RESUMEN
Leaflets inside drug boxes are complex and often poorly understood. Patients consulting in nephrology are mostly old and often suffer from multiple comorbidities. As so, they are often subject to various contra-indications and drug interactions. This paper aims to evaluate if patients actually read leaflets or other medical information on others medias such as Internet and whether this could, potentially, interfere with their observance. Results showed that leaflets were read by 65.1% of patients, leading to 12% of withdrawal or not taking drugs. Furthermore, compliance to medical guidance was deemed e-read by 65.1% of patients, leading to 12% of withdrawal or not taken drugs. Furthermore, this study showed no clear profile for non-compliant patients. Even the youngest patients (under 50 years old) have had a good compliance, with not more withdrawal or not taking pills. Nonetheless, youngest patients used more often to consult alternative medias and did not read much of the leaflets' information. Patients who were reading leaflets however, tended to search further information on other medias. This situation would create new challenges in health care, as it seems that data available on new medias are not systematically validated or adapted to the needs of the patients.
Asunto(s)
Nefrología , Cooperación del Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrología/estadística & datos numéricos , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Etiquetado de Productos/estadística & datos numéricos , Lectura , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In an experiment measuring event-related brain potentials (ERPs), single-letter targets were preceded by briefly presented masked letter primes. Name and case consistency were manipulated across primes and targets so that the prime was either the same letter as the target (or not), and was presented in the same case as the target (or not). Separate analyses were performed for letters whose upper- and lowercase forms had similar features (or not). The results revealed an effect of prime-target visual similarity between 120 and 180 msec, an effect of case-specific letter identity between 180 and 220 msec, and an effect of case-independent letter identity between 220 and 300 msec. We argue that these ERP results reflect processing in a hierarchical system for letter recognition that involves both case-specific and case-independent representations of alphabetic stimuli.