Diagnostic and prognostic value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T in patients with syncope.

OBJECTIVE: We examined the diagnostic and predictive value of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (cTnThs) in patients with syncope. METHODS: We performed an analysis of consecutive patients with syncope presenting to the emergency department. The primary end point was the accuracy to diagnose a cardiac syncope. In addition, the study explored the prognostic relevance of cTnThs in patients with cardiac and noncardiac syncope. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were enrolled (median age, 70.5 years; male, 55.8%; 23.9% aged >80 years). Cardiac syncope was present in 22% of patients, reflex syncope was present in 40% of patients, syncope due to orthostatic hypotension was present in 20% of patients, and unexplained syncope was present in 17.5% of patients. A total of 148 patients (41%) had cTnThs levels above the 99% confidence interval (CI) (cutoff point). The diagnostic accuracy for cTnThs levels to determine the diagnosis of cardiac syncope was quantified by the area under the curve (0.77; CI, 0.72-0.83; P < .001). A comparable area under the curve (0.78; CI, 0.73-0.83; P < .001) was obtained for the predictive value of cTnThs levels within 30 days: Patients with increased cTnThs levels had a 52% likelihood for adverse events, patients with cTnThs levels below the cutoff point had a low risk (negative predictive value, 83.5%). Increased cTnThs levels indicate adverse prognosis in patients with noncardiac causes of syncope, but not in patients with cardiac syncope being a risk factor for adverse outcome by itself. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with syncope presenting to the emergency department have a high proportion of life-threatening conditions. cTnThs levels show a limited diagnostic and predictive accuracy for the identification of patients with syncope at high risk.

The prevalence and prognostic significance of near syncope and syncope: a prospective study of 395 cases in an emergency department (the SPEED study).

BACKGROUND: The prognostic significance of near-syncope has not yet been adequately characterized. METHOD: We collected prospective data on a consecutive series of patients seen in an emergency department with syncope (brief loss of consciousness, usually with loss of muscle tone) or near-syncope (a feeling that syncope is about to occur, but without actual loss of consciousness or muscle tone). We report on the prevalence, etiology, and prognosis of such events (the SPEED study). Patients were followed up at 30 days and at 6 months after the event. RESULTS: From 17 July to 31 October 2011, 395 patients were seen in the emergency department for a chief complaint of syncope or near-syncope (3% of all emergency patients). Their median age was 70 years, and 55% were men. 62% had experienced syncope, and 38% near-syncope. The patients with near-syncope were younger than those with syncope ( 63 vs. 72 years, p < 0.014) and were also more commonly male (63% vs. 49%, p = 0.006). The two patient groups did not differ significantly with respect to their measured laboratory values and vital parameters or their accompanying medical conditions. Hospitalizations were more common for syncope than for near-syncope (86% vs. 70%, p < 0.001). Etiologies were similarly distributed in the two patient groups, with the main ones being reflex syncope, orthostatic syncope, cardiac syncope, and syncope of uncertain origin. In all, 123 of 379 patients (32%) had further undesired events within 30 days of the event. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that age, heart rate, and renal dysfunction were independent predictors of undesired events, while the type of syncope was not. CONCLUSION: Patients with near-syncope do not differ to any large extent from patients with syncope with respect to the features studied. The diagnostic evaluation should be similar for patients in the two groups.

Reduction of mortality in community-acquired pneumonia after implementing standardized care bundles in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is associated with high in-hospital mortality. Standardization of diagnostics and adherence to sepsis bundles in the emergency department (ED) are associated with reduced mortality in patients with sepsis. We examined whether introduction of standardized care bundles and checklists in the ED is associated with reduced mortality in patients hospitalized for CAP. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed performance indicators of 2819 consecutive patients with CAP admitted to the Nuremberg Hospital, Germany, from 2008 to 2009. At the turn of the year, CAP care bundles were implemented including interprofessional education, check lists, and institutionalized feedback. Primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality of CAP patients. The secondary endpoint was mortality in the subgroups of CRB-65 risk classes (C, mental confusion; R respiratory rate≥30/min; B systolic blood pressure<90 mmHg; 65, age≥65 years). RESULTS: After implementation of CAP care bundles in the ED, in-hospital mortality of affected patients was significantly lower in 2009 compared with 2008 (11.3 vs. 14.3%; P=0.02). Lower mortality was observed in CRB-65 risk classes 2 (n=2142; 11.9 vs. 15.4%, P=0.02) and 3 (n=119; 36.6 vs. 47.9%, P=0.21). Lower in-hospital mortality was also observed in patients between 18 and 79 years (7.2 vs. 10.7%; P=0.02). Mortality in the 80 years and older group was not significantly different after implementation of the CAP care bundle. Antimicrobial therapy was started earlier in the CAP care bundle group (72.8 vs. 82.7% within the first 4 h; P=0.0001), and length of stay in the hospital was significantly reduced from 9 to 8 days (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that implementation of standardized CAP care bundles in the ED is associated with a 21% relative risk reduction of in-hospital mortality. Standardization of diagnostic and therapeutic processes in the ED improves outcome of patients hospitalized for CAP.

Severity illness scoring systems for early identification and prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with suspected sepsis presenting to the emergency department.

The in-hospital mortality of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock (SSSS) is high. In this study we examined the diagnostic and prognostic accuracy of the emergency severity index (ESI), the modified early warning score (MEWS), and the mortality in emergency department (ED) sepsis (MEDS) score. This is a single-centre, prospective and observational study of 151 consecutive patients presenting to the ED of the Nuremberg Hospital with suspected sepsis (age 68.3 ± 18 years, 54.3 % men, 45 % with SSSS, in-hospital mortality of SSSS: 27.8 %). In this study, 37.7 % of the studied patients had a urinary tract infection (n = 57/151), 33.8 % a pneumonia (n = 51/151), 8.6 % an acute abdominal infection (n = 13/151), and in 12.6 % the focus of infection was not further specified or identifiable (n = 19/151). The diagnostic and prognostic accuracy was analyzed by means of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The areas under curve (AUC) in terms of diagnostic accuracy were 0.609, 0.641, and 0.778 for the ESI, MEWS, and MEDS score respectively. The AUCs concerning prognostic accuracy were 0.617, 0.642, and 0.871 for ESI, MEWS, and MEDS score respectively.By using the MEDS score systematically, critically ill patients with sepsis could be detected in the ED. Finally, the MEDS score provides the basis for a risk adjusted disposition management that follows objective criteria.

Do clinical guidelines improve management of sepsis in critically ill elderly patients? A before-and-after study of the implementation of a sepsis protocol.

AIM: Guidelines for the management of sepsis have been published but not validated for elderly patients, though a prompt work-up and initiation of appropriate therapy are crucial. This study assesses the impact of a sepsis protocol on timelines for therapy and mortality in standardized management. METHODS: Consecutive patients aged 70 years and older who were diagnosed with sepsis and admitted during the observation periods were included in this before-and-after study at a medical intensive care unit (ICU). Age, sex, and process-of-care variables including timely administration of antibiotics, obtaining blood cultures before the start of antibiotics, documenting central venous pressure, evaluation of central venous blood oxygen saturation, fluid resuscitation, and patient outcome were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 122 patients were included. Sepsis was diagnosed in 22.9 % of patients prior to the introduction of the protocol and 57.4 % after introduction. Volume therapy was conducted in 63.9 % of the patients (11.5 % preprotocol). Blood culture samples were taken prior to the administration of antibiotics in 67.2 % of patients (4.9 % preprotocol), and antibiotics were applied early in 72.1 % of patients (32.8 % preprotocol). Lactate was set in 77.0 % of patients (11.5 % preprotocol). A central venous catheter was inserted in 88.5 % of patients (68.9 % preprotocol), and the target central venous pressure was achieved in 64.3 % of patients (47.2 % preprotocol). ICU mortality was reduced by 5.2 % and hospital mortality by 6.4 %. CONCLUSIONS: The use of standardized order sets for the management of sepsis in elderly patients should be strongly recommended for better performance in treatment. Compliance with the protocol was associated with reduced length of stay, reduced mortality, and improved initial appropriate therapy.

Patients with syncope in a German emergency department: description of patients and processes.

BACKGROUND: We studied the characteristics and resource utilization of patients with syncope in a German emergency department (ED). METHODS: We carried out a single-center retrospective analysis of patients with syncope who presented to the ED of the Klinikum Nürnberg (a municipal hospital in Nuremberg, Germany). RESULTS: Among the 28 477 patients who presented to the ED from 15 May 2009 to 30 September 2009, 440 (1.5%) presented with syncope. Their mean age was 62 years (standard deviation, 20 years); 50.4% were women, 43.4% were over age 70, 11.8% had cardiogenic and 4.8% neurological syncope, and 18.2% had more than two comorbid conditions. 20.7% were discharged after evaluation in the ED, 14.1% were brielfly hospitalized in the ED's clinical observation unit, and 56.6% were admitted to one of the hospital's specialty wards. 8.6% left the ED against medical advice. All of the syncope patients were evaluated by history-taking, physical examination, and 12-lead electrocardiogragraphy (ECG); ECG revealed abnormal findings in 36.4% of patients. Nearly all patients also underwent laboratory testing, which revealed hyponatremia (a serum sodium concentration under 130 mmol/L) in 5.9% and a serum creatinine level above 2 mg/dL in 5.3%. Many underwent technology-intensive tests such as cranial computed tomography (129 patients), but these tests only rarely yielded abnormal findings (3.1%). 27% of the syncope patients underwent Doppler ultrasonography of the vessels supplying the brain, with abnormal findings in 6.7% of cases. (Orthostatic testing was performed in 14.5% of the patients and was positive in 26.6%.) CONCLUSION: Many patients presenting with syncope to a German ED are elderly, and multiple comorbidities are common. Technology-intensive testing in patients with syncope has a low diagnostic yield and consumes resources. The introduction of standards for the evaluation of syncope in the ED would be helpful.

High-sensitivity troponin assays in the evaluation of patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department.

Evaluating patients with acute chest pain presenting to the emergency department remains an ongoing challenge. The spectrum of etiologies in acute chest pain ranges from minor disease entities to life-threatening diseases, such as pulmonary embolism, acute aortic dissection or acute myocardial infarction (MI). The diagnosis of acute MI is usually made integrating the triad of patient history and clinical presentation, readings of 12-lead ECG and measurement of cardiac troponins (cTn). Introduction of high-sensitivity cTn assays substantially increases sensitivity to identify patients with acute MI even at the time of presentation to the emergency department at the cost of specificity. However, the proportion of patients presenting with cTn positive, non-vascular cardiac chest pain triples with the implementation of new sensitive cTn assays increasing the difficulty for the emergency physician to identify those patients who are at need for invasive diagnostics. The main objectives of this mini-review are 1) to discuss elements of disposition decision made by the emergency physician for the evaluation of chest pain patients, 2) to summarize recent advances in assay technology and relate these findings into the clinical context, and 3) to discuss possible consequences for the clinical work and suggest an algorithm for the clinical evaluation of chest pain patients in the emergency department.

Implementation of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T measurement in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: we examined the diagnostic performance of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (cTnThs) measurement and its ability to predict risk in unselected patients presenting to the emergency department with acute chest pain. METHODS: we conducted a retrospective analysis of 137 consecutive patients with chest pain (age range, 66 ± 16 years; 64% male). A final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction was made using the "old" (cTnT fourth-generation assay, ≥ 0.04 microg/L) or the "new" cutpoint (cTnThs ≥ 0.014 microg/L). RESULTS: the adjudicated final diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction significantly increased from 20 to 35 patients (a 75% increase) and troponin-positive nonvascular cardiac chest pain from 10 to 30 (a 200% increase) using cTnThs. The number of patients with unstable angina or troponin-negative nonvascular cardiac chest pain significantly decreased (P <.05). Diagnostic performance of cTnThs levels at admission was significantly higher compared to cTnT levels (area under the curve [AUC] 0.85 vs AUC 0.70; P <.05). cTnThs levels below the detection limit (<0.003 microg/L) had a negative predictive value of 100% to exclude acute myocardial infarction. The event rate during 6 months of follow-up was low in patients with cTnThs levels <0.014 microg/L, while patients with cTnT levels ≥ 0.04 µg/L were at increased, and patients with cTnThs ≥ 0.014 µg/L and cTnT <0.04 microg/L at intermediate risk of death or recurrent myocardial infarction (P = .002). Risk was highest in chest pain patients with dynamic changes of cTnThs levels >30%. CONCLUSION: the introduction of cTnThs assay displays an excellent diagnostic performance for the workup of patients with chest pain at the time of their initial presentation. Even small increases of cTnThs indicate increased risk for death or myocardial infarction during follow-up.