Initial experience with dual-layer detector spectral CT for diagnosis of blood or contrast after endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke.

PURPOSE: To determine whether spectral detector CT (SDCT) with a plain non-enhanced monochromatic CT, a water-weighted image after iodine removal, an iodine map, and Mono energetic images changes the diagnosis and classification of intracranial hemorrhage based on single energy CT after endovascular treatment (EVT) for ischemic stroke. METHODS: Two readers evaluated single energy and SD CT data collected from 63 patients within one week after EVT. They diagnosed ICH or contrast staining, and graded ICH according to the Heidelberg and Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) classification. Differences in diagnosis between single energy and SD CT were tested with Pearson's chi-squared test. Diagnostic values of single energy CT were calculated. Interrater agreement was based on Cohen's Kappa. RESULTS: When spectral data were added to single energy CT, the diagnosis of ICH changed in 8 CT scans (13%): in 4, the diagnosis of ICH was rejected and in 4, initially undetected ICH was diagnosed. In an additional 3 patients, the ICH grade was modified. CT alone had 88% sensitivity, 87% specificity, 88% positive diagnostic value, 87% negative diagnostic value, and 87% overall accuracy for ICH compared to SDCT. Interreader agreement on the presence of ICH was 0.84 (95% CI 0.51-0.86) for spectral CT and 0.84 (95% CI 0.73-0.97) for single energy CT. CONCLUSION: SD CT after endovascular treatment contributes to the distinction between intracranial hemorrhage and contrast staining.

A novel abdominal wall entry suction device to increase Veress needle safety: A prospective cohort pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In laparoscopic surgery, the Veress needle technique is most often used to initiate a pneumoperitoneum. Although low, entry-related injuries of the intestines and major vascular structures occur in 0.04-0.1% of cases. Up to 50% of these injuries remain undiagnosed at the time of surgery, resulting in mortality rates between 2.5 and 30%. In an effort to minimize such injuries we objectively assessed a novel abdominal wall entry suction device (AWESD) that was hypothesized to lift the abdominal wall and create an additional post-peritoneum safe margin for safer Veress needle introduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective pilot study was conducted in which CT-scans with and without AWESD application (centered above the umbilicus) were assessed to determine its effect on the distance from the linea alba to the intestines, vena cava and abdominal aorta. Paired measurements were subjected to the Wilcoxon signed rank test. RESULTS: Twelve participants were included. The AWESD significantly increased the median distance towards the intestines in the axial and sagittal plane (P = 0.01 and P = 0.006) from 0.93 (Inter Quartile Range (IQR): 0.33-1.51) and 0.85 (IQR: 0.32-1.47) to 1.35 (IQR: 0.39-2.27) and 1.25 (IQR: 0.42-2.10) centimeters, respectively. Similarly, for the median axial distances towards the vena cava and abdominal aorta (both P = 0.002) that were increased from 10.00 (IQR: 7.18-11.12) and 9.33 (IQR: 6.55-10.28) to 13.23 (IQR: 11.76-14.31) and 12.49 (IQR: 10.98-13.32) centimeters, respectively. CONCLUSION: The AWESD significantly increased the distances between the peritoneum and main intra-abdominal structures. However, conclusions on subsequent increased safety cannot be drawn as high-volume studies are required to determine its clinical relevance.

Diagnosing Internal Herniation After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery: Literature Overview, Cadaver Study and the Added Value of 3D CT Angiography.

PURPOSE: The purposes of the study are to outline the complexity of diagnosing internal herniation after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery and to investigate the added value of computed tomography angiography (CTA) for diagnosing internal herniation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cadaver study was performed to investigate the manifestations of internal hernias and mesenteric vascularization. Furthermore, a prospective, ethics approved study with retrospective interpretation was conducted. Ten patients, clinically suspected for internal herniation, were prospectively included. After informed consent was obtained, these subjects underwent abdominal CT examination, including additional arterial phase CTA. All subjects underwent diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected internal herniation. The CTA was used to create a 3D reconstruction of the mesenteric arteries and surgical staples (3D CTA). The 3D CTA was interpreted, taking into account the presence and type of internal hernia that was found upon laparoscopy. RESULTS: Cadaveric analysis demonstrated the complexity of internal herniation. It also confirmed the expected changes in vascular structure and surgical staple arrangement in the presence of internal herniation. 3D CTA studies of the subjects with active internal hernias demonstrated remarkable differences when compared to control 3D CTA studies. The blood supply of herniated intestinal limbs in particular showed abnormal trajectories. Additionally, enteroenterostomy staple lines had migrated or altered orientation. CONCLUSION: 3D CTA is a promising technique for diagnosing active internal hernias. Our findings suggest that for diagnosing internal hernias, focus should probably shift from routine abdominal CT examination towards the 3D assessment of the mesenteric vasculature and surgical staples.

Tailored imaging of islet cell tumors of the pancreas amidst increasing options.

Pancreatic islet cell tumors are neuroendocrine tumors, which can produce hormones and can arise as part of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 or von-Hippel-Lindau-disease, two genetically well-defined hereditary cancer syndromes. Currently, technical innovation improves conventional and specific molecular imaging techniques. To organize the heterogeneous results described for the imaging of these tumors, we distinguished three indications (1) imaging of a patient with hormone hypersecretion, (2) search for a pancreatic primary in case of proven neuroendocrine cancer of unknown primary, and (3) screening of asymptomatic mutation carriers. We searched for publications on imaging of islet cell tumors between 1995 and January 2010 and defined a Level of Evidence (LOE) for the applicability of each technique. For each technique, data were analyzed in a Forest plot and arranged per imaging indication and tumor subtype. LOEs are weak for all imaging techniques. Analyses indicate a prominent role for endoscopic ultrasound for all three indications.

6-[F-18]Fluoro-L-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography is superior to conventional imaging with (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy, computer tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in localizing tumors causing catecholamine excess.

CONTEXT: Catecholamine excess is rare, but symptoms may be life threatening. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to investigate the sensitivity of 6-[F-18]fluoro-l-dihydroxyphenylalanine positron emission tomography ((18)F-DOPA PET), compared with (123)I-metaiodobenzylguanidine ((123)I-MIBG) scintigraphy and computer tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for tumor localization in patients with catecholamine excess. DESIGN AND SETTING: All consecutive patients with catecholamine excess visiting the University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands, between March 2003 and January 2008 were eligible. PATIENTS: Forty-eight patients were included. The final diagnosis was pheochromocytoma in 40, adrenal hyperplasia in two, paraganglioma in two, ganglioneuroma in one, and unknown in three. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivities and discordancy between (18)F-DOPA PET, (123)I-MIBG, and CT or MRI were analyzed for individual patients and lesions. Metanephrines and 3-methoxytyramine in plasma and urine and uptake of (18)F-DOPA with PET were measured to determine the whole-body metabolic burden and correlated with biochemical tumor activity. The gold standard was a composite reference standard. RESULTS: (18)F-DOPA PET showed lesions in 43 patients, (123)I-MIBG in 31, and CT/MRI in 32. Patient-based sensitivity for (18)F-DOPA PET, (123)I-MIBG, and CT/MRI was 90, 65, and 67% (P < 0.01 for (18)F-DOPA PET vs. both (123)I-MIBG and CT/MRI, P = 1.0 (123)I-MIBG vs. CT/MRI). Lesion-based sensitivities were 73, 48, and 44% (P < 0.001 for (18)F-DOPA PET vs. both (123)I-MIBG and CT/MRI, P = 0.51 (123)I-MIBG vs. CT/MRI). The combination of (18)F-DOPA PET with CT/MRI was superior to (123)I-MIBG with CT/MRI (93 vs. 76%, P < 0.001). Whole-body metabolic burden measured with (18)F-DOPA PET correlated with plasma normetanephrine (r = 0.82), urinary normetanephrine (r = 0.84), and metanephrine (r = 0.57). CONCLUSION: To localize tumors causing catecholamine excess, (18)F-DOPA PET is superior to (123)I-MIBG scintigraphy and CT/MRI.

Colorectal liver metastases: CT, MR imaging, and PET for diagnosis--meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: To perform a meta-analysis to obtain sensitivity estimates of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for detection of colorectal liver metastases on per-patient and per-lesion bases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CANCERLIT databases and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched for relevant original articles published from January 1990 to December 2003. Criteria for inclusion of articles were as follows: Articles were reported in the English, German, or French language; CT, MR imaging, or FDG PET was performed to identify and characterize colorectal liver metastases; histopathologic analysis (surgery, biopsy, or autopsy), intraoperative observation (manual palpatation, intraoperative ultrasonography [US]), and/or follow-up US was the reference standard; and data were sufficient for calculation of true-positive or false-negative values. A random-effects linear regression model was used to obtain sensitivity estimates in assessment of liver metastases. RESULTS: Of 165 identified relevant articles, 61 fulfilled all inclusion criteria. Sensitivity estimates on a per-patient basis for nonhelical CT, helical CT, 1.5-T MR imaging, and FDG PET were 60.2%, 64.7%, 75.8%, and 94.6%, respectively; FDG PET was the most accurate modality. On a per-lesion basis, sensitivity estimates for nonhelical CT, helical CT, 1.0-T MR imaging, 1.5-T MR imaging, and FDG PET were 52.3%, 63.8%, 66.1%, 64.4%, and 75.9%, respectively; nonhelical CT had lowest sensitivity. Estimates of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-enhanced MR imaging were significantly better, compared with nonenhanced MR imaging (P = .019 and P < .001, respectively) and with helical CT with 45 g of iodine or less (P = .02 and P < .001, respectively). For lesions of 1 cm or larger, SPIO-enhanced MR imaging was the most accurate modality (P < .001). CONCLUSION: FDG PET had significantly higher sensitivity on a per-patient basis, compared with that of the other modalities, but not on a per-lesion basis. Sensitivity estimates for MR imaging with contrast agent were significantly superior to those for helical CT with 45 g of iodine or less.

Quantitative analysis of focal masses at MR imaging: a plea for standardization.

PURPOSE: To assess the effects of changing analytic method variables on the signal intensity (SI) difference-to-noise ratios (SDNRs) for the contrast between lesions and background organs depicted on magnetic resonance (MR) images and to propose a standardized analytic method for the quantitative analysis of focal masses seen at MR imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The SIs of 48 liver metastases (originating from colorectal cancer) in 20 patients, the surrounding liver parenchyma, and the background noise were measured on T2-weighted MR images. All 2000 and 2001 issues of the American Journal of Roentgenology, the Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Radiology were searched for articles describing quantitative analyses. SDNRs were calculated by using formulas from these articles and various region-of-interest (ROI) locations to measure metastasis and background noise SIs. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the various SDNR calculations. RESULTS: In 34 articles in which quantitative analyses of focal masses are described, the reported SDNRs were calculated with four different formulas. The SDNRs for our study material calculated with the four formulas reported in the literature differed grossly in both number and unit. The SDNRs for ROIs encompassing the entire metastasis differed significantly (P =.034) from the SDNRs for ROIs in a homogeneous area of the metastasis margin. Differences in SDNRs between various noise ROI locations were significant (P <.022). CONCLUSION: Slight changes in the variables of quantitative analysis of focal masses had marked effects on reported SDNRs. To overcome these effects, the use of a standardized method involving one formula, a lesion ROI in a homogeneous area at the metastasis margin, and a background noise ROI along the phase-encoding axis in the air (including systematic noise) is proposed for the quantitative analysis of findings on magnitude MR images.

Isolated hepatic perfusion with high-dose melphalan for the treatment of uveal melanoma metastases confined to the liver.

Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular tumour in adults. After treatment of the primary tumour, up to 50% of patients will ultimately develop metastases. Treatment options for metastases are limited. When uveal melanoma metastases are confined to the liver, isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) could be a treatment option. Herein, we report the results of a small group of patients with uveal melanoma metastases of the liver treated with IHP. Eight patients with uveal melanoma metastases confined to the liver underwent IHP with high-dose melphalan (200 mg) for 1 h. Toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria and tumour response was assessed according to World Health Organization criteria. The tumour response rate (complete or partial remission) was 50%. The median time to progression was 6.7 months (range, 1.7-16.9 months). The overall median survival was 9.9 months (range, 4.7-34.6 months), with a 1 year survival of 50% and a 2 year survival of 37.5%. Three patients experienced grade 3-4 hepatotoxicity which was transient within 3 months. Although only a small group of patients has been treated and evaluated so far, IHP is a treatment option for uveal melanoma metastases confined to the liver which can result in tumour responses and may lead to survival benefits in a selective group of patients.

Metastases of colorectal carcinoma: comparison of soft- and hard-copy helical CT interpretation.

PURPOSE: To compare soft- and hard-copy computed tomographic (CT) image interpretation with regard to evaluation time and detection rates for hepatic and extrahepatic colorectal metastases in candidates for liver surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 20 patients with a history of colorectal carcinoma, two radiologists independently evaluated CT data sets. Focal hepatic lesions were characterized as benign or malignant by using a five-point scale. In each patient, soft-copy readouts and hard-copy printouts were compared for nonenhanced hepatic, contrast material-enhanced hepatic, and contrast-enhanced extrahepatic data sets. A stopwatch was used to document evaluation time. Ninety-two hepatic metastases and six extrahepatic metastatic recurrences were detected with the standard of reference--surgical, intraoperative ultrasonographic, and histologic findings. RESULTS: Both observers evaluated the contrast-enhanced hepatic data set significantly faster (P =.026 and.009) by using soft-copy readouts. The contrast-enhanced extrahepatic data set was also evaluated significantly faster (P =.010 and.006) with soft-copy readouts. Detection of hepatic and extrahepatic tumor with soft-copy readouts is not significantly superior to that with hard copies. Detection rates of hepatic metastases for nonenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT for both observers ranged from 50%-80% (46-74 of 92) for soft-copy readouts and 46%-75% (42-69 of 92) for hard copies. Interobserver agreement was highest for contrast-enhanced soft-copy readouts for hepatic metastases. CONCLUSION: Soft-copy readouts of contrast-enhanced CT data sets for the detection of hepatic metastases and extrahepatic metastatic recurrences were evaluated significantly faster than were hard copies, with at least equal sensitivity and with excellent interobserver agreement.

Hepatic metastases in patients with colorectal cancer: relationship between size of metastases, standard of reference, and detection rates.

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between the size of hepatic metastases, the standard of reference, and the reported detection rate in patients with colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With use of a MEDLINE search (January 1994 to January 2001), articles were selected that contained original results on detection of hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer, categorized for size in at least two categories, with use of helical computed tomography (CT), helical CT at arterial portography, or magnetic resonance imaging. Results were compared with the size distribution of hepatic metastases in 47 consecutive patients with colorectal carcinoma, which were detected by using a combination of intraoperative ultrasonography (US) and palpation. RESULTS: Seven studies met all predefined criteria. Four studies involved intraoperative US in all patients and demonstrated a significant negative correlation (-0.988) between detection rate and fraction of small metastases. These studies had a higher fraction and lower detection rate of small metastases and a lower overall detection rate. A majority (58% [145 of 252]) of metastases in the study population were smaller than 20 mm. CONCLUSION: Few articles adequately describe the standard of reference and size distribution of hepatic lesions. Hepatic metastases of colorectal cancer are frequently smaller than 20 mm. When the standard of reference is suboptimal, many small metastases are excluded from analysis, and detection rates are therefore inflated.