GAPS phase II: development and pilot results of the global assessment in pediatric surgery, an evidence-based pediatric surgical capacity assessment tool for low-resource settings.

PURPOSE: Pediatric surgical care in low- and middle-income countries is often hindered by systemic gaps in healthcare resources, infrastructure, training, and organization. This study aims to develop and validate the Global Assessment of Pediatric Surgery (GAPS) to appraise pediatric surgical capacity and discriminate between levels of care across diverse healthcare settings. METHODS: The GAPS Version 1 was constructed through a synthesis of existing assessment tools and expert panel consultation. The resultant GAPS Version 2 underwent international pilot testing. Construct validation categorized institutions into providing basic or advanced surgical care. GAPS was further refined to Version 3 to include only questions with a > 75% response rate and those that significantly discriminated between basic or advanced surgical settings. RESULTS: GAPS Version 1 included 139 items, which, after expert panel feedback, was expanded to 168 items in Version 2. Pilot testing, in 65 institutions, yielded a high response rate. Of the 168 questions in GAPS Version 2, 64 significantly discriminated between basic and advanced surgical care. The refined GAPS Version 3 tool comprises 64 questions on: human resources (9), material resources (39), outcomes (3), accessibility (3), and education (10). CONCLUSION: The GAPS Version 3 tool presents a validated instrument for evaluating pediatric surgical capabilities in low-resource settings.

Exploring the digital divide: results of a survey informing mobile application development.

Introduction: Mobile health apps risk widening health disparities if they overlook digital inclusion. The digital divide, encompassing access, familiarity, and readiness, poses a significant barrier to medical interventions. Existing literature lacks exploration of the digital divide's contributing factors. Hence, data are needed to comprehend the challenges in developing inclusive health apps. Methods: We created a survey to gauge internet and smartphone access, smartphone familiarity, and readiness for using mobile health apps among caregivers of pediatric patients in tertiary care. Open-ended questions solicited feedback and suggestions on mobile health applications. Responses were categorized by similarity and compared. Developed with patient partners, the survey underwent cognitive testing and piloting for accuracy. Results: Data from 209 respondents showed that 23% were affected by the digital divide, mainly due to unfamiliarity with digital skills. Among 49 short text responses about health app concerns, 31 mentioned security and confidentiality, with 7 mentioning the impersonal nature of such apps. Desired features included messaging healthcare providers, scheduling, task reminders, and simplicity. Conclusions: This study underscores a digital divide among caregivers of pediatric patients, with nearly a quarter affected primarily due to a lack of digital comfort. Respondents emphasized user-friendliness and online security for health apps. Future apps should prioritize digital inclusion by addressing the significant barriers and carefully considering patient and family concerns.

Implementation of a Global Pediatric Trauma Course in an Upper Middle-Income Country: A Pilot Study.

INTRODUCTION: Over 90% of pediatric trauma deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), yet pediatric trauma-focused training remains unstandardized and inaccessible, especially in LMICs. In Brazil, where trauma is the leading cause of death for children over age 1, we piloted the first global adaptation of the Trauma Resuscitation in Kids (TRIK) course and assessed its feasibility. METHODS: A 2-day simulation-based global TRIK course was hosted in Belo Horizonte in October 2022, led by one Brazilian and four Canadian instructors. The enrollment fee was $200 USD, and course registration sold out in 4 d. We administered a knowledge test before and after the course and a postcourse self-evaluation. We recorded each simulation to assess participants' performance, reflected in a team performance score. Groups received numerical scores for these three areas, which were equally weighted to calculate a final performance score. The scores given by the two evaluators were then averaged. As groups performed the specific simulations in varying orders, the simulations were grouped into four time blocks for analysis of performance over time. Statistical analysis utilized a combination of descriptive analysis, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: Twenty-one surgeons (19 pediatric, one trauma, one general) representing four of five regions in Brazil consented to study participation. Women comprised 76% (16/21) of participants. Overall, participants scored higher on the knowledge assessment after the course (68% versus 76%; z = 3.046, P < 0.001). Participants reported improved knowledge for all tested components of trauma management (P < 0.001). The average simulation performance score increased from 66% on day 1% to 73% on day 2, although this increase was not statistically significant. All participants reported they were more confident managing pediatric trauma after the course and would recommend the course to others. CONCLUSIONS: Completion of global TRIK improved surgeons' confidence, knowledge, and clinical decision-making skills in managing pediatric trauma, suggesting a standardized course may improve pediatric trauma care and outcomes in LMICs. We plan to more closely address cost, language, and resource barriers to implementing protocolized trauma training in LMICs with the aim to improve patient outcomes and equity in trauma care globally.

Essential surgery delivery in the Northern Kivu Province of the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical services are an essential part of a functional healthcare system, but the Lancet Commission of Global Surgery (LCoGS) indicators of surgical capacity such as perioperative workforce and surgical volume are unknown in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) including the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). We aimed to determine the surgical capacity and its associated factors within the DRC. METHODS: Hospitals were assessed in the North Kivu province of the DRC. Hospital characteristics and surgical rates were determined using the WHO-PGSSC hospital assessment tool and operating room (OR) registries. The primary outcome of interest was the number of Bellwether operations (i.e. Caesarean sections, laparotomies, and external fixation for bone fractures) per 100,000 people. Univariate and multiple linear regressions were performed. Primary predictors were the number of trained surgeons, anaesthesiologists, and obstetricians (SAOs) and the number of perioperative providers (including clinical officers and nurse anaesthetists) per 100,000 people. RESULTS: Twenty-eight hospitals in North Kivu were assessed over one year in 2021; 24 (86%) were first-level referral health centres while 4 (14%) were second-level referral hospitals. In total, 11,176 Bellwether procedures were performed in the region in one year. Rates per 100,000 people were 1,461 Bellwether surgical interventions, 1.05 SAOs, and 13.1 perioperative providers. In univariate linear regression analysis, each additional SAO added 239 additional cases annually (p = 0.023), while each additional perioperative provider added 110 cases annually (p < 0.001). In our multiple regression analysis adjusting for other hospital services, the association between workforce and Bellwether surgeries was no longer significant. CONCLUSIONS: The surgical workforce in DRC did not meet the LCoGS benchmark of 20 SAOs per 100,000 people but was not an independent predictor of surgical capacity. Major investment is needed to simultaneously bolster healthcare facilities and increase surgical workforce training.

Patient-Centered Surgical Care for Children in Low and Lower-Middle Income Countries (LMICs) - A Systematic Scoping Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE: Studies exploring patient-centered care (PCC) in pediatric surgery have been disproportionately concentrated in high-income countries. This review aims to characterize the adoption of key PCC domains in low and lower-middle income countries (LMICs). METHODS: Seven databases were searched from inception until January 2023 to retrieve relevant articles in pediatric surgery in LMICs. We focused on six key PCC domains: patient-reported outcomes (PROs), patient-reported experiences (PREs), shared decision-making (SDM), patient/parent education, patient/parent satisfaction, and informed consent. RESULTS: Of 8050 studies screened, 230 underwent full-text review, and 48 were finally included. Most were single-center (87.5%), cross-sectional studies (41.7%) from the South-East Asian (35.4%) and Eastern Mediterranean regions (33.3%). Studies most frequently focused on postoperative care (45.8%) in pediatric general surgery (18.8%), and included 1-3 PCC domains. PREs (n = 30), PROs (n = 16) and patient/parent satisfaction (n = 16) were most common. Informed consent (n = 2) and SDM (n = 1) were least studied. Only 13 studies directly elicited children's perspectives. Despite all studies originating in LMICs, 25% of first and 17.8% of senior authors lacked LMIC affiliations. CONCLUSION: The adoption of PCC in LMICs appears limited, focusing predominantly on PROs and PREs. Other domains such as informed consent and SDM are rarely addressed, and the voice of children and young people is rarely heard in their care. Opportunities to enhance PCC in LMICs abound, with the potential to improve the surgical care of children in resource-limited settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

The State of Artificial Intelligence in Pediatric Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Artificial intelligence (AI) has been recently shown to improve clinical workflows and outcomes - yet its potential in pediatric surgery remains largely unexplored. This systematic review details the use of AI in pediatric surgery. METHODS: Nine medical databases were searched from inception until January 2023, identifying articles focused on AI in pediatric surgery. Two authors reviewed full texts of eligible articles. Studies were included if they were original investigations on the development, validation, or clinical application of AI models for pediatric health conditions primarily managed surgically. Studies were excluded if they were not peer-reviewed, were review articles, editorials, commentaries, or case reports, did not focus on pediatric surgical conditions, or did not employ at least one AI model. Extracted data included study characteristics, clinical specialty, AI method and algorithm type, AI model (algorithm) role and performance metrics, key results, interpretability, validation, and risk of bias using PROBAST and QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Authors screened 8178 articles and included 112. Half of the studies (50%) reported predictive models (for adverse events [25%], surgical outcomes [16%] and survival [9%]), followed by diagnostic (29%) and decision support models (21%). Neural networks (44%) and ensemble learners (36%) were the most commonly used AI methods across application domains. The main pediatric surgical subspecialties represented across all models were general surgery (31%) and neurosurgery (25%). Forty-four percent of models were interpretable, and 6% were both interpretable and externally validated. Forty percent of models had a high risk of bias, and concerns over applicability were identified in 7%. CONCLUSIONS: While AI has wide potential clinical applications in pediatric surgery, very few published AI algorithms were externally validated, interpretable, and unbiased. Future research needs to focus on developing AI models which are prospectively validated and ultimately integrated into clinical workflows. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2A.

ChatGPT: What Every Pediatric Surgeon Should Know About Its Potential Uses and Pitfalls.

ChatGPT - currently the most popular generative artificial intelligence system - has been revolutionizing the world and healthcare since its release in November 2022. ChatGPT is a conversational chatbot that uses machine learning algorithms to enhance its replies based on user interactions and is a part of a broader effort to develop natural language processing that can assist people in their daily lives by understanding and responding to human language in a useful and engaging way. Thus far, many potential applications within healthcare have been described, despite its relatively recent release. This manuscript offers the pediatric surgical community a primer on this new technology and discusses some initial observations about its potential uses and pitfalls. Moreover, it introduces the perspectives of medical journals and surgical societies regarding the use of this artificial intelligence chatbot. As ChatGPT and other large language models continue to evolve, it is the responsibility of the pediatric surgery community to stay abreast of these changes and play an active role in safely incorporating them into our field for the benefit of our patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

The Impact of Educational Materials on Parental Anxiety and Productivity: A Clinical Trial in Pediatric Appendicitis.

OBJECTIVES: There is limited literature on how acute appendicitis, the most common acute children's surgical illness, affects the family. We conducted a prospective study to assess the impact of educational materials on parents' anxiety and productivity during the child's illness. METHODS: A quasi-experimental clinical trial was conducted among parents of children undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy. In Phase I, parents received the standard explanations at diagnosis and throughout the postoperative period. In Phase II, parents also received a comprehensive educational brochure on pediatric appendicitis at diagnosis. The primary outcome, parental preoperative anxiety, was assessed using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS). The secondary outcome, parental productivity, was evaluated through a post-recovery online questionnaire based on the Productivity and Disease Questionnaire (PRODISQ). Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two cohorts using t-tests, Mann-Whitney, chi-square, or Fischer's exact test as appropriate. RESULTS: Phases I and II included 67 and 66 families, respectively. Patient demographics and disease severity were similar between both groups. Of the 53 parents (80.3%) in Phase II who answered the postoperative questionnaire, most recommended the booklet (96.2%), as it decreased their stress (78.0%) and enhanced their understanding of appendicitis (94.1%). However, the two groups showed similar preoperative anxiety levels and postoperative productivity loss. CONCLUSIONS: Educational materials increased satisfaction with surgical care but did not mitigate the high parental preoperative anxiety levels and postoperative productivity loss. Additional research is required to elucidate interventions that may improve these important patient and family-centered outcomes. TYPE OF STUDY: Non-Randomized Clinical Trial. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Adaptation, Translation, and Validation of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure for Children and Young People for the Canadian Context.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) evaluate children's and young people's (CYP) perceptions of care. An important PREM developed with and for children was created in London, UK. Given the absence of similar North American instruments, we aimed to adapt, translate, and linguistically validate this instrument for use in a Canadian pediatric outpatient setting. METHODS: A qualitative design was used, involving CYP and their parents/caregivers. Phase 1 entailed the English survey adaptation using think-aloud testing, revision, and cognitive testing. Phase 2 involved translation into French, revision and back-translation, and cognitive testing. Phase 3 encompassed a cross-validation of the English and French versions of the adapted instrument. RESULTS: Fifty-five children in 3 age groups (8-11y, 12-13y, 14-16y) participated in creating the Canadian PREM. In Phases 1 and 2, 41 children participated in reviewing and updating specific questions in the instrument, resulting in adjustments and revisions based on their feedback. In Phase 3, 14 bilingual children linguistically validated the PREM instrument. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports the development of the first Canadian PREM specifically tailored to children. By incorporating the perspectives and preferences of CYP in clinical practice, this approach has the potential to amplify the delivery of patient-centered care for this vulnerable population and ensure that the needs and voices of CYP are acknowledged. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V, Therapeutic.

Improving Pediatric Trauma Education by Teaching Non-technical Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric trauma is a significant cause of child mortality, and the absence of non-technical skills (NTS) among health providers is linked with errors in patients' care. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness of a structured debriefing protocol in enhancing NTS during pediatric trauma simulation. METHODS: A total of 45 medical students were successfully recruited from two medical schools, one in Brazil and one in Canada. Medical students were assigned to a control (N = 20) or intervention group (N = 25) in a randomized control trial. Following simulated scenarios, participants in the intervention group underwent NTS debriefing, while the control received standard debriefing based on the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) protocol. Students' confidence, NTS level, and performance were measured through self-assessment surveys, the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) score, and adherence to the trauma protocol, respectively. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared using t-tests, Mann-Whitney, Wilcoxon signed-rank Kruskal-Wallis, ANOVA, and a repeated-measures ANCOVA. A significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The workshop increased students' confidence in leading trauma resuscitation regardless of their assignment to condition. While controlling for covariates, students in the intervention group significantly improved their overall NOTSS compared to those in the control and in all categories: situational awareness, decision-making, communication and teamwork, and leadership. The intervention teams also demonstrated a significant increase in completing trauma protocol steps. CONCLUSION: Implementing structured debriefing focusing on NTS enhanced these skills and improved adherence to protocol among medical students managing pediatric trauma-simulated scenarios. These findings support integrating NTS training in pediatric trauma education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Using Artificial Intelligence to Label Free-Text Operative and Ultrasound Reports for Grading Pediatric Appendicitis.

PURPOSE: Data science approaches personalizing pediatric appendicitis management are hampered by small datasets and unstructured electronic medical records (EMR). Artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots based on large language models can structure free-text EMR data. We compare data extraction quality between ChatGPT-4 and human data collectors. METHODS: To train AI models to grade pediatric appendicitis preoperatively, several data collectors extracted detailed preoperative and operative data from 2100 children operated for acute appendicitis. Collectors were trained for the task based on satisfactory Kappa scores. ChatGPT-4 was prompted to structure free text from 103 random anonymized ultrasound and operative records in the dataset using the set variables and coding options, and to estimate appendicitis severity grade from the operative report. A pediatric surgeon then adjudicated all data, identifying errors in each method. RESULTS: Within the 44 ultrasound (42.7%) and 32 operative reports (31.1%) discordant in at least one field, 98% of the errors were found in the manual data extraction. The appendicitis grade was erroneously assigned manually in 29 patients (28.2%), and by ChatGPT-4 in 3 (2.9%). Across datasets, the use of the AI chatbot was able to avoid misclassification in 59.2% of the records including both reports and extracted data approximately 40 times faster. CONCLUSION: AI chatbot significantly outperformed manual data extraction in accuracy for ultrasound and operative reports, and correctly assigned the appendicitis grade. While wider validation is required and data safety concerns must be addressed, these AI tools show significant promise in improving the accuracy and efficiency of research data collection. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Correlation between Preoperative MRI Parameters and Oswestry Disability Index in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is a degenerative condition posing significant challenges in clinical management. Despite the use of radiological parameters and patient-reported outcome measures like the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for evaluation, there is limited understanding of their interrelationship. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between preoperative MRI parameters and ODI scores in patients with LSS undergoing surgical treatment. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 86 patients diagnosed with LSS over a 5-year period. Preoperative MRI measurements, including the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle, lumbar canal stenosis, neural foramina area, and facet joint osteoarthritis, were assessed. ODI scores were collected preoperatively and at a 1-year follow-up. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (version 26). Results: Weak to moderate correlations were observed between certain MRI parameters and ODI scores. The initial ODI score had a weak positive correlation with the severity of lumbar canal stenosis according to Schizas criteria (rho = 0.327, p = 0.010) and a moderate negative correlation with the relative cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle (rho = -0.498, p = 0.000). At 1-year follow-up, the ODI had a weak negative correlation with the relative cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle (rho = -0.284, p = 0.026). Conclusions: While the severity of LSS showed a weak correlation with initial ODI, it was not a predictor of 1-year postoperative ODI. Furthermore, although the cross-sectional area of the thecal sac, the sagittal area of the neural foramen, and the grade of facet joint osteoarthritis influence the imagistic severity, none of them correlate with ODI. These findings underscore the need for a comprehensive model that integrates multiple imaging and clinical parameters for a holistic understanding of LSS and its functional outcomes.

The evidence mismatch in pediatric surgical practice.

PURPOSE: Outpatient pediatric surgical practice often involves conditions of limited morbidity but significant parental concern. We explore existing evidence-based management recommendations and the mismatch with practice patterns for four common outpatient pediatric surgical conditions. METHODS: Using the Cochrane Rapid Review Group recommendations and librarian oversight, we conducted a rapid review of four outpatient surgical conditions: dermoid cysts, epigastric hernias, hydroceles, and umbilical hernias. We extracted patient demographics, intervention details, outcome measures and evaluated justifications presented for chosen management options. A metric of evidence volume (patient/publication ratio) was generated and compared between diagnoses. RESULTS: Out of 831 articles published since 1990, we identified 49 cohort studies (10-dermoid cyst, 6-epigastric hernia, 25-hydrocele, and 8-umbilical hernia). The 49 publications included 34,172 patients treated across 18 countries. The evidence volume for each outpatient condition demonstrates < 1 cohort/condition/year. The evidence mismatch rate varied between 33 and 75%; many existing recommendations are not evidence-based, sometimes conflicting and frequently misrepresentative of clinical practice. CONCLUSIONS: Published literature concerning common outpatient pediatric surgical conditions is sparse and demonstrates wide variations in practice. All individual practice choices were justified using either risk of complications or patient preference. Most early intervention practices were based on weak or outdated studies and "common wisdom" rather than genuine evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Defining Feasibility as a Criterion for Essential Surgery: A Qualitative Study with Global Children's Surgery Experts.

BACKGROUND: The Disease Control Priorities (DCP-3) group defines surgery as essential if it addresses a significant burden, is cost-effective, and is feasible-yet the feasibility component remains largely unexplored. The aim of this study was to develop a precise definition of feasibility for essential surgical procedures for children. METHODS: Four online focus group discussions (FGDs) were organized among 19 global children's surgery providers with experience of working in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), representing 10 countries. FGDs were transcribed verbatim, and qualitative data analysis was performed. Codes, categories, themes, and subthemes were identified. RESULTS: Six determinants of feasibility were identified, including: adequate human resources; adequate material resources; procedure and disease complexity; team commitment and understanding of their setting; timely access to care; and the ability to monitor and achieve good outcomes. Factors unique to feasibility of children's surgery included children's right to health and their reliance on adults for accessing safe and timely care; the need for specialist workforce; and children's unique perioperative care needs. FGD participants reported a greater need for task-sharing and shifting, creativity, and adaptability in resource-limited settings. Resource availability was seen to have a direct impact on decision-making and prioritization, e.g., saving a life versus achieving the best outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The identification of a precise definition of feasibility serves as a pivotal step in identifying a list of essential surgical procedures for children, which would serve as indicators of institutional surgical capacity for this age group.

Determinants of Access to Essential Surgery in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

INTRODUCTION: In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), the determinants and barriers of essential surgical care are not well described, hindering efforts to improve national surgical programs and access. METHODS: A cross-sectional study evaluated access to essential surgery in the Butembo and Katwa health zones in the North Kivu province of DRC. A double-clustered random sample of community members was surveyed using questions derived from the Surgeons OverSeas Surgical Needs Assessment Survey, a validated tool to determine the reasons for not seeking, reaching, or receiving a Bellwether surgery (i.e., caesarean delivery, laparotomy, and external fixation of a fracture) when needed. RESULTS: Overall, 887 households comprising 5944 community members were surveyed from April to August 2022. Six percent (n = 363/5944) of the study population involving 35% (n = 309/887) households needed a Bellwether surgery in the previous year, 30% (n = 108/363) of whom died. Of those who needed surgery, 25% (n = 78) did not go to the hospital to seek care and were more likely to find transportation unaffordable (P = 0.042). The most common reasons for not seeking care were lack of funds for hospitalization, prior poor hospital experience, and fear of hospital care. CONCLUSIONS: Access and delivery of essential surgery are drastically limited in the North Kivu province of the DRC, such that a quarter of households needing surgery fails to seek surgical care. Poor access was predominantly driven by households' inability to pay for surgery and community distrust of the hospital system.

Assessing the inclusion of children's surgical care in National Surgical, Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plans: a policy content analysis.

OBJECTIVE: While National Surgical, Obstetric and Anaesthesia Plans (NSOAPs) have emerged as a strategy to strengthen and scale up surgical healthcare systems in low/middle-income countries (LMICs), the degree to which children's surgery is addressed is not well-known. This study aims to assess the inclusion of children's surgical care among existing NSOAPs, identify practice examples and provide recommendations to guide inclusion of children's surgical care in future policies. DESIGN: We performed two qualitative content analyses to assess the inclusion of children's surgical care among NSOAPs. We applied a conventional (inductive) content analysis approach to identify themes and patterns, and developed a framework based on the Global Initiative for Children's Surgery's Optimal Resources for Children's Surgery document. We then used this framework to conduct a directed (deductive) content analysis of the NSOAPs of Ethiopia, Nigeria, Rwanda, Senegal, Tanzania and Zambia. RESULTS: Our framework for the inclusion of children's surgical care in NSOAPs included seven domains. We evaluated six NSOAPs with all addressing at least two of the domains. All six NSOAPs addressed 'human resources and training' and 'infrastructure', four addressed 'service delivery', three addressed 'governance and financing', two included 'research, evaluation and quality improvement', and one NSOAP addressed 'equipment and supplies' and 'advocacy and awareness'. CONCLUSIONS: Additional focus must be placed on the development of surgical healthcare systems for children in LMICs. This requires a focus on children's surgical care separate from adult surgical care in the scaling up of surgical healthcare systems, including children-focused needs assessments and the inclusion of children's surgery providers in the process. This study proposes a framework for evaluating NSOAPs, highlights practice examples and suggests recommendations for the development of future policies.

"Your child needs surgery": A survey-based evaluation of simulated expert consent conversations by key stakeholders.

BACKGROUND: Consent conversations in pediatric surgery are essential components of pre-operative care which, when inadequate, can lead to significant adverse consequences for the child, parents, surgeon, and others in the healthcare system. The aim of this study is to explore expert consenting practice from the key stakeholders' perspective. METHODS: Four senior attending pediatric surgeons obtained consent from a standardized mother of a child requiring surgery in two scenarios: a low-risk elective surgery (inguinal hernia repair - Video 1), and a high-risk emergency surgery (intestinal atresia - Video 2). All sessions were recorded. Families of children who had undergone minor or major surgery, families without medical or surgical background, and healthcare professionals were invited to view and evaluate the videos using a semi-structured questionnaire. RESULTS: Out of 251 distributed surveys, 56 complete responses were received. Thirty two participants (57.1%) evaluated video 1 and 24 (42.9%) evaluated. Overall, 22 (69%) respondents to video 1 and 20 (84%) respondents to video 2 were "very satisfied" with the recorded consent conversation. Qualitative responses shared common themes of valuing surgeon empathy, good surgeon communication, patient engagement, and adequate time and information. Suggestions for improvement included additional resources and visual aids, improved patient engagement, and discussion of post-operative expectations. CONCLUSION: Our data identifies strengths and gaps in the current consent process from the perspective of patient families and providers. Identified areas for improvement in the informed consent process based on multi-stakeholder input will guide the planned development of a consenting educational video resource. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Technology-enhanced trauma training in low-resource settings: A scoping review and feasibility analysis of educational technologies.

BACKGROUND: Lack of training contributes to the burden of trauma-related mortality and morbidity in low- and lower-middle-income countries (LMICs). Educational technologies present a unique opportunity to enhance the quality of trauma training. Therefore, this study reviews current technologies used in trauma courses and evaluates their feasibility for LMICs. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review evaluating the learning outcomes of technology-enhanced training in general trauma assessment, team skills or any procedures covered in the 2020 Advanced Trauma Life Support® program. Based on the Technology-Enhanced Learning criteria, we created and applied a feasibility analysis tool to evaluate the technologies for use in LMICs. RESULTS: We screened 6471 articles and included 64. Thirty-four (45%) articles explored training in general trauma assessment, 28 (37%) in team skills, and 24 (32%) in procedures. The most common technologies were high-fidelity mannequins (60%), video-assisted debriefing (19%), and low-fidelity mannequins (13%). Despite their effectiveness, high-fidelity mannequins ranked poorly in production, maintenance, cost, and reusability categories, therefore being poorly suited for LMICs. Virtual simulation and digital courses had the best feasibility scores, but still represented a minority of articles in our review. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to perform a feasibility analysis of trauma training technologies in the LMIC context. We identified that the majority of trauma courses in the literature use technologies which are less suitable for LMICs. Given the urgent need for pediatric trauma training, educators must use technologies that optimize learning outcomes and remain feasible for low-resource settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.