A mouse mutant deficient in both neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis-associated proteins CLN3 and TPP1.

Late-infantile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (LINCL) and juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL) are inherited neurodegenerative diseases caused by mutations in the genes encoding lysosomal proteins tripeptidyl peptidase 1 (TPP1) and CLN3 protein, respectively. TPP1 is well-understood and, aided by animal models that accurately recapitulate the human disease, enzyme replacement therapy has been approved and other promising therapies are emerging. In contrast, there are no effective treatments for JNCL, partly because the function of the CLN3 protein remains unknown but also because animal models have attenuated disease and lack robust survival phenotypes. Mouse models for LINCL and JNCL, with mutations in Tpp1 and Cln3, respectively, have been thoroughly characterized but the phenotype of a double Cln3/Tpp1 mutant remains unknown. We created this double mutant and find that its phenotype is essentially indistinguishable from the single Tpp1-/- mutant in terms of survival and brain pathology. Analysis of brain proteomic changes in the single Tpp1-/- and double Cln3-/- ;Tpp1-/- mutants indicates largely overlapping sets of altered proteins and reinforces earlier studies that highlight GPNMB, LYZ2, and SERPINA3 as promising biomarker candidates in LINCL while several lysosomal proteins including SMPD1 and NPC1 appear to be altered in the Cln3-/- animals. An unexpected finding was that Tpp1 heterozygosity significantly decreased lifespan of the Cln3-/- mouse. The truncated survival of this mouse model makes it potentially useful in developing therapies for JNCL using survival as an endpoint. In addition, this model may also provide insights into CLN3 protein function and its potential functional interactions with TPP1.

Intracranial delivery of AAV9 gene therapy partially prevents retinal degeneration and visual deficits in CLN6-Batten disease mice.

Batten disease is a family of rare, fatal, neuropediatric diseases presenting with memory/learning decline, blindness, and loss of motor function. Recently, we reported the use of an AAV9-mediated gene therapy that prevents disease progression in a mouse model of CLN6-Batten disease (Cln6 nclf ), restoring lifespans in treated animals. Despite the success of our viral-mediated gene therapy, the dosing strategy was optimized for delivery to the brain parenchyma and may limit the therapeutic potential to other disease-relevant tissues, such as the eye. Here, we examine whether cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) delivery of scAAV9.CB.CLN6 is sufficient to ameliorate visual deficits in Cln6 nclf mice. We show that intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) delivery of scAAV9.CB.CLN6 completely prevents hallmark Batten disease pathology in the visual processing centers of the brain, preserving neurons of the superior colliculus, thalamus, and cerebral cortex. Importantly, i.c.v.-delivered scAAV9.CB.CLN6 also expresses in many cells throughout the central retina, preserving many photoreceptors typically lost in Cln6 nclf mice. Lastly, scAAV9.CB.CLN6 treatment partially preserved visual acuity in Cln6 nclf mice as measured by optokinetic response. Taken together, we report the first instance of CSF-delivered viral gene reaching and rescuing pathology in both the brain parenchyma and retinal neurons, thereby partially slowing visual deterioration.

Survey of pharmacists' and physicians' perceptions of therapeutic interchange.

Therapeutic interchange has long been an integral part of drug formulary management, but physicians' and pharmacists' attitudes toward such programs are relatively unknown. This survey was undertaken to determine pharmacists' attitudes, physicians' potential response to a hypothetical interchange, and how well pharmacists predicted physicians' responses. A survey that described a drug interchange program and several potential responses to the proposed switch was provided to 300 staff physicians at a 512-bed community facility in southwest Florida; the survey was also mailed to pharmacy directors or clinical pharmacy coordinators at 42 southwest Florida hospitals. Responses were obtained from 98 physicians and 95 pharmacists. Most physicians would not cooperate with an interchange if they were not familiar with the proposed drug; 16% would continue to prescribe the original drug, knowing that the new agent would be provided; and 58% would switch to another agent with which they had clinical experience. Only 26% of physicians would follow the interchange program. In contrast, 48% of pharmacists believed that physicians would continue to order the original therapy, 32% believed that physicians would order the new agent, and only 20% believed that physicians would switch to an alternative drug (P<.005 vs physician responses). Clearly, pharmacists' expectations of physicians' response to a therapeutic interchange differ significantly from the physicians' expected behavior. This difference has potentially important implications for actual versus projected cost savings of therapeutic interchange.