Effect of sentinel lymph node biopsy on upper limb function in women with early breast cancer: A systematic review of clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Axillary surgery is still essential in the management of early breast cancer. Conservative procedures like sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) are less invasive than the traditional axillary node dissection (ALND). However, some extent of ipsilateral upper limb dysfunction might still occur. This systematic review aimed to describe the incidence of lymphedema, pain, sensory, and motor disorders after SLNB in women with early breast cancer. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. The search was performed on Pubmed, EMBASE, CINAHAL, and Web of Science. The search was based on the following concepts: breast cancer, sentinel lymph node biopsy, axillary dissection, upper limb complications. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Rob 2.0 toll. RESULTS: We obtained 979 unique registries from the primary search and 381 additional records from the included articles' reference lists. Fifty-one articles were assessed as full text. Nine studies were included in the review. A total of 5161 patients undergone SLNB, and 4110 patients were assessed for ipsilateral arm complications. Six months after the surgery, 0-11% of patients presented lymphedema, 11-16% pain, 2-22% sensory disorders, and 0-9% motor disorders. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB was associated with persistent postoperative complications. The burden of complications, although lower when compared to ALND, should not be ignored. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number CRD42018090540, registered July 09, 2018.

Daily life attitudes of women with moderate or severe chronic pelvic pain. A qualitative study.

OBJECTIVE: How a woman copes with the pain might play a significant role in the management of chronic pelvic pain. This study aimed to understand the attitudes adopted by women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP) to deal with daily life problems caused by the illness. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a qualitative study including 58 women diagnosed with chronic pelvic pain regardless of the cause. To collect the data, we used semi-structured interviews with the key question: "How do you handle the pain in your daily life?". The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. We conducted a qualitative thematic analysis of transcribed texts following the sequence: 1) initial reading; 2) preliminary identification of codes; 3) identification of themes; 4) review of themes; 5) nominating the themes in categories; 6) final study synthesis. The analysis was performed with the aid of the RQDA package in the R environment. RESULTS: Daily life attitudes varied from submission to the pain to positive coping. We identified five major categories: 1) shaping life by pain; 2) isolating from social contact; 3) avoiding sexual relationship; 4) seeking pain relief; 5) seeking positive strategies. Positive strategies were more frequent in older women. CONCLUSION: Women with chronic pelvic pain adopted a broad spectrum of attitudes to deal with the pain in daily life. The depth understanding of patient perspectives has the potential to improve the multidisciplinary care of this debilitating condition.

Current usage of qualitative research in female pelvic pain: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Qualitative research has received growing attention in the multidisciplinary investigation of patients' perceptions about chronic diseases. The purpose of this systematic review was to characterize the usage of qualitative research in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP). METHODS: We performed a structured search in Web of Science, Pubmed, and EMBASE platforms until June 2019. The search combined the keywords: "pelvic pain", "endometriosis", "dyspareunia", "dysmenorrhea", "vaginismus", "focus groups", "qualitative research", "hermeneutics", "grounded theory", and "women". Qualitative studies on female CPP were included and the main findings combined using thematic synthesis. RESULTS: We found 1211 citations, of which 52 were included in this review. The majority of included studies were based on phenomenological design. The main method for data collection was semi-structured interviews. Endometriosis was the theme of 23 studies, chronic pelvic pain of eight, dysmenorrhea of eight, dyspareunia of four, interstitial cystitis of two, vaginismus of two, vulvodynia of two, and pelvic inflammatory disease of one study. We found a wide variety of contributions. Among them, the impact of the disease on women's lives was the commonest. CONCLUSION: Qualitative research has the potential to reveal and explain several aspects of CPP in women. The medical community may better accept knowledge gained from these studies if the methods are described more transparently in published articles.