Real-world experience of Australian and New Zealand patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma accessing ibrutinib through a Named Patient Program.

Ibrutinib is a small molecule inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase indicated for the treatment of relapsed/refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). The Named Patient Program in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ NPP) provided access to ibrutinib treatment to 1126 R/R CLL/SLL and 330 R/R MCL patients, prior to Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme listing. This study aimed to assess the duration of treatment for the ANZ NPP patients, as an indicator of efficacy and tolerability of ibrutinib in the real world. Based on the NPP data, ibrutinib provided a median of 47 months clinical benefit for participants with CLL/SLL and 14 months clinical benefit for those with MCL; outcomes that are consistent with the clinical trial results and further support the well-established efficacy and safety profile of ibrutinib in the real world.

Maori and Pacific Peoples With Multiple Myeloma in New Zealand are Younger and Have Inferior Survival Compared to Other Ethnicities: A Study From the Australian and New Zealand Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry (MRDR).

BACKGROUND: Maori and Pacific peoples (MPP) in New Zealand (NZ) have poorer health outcomes than other ethnicities. However, this has not been clinically investigated in multiple myeloma (MM). Using data from the Australian and NZ Myeloma and Related Diseases Registry for all participating centers in NZ, we compared MPP demographics, clinical characteristics, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes to non-MPP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MPP were defined as having ≥1 grandparent of this heritage. We tested ethnicity as a predictor of overall survival (OS) with multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 568 NZ patients with MM (September 2012 to April 2021) and ethnicity data, 138 were MPP. They were diagnosed younger than non-MPP (median age 63 [IQR: 57-72] vs. 70y [62-77], P < .001). Obesity (53 vs. 27%, P < .001), diabetes (24 vs. 8%, P < .001), renal insufficiency (28 vs. 17%, P = .005), pulmonary disease (10 vs. 5%, P = .02) and FISH abnormalities (54 vs. 42%, P = .04) were more common in MPP, and a lower proportion received first-line drug therapy (88 vs. 94%, P = .03) and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) (age <70y: 56 vs. 70%, P = .03). OS for MPP was shorter than non-MPP even after adjusting for age, comorbidities, disease stage, performance status, FISH abnormalities and treatment (HR 1.58 [1.04-2.39], P = .03). CONCLUSION: MPP with MM in NZ were younger, a greater proportion had comorbidities and FISH abnormalities at diagnosis, fewer received first-line treatment and/or ASCT, and they had poorer OS than non-MPP. Investigation of modifiable factors to improve outcomes and discern why MM occurs at a younger age in MPP is needed.

Does transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) alleviate the pain experienced during bone marrow sampling in addition to standard techniques? A randomised, double-blinded, controlled trial.

AIMS: Bone marrow aspiration and trephine (BMAT) biopsies remain important tests in haematology. However, the procedures can be moderately to severely painful despite standard methods of pain relief. To test the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in alleviating the pain from BMAT in addition to standard analgesia using a numerical pain rating scale (NRS). METHODS: 70 patients requiring BMAT were randomised (1:1) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. -35 patients received TENS impulses at a strong but comfortable amplitude (intervention group) and 35 patients received TENS impulses just above the sensory threshold (control group) (median pulse amplitude 20 and 7 mA, respectively). Patients and operators were blinded to group allocation. Pain assessments were made using a numerical pain scale completed after the procedure. RESULTS: No significant difference in NRS pain recalled after the procedure was detected (median pain score 5.7 (95% CI 4.8 to 6.6) in control vs 5.6 (95% CI 4.8 to 6.4) in the intervention group). However, 100% of patients who had previous experience of BMAT and >94% of participants overall felt they benefited from using TENS and would recommend it to others for this procedure. There were no side effects from the TENS device, and it was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: TENS is a safe, non-invasive adjunct to analgesia for reducing pain during bone marrow biopsy and provides a subjective benefit to most users; however, no objective difference in pain scores was detected when using TENS in this randomised controlled study. CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02005354.