[Translated article] Descriptive study of spinal instrumentation-related infections in a tertiary hospital.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal instrumentation-related infections (SIRI) are one of the main causes of post-surgical complication and comorbidity. Our objective was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of these infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in our institution (2011-2018) including adult patients undergoing spinal instrumentation who met the diagnostic criteria for confirmed infection. Superficial surgical wound and deep intraoperative samples were processed for microbiological culture. The medical and orthopaedic team was always the same. RESULTS: Forty-one cases were diagnosed of which 39 patients (95.1%) presented early infection (<3 months after initial surgery) with symptoms in the first two weeks, mean CRP at diagnosis was 133mg/dl and 23% associated bacteremia. The remaining two patients (4.8%) were chronic infections (symptoms >3 months after surgery). The treatment of choice in early infections was the Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) strategy without removal of the bone graft, which successfully resolved 84.2% of the infections. The main aetiology was gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus: 31.7%), followed by gram-negative and polymicrobial flora. Antibiotics were optimised according to cultures with a mean duration of 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In early infections, early diagnosis and DAIR strategy (with bone graft retention) demonstrated a healing rate higher than 80%.

Descriptive study of spinal instrumentation-related infections in a tertiary hospital. / Estudio descriptivo de las infecciones asociadas con instrumentación de columna en un hospital terciario.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal instrumentation-related infections (SIRI) are one of the main causes of post-surgical complication and comorbidity. Our objective was to describe the clinical and microbiological characteristics, treatment and prognosis of these infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in our institution (2011-2018) including adult patients undergoing spinal instrumentation who met the diagnostic criteria for confirmed infection. Superficial surgical wound and deep intraoperative samples were processed for microbiological culture. The medical and orthopaedic team was always the same. RESULTS: Forty-one cases were diagnosed of which 39 patients (95.1%) presented early infection (<3 months after initial surgery) with symptoms in the first two weeks, mean CRP at diagnosis was 133mg/dl and 23% associated bacteremia. The remaining two patients (4.8%) were chronic infections (symptoms >3 months after surgery). The treatment of choice in early infections was the Debridement, Antibiotics and Implant Retention (DAIR) strategy without removal of the bone graft, which successfully resolved 84.2% of the infections. The main etiology was gram-positive (Staphylococcus aureus: 31.7%), followed by gram-negative and polymicrobial flora. Antibiotics were optimized according to cultures with a mean duration of 12 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: In early infections, early diagnosis and DAIR strategy (with bone graft retention) demonstrated a healing rate higher than 80%.

Development of a mapping function ("crosswalk") for the conversion of scores between the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI).

INTRODUCTION: The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) are two commonly used self-rating outcome instruments in patients with lumbar spinal disorders. No formal crosswalk between them exists that would otherwise allow the scores of one to be interpreted in terms of the other. We aimed to create such a mapping function. METHODS: We performed a secondary analysis of ODI and COMI data previously collected from 3324 patients (57 ± 17y; 60.3% female) at baseline and 1y after surgical or conservative treatment. Correlations between scores and Cohen's kappa for agreement (κ) regarding achievement of the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) score on each instrument (ODI, 12.8 points; COMI, 2.2 points) were calculated, and regression models were built. The latter were tested for accuracy in an independent set of registry data from 634 patients (60 ± 15y; 56.8% female). RESULTS: All pairs of measures were significantly positively correlated (baseline, 0.73; 1y follow-up (FU), 0.84; change-scores, 0.73). MCIC for COMI was achieved in 53.9% patients and for ODI, in 52.4%, with 78% agreement on an individual basis (κ = 0.56). Standard errors for the regression slopes and intercepts were low, indicating excellent prediction at the group level, but root mean square residuals (reflecting individual error) were relatively high. ODI was predicted as COMI × 7.13-4.20 (at baseline), COMI × 6.34 + 2.67 (at FU) and COMI × 5.18 + 1.92 (for change-score); COMI was predicted as ODI × 0.075 + 3.64 (baseline), ODI × 0.113 + 0.96 (FU), and ODI × 0.102 + 1.10 (change-score). ICCs were 0.63-0.87 for derived versus actual scores. CONCLUSION: Predictions at the group level were very good and met standards justifying the pooling of data. However, we caution against using individual values for treatment decisions, e.g. attempting to monitor patients over time, first with one instrument and then with the other, due to the lower statistical precision at the individual level. The ability to convert scores via the developed mapping function should open up more centres/registries for collaboration and facilitate the combining of data in meta-analyses.

Shorter and sweeter: the 16-item version of the SRS questionnaire shows better structural validity than the 20-item version in young patients with spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: In patients with adult spinal deformity, it was previously shown that 16 of the non-management items of the SRS-instrument showed a better fit to the theoretical four-factor model (pain, function, self-image, mental health) than did all 20 items. Whether the same phenomenon is observed in data from younger (< 20y) patients, for whom the questionnaire was originally designed, is not currently known. METHODS: Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the factor structure of the 20 non-management items of the SRS-instrument completed by 3618 young patients with spinal deformity (75.5% female; mean age, 15.0 ± 2.0 years) and of its equivalence across language versions (2713 English-speaking, 270 Spanish, 264 German, 223 Italian, and 148 French). The root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) and comparative fit index (CFI) indicated model fit. RESULTS: Compared with the 20-item version, the 16-item solution significantly increased the fit (p < 0.001) across all language versions, to achieve good model fit (CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.06). For both 16-item and 20-item models, equivalence across languages was not reached, with some items showing weaker item-loading for some languages, in particular German and French. CONCLUSION: In patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, the shorter 16-item version showed a better fit to the intended 4-factor structure of the SRS-instrument. The wording of some of the items, and/or their equivalence across language versions, may need to be addressed. Questionnaire completion can be a burden for patients; if a shorter, more structurally valid version is available, its use should be encouraged.

Impact of COVID-19 on the pain and disability of patients with adult spinal deformity.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the pain and functional effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients with ASD reflected by their response to SRS-22, ODI, and SF-36 questionnaires. METHODS: Patients who had stable pain and functional outcome scores over the preceding 2 years were enrolled in a local prospectively collected adult spinal deformity (ASD) database. A reanalysis of their SRS22, ODI and SF-36 data 14 days into confinement were compared to their last pre-confinement scores. RESULTS: 89 patients were included in this study (average age 60.7 years, 91% female) with an average time from last FU until confinement of 9.6 months. The ODI total score worsened by 5 points post-confinement with no difference seen in personal care, walking and social life. In contrast, the SRS-22 score showed small improvements in function/activity and satisfaction, but no significant differences for the other domains. Similarly, the SF-36 showed small improvements in physical function, physical and emotional role, vitality and PCS. CONCLUSION: The global COVID-19 pandemic and ensuing confinement had variable overall effects on ASD patients, without the expected marked worsening. In addition, this study illustrates that the SRS-22 questionnaire is less influenced by environmental and psychological factors than the ODI supporting its objectivity and accuracy in the evaluation of the QoL of ASD patients.

Intraoperative tranexamic acid use in major spine surgery in adults: a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial†.

Background: Perioperative tranexamic acid (TXA) use can reduce bleeding and transfusion requirements in several types of surgery, but level I evidence proving its effectiveness in major spine surgery is lacking. This study was designed to investigate the hypothesis that TXA reduces perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements in patients undergoing major spine procedures. Methods: We conducted a multicentre, prospective, randomized double-blind clinical trial, comparing TXA with placebo in posterior instrumented spine surgery. Efficacy was determined based on the total number of blood units transfused and the perioperative blood loss. Other variables such as the characteristics of surgery, length of hospital stay, and complications were also analysed. Results: Ninety-five patients undergoing posterior instrumented spine surgery (fusion of >3 segments) were enrolled and randomized: 44 received TXA (TXA group) and 51 received placebo (controls). The groups were comparable for duration of surgery, number of levels fused, and length of hospitalization. Transfusion was not required in 48% of subjects receiving TXA compared with 33% of controls (P = 0.05). Mean number of blood units transfused was 0.85 in the TXA group and 1.42 with placebo (P = 0.06). TXA resulted in a significant decrease in intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.01) and total bleeding (P = 0.01) relative to placebo. The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups. Conclusions: TXA did not significantly reduce transfusion requirements, but significantly reduced perioperative blood loss in adults undergoing major spinal surgery. Clinical trial registration: NCT01136590.

Tratamiento de la escoliosis juvenil: aumentar el tiempo entre alargamientos con la técnica de barras de crecimiento no debe comprometer necesariamente el crecimiento torácico / Treatment of juvenile scoliosis: increasing the lengthening interval with the growing rod technique should not necessarily compromise thoracic growth

Objetivo. Evaluar el crecimiento longitudinal del tórax y el control de la deformidad en una serie de pacientes con escoliosis juvenil tratados con barras de crecimiento aumentando los intervalos de tiempo entre alargamientos más de seis meses. Material y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo de ocho pacientes midiendo las siguientes variables: el ángulo de Cobb, la traslación vertebral apical, el balance coronal, la longitud torácica T1-L1, la cifosis torácica T5-T12, el ángulo de cifosis de unión proximal (CUP) y la lordosis lumbar. Se registraron las complicaciones. Resultados. Se evaluaron cinco escoliosis idiopáticas y tres casos de sindrómica (media de edad 9,4 ± 1,5 años). Se realizó una cirugía inicial y un promedio de dos retensados por paciente. El tiempo medio entre retensados fue de 15,7 meses. La corrección coronal final de la curva principal fue del 58%. La longitud torácica (T1-L1) preoperatoria fue de 20,8 cm, postoperatoria de 24,4 cm, y final de 26 cm. Al final del seguimiento el crecimiento medio del tórax fue de 5,2 cm. La cifosis preoperatoria (T5-T12) fue 33,5°, y final 32,1°. El cambio en el ángulo CUP fue de 2,5° en el seguimiento final. La mayoría de las complicaciones estuvieron relacionadas con la instrumentación. Se encontraron dos infecciones superficiales de la herida. Conclusión. En pacientes con escoliosis juvenil en formas «menos graves» tratados mediante barras de crecimiento, es posible espaciar los alargamientos más de un año y con ello disminuir el número de cirugías y al mismo tiempo controlar la deformidad y permitir el crecimiento longitudinal torácico (AU)

Objective. Serial lengthening with growing rods is recommended every six months for the treatment of early onset scoliosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal growth of the thorax and control of the deformity in a series of patients with juvenile scoliosis when time intervals were increased between lengthenings. Material and methods. Retrospective study of eight patients. The following variables were measured: the Cobb angle, the apical vertebral translation, the coronal balance, thoracic T1-L1 length, thoracic T5-T12 kyphosis, the proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) angle, and the lumbar lordosis. Complications were recorded. Results. Five idiopathic and three syndromic scoliosis cases (mean age 9.4 ± 1.5 years) were evaluated. The initial surgery was followed by with an average of two distractions per patient. The mean time between distractions was 15.7 months. The final coronal main curve correction was 58%. Apical translation and coronal balance were improved and maintained after the surgeries. The thoracic (T1-L1) preoperative length was 20.8 cm, the postoperative length was 24.4 cm, and the final length was 26 cm. At the end of follow-up, the average growth of the thorax was 5.2 cm. The preoperative (T5-T12) kyphosis was 33.5°, and final 32.1°. The change in the PJK angle was 2.5° at the end of follow-up. Most complications were related to instrumentation. Two superficial wound infections were encountered. Conclusion. For less severe juvenile scoliosis patients treated with growing rods, spacing out lengthenings over more than a year can decrease the number of surgeries, while still controlling the deformity and allowing longitudinal thoracic growth (AU)

[Treatment of juvenile scoliosis: Increasing the lengthening interval with the growing rod technique should not necessarily compromise thoracic growth]. / Tratamiento de la escoliosis juvenil: aumentar el tiempo entre alargamientos con la técnica de barras de crecimiento no debe comprometer necesariamente el crecimiento torácico.

OBJECTIVE: Serial lengthening with growing rods is recommended every six months for the treatment of early onset scoliosis. The objective of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal growth of the thorax and control of the deformity in a series of patients with juvenile scoliosis when time intervals were increased between lengthenings. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of eight patients. The following variables were measured: the Cobb angle, the apical vertebral translation, the coronal balance, thoracic T1-L1 length, thoracic T5-T12 kyphosis, the proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) angle, and the lumbar lordosis. Complications were recorded. RESULTS: Five idiopathic and three syndromic scoliosis cases (mean age 9.4 ± 1.5 years) were evaluated. The initial surgery was followed by with an average of two distractions per patient. The mean time between distractions was 15.7 months. The final coronal main curve correction was 58%. Apical translation and coronal balance were improved and maintained after the surgeries. The thoracic (T1-L1) preoperative length was 20.8 cm, the postoperative length was 24.4 cm, and the final length was 26 cm. At the end of follow-up, the average growth of the thorax was 5.2 cm. The preoperative (T5-T12) kyphosis was 33.5°, and final 32.1°. The change in the PJK angle was 2.5° at the end of follow-up. Most complications were related to instrumentation. Two superficial wound infections were encountered. CONCLUSION: For less severe juvenile scoliosis patients treated with growing rods, spacing out lengthenings over more than a year can decrease the number of surgeries, while still controlling the deformity and allowing longitudinal thoracic growth.

¿Es el autoinjerto del campo quirúrgico suficiente para la obtención de una buena artrodesis en paciente con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente? / Is local bone graft sufficient to maintain the surgical correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves?

Objetivo. El objetivo de este trabajo es determinar si los resultados clínicos y radiológicos obtenidos en cuanto a corrección a largo plazo se mantienen de forma similar usando injerto de cresta ilíaca ( CI ) o solo el hueso local (HL) en los pacientes intervenidos con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente. Pacientes y métodos. Se efectuó un estudio retrospectivo de cohortes homogéneas de 73 pacientes (CI n = 37 y HL n = 36) con escoliosis idiopática intervenidos mediante artrodesis por vía posterior con un seguimiento medio de 126 meses en el grupo CI y 66 meses en el grupo HL. Se compararon los resultados en cuanto a corrección quirúrgica y pérdida de la misma según las mediciones de los ángulos de Cobb en telerradiografías antero-posteriores y laterales preoperatorias, postoperatorias y finales, y se valoraron los resultados clínicos mediante el cuestionario SRS-22. Resultados. En el grupo HL la corrección postoperatoria resultó significativamente mayor 61 ± 15% vs. 51 ± 14% del grupo CI (p < 0,004). Durante la evolución el grupo CI presentó una pérdida de corrección media de 4,5 ± 7,3° respecto a los 8,5 ± 6,9° del grupo HL, (p = 0,02). La corrección final obtenida se iguala entre ambos grupos, 42 ± 18% vs. 46 ± 17% (p = 0,3). No se observa correlación clínica en la muestra respecto a los resultados del SRS-22. Conclusiones. Los pacientes intervenidos en los que se emplea injerto de CI tienen una pérdida de corrección inferior a los pacientes en los que se emplea injerto de HL aunque no parece existir correlación clínica de esta pérdida de corrección (AU)

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative clinical and radiological results in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves treated by posterior arthrodesis using autogenous bone graft from iliac crest (CI) versus only local autograft bone (HL). Patients and methods: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted on 73 patients (CI n=37 and HL n=36) diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and treated surgically by posterior arthrodesis. The mean post-operative follow-up was 126 months in the CI group vs. 66 months in the HL group. The radiographic data collected consisted of preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up antero-posterior and lateral full-length radiographs. Loss of correction and quality of arthrodesis were evaluated by comparing the scores obtained from the Spanish version of the SRS-22 questionnaire. Results: There were significant differences in the post-operative results as regards the correction of the Cobb angle of the main curve (HL 61 ± 15% vs. CI 51 ± 14%, P<.004), however a greater loss of correction was found in the local bone group (CI 4.5 ± 7.3◦ vs. HL 8.5 ± 6.3◦, P=.02). There were no significant differences as regards the correction of the Cobb angle of the main curve at the end of follow-up. There were no clinical differences between the two groups in the SRS-22 scores. Conclusion: At 5 years of follow-up, there was a statistically significant greater loss of radiographic correction at the end of final follow-up in the local bone graft group. However clinical differences were not observed as regards the SRS-22 scores (AU)

[Is local bone graft sufficient to maintain the surgical correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves?]. / ¿Es el autoinjerto del campo quirúrgico suficiente para la obtención de una buena artrodesis en paciente con escoliosis idiopática del adolescente?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative clinical and radiological results in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves treated by posterior arthrodesis using autogenous bone graft from iliac crest (CI) versus only local autograft bone (HL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective matched cohort study was conducted on 73 patients (CI n=37 and HL n=36) diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and treated surgically by posterior arthrodesis. The mean post-operative follow-up was 126 months in the CI group vs. 66 months in the HL group. The radiographic data collected consisted of preoperative, postoperative, and final follow-up antero-posterior and lateral full-length radiographs. Loss of correction and quality of arthrodesis were evaluated by comparing the scores obtained from the Spanish version of the SRS-22 questionnaire. RESULTS: There were significant differences in the post-operative results as regards the correction of the Cobb angle of the main curve (HL 61 ± 15% vs. CI 51 ± 14%, P<.004), however a greater loss of correction was found in the local bone group (CI 4.5 ± 7.3° vs. HL 8.5 ± 6.3°, P=.02). There were no significant differences as regards the correction of the Cobb angle of the main curve at the end of follow-up. There were no clinical differences between the two groups in the SRS-22 scores. CONCLUSION: At 5 years of follow-up, there was a statistically significant greater loss of radiographic correction at the end of final follow-up in the local bone graft group. However clinical differences were not observed as regards the SRS-22 scores.

[Prognostic factors of the crankshaft phenomenon in patients with scoliosis and open triradiate cartilage. Is the double approach the solution?]. / Factores pronósticos del fenómeno de crankshaft en los pacientes con escoliosis y cartílago trirradiado abierto. ¿Es el doble abordaje la solución?

OBJECTIVE: To study young patients after scoliosis surgery in order to determine risk and prevention factors for developing a crankshaft phenomenon (CP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective study of a cohort of 26 skeletally immature patients. Six were excluded due to progression of various conditions. Crankshaft was defined as an increase in the Cobb angle >10°, or an increase in the Mehta angle (DAVC) >10°, or any decrease in the apex-rib thoracic distance, or increase in the apical vertebral translation (AVT). Patients with and without CP development were compared in order to analyse preoperative, surgical and postoperative risk factors, as well as the influence of different surgical techniques. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 83.9 months. Nine patients (45%) developed the crankshaft phenomenon. Only immaturity parameters were associated with development of CP. No preoperative or postoperative radiographic parameters appeared to influence its development. The amount of correction may be a protective factor (41.4 vs. 61.4%; P=.06). The double approach was able to prevent the development of CP (0%) compared with single posterior instrumentation (44%), P=.02. DISCUSSION: None of these preoperative factors seemed to predispose to CP: gender or aetiology, T5-T12 kyphosis or apical hypokyphosis, coronal Cobb, vertebral rotation, or DAVC. The residual postoperative Cobb, achieved kyphosis, or wired instrumentation versus hooks, also seemed to have no influence. CONCLUSION: In patients with open triradiate cartilage under 11 years of age, it seems advisable to correct by double approach to avoid the appearance of the crankshaft phenomenon.

Factores pronósticos del fenómeno de crankshaft en los pacientes con escoliosis y cartílago trirradiado abierto. ¿Es el doble abordaje la solución? / Prognostic factors of the crankshaft phenomenon in patients with scoliosis and open triradiate cartilage. Is the double approach the solution?

Objetivo. Estudiar los pacientes inmaduros con cartílago trirradiado abierto, operados de escoliosis, en busca de factores de riesgo y de prevención para desarrollar un fenómeno de crankshaft (CP). Material y métodos. Estudio retrospectivo de una cohorte de 26 pacientes esqueléticamente inmaduros. Seis se excluyeron por progresión de distinta etiología. Se definió crankshaft como un aumento del Cobb mayor de 10°, o un incremento en la diferencia del ángulo de Mehta (diferencia ángulo vértebra-costilla, DAVC) mayor de 10°, o cualquier disminución de la distancia ápex-costilla torácica o aumento de la traslación vertebral apical lumbar (AVT, sigla del inglés apical vertebral translation). Se compararon los pacientes con y sin desarrollo de CP para analizar los factores de riesgo preoperatorios, quirúrgicos y postoperatorios. Se estudió la influencia de las distinta técnicas quirúrgicas. Resultados. El seguimiento medio fue de 83,9 meses. Nueve pacientes (45%) desarrollaron el CP. Solo los parámetros de inmadurez ósea se asociaron al desarrollo de CP. Ningún parámetro radiográfico preoperatorio o postoperatorio parece influir en su desarrollo. La cantidad de corrección podría ser un factor de protección (41,4 vs. 61,4%; p = 0,06). El doble abordaje fue capaz de evitar el desarrollo de CP (0%) en comparación con la instrumentación única posterior (44%), p = 0,02. Discusión. No se ha conseguido demostrar que los siguientes factores preoperatorios predispongan a la aparición de crankshaft: sexo o etiología, cifosis T5-T12, hipocifosis apical, Cobb coronal, rotación vertebral o DAVC. Tampoco parecen influir el Cobb postoperatorio residual, la cifosis conseguida, o la instrumentación con alambres frente a ganchos. Conclusión. En los pacientes con cartílago trirradiado abierto menores de 11 años parece aconsejable corregir la escoliosis mediante doble abordaje para evitar el fenómeno del cigüeñal o CP (progresión de la deformidad tras una artrodesis posterior por crecimiento anterior vertebral) (AU)

Objective. To study young patients after scoliosis surgery in order to determine risk and prevention factors for developing a crankshaft phenomenon (CP). Material and methods. Retrospective study of a cohort of 26 skeletally immature patients. Six were excluded due to progression of various conditions. Crankshaft was defined as an increase in the Cobb angle >10°, or an increase in the Mehta angle (DAVC) >10°, or any decrease in the apex-rib thoracic distance, or increase in the apical vertebral translation (AVT). Patients with and without CP development were compared in order to analyse preoperative, surgical and postoperative risk factors, as well as the influence of different surgical techniques. Results. The mean follow-up was 83.9 months. Nine patients (45%) developed the crankshaft phenomenon. Only immaturity parameters were associated with development of CP. No preoperative or postoperative radiographic parameters appeared to influence its development. The amount of correction may be a protective factor (41.4 vs. 61.4%; P=.06). The double approach was able to prevent the development of CP (0%) compared with single posterior instrumentation (44%), P=.02. Discussion. None of these preoperative factors seemed to predispose to CP: gender or aetiology, T5-T12 kyphosis or apical hypokyphosis, coronal Cobb, vertebral rotation, or DAVC. The residual postoperative Cobb, achieved kyphosis, or wired instrumentation versus hooks, also seemed to have no influence. Conclusion. In patients with open triradiate cartilage under 11 years of age, it seems advisable to correct by double approach to avoid the appearance of the crankshaft phenomenon (AU)

¿Mejora la liberación posterior ampliada a múltiples niveles la corrección de la curva en la escoliosis idiopática del adolescente? / Can multiple-level posterior release improve curve correction in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Objetivo: Comparar los resultados de la corrección por vía posterior con una construcción híbrida mediante el empleo de una liberación posterior clásica y la liberación posterior ampliada (LPA). Material y métodos: Efectuamos un estudio de cohortes retrospectivo con 46 pacientes diagnosticados de escoliosis idiopática del adolescente (EIA). Se realizó una corrección por vía posterior mediante el empleo de una instrumentación híbrida. En el primer grupo se realizó una liberación posterior estándar (LPE) y en el segundo se realizó una LPA, y se resecaron todos los ligamentos posteriores y se realizó una facetectomía amplia bilateral. Se compararon los resultados de las mediciones en telerradiografías anteroposteriores y laterales preoperatorias, postoperatorias y a los 2 años. Se valoraron los resultados clínicos mediante el cuestionario SRS 22. Resultados: No hubo diferencias en cuanto al sexo, edad, tipo de curva, niveles instrumentados, tiempo quirúrgico o Cobb preoperatorio (LPE: 60°±10°; LPA: 59°±8°) de la curva principal. En el grupo de LPA la corrección obtenida fue significativamente mayor en el postoperatorio (p<0,001) y a los 2 años (p<0,05). La corrección de la curva proximal y lumbar resultó similar en ambos grupos y no se encontraron diferencias significativas. Las complicaciones menores fueron similares en ambos grupos y no existieron complicaciones graves. Conclusión: La LPA a múltiples niveles mejora la corrección de la curva principal en el plano coronal en los pacientes con EIA, sin aumento de la incidencia de complicaciones, además de aumentar la superficie de artrodesis y facilitar la introducción del alambrado (AU)

Purpose: To compare the results of posterior correction using hybrid instrumentation and classical posterior release with those obtained with an extended posterior release. Material and methods: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of 46 patients diagnosed with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). A posterior correction was carried out using hybrid instrumentation. In the first group, a standard posterior release (SPR) was performed, whereas in the second an extended release (EPR) was carried out, resecting all posterior ligaments and performing an extended bilateral facetectomy. The results of the measurements were compared using pre-op, post-op and 2-year-follow-up anteroposterior and lateral teleradiographs. Clinical results were evaluated using the SRS 22 questionnaire. Results: There were no differences as regards gender, age, curve type, instrumented levels, OR time or pre-op Cobb's angle (SPR: 60°±10°; EPR: 59°±8°) of the principal curve. In the extended release group the correction obtained was significantly greater at post-op (p<0.001) and at 2 years (p<0.05). Correction of the proximal and lumbar curve was similar in both groups, with no significant differences. Minor complications were similar in both groups, with no serious complications. Conclusion: Multiple-level posterior release improves correction of the principal curve on the coronal plane in patients with AIS, without an increase in the complications rate. The procedure also extends the arthrodesed area and facilitates introduction of the wires (AU)

Carcinoma hepatocelular asociado a hepatitis crónica C no cirrótica / Hepatocellular carcinoma associated with non cirrhotic chronic hepatitis C

No disponible

Fístula biliobronquial secundaria a estenosis biliar tras resección hepática / Bronchobiliary fistula secondary to biliary stricture after hepatectomy

No disponible