Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Neurohospitalist ; 13(4): 434-437, 2023 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37701253

RESUMEN

Clobazam is a 1,5-benzodiazepine frequently used as an adjunctive agent for refractory seizures and status epilepticus. Clobazam undergoes metabolism to an active metabolite norclobazam which is subsequently hydroxylated by CYP2C19, a cytochrome with several pharmacogenetic variants. Patients with poor metabolizer phenotypes may have elevated norclobazam levels and subsequent adverse effects. We present a case of an Asian American male receiving clobazam at a standard therapeutic dose for seizure disorder who became comatose secondary to significantly elevated norclobazam concentrations. Genetic testing revealed the patient was a poor CYP2C19 metabolizer, accounting for the impaired clearance. Clinicians should be aware of the patient populations at risk for these genetic polymorphisms and adjust initial doses based on package labeling or consider therapeutic drug monitoring to avoid adverse effects.

2.
Crit Care Med ; 48(10): 1445-1453, 2020 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32706559

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to: 1) determine the association between vasopressor dosing intensity during the first 6 hours and first 24 hours after the onset of septic shock and 30-day in-hospital mortality; 2) determine whether the effect of vasopressor dosing intensity varies by fluid resuscitation volume; and 3) determine whether the effect of vasopressor dosing intensity varies by dosing titration pattern. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective cohort study between September 2017 and February 2018. Vasopressor dosing intensity was defined as the total vasopressor dose infused across all vasopressors in norepinephrine equivalents. SETTING: Thirty-three hospital sites in the United States (n = 32) and Jordan (n = 1). PATIENTS: Consecutive adults requiring admission to the ICU with septic shock treated with greater than or equal to 1 vasopressor within 24 hours of shock onset. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Out of 1,639 patients screened, 616 were included. Norepinephrine (93%) was the most common vasopressor. Patients received a median of 3,400 mL (interquartile range, 1,851-5,338 mL) during the 24 hours after shock diagnosis. The median vasopressor dosing intensity during the first 24 hours of shock onset was 8.5 µg/min norepinephrine equivalents (3.4-18.1 µg/min norepinephrine equivalents). In the first 6 hours, increasing vasopressor dosing intensity was associated with increased odds ratio of 30-day in-hospital mortality, with the strength of association dependent on concomitant fluid administration. Over the entire 24 hour period, every 10 µg/min increase in vasopressor dosing intensity was associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 1.16-1.53), and this association did not vary with the amount of fluid administration. Compared to an early high/late low vasopressor dosing strategy, an early low/late high or sustained high vasopressor dosing strategy was associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing vasopressor dosing intensity during the first 24 hours after septic shock was associated with increased mortality. This association varied with the amount of early fluid administration and the timing of vasopressor titration.


Asunto(s)
Fluidoterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Choque Séptico/terapia , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , APACHE , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Estudios Prospectivos , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasoconstrictores/administración & dosificación
3.
Ther Drug Monit ; 42(4): 617-625, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32049893

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Phenytoin has a narrow therapeutic index and the potential of under-treatment or toxicity. Available equations are used to correct for the impact of hypoalbuminemia on unbound (free) phenytoin levels. The authors aimed to determine the accuracy of equations used to estimate free phenytoin in hospitalized patients and assess the impact of using additional clinical data. METHODS: Concurrently measured total and free phenytoin levels in hospitalized patients (2014-2018) were retrospectively evaluated, excluding those from patients on renal replacement therapy and valproic acid. Differences between actual and estimated free phenytoin levels by the original (Original WTZ), Anderson-modified, and Kane-modified Winter-Tozer equations were assessed using Pearson correlations and Bland-Altman analysis. Thereafter, a population-derived formula was developed and validated in a testing cohort. RESULTS: In the 4-year training cohort (n = 81), the Original WTZ equation had the smallest mean difference of all equations. A higher mean difference [-0.362 mcg/mL (95% CI -0.585 to -0.138) vs. -0.054 mcg/mL (95% CI -0.186 to 0.078)] was observed in intensive care unit (ICU) patients compared with non-ICU patients. A cross-validated multivariable model improved the accuracy of free phenytoin estimation in ICU and non-ICU patients, even in the separate testing cohort (n = 52) with respective mean differences of -0.322 mcg/mL (95% CI -0.545 to -0.098) and -0.025 mcg/mL (95% CI -0.379 to 0.329) and was superior to the Original WTZ [mean difference -0.858 mcg/mL (95% CI -1.069 to -0.647) vs. -0.106 mcg/mL (95% CI -0.362 to 0.151), respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Free phenytoin levels in hospitalized patients cannot be accurately determined using available estimation equations, particularly in critically ill patients. Combining ICU status and other available clinical data can improve therapeutic drug monitoring and prevent high-magnitude errors, particularly when free phenytoin assays are not readily available.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Fenitoína/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Hipoalbuminemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ácido Valproico/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven
5.
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent) ; 28(4): 466-8, 2015 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26424943

RESUMEN

We present a case of suspected linezolid toxicity in a 34-year-old man with sickle cell disease and line-related vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bacteremia and tricuspid valve endocarditis. The patient developed sudden-onset hypoglycemia, lactic acidosis, and acute pancreatitis 11 days after initiation of linezolid. All adverse effects quickly resolved with drug cessation. The pathophysiology underlying this triad of linezolid toxicity is unclear, but may be related to mitochondrial dysfunction.

6.
Pharmacotherapy ; 34(9): e162-8, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25074285

RESUMEN

Current fluconazole dosing strategies can be described using either standardized doses (800 or 400 mg) or as weight-based dosing recommendations (12 mg/kg loading dose followed by 6 mg/kg maintenance dose). The ideal method of fluconazole dosing is still unclear for certain patient populations, such as those receiving renal replacement therapy or the morbidly obese. We describe a 48-year-old man with a body mass index of 84 kg/m(2) who was receiving continuous venovenous hemofiltration (CVVH) and was treated with fluconazole by using a weight-based dose determined by lean body weight, infused at a rate of 200 mg/hour. Blood samples were collected at hour 0 (i.e., ~24 hrs after the loading dose was administered) and at 3.5, 6.8, and 11.3 hours after the start of the 600-mg maintenance dose, infused over 3 hours. Pharmacokinetic parameters calculated were maximum serum concentration 9.64 mg/L, minimum serum concentration 5.98 mg/L, area under the serum concentration-time curve from 0-24 hours (AUC0-24 ) 184.75 mg/L•hour, elimination rate constant 0.0199 hour(-1) , elimination half-life 34.8 hours, and total body clearance 3.25 L/hour. Our data, when combined with previously published literature, do not support using a linear dose-to-AUC approximation to estimate drug dosing needs in the critically ill patient population receiving CVVH. In addition, our results suggest that morbidly obese patients are able to achieve pharmacodynamic goals defined as an AUC:MIC ratio higher than 25 by using a lean body weight for fluconazole dosing calculations.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/farmacocinética , Fluconazol/farmacocinética , Hemofiltración , Obesidad Mórbida/metabolismo , Área Bajo la Curva , Enfermedad Crítica , Monitoreo de Drogas , Semivida , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad
7.
J Pharm Pract ; 26(5): 476-82, 2013 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24064436

RESUMEN

Antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) describes any unexplained diarrhea associated with the use of an antibiotic. AAD also includes infection caused by Clostridium difficile, however this organism only accounts for a small percentage of diarrhea caused by antibiotics. AAD can be caused by multiple other organisms including C perfringens, S aureus, and Candida. Some antibiotics are more likely to cause non-C difficile AAD, such as erythromycin and the penicillin class. AAD develops through the loss of normal flora and reduced colonic bacterial carbohydrate metabolism during antibiotic administration. There is an increasing interest in the use of probiotics for the prevention of AAD. There are several meta-analyses that report a relative risk reduction of AAD with the use of probiotics during antibiotic administration. Interpretation of these studies has been challenging due to the heterogeneity and size of the patient populations, unclear probiotic regimen, and unclear safety profile. Since AAD can be a reason for a patient to become non-compliant or receive incomplete treatment, clinicians should monitor for this potential adverse effect caused by antibiotics.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Diarrea/prevención & control , Probióticos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Metabolismo de los Hidratos de Carbono/efectos de los fármacos , Clostridioides difficile/aislamiento & purificación , Colon/metabolismo , Colon/microbiología , Diarrea/inducido químicamente , Diarrea/microbiología , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Probióticos/administración & dosificación , Probióticos/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA