Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Anim Nutr ; 63(2): 112-26, 2009 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19489454

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different feeding strategies on the gut microbiota of organic growing-finishing pigs. A total of 76 pigs were allocated to four different dietary treatments (control, probiotics, maize silage and grass silage). Effects of the applied probiotic preparation on the composition of the intestinal and faecal microbiota were monitored. By using a DGGE (denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis)-based methodology, fingerprints of the intestinal microbiota were obtained. The total microbial DNA was isolated from faecal and colon samples and amplified with PCR using different primer sets to detect bifidobacteria and lactobacilli. PCR products were separated using DGGE and the resulting profiles were compared with the findings of the other dietary treatments. Bands were excised from the gels and sequenced for further identification. Particularly two different DGGE profiles of bifidobacteria were observed, while lactobacilli showed larger variety within the dietary treatments.


Asunto(s)
Alimentación Animal/análisis , Bifidobacterium/aislamiento & purificación , Electroforesis en Gel Bidimensional/métodos , Intestinos/microbiología , Lactobacillus/aislamiento & purificación , Porcinos , Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales de los Animales , Animales , ADN Bacteriano/aislamiento & purificación , Dieta/veterinaria , Heces/microbiología , Contenido Digestivo/microbiología
2.
Int J Food Microbiol ; 120(1-2): 191-5, 2007 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17884216

RESUMEN

There is urgent need for having available suitable methods and data regarding the susceptibility levels of antibiotic resistant and sensitive strains of bifidobacteria. Based on a defined standard operation procedure, agar disc diffusion and broth microdilution were compared in order to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of 82 B. pseudolongum and 80 B. thermophilum strains mainly originating from the meat production chain. The methods that were assessed showed interpretable agreement within this study. The disc diffusion zone diameters are highly reproducible making the method a useful alternative to broth microdilution for antimicrobial susceptibility screening of bifidobacteria.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bifidobacterium/efectos de los fármacos , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana/métodos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Animales , Bifidobacterium/crecimiento & desarrollo , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Microbiología de Alimentos , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Probióticos
3.
J Food Prot ; 70(1): 119-24, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17265870

RESUMEN

The widespread use of antimicrobial substances has led to resistant populations of microorganisms in several ecosystems. In animal husbandry, the application of antibiotics has contributed to resistance development in pathogenic and commensal bacteria. These strains or their resistance genes can be spread along several ecological routes, including the food chain. Antibiotic resistance is important in terms of the safety of industrial strains, such as probiotics for food and feed. Bifidobacterium thermophilum and Bifidobacterium pseudolongum are known to comprise the major part of the bifidobacterial microbiota in the gut and feces of cattle and pigs. In this study, the antimicrobial susceptibility in bifidobacterial isolates of these species was investigated. Isolates from the beef and pork production chain were identified and typed to strain level, and the antimicrobial susceptibility level was tested to a set of antibiotics. Isolates with low susceptibility levels were screened by PCR for already described resistance genes. Strains atypically resistant to clindamycin, erythromycin, and tetracycline were determined. The resistance genes tet(O), tet(W), and erm(X) were detected in the bifidobacterial species that were examined.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacología , Bifidobacterium/efectos de los fármacos , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Animales , Bifidobacterium/clasificación , Bovinos , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Probióticos , Especificidad de la Especie , Porcinos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...