Short-term outcomes of the C3 excluder for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and unfavorable proximal aortic seal zones.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) in patients with unfavorable proximal seal zones remains challenging. The purpose of this study was to identify the incidence of proximal extension cuff usage for type I endoleaks in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms and unfavorable necks treated with the C3 Excluder repositionable endoprosthesis compared with the traditional Excluder stent-graft. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients undergoing EVAR with unfavorable neck anatomy from January 2010 to October 2011 using the Excluder endoprosthesis on the traditional deployment system or the C3 repositionable system. Seventy-seven patients were treated with the Excluder device, with 44 (57%) having unfavorable neck anatomy defined as proximal aortic neck length of <15 mm, neck diameter of >28 mm, neck angulation of >60°, circumferential thrombus of >50% or calcification at the proximal seal zone, or a "reverse taper" on computed tomographic angiography. Of the 44 patients with unfavorable neck anatomy, 24 patients received the C3 Excluder and 20 received the traditional Excluder. RESULTS: The groups' comorbidities, aneurysm characteristics, and high-risk neck criteria were comparable. Initial success was 100% in both groups. Sixteen of the 44 patients (36%) with high-risk neck criteria required proximal extension cuffs for type I endoleaks, with 3 of the 24 patients (13%) in the C3 group compared with 13 of the 20 patients (65%) in the traditional Excluder group requiring proximal extension (P = 0.0005). Operative variables between the two groups were similar. At mean follow-up of 2 months (range: 1-6 months), there were no type I endoleaks or renal artery occlusion, and sac size regression was similar. CONCLUSIONS: The C3 Excluder endoprosthesis significantly reduces the need for proximal extension cuffs in patients with unfavorable aortic neck anatomy compared with the traditional Excluder with identical short-term clinical outcomes. Repositionable grafts could increase the number of patients who can effectively be treated with EVAR.

Endovascular repair of a para-anastomotic pseudoaneurysm after renal autotransplantation: an alternative to open reconstruction.

Renal artery anastomotic pseudoaneurysms are rare after renal transplantation. The etiology tends to be technical, infectious, or degenerative, and repair is difficult with a high postsurgical complication rate. We report the first case of a complex autotransplant renal artery pseudoaneurysm repaired with kissing covered stents. A 52-year-old woman presented with severe left lower quadrant abdominal pain 6 years after a renal autotransplant for ureteral stenosis and recurrent pyelonephritis. A computed tomographic angiography (CTA) scan revealed a bilobed aneurysm arising at the anastomosis between the renal and common iliac arteries. Kissing covered stents were placed within the common iliac artery proximally and extending into the transplant renal artery and external iliac artery. Postdeployment angiography confirmed complete exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm and excellent flow into the transplant kidney and left lower extremity. A follow-up CTA scan at 1 month revealed continued stent-graft patency and complete exclusion of the pseudoaneurysm. An endovascular approach to transplant anastomotic pseduoaneurysms using kissing covered stents is a viable option to exclude aneurysmal changes and preserve flow to the transplanted organ in carefully selected patients.

True lumen re-entry devices facilitate subintimal angioplasty and stenting of total chronic occlusions: Initial report.

OBJECTIVE: The acute technical failure of endovascular treatment of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) is most often due to the inability to re-enter the true lumen after occlusion is crossed in a subintimal plane. This study reports our initial experience with true lumen re-entry devices in the treatment of CTOs. METHODS: Patients with treatment of CTOs were identified from our vascular registry. All patients in whom the Pioneer catheter or the Outback catheter were used were also identified from a prospectively maintained separate database of cases in which true lumen re-entry devices were used. We used procedural data from the prospective database and reviewed the medical records. Lesion character and location, access type, location of true lumen re-entry, stent usage, procedural times, and complications, were tabulated. RESULTS: From August 2003 to December 2004, endovascular techniques were used to treat 87 CTOs in 58 iliac and 29 superficial femoral arteries. In 24 (26%), the true lumen could not be re-entered by using standard catheter and wire techniques. The true lumen was not initially re-entered in 20 (34%) of 58 of treated iliac CTOs and four (13%) of 29 of treated superficial femoral artery CTOs (73% TASC C and D lesions). Intravascular ultrasound-guided true lumen re-entry using the Pioneer catheter (21 CTOs), or fluoroscopic-guided true lumen re-entry using the Outback catheter (3 CTOs) was successful in achieving true lumen re-entry in all cases at the location desired. Total time of re-entry catheter manipulation required to achieve re-entry was <10 minutes and was routinely accomplished in <3 minutes. All occlusions were stented. No cases were converted to open repair. Bleeding from the recanalization and angioplasty site occurred in four patients (15%). It was controlled with use of covered stents in two cases, and resolved after placement of uncovered stents in the other two. No significant bleeding occurred at the sites of true lumen re-entry needle deployment. All occlusions treated with true lumen re-entry devices remain clinically patent at a mean follow-up of 5.8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment of chronic total occlusions is often limited by the inability to re-enter the true lumen after subintimal crossing of the occluded segment. This occurs more commonly with treatment of iliac occlusions than in superficial femoral artery occlusions. True lumen re-entry catheters are very effective at gaining wire passage back to the true lumen and facilitating successful endovascular treatment of chronic total occlusions that would otherwise require open bypass.

Outcomes of endovascular AAA repair in patients with hostile neck anatomy using adjunctive balloon-expandable stents.

Hostile neck anatomy remains the predominant reason that patients are denied endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). We reviewed our experience of EVAR with use of prophylactic adjunctive proximal balloon-expandable stents in patients with hostile neck anatomy and adjunctive proximal balloon-expandable stents in patients with type I endoleaks. Of 140 patients who underwent EVAR between 2000 and 2004, we reviewed data for 19 patients in whom we used proximal balloon-expandable stents. By high-resolution computed tomography scan or angiography, hostile neck anatomy was classified as length <15 mm, neck diameters > or =26 mm, circumferential thrombus at the proximal neck, angulated neck > or =60 degrees, and neck bulge or reverse taper necks. Patients were considered to have hostile anatomy if they met 1 or more of the above-cited criteria. All patients underwent AAA repair with commercially available endograft systems, Zenith (Cook, Bloomington, IN) and AneuRx (Medtronic/AVE, Minneapolis, MN). Balloon-expandable stents utilized included Cordis-Palmaz stents (17/19) and eV3 Max stents (2/19). Stents were deployed in the proximal graft with transrenal extension. AneuRx (18/19) and Zenith (1/19) endografts were used in all of the patients. Of the 19 patients, 15 had prophylactic stent placement for known hostile neck anatomy and 4 patients had stent placement for type I endoleak. Assisted primary technical success was achieved in all patients. Three patients had maldeployment of the endograft or proximal stent requiring additional endovascular interventions at the time of surgery. No endografts were deployed too low requiring stent placement. Procedure-related complications occurred in 2 of 19 patients. These included 1 operative death secondary to pneumonia and 1 patient who developed progressive renal failure. Short-term clinical success was achieved in 17 of 19 patients. Two patients required secondary interventions, 1 due to device migration with secondary conversion to open repair, and an endoleak, which, on angiogram, was a large type II endoleak successfully treated with coiling of the inferior mesenteric artery. One patient was observed to have a type II endoleak with no associated aneurysm enlargement. Short-term results suggest the use of prophylactic adjunctive balloon-expandable stents may decrease the incidence of secondary interventions related to hostile neck anatomy when used as an adjunctive measure with EVAR. Based on our experience, we feel EVAR may be offered to an expanded patient population with hostile neck anatomy with use of prophylactic balloon-expandable stents.