Healthcare-Associated Infections and the Use of Antibiotics in German Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: A national point prevalence survey (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and antibiotic use (AU) was carried out in Germany in 2022 in the framework of the European PPS conducted by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The objective was to determine the prevalence of HAI and AU in German hospitals and to compare the obtained values with those of the most recent previous PPS, which was carried out in 2016. METHODS: The German National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections was entrusted with the organization of the PPS of 2022. As recommended by the ECDC, each hospital in a representative sample of 50 hospitals was invited to participate, and all other interested hospitals in Germany were also able to participate if desired. The data were collected by specially trained hospital staff in May, June, and July 2022. The definitions and methods put forth by the ECDC were used. RESULTS: Data from 66 586 patients in 252 hospitals were included. The prevalence of HAI in all participating hospitals was 4.9%, and that of AU was 26.9%. The HAI and AU prevalences were essentially unchanged in comparison to 2016. The most common types of HAI were surgical site infection (23.5%), lower respiratory tract infection (21.6%), and urinary tract infection (19.0%). CONCLUSION: HAI were just as frequent in 2022 as in 2016, affecting approximately one in twenty hospitalized patients on any given day.

Clinical evaluation of a web-based personalized recommendation system with electronic health record interface to optimize healthcare resources during SARS-CoV-2 surges.

During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, the German healthcare system faced challenges of efficiently allocating testing resources. To address this, we developed an open-source personalized recommendation system (PRS) called "CovApp". The PRS utilized a questionnaire to estimate the risk of infection, provided personalized recommendations such as testing, self-isolation, or quarantine, and featured QR code data transmission to electronic health records. The PRS served up to 2.5 million monthly users and received 67,000 backlinks from 1800 domains. We clinically evaluated the PRS at the SARS-CoV-2 testing facility at Charité and observed a 21.7% increase in patient throughput per hour and a 22.5% increase in patients per day. Patients using the PRS were twice as likely to belong to the High Risk group eligible for testing (18.6% vs. 8.9%, p < 0.0001), indicating successful compliance with CovApp's recommendations. CovApp served as a digital bridge between the population and medical staff and significantly improved testing efficiency. As an open-source platform, CovApp can be readily customized to address emerging public health crises. Further, given the EHR interface, the app is of great utility for other applications in clinical settings.

Good handling practice of parenterally administered medicines in neonatal intensive care units - position paper of an interdisciplinary working group.

This position paper, developed by an interdisciplinary expert group of neonatologists, paediatric infectious disease physicians, clinical pharmacists and specialists for the prevention and control of nosocomial infections, describes the "Good handling practice of medicines parenterally administered to patients on NICUs". It takes equal account of patient safety and the specialties of neonatal intensive care regarding feasibility and proportionality. The overall concept is perceived as a "learning system", in which open communication within the health-care team relating to medication errors and critical incidents enables continuous development and improvement to ensure patient safety. In our opinion, pharmacists, who are responsible for the supply of ready-to-administer parenteral medicinal products for neonatal intensive care patients, as well as the hygiene staff responsible on site are integral parts of the interdisciplinary treatment team. Risks of the current clinical practice of parenteral treatment of NICU patients are discussed in detail and recommendations for safety-relevant procedures are given.

Surgical site infection surveillance in German hospitals: a national survey to determine the status quo of digitalization.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance of surgical site infections (SSI) relies on access to data from various sources. Insights into the practices of German hospitals conducting SSI surveillance and their information technology (IT) infrastructures are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate current SSI surveillance practices in German hospitals with a focus on employed IT infrastructures. METHODS: German surgical departments actively participating in the national SSI surveillance module "OP-KISS" were invited in August 2020 to participate in a questionnaire-based online survey. Depending on whether departments entered all data manually or used an existing feature to import denominator data into the national surveillance database, departments were separated into different groups. Selected survey questions differed between groups. RESULTS: Of 1,346 invited departments, 821 participated in the survey (response rate: 61%). Local IT deficits (n = 236), incompatibility of import specifications and hospital information system (n = 153) and lack of technical expertise (n = 145) were cited as the most frequent reasons for not using the denominator data import feature. Conversely, reduction of workload (n = 160) was named as the main motivation to import data. Questions on data availability and accessibility in the electronic hospital information system (HIS) and options to export data from the HIS for the purpose of surveillance, yielded diverse results. Departments utilizing the import feature tended to be from larger hospitals with a higher level of care. CONCLUSIONS: The degree to which digital solutions were employed for SSI surveillance differed considerably between surgical departments in Germany. Improving availability and accessibility of information in HIS and meeting interoperability standards will be prerequisites for increasing the amount of data exported directly from HIS to national databases and laying the foundation for automated SSI surveillance on a broad scale.

Tolerance of biofilm of a carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae involved in a duodenoscopy-associated outbreak to the disinfectant used in reprocessing.

BACKGROUND: One possible transmission route for nosocomial pathogens is contaminated medical devices. Formation of biofilms can exacerbate the problem. We report on a carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae that had caused an outbreak linked to contaminated duodenoscopes. To determine whether increased tolerance to disinfectants may have contributed to the outbreak, we investigated the susceptibility of the outbreak strain to disinfectants commonly used for duodenoscope reprocessing. Disinfection efficacy was tested on planktonic bacteria and on biofilm. METHODS: Disinfectant efficacy testing was performed for planktonic bacteria according to EN standards 13727 and 14561 and for biofilm using the Bead Assay for Biofilms. Disinfection was defined as ≥ 5log10 reduction in recoverable colony forming units (CFU). RESULTS: The outbreak strain was an OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae of sequence type 101. We found a slightly increased tolerance of the outbreak strain in planktonic form to peracetic acid (PAA), but not to other disinfectants tested. Since PAA was the disinfectant used for duodenoscope reprocessing, we investigated the effect of PAA on biofilm of the outbreak strain. Remarkably, disinfection of biofilm of the outbreak strain could not be achieved by the standard PAA concentration used for duodenoscope reprocessing at the time of outbreak. An increased tolerance to PAA was not observed in a K. pneumoniae type strain tested in parallel. CONCLUSIONS: Biofilm of the K. pneumoniae outbreak strain was tolerant to standard disinfection during duodenoscope reprocessing. This study establishes for the first time a direct link between biofilm formation, increased tolerance to disinfectants, reprocessing failure of duodenoscopes and nosocomial transmission of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae.

Reduction of antibacterial use in patients with very low birth weight on German NICUs after implementation of a mandatory surveillance system. A longitudinal study with national data from 2013 to 2019.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the influence of a national surveillance system for neonates (NEO-KISS) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) on consumption of antibacterial and to identify risk factors for prescriptions. METHODS: Data on antibacterial use between 2013 and 2019 from 231 NICUs in Germany was analyzed in this longitudinal study after introduction of a mandatory module for surveillance of antibacterial consumption in preterm infants. 59,411 newborns with a birth weight under 1500 gs were under surveillance in NEO-KISS during the study period. We report the development of antibacterial consumption during the days of treatment (DOT)/1000 patient days (PD) including the name of the substance administered. Risk factors for antibacterial treatment over time were analyzed. RESULTS: A total, 2,090,341 surveillance patient days were monitored. Antibacterial consumption was 430.4 DOT/1000PD (Median 380.3; IQR: 284.2-502.7). Antibacterial use significantly decreased by 19.5% from 2013, 474.3 DOT/1000PD to 382.1 DOT/1000PD in 2019. Use of penicillins with extended spectrum (J01CA), other aminoglycosides (J01GB), glycopeptide antibacterials (J01XA and J01DH), and third-generation cephalosporins (J01DD) decreased, while use of macrolides (J01FA) and combinations of penicillins, including beta-lactamase inhibitors (J01CR), increased over time. Regression analysis identified year of birth as an independent protective factor for the prescription of antibacterials in general. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a national mandatory surveillance system was associated with a reduction in antibacterial consumption in preterm infants with VLBW. Surveillance of antibacterial use is an integral part of targeting antimicrobial stewardship efforts.

[Process for the Implementation of Evidence-Based Parenteral Nutrition in German Perinatal Centres - Outcomes of a Multidisciplinary Network]. / Prozess zur Implementierung Evidenzbasierter Parenteraler Ernährung in Deutschen Perinatalzentren ­ Ergebnisse eines Multidisziplinären Netzwerks.

INTRODUCTION: Parenteral nutrition, usually indicated for preterm infants with a birthweight<1500 g and sick newborns, enables the supply with critical nutrients. As a high degree of therapy safety is required, a European guideline provides recommendations for safe therapy procedures. The present project aimed to evaluate the implementation of the European guideline in German perinatal centers and to identify possible barriers that impede its implementation. A further goal was to develop solution approaches to overcome possible barriers. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multidisciplinary cooperation conducted an online survey questioning the current implementation procedures of the European guideline among pediatricians and hospital pharmacists. Results show barriers in the provisioning process of parenteral nutrition that hinder a guideline-compliant implementation in practice. Based on results of this survey, an expert network developed an interactive toolkit with simplified guideline recommendations, guideline-compliant advice for practice, best-practice examples, forms, and handouts. It seeks to encourage critical reflection of routine processes and provides concrete solutions to overcome barriers in practice. CONCLUSION: The current procedures related to parenteral nutrition deviate from guideline recommendations. The developed toolkit provides practice-oriented support aiming to enhance the guideline-compliant implementation of parenteral nutrition in perinatal centers.

Risk factors for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients: results from a retrospective matched case-control study in a tertiary care university center.

BACKGROUND: Factors contributing to the spread of SARS-CoV-2 outside the acute care hospital setting have been described in detail. However, data concerning risk factors for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections in hospitalized patients remain scarce. To close this research gap and inform targeted measures for the prevention of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections, we analyzed nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 cases in our hospital during a defined time period. METHODS: Data on nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections in hospitalized patients that occurred between May 2020 and January 2021 at Charité university hospital in Berlin, Germany, were retrospectively gathered. A SARS-CoV-2 infection was considered nosocomial if the patient was admitted with a negative SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test and subsequently tested positive on day five or later. As the incubation period of SARS-CoV-2 can be longer than five days, we defined a subgroup of "definite" nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 cases, with a negative test on admission and a positive test after day 10, for which we conducted a matched case-control study with a one to one ratio of cases and controls. We employed a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors significantly increasing the likelihood of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections. RESULTS: A total of 170 patients with a nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. The majority of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 patients (n = 157, 92%) had been treated at wards that reported an outbreak of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 cases during their stay or up to 14 days later. For 76 patients with definite nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections, controls for the case-control study were matched. For this subgroup, the multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed documented contact to SARS-CoV-2 cases (odds ratio: 23.4 (95% confidence interval: 4.6-117.7)) and presence at a ward that experienced a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak (odds ratio: 15.9 (95% confidence interval: 2.5-100.8)) to be the principal risk factors for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS: With known contact to SARS-CoV-2 cases and outbreak association revealed as the primary risk factors, our findings confirm known causes of SARS-CoV-2 infections and demonstrate that these also apply to the acute care hospital setting. This underscores the importance of rapidly identifying exposed patients and taking adequate preventive measures.

Implementation of an automated cluster alert system into the routine work of infection control and hospital epidemiology: experiences from a tertiary care university hospital.

BACKGROUND: Early detection of clusters of pathogens is crucial for infection prevention and control (IPC) in hospitals. Conventional manual cluster detection is usually restricted to certain areas of the hospital and multidrug resistant organisms. Automation can increase the comprehensiveness of cluster surveillance without depleting human resources. We aimed to describe the application of an automated cluster alert system (CLAR) in the routine IPC work in a hospital. Additionally, we aimed to provide information on the clusters detected and their properties. METHODS: CLAR was continuously utilized during the year 2019 at Charité university hospital. CLAR analyzed microbiological and patient-related data to calculate a pathogen-baseline for every ward. Daily, this baseline was compared to data of the previous 14 days. If the baseline was exceeded, a cluster alert was generated and sent to the IPC team. From July 2019 onwards, alerts were systematically categorized as relevant or non-relevant at the discretion of the IPC physician in charge. RESULTS: In one year, CLAR detected 1,714 clusters. The median number of isolates per cluster was two. The most common cluster pathogens were Enterococcus faecium (n = 326, 19 %), Escherichia coli (n = 274, 16 %) and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 250, 15 %). The majority of clusters (n = 1,360, 79 %) comprised of susceptible organisms. For 906 alerts relevance assessment was performed, with 317 (35 %) alerts being classified as relevant. CONCLUSIONS: CLAR demonstrated the capability of detecting small clusters and clusters of susceptible organisms. Future improvements must aim to reduce the number of non-relevant alerts without impeding detection of relevant clusters. Digital solutions to IPC represent a considerable potential for improved patient care. Systems such as CLAR could be adapted to other hospitals and healthcare settings, and thereby serve as a means to fulfill these potentials.

SARS-Coronavirus-2 cases in healthcare workers may not regularly originate from patient care: lessons from a university hospital on the underestimated risk of healthcare worker to healthcare worker transmission.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) represents an unprecedented healthcare challenge. Various SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in healthcare facilities have been reported. Healthcare workers (HCWs) may play a critical role in the spread of the virus, particularly when asymptomatic. We examined four healthcare-associated outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 infections that occurred at a university hospital in Berlin, Germany. We aimed to describe and analyze the spread of the virus in order to draw conclusions for effective containment of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare facilities. METHODS: Healthcare-associated outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 infections were defined as two or more laboratory confirmed infections with SARS-CoV-2 where an epidemiological link within the healthcare setting appeared likely. We focused our analysis on one of three sites of the Charité-University Medicine hospital within a 2 month period (March and April 2020). RESULTS: We observed four healthcare-associated outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 infections, with a total of 24 infected persons (23 HCWs and one patient). The outbreaks were detected in the departments of nephrology and dialysis (n = 9), anesthesiology (n = 8), surgical pediatrics (n = 4), and neurology (n = 3). Each outbreak showed multiple unprotected contacts between infected HCWs. A combination of contact tracing, testing, physical distancing and mandatory continuous wearing of face masks by all HCWs was able to contain all four outbreaks. CONCLUSIONS: HCW to HCW transmission represented the likely source of the four outbreaks. Ensuring proper physical distancing measures and wearing of protective equipment, also when interacting with colleagues, must be a key aspect of fighting COVID-19 in healthcare facilities.

Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infections at a testing site in Berlin, Germany, March and April 2020-a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: In Berlin, the first public severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing site started 1 day after the first case in the city occurred. We describe epidemiological and clinical characteristics and aim at identifying risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 detection during the first 6 weeks of operation. METHODS: Testing followed national recommendations, but was also based on the physician's discretion. We related patient characteristics to SARS-CoV-2 test positivity for exploratory analyses using a cross-sectional, observational study design. RESULTS: Between 3 March and 13 April 2020, 5179 individuals attended the site (median age 34 years; interquartile range 26-47 years). The median time since disease onset was 4 days (interquartile range 2-7 days). Among 4333 persons tested, 333 (7.7%) were positive. Test positivity increased up to 10.3% (96/929) during the first 3 weeks and then declined, paralleling Germany's lock-down and the course of the epidemic in Berlin. Strict adherence to testing guidelines resulted in 10.4% (262/2530) test positivity, compared with 3.9% (71/1803) among individuals tested for other indications. A nightclub was a transmission hotspot; 27.7% (26/94) of one night's visitors were found positive. Smell and/or taste dysfunction indicated coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with 85.6% specificity (95% CI 82.1%-88.1%). Four per cent (14/333) of those infected were asymptomatic. Risk factors for detection of SARS-CoV-2 infection were recent contact with a positive case (second week after contact, OR 3.42; 95% CI 2.48-4.71), travel to regions of high pandemic activity (e.g. Austria, OR 4.16; 95% CI 2.48-6.99), recent onset of symptoms (second week, OR 3.61; 95% CI 1.87-6.98) and an impaired sense of smell/taste (4.08; 95% CI 2.36-7.03). CONCLUSIONS: In this young population, early-onset presentation of COVID-19 resembled flu-like symptoms, except for smell and/or taste dysfunction. Risk factors for SARS-CoV-2 detection were return from regions with high incidence and contact with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 cases, particularly when tests were administered within the first 2 weeks after contact and/or onset of symptoms.

Screening for Third-Generation Cephalosporin-Resistant Bacteria Reduces the Incidence on Late-Onset Sepsis and Antibiotic use in Neonates.

BACKGROUND: The extensive use of antibiotics is reflected by an increasing prevalence of infections with multidrug-resistant bacteria, including third-generation cephalosporin-resistant bacteria (3GCRB). For neonatal intensive care units screening and enhanced barrier precautions are recommended to control the spread of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, while evidence for efficacy of barrier precautions remains scarce in a non-outbreak setting. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a screening program for maternal 3GCRB colonization and the effects of contact precautions and cohort nursing, concerning the risk of neonatal late-onset sepsis (LOS) and antibiotic use rates (AURs). STUDY DESIGN: In a retrospective matched-pair cohort study, data of neonates exposed to maternal 3GCRB colonization were compared with findings in non-exposed neonates. RESULTS: Of 3,144 neonates admitted, 184 neonates born to 3GCRB-positive mothers were eligible. Among them, 37 (20%) became 3GCRB positive during hospital stay. 3GCRB-exposed infants had a lower rate of LOS (6.5 vs. 14.1%, p=0.03) and lower AURs in that time period compared to controls (mean 0.009 vs. 0.025, p=0.006). When started within the first 72h after birth, days of therapy with meropenem were significantly lower in non-exposed vs. 3GCRB-exposed infants (mean 0.13 vs. 0.42; p=0.002). No invasive infections with 3GCRB occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Neonates of 3GCRB-positive mothers do not have an increased a priori risk for invasive 3GCRB infection and may benefit from enhanced contact precautions measures. HINTERGRUND: Der zunehmende Einsatz von Antibiotika führt zu einem Anstieg von Infektionen mit multiresistenten Erregern wie z. B. Drittgeneration Cephalosporin-resistenten Bakterien (3GCRB). Empfehlungen zu Screening- und Kohortierungsmaßnahmen auf neonatologischen Intensivstationen zielen auf die Prävention von horizontaler Transmission und invasiven Infektionen ab. Für Nicht-Ausbruchssituationen ist die Evidenz für Hygienemaßnahmen und Screeningprogrammen unzureichend. ZIEL: Evaluation eines Screening für mütterliche 3GCRB-Besiedlung mit nachfolgender Isolation bzw. Kohortenpflege des Neugeborenen (NG) unter Bezug auf das Risiko einer Late-Onset-Sepsis (LOS) und die Anzahl der Antibiotika-Tage (AUR). STUDIENDESIGN: In einer retrospektiven Fall-Kontroll-Kohortenstudie wurden Daten von NG mit maternaler 3GCRB-Besiedelung im Vergleich zu einer Kontrollgruppe mit unauffälligem Screening analysiert. ERGEBNISSE: In einer Kohorte von 3144 NG fanden sich 184 NG von 3GCRB-besiedelten Müttern. Bei 37 (20%) wurde im Verlauf eine Besiedelung mit 3GCRB nachgewiesen. In der Gruppe der 3GCRB-exponierten NG kam es seltener zu einer LOS (6,5 vs. 14,1%, p=0,03). Zwischen dem 4. Lebenstag und der Entlassung hatten 3GCRB-exponierte NG eine niedrigere AUR (Mittelwert 0,009 vs. 0,025, p=0,006) als die Kontrollgruppe. Die Behandlungstage mit Meropenem (Start in den ersten 3 Lebenstagen), war in der Kontrollgruppe signifikant geringer als in der 3GCRB-exponierten Gruppe (Mittelwert 0,13 vs. 0,43 Tage; p=0,002). In beiden Gruppen trat keine invasive Infektion mit 3GCRB auf. SCHLUSSFOLGERUNG: Neugeborene, deren Mütter 3GCRB besiedelt sind, haben kein erhöhtes a priori Risiko für eine invasive Infektion mit 3GCRB Erregern und profitieren wahrscheinlich von erweiterten Kohortierungs- und Isolationsmaßnahmen.

Lean back and wait for the alarm? Testing an automated alarm system for nosocomial outbreaks to provide support for infection control professionals.

INTRODUCTION: Outbreaks of communicable diseases in hospitals need to be quickly detected in order to enable immediate control. The increasing digitalization of hospital data processing offers potential solutions for automated outbreak detection systems (AODS). Our goal was to assess a newly developed AODS. METHODS: Our AODS was based on the diagnostic results of routine clinical microbiological examinations. The system prospectively counted detections per bacterial pathogen over time for the years 2016 and 2017. The baseline data covers data from 2013-2015. The comparative analysis was based on six different mathematical algorithms (normal/Poisson and score prediction intervals, the early aberration reporting system, negative binomial CUSUMs, and the Farrington algorithm). The clusters automatically detected were then compared with the results of our manual outbreak detection system. RESULTS: During the analysis period, 14 different hospital outbreaks were detected as a result of conventional manual outbreak detection. Based on the pathogens' overall incidence, outbreaks were divided into two categories: outbreaks with rarely detected pathogens (sporadic) and outbreaks with often detected pathogens (endemic). For outbreaks with sporadic pathogens, the detection rate of our AODS ranged from 83% to 100%. Every algorithm detected 6 of 7 outbreaks with a sporadic pathogen. The AODS identified outbreaks with an endemic pathogen were at a detection rate of 33% to 100%. For endemic pathogens, the results varied based on the epidemiological characteristics of each outbreak and pathogen. CONCLUSION: AODS for hospitals based on routine microbiological data is feasible and can provide relevant benefits for infection control teams. It offers in-time automated notification of suspected pathogen clusters especially for sporadically occurring pathogens. However, outbreaks of endemically detected pathogens need further individual pathogen-specific and setting-specific adjustments.

Implementación de NeoKissEs en España: un sistema validado de vigilancia de la sepsis nosocomial en recién nacidos de muy bajo peso / mplementation of NeoKissEs in Spain: A validated surveillance system for nosocomial sepsis in very low birth weight infants

Antecedentes: Las sepsis son las infecciones nosocomiales más frecuentes en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos Neonatales (UCIN), afectando especialmente a los recién nacidos de muy bajo peso al nacer (RNMBP, ≤ 1.500 g). Un sistema de vigilancia epidemiológica puede contribuir a su prevención mediante una evaluación continua de su frecuencia y factores de riesgo asociados. El objetivo de este artículo es describir la implementación del sistema de vigilancia de las sepsis nosocomiales en RNMBP (NeoKissEs) en un grupo de UCIN españolas. Métodos: Estudio de cohorte de RNMBP con < 28 días de edad ingresados en las UCIN participantes. Dos UCIN tradujeron y adaptaron materiales a partir del sistema original alemán NEO-KISS. Durante la implementación, se desarrollaron 8talleres formativos, con participación de 210 profesionales. Se creó un sistema web para la introducción de datos de pacientes y episodios de sepsis, su monitorización, análisis comparativo y retroalimentación a las unidades. En cada UCIN, un neonatólogo fue responsable de la implementación, recogiendo información sobre las dificultades percibidas durante el proceso. Resultados: De 50 unidades que aceptaron participar, 45 utilizaron NeoKissEs durante la fase de implementación, registrando 1.108 episodios de sepsis asociados a catéter vascular en 3.638 neonatos, con una tasa de 18,4 episodios por 1.000 pacientes-día con catéter (IC del 95%: 17,8-19,1). Conclusiones: El sistema de vigilancia epidemiológica NeoKissEs representa una fuente útil de información para la comparación estandarizada de la incidencia de sepsis de las UCIN, evaluar factores de riesgo y facilitar la evaluación del efecto de futuras intervenciones preventivas

Background: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are the most frequent nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), especially in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (birth weight ≤ 1500 g). An epidemiologic surveillance system may contribute to the prevention of infection by continuous monitoring of its frequency and associated risk factors. The aim of this article was to describe the implementation of the NeoKissEs surveillance system for BSIs in VLBW newborns in a group of Spanish NICUs. Methods: We assessed the clinical cohort consisting of all VLBW newborns aged less than 28 days admitted to the participating units. In the pilot phase, 2NICUs translated and adapted materials from the original German NEO-KISS system. During implementation, 210 health care professionals attended one of 8 educational workshops. A web-based system was created that allows entering data regarding patients and BSI episodes, data monitoring, benchmarking and providing feedback to the units. At each NICU, one neonatologist was responsible for the implementation of the system and reporting the difficulties perceived throughout the process. Results: Out of the 50 units that agreed to participate, 45 successfully started using the surveillance platform during the implementation phase, recording 1108 episodes of catheter-associated BSI (CABSI) in 3638 newborns, and finding an overall rate of CABSI of 18.4 (95% CI, 17.8-19.1) per 1000 catheter days. Conclusions: The NeoKissEs surveillance system constitutes a helpful source of information for the purpose of benchmarking the performance of neonatal units, assessing factors associated with BSI in VLBW infants and measuring the impact of future preventive interventions in NICUs

[Implementation of NeoKissEs in Spain: A validated surveillance system for nosocomial sepsis in very low birth weight infants]. / Implementación de NeoKissEs en España: un sistema validado de vigilancia de la sepsis nosocomial en recién nacidos de muy bajo peso.

BACKGROUND: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are the most frequent nosocomial infections in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs), especially in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants (birth weight ≤ 1500g). An epidemiologic surveillance system may contribute to the prevention of infection by continuous monitoring of its frequency and associated risk factors. The aim of this article was to describe the implementation of the NeoKissEs surveillance system for BSIs in VLBW newborns in a group of Spanish NICUs. METHODS: We assessed the clinical cohort consisting of all VLBW newborns aged less than 28 days admitted to the participating units. In the pilot phase, 2NICUs translated and adapted materials from the original German NEO-KISS system. During implementation, 210 health care professionals attended one of 8 educational workshops. A web-based system was created that allows entering data regarding patients and BSI episodes, data monitoring, benchmarking and providing feedback to the units. At each NICU, one neonatologist was responsible for the implementation of the system and reporting the difficulties perceived throughout the process. RESULTS: Out of the 50 units that agreed to participate, 45 successfully started using the surveillance platform during the implementation phase, recording 1108 episodes of catheter-associated BSI (CABSI) in 3638 newborns, and finding an overall rate of CABSI of 18.4 (95% CI, 17.8-19.1) per 1000 catheter days. CONCLUSIONS: The NeoKissEs surveillance system constitutes a helpful source of information for the purpose of benchmarking the performance of neonatal units, assessing factors associated with BSI in VLBW infants and measuring the impact of future preventive interventions in NICUs.

Antimicrobial usage in German acute care hospitals: results of the third national point prevalence survey and comparison with previous national point prevalence surveys.

Objectives: Previous point prevalence surveys (PPSs) revealed the potential for improving antimicrobial usage (AU) in German acute care hospitals. Data from the 2016 German national PPS on healthcare-associated infections and AU were used to evaluate efforts in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Methods: A national PPS in Germany was organized by the German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections in 2016 as part of the European PPS initiated by the ECDC. The data were collected in May and June 2016. Results were compared with data from the PPS 2011. Results: A total of 218 hospitals with 64 412 observed patients participated in the PPS 2016. The prevalence of patients with AU was 25.9% (95% CI 25.6%-26.3%). No significant increase or decrease in AU prevalence was revealed in the group of all participating hospitals. Prolonged surgical prophylaxis was found to be common (56.1% of all surgical prophylaxes on the prevalence day), but significantly less prevalent than in 2011 (P < 0.01). The most frequently administered antimicrobial groups were penicillins plus ß-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) (23.2%), second-generation cephalosporins (12.9%) and fluoroquinolones (11.3%). Significantly more penicillins plus BLIs and fewer second-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones were used in 2016. Overall, an increase in the consumption of broad-spectrum antimicrobials was noted. For 68.7% of all administered antimicrobials, the indication was documented in the patient notes. Conclusions: The current data reaffirm the points of improvement that previous data identified and reveal that recent efforts in AMS in German hospitals require further intensification.

The Prevalence of Nosocomial Infection and Antibiotic Use in German Hospitals.

BACKGROUND: In 2011 and again in 2016, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) asked all European countries to carry out nationwide studies on the prevalence of nosocomial infection (NI) and antibiotic use (AU). Data on NI and AU constitute an essential basis for the development of measures to prevent infection and lessen antibiotic resistance. METHODS: The German prevalence study of 2016 was carried out according to the ECDC protocol. Alongside a sample of 49 acute-care hospitals requested by the ECDC that was representative in terms of size (number of beds), further hospitals were invited to participate as well. Analyses were made of the overall group (218 hospitals, 64 412 patients), the representative group (49 hospitals), and the core group (46 hospitals). The core group consisted of the hospitals that had participated in the study of 2011. RESULTS: The prevalence of patients with NI was 4.6% in the overall group in 2016; it had been 5.1% in 2011 (p <0.01). In the representative group, the prevalence was 3.6% (compared to 5.1% in 2011, p <0.01). In the core group, the prevalence of NI was the same in 2016 as it had been in 2011. The prevalence of patients with ABU in the overall group remained the same, but a fall was seen in the representative group (21.5% versus 23.3%; p <0.01) and a rise in the core group (27.3% versus 26.2%; p = 0.02). The staff-patient ratio among the infection prevention and control professionals improved in all three groups. CONCLUSION: A decrease in NI and AU prevalence was seen in the representative group, while mixed results were seen in the other analyzed groups. Further efforts to reduce NI and ABA are clearly necessary.

Pathogen-specific mortality in very low birth weight infants with primary bloodstream infection.

OBJECTIVE: Mortality in very low birth weight infants following microbiology confirmed primary bloodstream infections varies with the type of causative pathogen. Given evidence from other studies that infections with gram negative bacteria and fungi cause a higher case fatality risk. We tried to confirm this in a nation-wide multi-center trial. METHODS: A cohort of 55,465 very low birth weight infants from 242 neonatal departments participating in the German national neonatal infection surveillance system NEO-KISS was used to investigate differences in the case fatality risk of microbiology confirmed primary bloodstream infections according to individual pathogens. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed with the outcomes death and time from microbiology confirmed primary bloodstream infections. The results were adjusted to the recorded risk factors and hospital and department characteristics. RESULTS: A total of 4 094 very low birth weight infants with microbiology confirmed primary bloodstream infections were included in the analysis. The crude case fatality risk was 5.7%. The Cox proportional hazard regression analysis with adjustment for available risk factors revealed that microbiology confirmed primary bloodstream infections caused by Klebsiella spp. (HR 3.17 CI95 1.69-5.95), Enterobacter spp. (HR 3.42 CI95 1.86-6.27), Escherichia coli (HR 3.32 CI95 1.84-6.00) and Serratia spp. (HR 3.30 CI95 1.44-7.57) were associated with significantly higher case fatality risk compared to Staphylococcus aureus. After adjusting, case fatality risk of Candida albicans causing microbiology confirmed primary bloodstream infections was not higher than that of S. aureus. CONCLUSION: In very low birth weight infants, bloodstream infections caused by gram negative pathogens have an increased case fatality risk compared to bloodstream infections caused by gram positive pathogens. This should be considered for prevention and therapy. Further research should address the specific risk factors for case fatality of C. albicans bloodstream infections.