Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Gesundheitswesen ; 74(10): e99-e113, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23165608

RESUMEN

From 2004 to 2012, the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) established its first funding programme for the promotion of prevention research. 60 projects on primary prevention and health promotion and the meta-project entitled "Cooperation for Sustainable Prevention Research" (KNP) received BMBF grants under this programme during this period. The experience and knowledge gained and recommendations arising from the research funded under this programme are compiled in memorandum format. The "Memorandum on Prevention Research - Research Areas and Methods" highlights 5 research areas that are considered to be especially relevant from the perspective of the involved scientists and practice partners.The promotion of structural development and sustainability enhancement in disease prevention and health promotion are central areas that should branch out from existing nuclei of crystallization. Improving the health competence of the population and of specific subpopulations is another major area. Research in these areas should contribute to the development of theoretical concepts and to the empirical testing of these concepts. The transfer of knowledge for effective use of developed disease prevention and health promotion programmes and measures is still a scarcely researched area. Among other things, studies of the transfer of programmes from one context to another, analyses of the coop-eration between politics and science, and the continued theoretical and conceptual development of transfer research are needed. Long-term data on the effects of intervention studies are also needed for proper evaluation of sustainability. The latter dem-onstrates the importance of method development in disease prevention and health promotion research as an area that should receive separate funding and support. This research should include, in particular, studies of the efficacy of complex interventions, health economic analyses, and participative health research.


Asunto(s)
Financiación Gubernamental/métodos , Financiación Gubernamental/organización & administración , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Promoción de la Salud/organización & administración , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Prevención Primaria/métodos , Prevención Primaria/organización & administración , Conducta Cooperativa , Difusión de Innovaciones , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/organización & administración , Femenino , Alemania , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Educación en Salud/métodos , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Alfabetización en Salud , Implementación de Plan de Salud/métodos , Implementación de Plan de Salud/organización & administración , Política de Salud , Humanos , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Masculino , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Transferencia de Experiencia en Psicología
2.
Prenat Diagn ; 15(9): 809-16, 1995 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8559750

RESUMEN

The pregnancy outcome of 1936 women who had transcervical chorionic villus sampling (CVS) with a flexible biopsy forceps was evaluated. Follow-up until 4 weeks after delivery was 99.4 per cent. Various patient- and procedure-related risk factors for spontaneous loss (fetal or neonatal death) were analysed using stepwise logistic regression analysis. The overall spontaneous loss rate was 4.5 per cent. Factors found to be significantly associated with spontaneous loss were quantity of villi < or = 15 mg (relative risk (RR) 2.13), a history of first-trimester miscarriage (RR 1.87) or delivery between 16 and 27 weeks (RR 3.87), cervical culture positive for anaerobes (RR 4.52) or group B streptococcus (RR 3.62), post-procedural bleeding > 3 days (RR 1.99), and multiple insertions (RR 2.64). Significant differences in loss rates between individual operators were found. A learning effect was not present. There were no infants born with terminal transversal limb anomalies in our series. We conclude that knowledge about significant risk factors for spontaneous loss after CVS is important both for obstetricians carrying out CVS procedures and for women seeking prenatal diagnosis.


Asunto(s)
Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica/efectos adversos , Muerte Fetal/etiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Adulto , Biopsia/instrumentación , Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica/instrumentación , Muestra de la Vellosidad Coriónica/métodos , Femenino , Enfermedades Fetales/diagnóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...