6 and 12 month outcomes in patients following COVID-19-related hospitalization: a prospective monocentric study.

The long-term consequences of COVID-19 in those who recover from acute infection requiring hospitalization have not been defined yet. In this study, we aim to describe the long-term symptoms and respiratory outcomes over 12 months in patients hospitalized for severe COVID-19. In this prospective cohort study, patients admitted to hospital for severe COVID-19 were prospectively followed up at 6 and 12 months after discharge from the Hospital of Fermo, Italy. Patients were interviewed for persisting symptoms and underwent physical examination, routine blood test, pulmonary function tests, chest high-resolution CT (HRCT), and 6 min walking test. A total of 64 patients were evaluated and participated in this study. The mean age of participants was 68 years, 41 (64%) were males, and the median body mass index (BMI) was 26 kg/m2. After 6 months, 36% of patients reported persistent dyspnea, 37.5% persistent fatigue, 30.6% hair loss, 14% arthralgia and 11% memory and attention deficits. The rate of these symptoms reduced at the 12 month follow-up. At least 50% of the patients reported anxiety and depression symptoms. At 6 months 57.4% of patients showed reduced DLCO and 21.3% reduced FVC% and improvement at 12 months was noted for FVC but not for DLCO and TLC. Persistent radiographic abnormalities, most commonly ground-glass opacities and interstitial changes, were observed at both timepoints in many patients. Long-term symptoms and pulmonary deficits are common in patients admitted for severe COVID-19. Further studies are needed to assess the clinical significance of long-term consequences of severe COVID-19.

Pulmonary embolism: a retrospective comparative study between patients with atypical vs typical clinical presentation

Background: Natural history and outcomes of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) without typical symptoms (atypical PE) remain unclear. The aim of the study is to compare the clinical characteristics and the prognosis between typical PE and atypical PE. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from consecutive patients admitted to the Emergency Department (ED) because of a diagnosis of PE and classified them in two groups: typical PE and atypical PE. We defined PE to be typical in presence of almost one of the following symptoms or signs: dyspnea, chest pain, hemoptysis or signs of deep vein thrombosis. Results: Of the 191 patients with PE, 154 (81%) had typical PE and 37 (19%) had atypical PE. Patients with atypical and typical PE seemed to had similar prognostic factor such as high risk sPESI (73% vs 65%, p=0.3), right ventricular dysfunction (30% vs 26%, p=0.6) and central PE at chest CT scan (38% vs 36%, p=0.8). The rate of 30 day mortality was 7% in the typical group and 8% in the atypical group (p=0.8). The length of stay in hospital was the same in the two groups (6 days; p=0.2). Conclusions: We found that atypical and typical PE seem to be related diseases with a similar short term prognosis. Therefore, we could speculate that a missed diagnosis of PE in ED could expose the patients to a worsen prognosis. Further perspective studies are required for better investigate this diagnostic challenge.

Consensus recommendations for improvement of unmet clinical needs--the example of chronic graft-versus-host disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Consensus recommendations are used to improve the methodology of research about rare disorders, but their uptake is unknown. We studied the uptake of consensus recommendations in steroid-refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease (SR-cGVHD). Although in 2006 the National Institutes of Health (NIH) cGVHD consensus project produced recommendations for clinical trials, guidelines have emphasised the scarcity of valuable evidence for all tested interventions. METHODS: We searched Medline (PubMed) between Jan 1, 1998, and Oct 1, 2013, for non-randomised studies of systemic treatment for SR-cGVHD. To measure adherence to NIH recommendations, we applied a 61 item checklist derived from the NIH consensus document. We did a meta-analysis to measure pooled effect size for overall response rate (ORR) and meta-regression analyses to measure the effect of deviations from NIH recommendations on pooled effect size. FINDINGS: We included 82 studies related to nine interventions. Conformity to NIH recommendations was evenly low across the analysed timeframe (1998-2013), and did not change significantly after publication of NIH recommendations. The pooled effect size for ORR for systemic treatment of SR-cGVHD was 0.66 (95% CI 0.62-0.70). Increased adherence to NIH recommendations in a score of items defining correct response assessment was associated with a significant reduction in ORR (-4.2%, 95% CI -6.6 to -1.9; p=0.001). We recorded no significant association between ORR and sets of items related to correct diagnostic definition of SR-cGVHD (change in ORR -3.1%, 95% CI -7.7 to 1.5), specification of primary intervention (0, -3.8 to 3.6), or concomitant treatments (-1.6%, -5.4 to 2.3). The score of items defining correct response assessment increased after publication of NIH recommendations. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show evidence of bias in the reported efficacy of treatment of SR-cGVHD. The overall effect of NIH recommendations in scientific literature is scarce; however, NIH recommendations improved assessment of response, possibly reducing the overestimation bias. Better implementation of NIH recommendations might reduce false expectations about new interventions, and thus prevent clinical studies with ineffective treatments. FUNDING: None.

Successful treatment of a Caucasian case of multifocal Castleman's disease with TAFRO syndrome with a pathophysiology targeted therapy - a case report.

BACKGROUND: Castleman-Kojima disease (TAFRO Syndrome) is characterized by Thrombocytopenia, Anasarca, myeloFibrosis, Renal dysfunction, Organomegaly, multiple lymphadenopathy and histopathology pattern of atypical Castleman's disease (CD). Only few cases of this recently identified unique variant of Multicentric CD (MCD) are described in literature, all Japanese. It therefore poses serious diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. CASE DESCRIPTION: We describe a 21 year old woman with fever, asthenia, bilateral pleural effusion, ascites, hypoalbuminemia, severe thrombocytopenia, anemia, renal failure and proteinuria, whereas microbiological tests, immune serology (except ANA) and bone marrow biopsy were all negative. A CT-scan showed multiple lymphadenopathy and tissue samplings of mediastinal lymph nodes was compatible with a mixed-type CD. The diagnosis of MCD with TAFRO syndrome was made, but after an initial improvement with high dose corticosteroid therapy, clinical and laboratory features worsened. Based upon the high serum IL-6 levels and the high number of CD20-lymphocytes in lymph nodes tissue, we started tocilizumab (partial benefit), followed by rituximab combined with CVP (cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone) chemotherapy, achieving a complete response. A total of six cycles of R-CVP were administered monthly, followed by maintenance with monthly rituximab. A complete remission persists at the 12th month of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with massive immune system activation and lymphadenopathy it is mandatory to rule out Castleman-Kojima disease. In our patient a therapy aimed at the prominent pathophysiological abnormalities has been successful so far. However, since the rarity of TAFRO Syndrome, a multicenter registry is strongly desirable for a better understanding of the disease mechanisms, hopefully leading to evidence-based therapeutic choices.