The CBCT-guided couch movement resulted in a mean translational 3D vector correction of 7.4 mm. Residual rotational error resulted in a target shift exceeding 5 mm in 57 of the 650 treatment fractions. Three patients alone accounted for 30 of these fractions. Nine patients had no shifts exceeding 5 mm and 13 patients had 5 or less treatment fractions with such shifts. CONCLUSION: Twenty-two of the 25 patients have none or few treatment fractions with target shifts larger than 5mm due to residual rotational error. However, three patients display a significant number of shifts suggesting a more systematic set-up error.