[The relationship between the level of Lр(а) and the prevalence of atherosclerosis among young patients].

BACKGROUND: Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) is an independent and cause risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). The correlation between lipoprotein (a) Lp(a) and inflammation in the vessel wall was actively studied during the past few years. C-reactive protein (CRP) plays an important role in ASCVD. AIM: To analyze the relationship between hyperlipoproteinemia (a), inflammatory markers, and the early development of stenosing atherosclerosis (AS) in several vascular pools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 76 patients, 55 men aged 18 to 55 years and 21women 18 to 60 years, with the results of instrumental examination of coronary, carotid and lower extremities vascular pools were enrolled. Three groups: with stenosing (50%) AS of only one (group 1, n=29); two or three (group 2, n=21) vascular pools. 26 patients without coronary heart disease and AS were included in the control group. All patients in groups 1 and 2 and 65% of those in the control group took statins. The concentrations of Lp(a), CRP, lipids and blood count were determined. RESULTS: The patients of the three groups did not differ in age. In the groups with AS (79% in group 1 and 85% in group 2), there were more men (relative to 54% in the control group). Diabetes mellitus was more common only in patients with multifocal AS. The absolute number of blood monocytes and leukocytes, the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, as well as Lp(a) level were higher in patients of groups 1 and 2 relative to the control. The maximum Lp(a) level (median [25%; 75%]) was observed in patients with lesions of two or more vascular pools vs the control group (49 [4; 96] mg/dL, vs 10 [4; 21] mg/dL, p=0.02). The CRP level was significant elevated in patients from group 2 7.2 [4.0; 9.7] mg/L, relative to group 1 2.5 [1.0; 4.7] mg/L, and the control group 2.9 [1.2; 4.9] mg/L, p0.05. The Lp(a) and CRP concentration, or the presence of diabetes mellitus in patients, regardless of other risk factors, were associated with severe stenosing AS in young and middle age. CONCLUSION: An elevated concentration of Lp(a) (30 mg/dL) determines the presence of both isolated and multifocal stenosing AS in the examined patients. A simultaneous increase in the concentration of both Lp(a) and CRP, as well as the presence of diabetes mellitus, are associated with the premature development of stenosing atherosclerotic lesions in several vascular regions at once. Measurement of these predictors in young and middle-aged patients makes it possible to use them as biochemical markers to assess the likelihood of multifocal lesions of the vascular pool.

A Sorbent with Synthetic Ligand for Removing Pro-atherogenic and Pro-inflammatory Components from Human Blood Plasma.

Elevated levels of apoB-100 containing lipoproteins and markers of systemic inflammation are often observed in patients with cardiovascular diseases. The concentrations can be reduced by pharmacotherapy or extracorporeal treatment. The sorbent, which removes CRP and atherogenic lipoproteins, simultaneously reduces the bloodstream concentration of these components. The efficacy and selectivity of the designed sorbent were studied, desorption constants of CRP (Kd = 4.2 × 10-8 M) and LDL (Kd = 7.7 × 10-7 M) were distribution coefficients of CRP (Kc = 101) and Lp(a) (Kc = 38) were calculated, and the ability to bind large amounts of atherogenic lipoproteins (up to 32 mg of TC per mL of the sorbent gel) was demonstrated. Our sorbent can be recommended for performing complex removal of CRP and atherogenic lipoproteins from the blood plasma in patients with refractory hyperlipidemia and CVD that are accompanied by elevated levels of CRP.

[Association of lipoprotein (a) with ischemic stroke and stenotic carotid atherosclerosis]. / Sviaz' lipoproteida(a) s ishemicheskim insul'tom i stenoziruiushchim aterosklerozom sonnykh arterii.

INTRODUCTION: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor of coronary heart disease and its complications. Meanwhile data about the role of Lp(a) in development of ischemic stroke are controversial. AIM: To investigate the association of Lp(a) with atherothrombotic ischemic stroke and stenotic (≥50%) atherosclerosis of carotid arteries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 490 patients (mean age 60 years, 53% male). The first group comprised 157 patients with ischemic stroke, the second group 68 patients with isolated stenotic atherosclerosis of carotid arteries, but without significant lesion of coronary and low limbs arteries. The control group included 265 patients without stroke, myocardial infarction, stenotic atherosclerosis of coronary, carotid and low limbs arteries according to instrumental examinations. The levels of Lp(a) and lipids were measured in blood serum of all patients. RESULTS: Lp(a) concentration was significantly higher in patients of the first and second groups in comparison with the control group (median [interquartile range]): 24 [9; 48], 20 [8; 55] vs 13 [5; 27] mg/dl, respectively (p<0,05 in both cases). Hyperlipoproteinemia(a) (Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dl) was more frequent in the group with stroke, stenotic atherosclerosis of carotid arteries, than in the control group: 43%, 40% vs 22% (p<0.01 in all cases). In patients with hyperlipoproteinemia(a), odds ratio (OR) for ischemic stroke was 2.7 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-4.1), and OR for stenotic atherosclerosis of carotid arteries was 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-4.0) compared to the patients with Lp(a) level <30 mg/dl (p<0.01 in both cases). In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, smoking and Lp(a) concentration, the hyperlipoproteinemia(a) was associated with ischemic stroke and isolated stenotic carotid atherosclerosis. In the group with severe carotid atherosclerosis, 16 patients (24%) had ischemic stroke. Lp(a) concentration in these patients was higher 36 [20; 59] mg/dl, than in the patients with isolated carotid atherosclerosis without stroke 15 [7; 54] mg/dl (p=0.04). Other risk factors of atherosclerosis did not differ in patients with or without ischemic stroke. CONCLUSION: The study shows the association of elevated level of Lp(a) with ischemic stroke and isolated stenotic atherosclerosis of carotid arteries. In the presence of isolated stenotic carotid atherosclerosis, the median of Lp(a) concentration was significantly higher in patients with ischemic stroke than in patients without stroke.

[Lipoprotein(а) Level, Apolipoprotein(а) Polymorphism аnd Autoаntibodies Against Lipoprotein(а) in Patients with Stenotic Cаrotid Atherosclerosis].

Аim. Comparative assessment of respiratory indicators according to multifunctional monitoring (PFM) with the recommended standard for a complete polysomnographic study and an assessment of the effect of blood pressure (BP) measurements in PFM on sleep quality. Triаls on the аssociаtion of Lp(а) and cаrotid аtherosclerosis аre limited. The аim of the study wаs to investigаte the аssociаtion of Lp(а), аpolipoprotein(а) [apo(а)] polymorphism аnd аutoаntibodies to Lp(а) with stenotic (≥50%) cаrotid аtherosclerosis in dependence on CHD presence. Materials and methods. The study included 785 pаtients аt the аge from 21 to 92 with dаtа of instrumentаl exаmination of coronаry, cаrotid аnd lower limbs аrteries. Stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis wаs diаgnosed in 447 pаtients who were divided into two groups depending on presence (n=344) or аbsence (n=103) of CHD. The control group comprised of 338 pаtients without stenotic аtherosclerosis of coronаry, cаrotid аnd lower limbs аrteries. In the blood serum of pаtients levels of Lp(а), аutoаntibodies to Lp(а) were determined аnd аlso аpo(а) phenotyping wаs conducted. Results. There were more mаles, higher аverаge аge аnd frequency of hypertension, type 2 diаbetes mellitus, smoking, Lp(а) concentrаtion (mediаn [interquаrtile rаnge]): 30 [11; 63] vs. 14 [5; 30] mg/dl, p<0.01) in the group with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis in compаrison with control group. Besides, Lp(а) level wаs higher in CHD subgroup thаn in pаtients with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis without CHD: 32 [12; 72] vs. 24 [8; 50] mg/dl, respectively, p=0.01. Elevаted (≥30 mg/dl) Lp(а) level, low moleculаr weight аpolipoprotein(а) [(LMW аpo(а)] phenotype were аssociаted with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis (odds rаtio (OR) 2.9; 95% confidence intervаl (CI) 2.1-4.0, p<0.01 аnd OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.6-3.4, p<0.01, respectively). Logistic regression аnаlysis showed independent аssociаtion of elevаted Lp(а) level аnd LMW аpo(а) phenotype with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis both in the presence аnd absence of CHD. The level of IgM аutoаntibodies to Lp(а) wаs higher in control group thаn in pаtients with stenotic cаrotid аtherosclerosis, p=0.02. Conclusion The level of Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dl and low molecular weight phenotype of aprotein(a) are predictors of stenotic atherosclerosis CA, regardless of the presence of coronary heart disease and other risk factors, while a reverse relationship was found between the level of autoantibodies of the IgM class against Lp(a) and the severity of atherosclerosis CA.

[The Relationship of the Concentration of Lipoprotein(a) and Markers of Inflammation with Multifocal Atherosclerosis in Women].

PURPOSE: to study relationship of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], indicators of systemic inflammation and humoral immunity with severity of atherosclerotic involvement of various vascular beds in women. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included in this study 148 women aged 69±11 years with results of instrumental investigation of coronary, carotid arteries, and arteries of lower extremities. According to results of coronary angiography and ultrasound study patients were distributed into two groups: with stenosing atherosclerosis (those with hemodynamically significant [>50%] atherosclerotic lesions in any of these vascular beds, n=108), and control (those without hemodynamically significant stenoses, n=40). In dependence of extent of atherosclerotic involvement patients with stenosing atherosclerosis were divided into subgroups: with lesions in one vascular bed (subgroup 1, n=44) and with lesions in two and more vascular beds (subgroup 2, n=64). All patients with stenosing atherosclerosis and 78% of control patients took statins. In all patients we measured lipid spectrum, Lp(a) concentration, C-reactive protein (CRP). Preparations of oxidized lipoproteins [oxLp(a)] were obtained by Cu2+-induced free radical oxidation at 37 °Ð¡ for 3 hours. Titer of autoantibodies to Lp(a), LDL and their oxidized modifications was determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol corrected on cholesterol in Lp(a) (LDLCh corr) was calculated by Dahlen modification of Friedewald formula. RESULTS: Stenosing atherosclerosis was diagnosed in 60 of 74 women (80%) with Lp(a) concentration above median - 33 mg/dl (in 38 multifical). Increase of blood serum Lp(a) concentration was associated with presence of isolated as well as multifocal atherosclerosis according to unifactorial, multifactorial, and logistic analysis, irrespective of other factors of risk and indicators of inflammation. According to results of logistic regression analysis increase of Lp(a) concentration by 1 mg/dl was associated with 1 % elevation of probability of appearance and development of multifocal atherosclerosis in women. Low level of class IgM autoantibodies to Lp(a) was linked with detection of stenosing atherosclerosis in any of 3 vascular beds (1st vs. 4th quartile of IgM autoantibodies concentration - OR 7.6., 95%CI 1.9-29.4; р=0.004) and had diagnostic significance. Indicators of systemic inflammation such as CRP and circulating immune complexes were high and had diagnostic significance for detection of multifocal atherosclerosis in studied women. However none of indicators was predictor of appearance of stenosing atherosclerosis according to data of logistic regression analysis. CONCLUSION: Elevated concentration of Lp(a) is an independent predictor of risk of development stenosing atherosclerosis in various vascular beds and appearance of multifocal irrespective of other risk factors, indicators of systemic inflammation, and factors of humoral immunity in women. Markers of inflammation, as well as IgM autoantibodies against Lp(a) have diagnostic value for detection of patients stenosing lesions ib one or several vascular beds.

A Low-Molecular-Weight Phenotype of Apolipoprotein(a) as a Factor Provoking Accumulation of Cholesterol by THP-1 Monocyte-Like Cells.

Increased concentration of lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor of coronary heart disease. lipoprotein(a) consists of LDL-like and highly polymorphic apolipoprotein(a). Here we studied the effect of lipoprotein(a)-containing sera with different apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes on lipid accumulation by THP-1 monocyte-like cells. Cholesterol concentration in lysates of THP-1 cells was significantly higher after their incubation with lipoprotein(a)-containing serum samples with low-molecular-weight phenotype of apolipoprotein(a) in comparison with samples with a high-molecular-weight apolipoprotein(a) phenotype irrespective of initial cholesterol level as well as serum concentrations of apoB-100, oxidized LDL, and circulating immune complexes. The presence of the most atherogenic small dense LDL subfractions in examined sera in addition to a low-molecular-weight apolipoprotein(a) phenotype resulted in significant elevation of cholesterol accumulation by THP-1 cells. The data obtained explain greater atherogenicity of lipoprotein(a) with low-molecular-weight apolipoprotein(a) phenotype.

The Association of Lipoprotein(a), Apolipoprotein(a) Phenotypes and Autoantibodies to Lipoprotein(a) With Lower Extremity Artery Disease.

AIM: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and low molecular weight (LMW) apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotype are risk factors of сoronary heart disease and stroke. Data about the role of Lp(a) and phenotypes apo(a) in the development of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) is scarce. The aim of our study was to assess the association of Lp(a), apo(a) phenotypes and autoantibodies to apolipoprotein B100 (apoB100) lipoproteins with LEAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 622 patients (386 male and 236 female, average age 61±12 years), examined in the Department of Atherosclerosis of National Medical Research Center of Cardiology. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the main group included 284 patients with LEAD, 338 patients without significant atherosclerosis of coronary, carotid and lower limbs arteries formed the control group. LEAD was diagnosed as atherosclerotic lesions with at least one stenosis of low limb artery ≥50 % and ankle-brachial index ≤0.9. The concentration of Lp(a), lipids was measured in blood serum of all the patients, level of autoantibodies to apoB100 lipoproteins was measured in 247 patients, and apo(a) phenotypes were determined in 389 patients. RESULTS: Patients with LEAD were older, were more frequently male, and had a greater prevalence of risk factors including hypertension, type 2 diabetes, smoking than the control group patients (p<0.001 in all the cases). The level of Lp(a) was significantly higher in the main group compared to control group: 35 [14; 67] mg / dl vs. 14 [5; 32] mg / dl, p<0,001. ROC analysis demonstrated that the level of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl was associated with LEAD (sensitivity 61 %, specificity 70 %). The prevalence of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl and LMW apo(a) phenotype were higher in the main group in comparison with the control group: 61 % vs. 30 % and 48 % vs. 26 % respectively (p<0.001 in the both cases). The odds ratio of LEAD in the presence of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl was 3.7 (95 % confidence interval (CI), 2.6-5.1, p<0.001) and in the presence of LMW apo(a) phenotype was 2.6 (95 % CI, 1.7-4.0, p<0.001). In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, smoking, diabetes, both Lp(a) and LMW apo(a) phenotype were independent predictors of LEAD when included separately. The level of IgM autoantibodies to Lp(a) was significantly higher in the control group compared to the patients with LEAD (p=0.01). Concentration of IgG autoantobodies to Lp(a) and LDL in the plasma did not differ essentially in the both groups. CONCLUSION: The level of Lp(a) ≥26 mg / dl and LMW apo(a) phenotype are independent predictors of LEAD, whereas the contribution of autoantobodies to Lp(a) in LEAD development is controversial.

The association of lipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes with peripheral artery disease.

AIM: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an independent risk factor of coronary heart disease (CHD) and myocardial infarction. Data about the role of Lp(a) in the development of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is controversial and uncertain. The aim of the study was to evaluate the association between Lp(a), apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes and PAD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 998 patients (707 male and 291 female, average age 60±12). The patients were divided into 4 groups depending on the presence or absence PAD and CHD: group I (n=188, PAD+CHD+), group II (n=78, PAD+CHD-), group III (n=407, PAD-CHD+), group IV (n=325, PAD-CHD-). RESULTS: The level of Lp(a) was significantly higher in groups I, II, III in comparison with patients of control group (group IV): 34 [15; 80], 30 [10; 49], 22 [8; 60] mg/dl vs. 15 [6; 35] mg/dl respectively, p<0.01 in all cases. Lp(a) level was higher in the group I than in the other groups (p<0.05). The prevalence of elevated Lp(a) level (≥ 30 mg/dl) was significantly higher in groups I, II, III than in control group: 54%, 50%, 43% respectively vs. 30%, p<0.01 in all cases. The prevalence of Lp(a) ≥ 30 mg/dl was more frequent in the group with PAD and CHD than in the group with CHD and without PAD (p=0.02). The odds ratio (OR) of PAD in the presence of elevated Lp(a) level was 1.9 (95%CI, 1.4-2.5, p<0.01). Low molecular weight (LMW) apo(a) phenotype was met more frequently in groups I, II, III compared to group IV: 46%, 56%, 52% respectively vs. 28%, p<0.01. LMW apo(a) in the patients without CHD was associated with PAD (OR 3.3; 95% CI, 1.6-6.8, p<0.01), and there was no association with the patients with CHD. In logistic regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, obesity, smoking, diabetes, LDL-C, Lp(a) and LMW apo(a) phenotype were independent predictors of PAD when included separately. CONCLUSION: Elevated level of Lp(a) and LMW apo(a) phenotype are independent risk factors of PAD. The level of Lp(a) in the patients with PAD and CHD was higher than in the case of isolated lesion of each vascular pool. Higher level of Lp(a) is associated with more severe atherosclerosis involving more than one vascular pools.

Specific Lp(a) apheresis: A tool to prove lipoprotein(a) atherogenicity.

BACKGROUND: An elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) level is observed in more than 30% of patients with stable ischemic heart disease (SIHD). We conducted an investigation of the effects of specific Lp(a) apheresis on the progression of atherosclerosis in SIHD patients with Lp(a) levels greater than 50 mg/dL. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 15 patients diagnosed with SIHD based on symptom-driven coronary angiography findings, with Lp(a) ≥50 mg/dL and a low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) ≤2.5 mmol/L, who were on long-term statin therapy. They underwent weekly Lp(a) apheresis using Lp(a) Lipopak® adsorption columns which contain monospecific sheep polyclonal antibodies against human Lp(a). Fifteen age and gender matched SIHD patients receiving atorvastatin monotherapy served as controls. At baseline and 18 months post-treatment, quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary ultrasound with virtual histology and carotid ultrasound were performed. Lipid profile, including Lp(a), was measured at the scheduled visits, and before and after each apheresis procedure. Levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-7 and 9, and tissue inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMP)-1 and 2 were determined at baseline and at the end of the study period. RESULTS: Each specific Lp(a) apheresis procedure was carried out with two adsorption columns resulting in an average acute decrease in Lp(a) levels of 75% (from 110 ± 22 to 29 ± 16 mg/dL) without significant changes in other plasma components. Lp(a) reduction over the course of 18 months was associated with a decrease in the mean percent diameter stenosis of 5.05% and an increase in minimal lumen diameter of 14%; the mean total atheroma volume was reduced by 4.60 mm3 (p < 0.05 for all). There was a decrease in absolute common carotid intima-media thickness in the Lp(a) apheresis group of 0.07 ± 0.15 mm both from baseline and compared with the control group (p = 0.01). Levels of hsCRP were reduced by 40% in patients on Lp(a) apheresis without significant changes in the levels of other biomarkers at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Reduction of the atherosclerotic burden in coronary and carotid arteries was observed in patients treated with specific Lp(a) apheresis and statin over 18 months compared with statin therapy alone. These findings support the atherogenic role of Lp(a) and reinforce the need to assess the effects of Lp(a)-lowering on cardiovascular events and mortality. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02133807).

[Lipoprotein(a), its autoantibodies, and circulating T lymphocyte subpopulations as independent risk factors for coronary artery atherosclerosis]. / Lipoproteid(a), autoantitela k nemu i tsirkuliruyushchie subpopulyatsii T-limfotsitov kak nezavisimye faktory riska ateroskleroza koronarnykh arterii.

AIM: To study the role of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a potential autoantigen causing the activation of immunocompetent cells in atherosclerosis. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A total of 104 men with stable coronary artery (CA) disease and different degrees of progressive coronary atherosclerosis were examined. Clinical blood analysis was carried out and lymphocyte subpopulations (CD4+, Th1, Th17, and Treg) were determined using immunofluorescence and flow cytometry. In addition, the indicators of blood lipid composition, Lp(a), autoantibody (autoAb) titer to Lp(a), and low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and the lymphocyte activation marker sCD25 were also measured. RESULTS: The Lp(a) level was shown to predict the severity of CA lesions (ß=0.28, p<0.05), regardless of age, the level of cholesterol, different T-lymphocyte subpopulations, sCD25, and autoAb. A combination of the concentration of Lp(a) above 11.8 mg/dl, that of Th17 over 11.4∙103 cells/ml and the reduced levels of regulatory T cells and IL-10-producing CD4+ T cells showed a manifold increase in the risk of severe and progressive CA atherosclerosis. There was a direct correlation of the blood level of Th1 with that of IgG autoAb specific to all atherogenic apoB-containing lipoproteins, including Lp(a). There was an inverse correlations of the lymphocyte activation marker sCD25 with IgM anti-Lp(a) autoAb titers (r=-0.36; p<0.005), but this was less significant with autoAbs to native and oxidized LDL (r=-0.21 and r=-0.24; p<0.05, respectively). CONCLUSION: The slightly elevated Lp(a) concentration along with changes in the level of T lymphocyte subpopulations was first shown to significantly potentiate the risk of progressive and multiple CA lesion in the examinees. The correlation of IgM anti-Lp(a) autoAb with the lymphocyte activation marker sCD25 and that of IgG anti-Lp(a) autoAb with Th1 have demonstrated that Lp(a) is involved in the autoimmune inflammatory processes in atherosclerosis.

[Elevated Lipoprotein(a) Cncentration and Presence of Subfractions of Small Dense Low Density Lipoproteins as Independent Factors of Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease].

AIM: To study relation of lipoproteina - Lp(a) and subfractional composition of apoB containing lipoproteins to the presence of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Manerial and methods. Parameters of lipid spectrum, Lp(a), and subfractions of apoB containing lipoproteins were determined in blood serum of 187 patients with known data of instrumental examination. RESULTS: Lp(a) concentration was not linked to any of risk factors, levels total cholesterol (TC), low and high density lipoprotein CH, and subfractions of lipoproteins. In total group triglyceride (TGG) level correlated with content of small dense LDL (sdLDL) (r=0.445, <0.0001) and mean dimension of LDL particles (r=-0.424, p<0.0001). This correlation was absent in the subgroup with Lp(a) more or equal 30 mg/dl and was strengthered among patients with normal Lp(a) level. In total group presence of IHD was associated with sex (r=0.325, p<0.0001), Lp(a) concentration (r=0.271, p=0.0001), and level of triglycerides (r=0.159, p=0.030). In multiple regression analysis levels of TG, Lp(a) and sdLDL were selected as factors independently associated with presence of IHD. Detection of subfractions sdLDL>2 mg/dl in blood plasma (atherogenic profile B), as well as lowering of concentration of large LDL subfractions significantly increased probability of IHD presence in patients with elevated Lp(a) concentration Lp(a) concentration. CONCLUSION: Lp(a) is an independent factor of risk of coronary atherosclerosis more significant than shifts in subfractional composition of apoB containing lipoproteins. In patients with Lp(a) concentration less or equal 30 mg/dl subfractions of sdLDL were directly related to TG. Level of sdLDL and large lipoproteins of intermediate density are directly related to the presence of IHD. Large LDL correlates with concentration of HDL DL C and probably is cardioprotective. sdLDL content>2 mg/l or hypertriglyceridemia (TG>1.7 mmol/l) significantly increase chances of detection of confirmed IHD in patients with elevated Lp(a).

[Tyramine and tryptamine as ligands for medical and biotechnological affinity sorbents].

A novel technique for preparation affinity sorbent based on tyramine and tryptamine was proposed. It was shown that tryptamine-Sepharose and tyramine-Sepharose effectively bind IgG, IgA, lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) and low density lipoproteins (LDL) from blood plasma. The sorption capacity is 4-9 mg of IgG, 2-4 mg IgA, 3-5:mg of Lp(a) and 5-7 mg of LDL per mL of gel. It was found that new sorbents can bind Lp(a) and IgG as themselves or in a complex of Lp(a) with IgG. The existence of this complex may indicate the presence of anti-Lp(a) autoantibodies in the blood of some patients. The advantages of new sorbents are easiness of its synthesis and stability during use and storage. In practice they can be applied for medical and biotechnological purposes where it is necessary to bind Lp(a), LDL, IgG, IgA.

Lowering of lipoprotein(a) level under niacin treatment is dependent on apolipoprotein(a) phenotype.

BACKGROUND: Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a cardiovascular risk factor; in addition to being a low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-like particle, it contains highly heterogeneous apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)]. No prior studies have evaluated extended-release (ER) niacin effect on Lp(a) level depending on apo(a) phenotype. METHODS: For this 24-week, prospective, open-label clinical trial we recruited 30 men (mean age 46.2 ± 7.5 years) with Lp(a) levels >20 mg/dL. No participant had previously received lipid lowering therapy, and started ER niacin 500 mg with stepwise dose increasing up to 1.5-2.0 g. Subjects were evaluated for Lp(a), lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2), and fibrinolytic markers (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, tissue plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 complex, plasmin-antiplasmin complex). Patients were divided into two groups with major low- (LMW) or high-molecular weight (HMW) apo(a) isoforms determined by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of plasma under reducing conditions followed by immunoblotting. RESULTS: At baseline, groups were comparable in age, lipid, inflammatory and fibrinolytic biomarkers levels. There was a significant difference in baseline Lp(a) concentrations: 92 ± 29 mg/dL versus 54 ± 46 mg/dL in LMW and HMW apo(a) groups, respectively, p < 0.01. During the course of niacin treatment Lp(a) decreased by 28% (p < 0.003), Lp-PLA2 by 22% (p < 0.001), C-reactive protein by 24% (p = 0.07) in LMW apo(a) group, whereas no changes in Lp(a) and biomarkers levels were obtained in HMW apo(a) group. CONCLUSION: High-dose ER niacin declines elevated Lp(a) level in male subjects with low- but not high-molecular weight apo(a) phenotype.

Specific Lipoprotein(a) apheresis attenuates progression of carotid intima-media thickness in coronary heart disease patients with high lipoprotein(a) levels.

BACKGROUND: To date, there have been no studies evaluating the effect of isolated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) lowering therapy on carotid atherosclerosis progression. METHODS: We enrolled 30 patients who had coronary heart disease (CHD) verified by angiography, Lp(a) level ≥50 mg/dL, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level ≤2.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) on chronic statin therapy. Subjects were allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive apheresis treatment on a weekly basis with immunoadsorption columns ("Lp(a) Lipopak"(®), POCARD Ltd., Russia) added to atorvastatin, or atorvastatin monotherapy. The primary efficacy end-point was the change from baseline in the mean intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid arteries. RESULTS: After one month run-in period with stable atorvastatin dose, LDL-C level was 2.3 ± 0.3 mmol/L and Lp(a) - 105 ± 37 mg/dL. As a result of acute effect of specific Lp(a) apheresis procedures, Lp(a) level decreased by an average of 73 ± 12% to a mean of 29 ± 16 mg/dL, and mean LDL-C decreased by 17 ± 3% to a mean of 1.8 ± 0.2 mmol/L. In the apheresis group, changes in carotid IMT at 9 and 18 months from baseline were -0.03 ± 0.09 mm (p = 0.05) and -0.07 ± 0.15 mm (p = 0.01), respectively. In the atorvastatin group no significant changes in lipid and lipoprotein parameters as well as in carotid IMT were received over 18-month period. Two years after study termination carotid IMT increased by an average of 0.02 ± 0.08 mm in apheresis group and by 0.06 ± 0.10 mm in the control group (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Isolated extracorporeal Lp(a) elimination over an 18 months period produced regression of carotid intima-media thickness in stable CHD patients with high Lp(a) levels. This effect was maintained for two years after the end of study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02133807).

[Affine Haemosorbents Based on Aromatic Peptides for Binding of the Immunoglobulin G].

Affinity haemoadsorbents based on WY, WTY, WNY ligands and polysaccharide matrix were developed for the human immunoglobulin G binding. The characteristics of new sorbents such as the binding of total IgG and binding of IgG subclasses were compared. It was found that all new sorbents well extract the IgG from the blood plasma. It was evidenced that WNY-based sorbent is more effective for binding of IgG subclass 3. The determination of physic-chemical characteristics of IgG binding revealed that desorption constants for IgG are 10 ± 3, 28 ± 4 and 13 ± 3 µM for WY, WTY, WNY based sorbents respectively. Maximum sorption capacities for IgG are 43 ± 2, 45 ± 3 and 46 ± 3 mg IgG per ml of sorbent for WY, WTY, WNY based sorbents respectively. Also it was shown that the new sorbents are compatible with blood and are suitable for the medical purposes.

Immunosorbent for IgG apheresis: an in vitro study.

We obtained anti-IgG Sepharose-an immunosorbent with sheep monospecific polyclonal antibodies against human IgG-for extracorporeal removal of human IgG. Appropriate conditions for effective usage of the immunosorbent were chosen. Binding capacity and selectivity of anti-IgG Sepharose were determined and compared with the corresponding properties of other sorbents for IgG apheresis; these properties appeared to be acceptable for immunoapheresis procedures. Methods for therapeutic application of anti-IgG Sepharose is expected to be effective when used in immunoapheresis procedures for treatment of autoimmune diseases and for preparation of patients for organ transplantation.

Development of immunosorbents for apoB-containing lipoproteins apheresis.

Three types of sorbents were developed for the specific removal of atherogenic apoB-containing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and lipoprotein LDL (a) (Lp[a]) from human plasma. Two sorbents contained monospecific sheep polyclonal or mouse monoclonal antibodies against human apoprotein B-100. The third one was intended for specific removal of Lp(a) and contains sheep antibodies against human Lp(a). Thirty patients were treated for up to 9 years by LDL apheresis with anti-LDL immunosorbents. A pilot study of Lp(a) apheresis with 3 patients was conducted during 3 years. The results showed that extracorporeal immunosorption is safe and effective for lowering LDL and Lp(a). These procedures may be used both for metabolic investigations and for studies on possible regression of atherosclerosis.

Extracorporeal immunoadsorption for the specific removal of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a) apheresis): preliminary clinical data.

The extracorporeal procedure for the specific removal of lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) from human plasma--Lp(a) apheresis--was applied to the treatment of three patients with coronary artery disease documented by angiography. Their initial lipid levels were as follows: total cholesterol, 210-230 mg/dl; low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, 140-160 mg/dl; Lp(a), 90-120 mg/dl. The patients underwent a total of 168 procedures without significant side effects. Lp(a) apheresis reduced the Lp(a) level by removing up to 88% of Lp(a). Other plasma compounds, including LDL and plasminogen, remained practically unchanged. Lp(a) apheresis appears to be a unique, effective and specific method for lowering the Lp(a) level. Additional trials are needed to evaluate the clinical effect of this treatment.