Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 56(206): 198-202, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28746314

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Bleeding from esophageal varices in cirrhosis is an emergent condition with high mortality. One of the preferred modality of treating esophageal varices is EVL. We aimed to find out the outcome of EVL in controlling acute esophageal variceal bleeding, prophylactic banding to prevent future bleeding and the number of sessions required for complete eradication of varices. METHODS: This descriptive observational study was carried out in Gastroenterology and Hepatology unit of Bir Hospital, NAMS from June 2016 to May 2017. Consecutive cases who presented in emergency room with acute variceal bleeding due to liver cirrhosis and cases of liver cirrhosis with large varices and red color signs on endoscopic examination were enrolled. They underwent EVL and subsequent re-endoscope at one month interval till the eradication of varices was achieved. RESULTS: Among 83 patients, 15 (18.1%) were of Child Pugh class A, 29 (34.9%) B and 39 (47%) were of C. In 20 (24.1%) cases varices could be eradicated in one session of EVL while 57 (68.7%) required two sessions and in 6 (7.2%) cases it took three sessions. Total average EVL session required for obliteration of esophageal varices was 1.84±0.53. There was only one (1.2%) of early re-bleeding post EVL. CONCLUSIONS: EVL is an effective modality of treatment in controlling acute esophageal variceal bleeding, in preventing future variceal bleeding as well as in eradicating esophageal varices with very few complications.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/métodos , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Hemostasis Quirúrgica , Cirrosis Hepática , Adulto , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/diagnóstico , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/etiología , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/cirugía , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/métodos , Hemostasis Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nepal/epidemiología , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Recurrencia
2.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 56(206): 211-216, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28746317

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: AUGIB is characterized by hematemesis or melena or both. Peptic ulcers and variceal bleed account for majority of cases. Use of proton pump inhibitors in current era is associated with a gradual reduction in burden of peptic ulcer disease. We conducted this study to look into the cause of AUGIB in our community. METHODS: We studied 100 patients in one year period who presented to us with hematemesis or melena. The study was conducted in department of Gastroenterology, Bir hospital, Kathmandu. We identified the culprit lesions by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS: The average age of patients with AUGIB was 51.6 years with 59 (59%) males. Duodenal ulcers are most common 29 (29%), followed by varices 23 (23%) and gastric ulcers 14 (14%). More than one lesion was identified in 38 (38%) patients. Patients with variceal bleed were more likely to present with hematemesis alone as compared to those with ulcer bleed (P=0.005). Variceal bleed patients presented earlier to the hospital (P=0.005), had lower MAP at presentation (P=0.0002), had lower hemoglobin level (P=0.0001) and higher serum creatinine level at presentation (P=0.001). Patients with variceal bleed were more likely to have consumed alcohol 20 (86.9%) and patients with ulcer bleed were more likely to be smokers 29 (67.4%) or consume tobacco 14 (32.5%) (P=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Ulcer related bleeding is still the most common cause of AUGIB. Many patients with AUGIB have more than one lesions identified during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.


Asunto(s)
Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/complicaciones , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal , Hemostasis Endoscópica , Úlcera Péptica/complicaciones , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Aguda , Estudios Transversales , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/diagnóstico , Várices Esofágicas y Gástricas/terapia , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/epidemiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiología , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirugía , Hemostasis Endoscópica/métodos , Hemostasis Endoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nepal/epidemiología , Úlcera Péptica/diagnóstico , Úlcera Péptica/prevención & control , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 56(206): 203-206, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28746315

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Some studies have suggested that colorectal cancer at a younger age had distinct biological characteristics: different clinical presentations, more advanced stage at time of diagnosis and poorly differentiated carcinoma. The aim of the study is to analyze clinical and histopathological differences between younger (≤40 years of age) and older (>40 years of age) colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted amongst the colorectal cancer patients who visited Bir Hospital between July 2015 and April 2017. All colonoscopically diagnosed and histopathologically proven cases of colon cancer were included. Chi-square test and independent t - test was performed to analyze the difference between clinical presentations and histopathological findings among two groups of patients and P value of <0.05 was considered as significant. RESULTS: Thirty younger patients and thirty older patients were enrolled without any differences in gender proportion. There were no statistical differences between clinical presentation and histological grade and type in younger and older patients. The younger patients had more complaints of altered bowel habit (P <0.001) while older patients mostly presented with per rectal bleeding (P< 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, colorectal cancer at younger ages showed similar characteristics to those of older patients except altered bowel habit was more common in younger patients while per rectal bleeding was more common in older patients. Although colorectal cancer incidence increases with age, younger patients with altered bowel habits, weight loss, anemia and anorexia should also be given due medical attention and undergo evaluation promptly.


Asunto(s)
Colonoscopía , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Colonoscopía/métodos , Colonoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Neoplasias Colorrectales/fisiopatología , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Nepal/epidemiología , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Evaluación de Síntomas/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos
4.
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc ; 56(206): 207-210, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28746316

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: There are new concepts and developments in the diagnosis and management of acute pancreatitis. Current evidence suggests that there is no role of prophylactic antibiotics use in acute pancreatitis. However, it is still a common practice to administer prophylactic antibiotics in a country like Nepal. So, we have conducted a study in mild and moderately severe acute pancreatitis to study the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics. METHODS: A case control study was conducted among 76 patients comparing efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics versus no antibiotics in patients with mild and moderately severe acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: The two most common etiology of acute pancreatitis in AG and NAG were alcohol 21 (55.2%) vs. 24 (63.1%) and biliary 10 (26.3%) vs. 4 (10.5%) respectively. Pancreatic necrosis was seen in five (13.1 %) in AG and four (10.5%) in NAG. Four (10.5%) developed extra pancreatic complications in AG and five (13.1%) in NAG. There was one (2.6%) death in AG and no death in NAG. Abdominal pain improvement seen in AG vs. NAG was 3.2 days vs. 2.4 days (P=0.002). The hospital stay was 7.7±2.23 days in AG and 7.5±1.85 days in NAG (P=0.65). CONCLUSIONS: The routine use of prophylactic antibiotics for mild and moderately severe acute pancreatitis is not associated with improvement in meaningful clinical outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica , Ciprofloxacina/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Pancreatitis , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Profilaxis Antibiótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nepal/epidemiología , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Pancreatitis/epidemiología , Pancreatitis/etiología , Pancreatitis/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...