A systematic review of case series and clinical trials investigating systemic oral or injectable therapies for the treatment of vitiligo.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of oral and injectable systemic treatments, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, cyclosporine, tofacitinib, baricitinib, corticosteroids, statins, zinc, apremilast, etc., for treating vitiligo lesions. METHOD: Databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were meticulously searched for studies spanning from 2010 to August 2023, focusing on systemic oral and injectable therapies for vitiligo, using comprehensive keywords and search syntaxes tailored to each database. Key data extracted included study design, treatment efficacy, patient outcomes, patient satisfaction, and safety profiles. RESULTS: In a total of 42 included studies, oral mini-pulse corticosteroid therapy (OMP) was the subject of six studies (14.2%). Minocycline was the focus of five studies (11.9%), while methotrexate, apremilast, and tofacitinib each were examined in four studies (9.5%). Antioxidants and Afamelanotide were the subjects of three studies each (7.1%). Cyclosporine, simvastatin, oral zinc, oral corticosteroids (excluding OMP) and injections, and baricitinib were each explored in two studies (4.8%). Azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and Alefacept were the subjects of one study each (2.4%). CONCLUSION: Systemic treatments for vitiligo have been successful in controlling lesions without notable side effects. OMP, Methotrexate, Azathioprine, Cyclosporine, Mycophenolate mofetil, Simvastatin, Apremilast, Minocycline, Afamelanotide, Tofacitinib, Baricitinib, Antioxidants, and oral/injectable corticosteroids are effective treatment methods. However, oral zinc and alefacept did not show effectiveness.

Interesting Mucocutaneous Manifestations in COVID-19 Infection or Vaccination Confirmed by Histopathology: A Case Series.

Introduction: Mucocutaneous complications or adverse events due to SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination have been well delineated in the literature, respectively. Most eruptions are considered mild and self-limiting; however, for the atypical cases with a tentative clinical diagnosis, performing a biopsy and histopathological assessment is pivotal to confirm the diagnosis and subsequently prescribe a more tailored treatment. Despite the diverse reporting of such incidents globally, most studies restrict the rate of biopsied cases to less than 15%. Case Presentations: This case series elucidates 20 patients referred to the tertiary dermatology clinic, including 14 COVID-19 infection-related eruptions such as lichen planus (LP), cutaneous vasculitis, pityriasis rosea (PR), discoid lupus erythematosus, guttate psoriasis, sarcoidosis, Raynaud's phenomenon, non-specific lesions resembling genital warts, Beau's line, and one severe case of purpura fulminans with a promising outcome. Moreover, we presented six vaccine-induced cases comprising LP, urticarial vasculitis, PR, parapsoriasis, and localized morphea. The diagnosis of all challenging cases has been proven by histopathological evaluation. We included pertaining anamnesis details of each patient and vivid classifying images to pinpoint the morphologic features of each condition. Discussion: In line with our previous studies, the vaccine-induced eruptions were less severe compared to infection-related complications of COVID-19 and are mostly controllable by antihistamines and corticosteroid administration. Therefore, reporting such events should not impede COVID-19 vaccination in the general population.

Development of a Scoring Method Based on a Chest CT Scan to Determine the Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients.

Introduction As COVID-19 shifts from pandemic urgency to endemic management, healthcare systems are faced with the evolving challenge of providing optimized care and adept resource allocation in this evolving landscape of the disease. However, the timely management and accurate assessment of disease severity remains a cornerstone of effective treatment. This study presents a pioneering scoring system, based on the primary chest CT scan findings, to predict patient outcomes and to equip clinicians with a tool that can expedite decision-making. Method A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 406 confirmed COVID-19 cases referred to two of our hospitals in Tehran, between February and April 2020. Radiographic and CT scan data were sourced from the imaging archive system and evaluated by a certified radiologist. We devised distinct severity scores for CT findings, demographic factors, and clinical indicators. These were synthesized into a comprehensive severity score to forecast critical patient outcomes, such as mortality, ICU admission, intubation, or extended hospitalization. Of the total cases, 161 (39.7%) were classified as severe, while 245 (60%) fell into the low or moderate severity category. Results The mean score of demographic, CT scan, and clinical characteristics was significantly higher for those in the severe COVID-19 than the non-severe group. The cutoff score for predicting the outcomes in COVID-19 patients for demographic, clinical, and chest CT scan factors was 2.5, 9.5, and 8.5, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that each unit increase in these scores elevated the odds of fatal outcomes by 24%, 2.8%, and 12%, respectively. Then, using the comprehensive severity score, which is the sum of the above scores, we further predicted the disease severity. Conclusion The findings suggest that our innovative scoring system, based on initial chest CT scan findings, serves as a robust predictor of COVID-19 outcomes.

Ruptured splenic abscess as an extremely rare cause of pneumoperitoneum: A comprehensive review with a case report.

Splenic abscess leading to rupture and pneumoperitoneum is a very rare condition that is limited to a few case reports. In this study, we first introduced a case of an adolescent girl with a medical history of diabetes mellitus who presented with left upper quadrant abdominal pain and fever. Ultrasound revealed an abscess in the spleen and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen revealed evidence of pneumoperitoneum secondary to the rupture of this abscess. The patient underwent splenectomy without postoperative complications. Secondly, we reviewed and discussed the current literature on this topic which predominantly denotes that the pneumoperitoneum following splenic abscess rupture mostly occurs in the immunocompromised status, without a specific predominant infectious agent but the culprit is a gas-forming organism, acute abdomen ensues if the diagnosis is delayed, diagnosis is via abdominal CT when there is hemodynamic stability otherwise exploratory laparotomy uncovers the diagnosis, and splenectomy with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy is the mainstay of treatment.

Predictive value of hematological indices on incidence and severity of pulmonary embolism in COVID-19 patients.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) is a common complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which raises the COVID-19 disease's fatality rate from 3% to 45%. Nevertheless, due to fairly indistinguishable clinical symptoms and a lack of validated clinical prediction models, PTE diagnosis in COVID-19 patients is challenging. This study aims to investigate the applicability of hematological indices to predict PTE incidence and its severity in SARS-CoV-2 patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on hospitalized patients with a confirmed diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection who underwent CT angiography to assess probable PTE in them. The correlation between complete blood count parameters 1 day before CT angiography and CT angiography outcomes, and simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (s-PESI) was investigated. RESULTS: We discovered that among individuals with a probable PTE, males and those with higher platelet-to-lymphocyte (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) ratios had a greater likelihood of PTE incidence (p < .001, .027, and .037, respectively). PLR was a significant and independent predictor of PTE with a p value of .045. Moreover, a higher neutrophil count was associated with a higher s-PESI score in COVID-19 patients developing PTE (p: .038). CONCLUSIONS: Among hematological indices, NLR and more precisely PLR are cost-effective and simply calculable markers that can assist physicians in determining whether or not COVID-19 patients with clinically probable PTE require CT angiography and the higher neutrophil count can be employed as an indicator of PTE severity in COVID-19 patients. Further large multicenter and prospective studies are warranted to corroborate these observations.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy, safety, and satisfaction rates of laser combination treatments vs laser monotherapy in skin rejuvenation resurfacing.

Laser therapies have been well-established in ameliorating skin-aging consequences. This systematic review aims to determine the efficacy, safety profile, and satisfaction rates of laser combination therapies on skin rejuvenation resurfacing. A systematic search was performed in four major databases up to September 2022. Skin rejuvenation studies were eligible comprising at least one laser combination arm, inclusive of all laser types (ablative or non-ablatives), and one monotherapy arm selected from one of the combined modalities. Studies combining one laser modality with radiofrequency (RF) or intense pulse light (IPL) were also assessed. Trials that did not encompass a monotherapy control arm were evaluated independently as single-arm studies. Eighteen clinical trials recruiting 448 cases were included after screening. A total of 532 nm KTP + 1064 nm Nd:YAG and 2940 nm Er:YAG + Nd:YAG were the two most utilized laser combinations and exerted higher improvements and milder adverse events, compared to their monotherapy in most studies. Combining CO2 with rhodamine-IPL or gallium arsenide laser increased efficacy and satisfaction and brings about faster skin recovery time. Augmenting CO2 + RF did not increase improvement vs CO2 laser alone but prolonged skin erythema. Our meta-analysis revealed the pooled prevalence of quartile improvement rates as 0%, 28%, 40%, 27% in laser combination group, and 0%, 9%, 31%, 17% in laser monotherapy group, respectively. The satisfaction within each quartile category was 39%, 25%, 15%, 7% in laser combination and 20%, 25%, 16%, 17% in laser monotherapy, respectively, suggestive of the higher efficacy and satisfaction of laser combination group. The pain scores were lower in laser combination group than monotherapy (4.8 ± 1.18 vs 7.18 ± 0.7, converted on a scale of 0 to 10). Post-laser skin erythema lasted less longer in the combination group (12.8 vs 15.24 days). Laser combination therapies were discovered to be superior to their monotherapies in terms of clinical improvement rates, diminished adverse events such as pain and erythema and patients satisfaction rates. Due to paucity of high-quality reportings, additional trials are warranted to corroborate these results.

Immune thrombocytopenic purpura secondary to COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review aimed to retrieve patients diagnosed with de novo immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) after COVID-19 immunization to determine their epidemiological characteristics, clinical course, therapeutic strategies, and outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted the review using four major databases, comprising PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library, until April 2022. A systematic search was performed in duplicate to access eligible articles in English. Furthermore, a manual search was applied to the chosen papers' references to enhance the search sensitivity. Data were extracted and analyzed with the SPSS 20.1 software. RESULTS: A total of 77 patients with de novo COVID-19 vaccine-associated ITP were identified from 41 studies, including 31 case reports and 10 case series. The median age of patients who developed COVID-19 vaccine-associated ITP was 54 years (IQR 36-72 years). The mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, including BNT16B2b2 and mRNA-1273, were most implicated (75.4%). Those were followed by the adenovirus vector-based vaccines, inclusive of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and vAd26.COV2.S. No report was found relating ITP to other COVID-19 vaccines. Most cases (79.2%) developed ITP after the first dose of COVID-19 vaccination. 75% of the patients developed ITP within 12 days of vaccination, indicating a shorter lag time compared to ITP after routine childhood vaccinations. Sixty-seven patients (87%) patients were hospitalized. The management pattern was similar to primary ITP, and systemic glucocorticoids, IVIg, or both were the basis of the treatment in most patients. Most patients achieved therapeutic goals; only two individuals required a secondary admission, and one patient who presented with intracranial hemorrhage died of the complication. CONCLUSIONS: De novo ITP is a rare complication of COVID-19 vaccination, and corresponding reports belong to mRNA-based and adenovirus vector-based vaccines, in order of frequency. This frequency pattern may be related to the scale of administration of individual vaccines and their potency in inducing autoimmunity. The more the COVID-19 vaccine is potent to induce antigenic challenge, the shorter the lag time would be. Most patients had a benign course and responded to typical treatments of primary ITP.

A concealed history behind the disaster: Extremely rare presentations of metformin toxicity in a patient with body dysmorphic disorder.

Metformin is a widely used anti-hyperglycemic agent with weight loss effect properties but besides its various utilities, despite being very rare, it has its characteristic toxicity and adverse effects when used in large doses and for the long-term or in patients with renal impairment. We presented here a case of a 36-year-old woman who developed several presentations with diverse features during three years comprising neuropathic symptoms, severe lactic acidosis, three episodes of cardiogenic shock, acute kidney injury, megaloblastic anemia, pancytopenia, and hyponatremia and did not receive a definite diagnosis after each presentation until when she inadvertently disclosed her abuse of extremely unusual doses of metformin during these three years with aim of weight reduction obsessively without knowing that her symptoms could pertain to metformin overdose. She was eventually diagnosed with a body dysmorphic disorder which led to unreasonable abuse of metformin pills that consequently caused its toxicity. Thereafter, with cease of metformin use and psychiatric treatment, her symptoms did not recur and she was doing well after one year of her last admission. Based on the review of the literature, this is the first case of metformin toxicity in a patient with body dysmorphic disorder who was affected with extremely rare features of this intoxication, nevertheless, every manifestation of the patient was discussed exhaustively according to the current and available medical literature.

Constrictive pericarditis following inactivated virus COVID-19 vaccine: a case report with review of the literature.

Cardiac adverse effects of the COVID-19 vaccine are very rare, myocarditis and pericarditis are the most common amid them, and constrictive pericarditis (CP) is reported to be restricted to a few cases following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines. We report a case of a 72-year-old male patient who developed symptoms of right-sided heart failure, which started after 8 days of receiving the third dose of inactivated virus COVID-19 vaccine and his diagnostic tests comprising transthoracic echocardiography, chest CT scan, cardiac magnetic resonance were in favor of CP. Ultimately, invasive cardiac catheterization confirmed the diagnosis of CP. Due to the lack of satisfactory response to corticosteroid therapy, pericardiectomy was performed, which gave rise to symptom relief progressively and substantially. Considering the temporal course of the patient's symptoms and exclusion of other possible etiologies based on the patient's medical history and diagnostic evaluation, immunization with the COVID-19 vaccine was recognized as a culprit for developing CP. Despite being a scarce phenomenon, the COVID-19 vaccine could have a tendency to provoke pericardial inflammation in so far as causing CP. Hence, physicians should have a high index of suspicion in these circumstances and accelerate the diagnostic investigation.

Successful liver and kidneys transplant following aortic dissection and subclavian artery rupture: A case report.

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE: Despite the increasing number of liver and kidney transplants, the number of patients awaiting for a proper donor is still exceeding. Therefore, the preservation of donor organs is critically advocated. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein, we presented a successful liver and kidney transplant from a brain-dead donor who was found preoperatively to have simultaneous aortic dissection and intramural hematoma and additionally developed left subclavian artery dissection and perforation, which was noticed following sternotomy. CLINICAL DISCUSSION: This case experience highlights the key role of cardiac surgeons in preserving visceral organs by rapid repair of the dissection and perforation sites of the aorta and its branches which culminate in lifesaving organ donation. CONCLUSION: This case report introduces the first case of a successful; liver and kidneys transplant in a patient with concurrent aortic dissection and subclavian artery rupture which served as a lifesaving donor.

COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccine-related dermatological reactions: An interesting case series with a narrative review of the potential critical and non-critical mucocutaneous adverse effects related to virus, therapy, and the vaccination.

This narrative review article was conducted to lay out a summarized but exhaustive review of current literature over mucocutaneous manifestations in 4 dimensions of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: virus itself, treatment-related, vaccine-induced, and alteration of chronic dermatologic diseases following infection. Virus and vaccine-related were mainly self-limited and non-severe. Treatment-related reactions could be life-threatening.

A systematic review on mucocutaneous presentations after COVID-19 vaccination and expert recommendations about vaccination of important immune-mediated dermatologic disorders.

With dermatologic side effects being fairly prevalent following vaccination against COVID-19, and the multitude of studies aiming to report and analyze these adverse events, the need for an extensive investigation on previous studies seemed urgent, in order to provide a thorough body of information about these post-COVID-19 immunization mucocutaneous reactions. To achieve this goal, a comprehensive electronic search was performed through the international databases including Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane, Web of science, and Google scholar on July 12, 2021, and all articles regarding mucocutaneous manifestations and considerations after COVID-19 vaccine administration were retrieved using the following keywords: COVID-19 vaccine, dermatology considerations and mucocutaneous manifestations. A total of 917 records were retrieved and a final number of 180 articles were included in data extraction. Mild, moderate, severe and potentially life-threatening adverse events have been reported following immunization with COVID vaccines, through case reports, case series, observational studies, randomized clinical trials, and further recommendations and consensus position papers regarding vaccination. In this systematic review, we categorized these results in detail into five elaborate tables, making what we believe to be an extensively informative, unprecedented set of data on this topic. Based on our findings, in the viewpoint of the pros and cons of vaccination, mucocutaneous adverse events were mostly non-significant, self-limiting reactions, and for the more uncommon moderate to severe reactions, guidelines and consensus position papers could be of great importance to provide those at higher risks and those with specific worries of flare-ups or inefficient immunization, with sufficient recommendations to safely schedule their vaccine doses, or avoid vaccination if they have the discussed contra-indications.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing efficacy, safety, and satisfaction between ablative and non-ablative lasers in facial and hand rejuvenation/resurfacing.

Skin aging inevitably begins from the very early days of life. The lasers used in skin rejuvenation are mainly of two types: ablative and non-ablative. This meta-analysis aimed at comparing ablative with non-ablative lasers in terms of their efficacy and safety in skin rejuvenation. Articles published by March 15, 2020 in Embase, Medline (PubMed), Scopus, Cochrane, and clinicalTrials.gov were searched. The inclusion criteria included randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) in English using ablative and non-ablative lasers and comparing their safety and efficiency in wrinkle improvement and photoaging therapy. Out of 1353 extracted articles, 11 were selected for qualitative synthesis and of these, 4 were quantitatively analyzed. Different modes of various lasers were implemented; the ablative lasers included Erbium: yttrium-aluminium-garnet (Er:YAG) and CO2, besides the non-ablative lasers, comprised Ytterbium/Erbium, Erbium: Glass, neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd:YAG), and alexandrite. Pooled analyses on 124 participants showed insignificant differences between ablative and non-ablative lasers in the likelihood of excellent improvement with an odds ratio of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.24, 2.83). The analyses also showed good improvement with an odds ratio of 0.88 (95% CI: 0.44, 1.78), fair improvement with an odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.56, 2.26) and side effects with an odds ratio of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.43, 1.56). The efficacy and safety of ablative laser were not higher than those of non-ablative laser in skin rejuvenation. Given the small samples of the included articles, it is recommended that further high-quality RCTs be conducted using larger samples to confirm this conclusion.

Acute gastric volvulus following rapid and incomplete chewing of vegetables: A case report.

One of the rare but serious causes of acute abdomen is gastric volvulus. It is considered an emergent surgical condition when it takes place acutely due to the risk of gastric strangulation, gangrene, and perforation. In this study, we introduce a case of a previously healthy young adult patient who presented with sudden severe epigastric and left upper quadrant abdominal pain along with nausea and retching following insufficient mastication and rapid swallowing of large amounts of vegetables. Radiological studies with chest and abdominal X-rays were in favor of acute gastric outlet obstruction and finally, laparotomy confirmed the diagnosis of acute, primary mesenteroaxial gastric volvulus. We postulated a probable justifying mechanism of the presence of a flaccid gastrocolic ligament (found through the laparotomy) besides rapid entrance of great pieces of vegetables into the stomach precipitated instant gastric rotation.

A case report of an extremely rare type of cardiac tumor: Primary cardiac angiofibroma.

Cardiac angiofibroma is a very rare diagnosis when a patient develops an intracardiac mass. It is a primary benign cardiac tumor with a scarcity of information in the literature. This case report illustrates a 26-year-old man with a complaint of chronic chest tightness who was first diagnosed with right ventricle tumor by echocardiography then underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) which confirmed the presence of a highly-vascular tumor with radiologically benign behavior. Then his tumor was excised, his postoperative course was uncomplicated and he was well within almost 2 months after discharge. Ultimately the histopathologic findings demonstrated vascular and stromal tissue in favor of angiofibroma and excluded the other diagnoses with immunohistochemical and trichrome staining. Angiofibroma is a benign, highly vascular tumor, mostly discovered in the nasopharynx. When it is found in the heart, CMR and pathology are pivotal to rule in its diagnosis. It is isointense in T1 weighted and hyperintense in T2 weighted sequences with intense enhancement following contrast injection. Its pathology contains an admixture of vasculatures with CD31 positive immunoreactivity for endothelial cells and fibrotic tissue with bluish coloration in trichrome staining. Eventually, its treatment includes merely surgical excision given its benign nature.

Simultaneous Occurrence of Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis and Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura in a Patient with a History of COVID-19 Infection.

Since the emergence of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, multiple but rare complications of this infection have been described, comprising cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) and immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Although these two complications have been reported as separate entities, to the best of our knowledge, their concurrent presentation has not been reported. In this case report, we present a middle-aged man with a history of COVID-19 infection who developed a sudden-onset severe occipital headache followed by right-sided blindness (right homonymous hemianopia). Upon his diagnostic workup, brain computed tomography scan with and without contrast was indicative of thrombosis of the left transverse venous sinus and hemorrhagic venous infarction. In addition, laboratory data revealed thrombocytopenia, which upon investigation confirmed a diagnosis of ITP. We postulate three pathophysiological mechanisms for this circumstance: either COVID-19 infection caused ITP and then ITP gave rise to CVST, or COVID-19 complications themselves resulted in ITP and CVST independently and simultaneously, or another plausible mechanism is immune-mediated thrombocytopenia caused by the anti-platelet 4-factor antibody, which is the proposed mechanism for CVST after the COVID-19 vaccine.

Predictors of critical COVID-19 in an Iranian population: Age and disabilities play a special role.

Background: Ever since coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a global public health problem, risk factors for severe disease have been reported in studies from Western countries. However, apart from studies of Chinese origin, few reports are available on COVID-19 severity among the Asian population. This study investigates potential risk factors for development of critical COVID-19 in an Iranian population. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included all adults with COVID-19 from 2 tertiary centers in Iran who had been diagnosed between February 20 and April 1, 2020, in either inpatient or outpatient settings. "Critical COVID-19" was proposed when a hospitalized patient was scheduled for admission to intensive care unit, assisted by mechanical ventilation, or pronounced dead. We used univariable and multivariable logistic and linear regression models to explore the potential risk factors associated with critical COVID-19, admission to hospital, and length of hospital stay. Results: Of the 590 recruited patients, 427 (72.4%) were hospitalized, 186 (31.5%) had critical COVID-19, and 107 (18.2%) died. In the multivariable regression analysis, age >60 years and physical/mental disabilities were associated with critical COVID-19 (odds ratio (OR), 2.33 and 7.03; 95% CI, 1.51-3.60 and 2.88-17.13, respectively); and history of renal, heart, or liver failure was associated with both COVID-19 hospitalization (OR, 4.13; 95% CI 1.91-8.95; p<0.001) and length of hospital stay (Beta 1.90; 95% CI, 0.76-3.04; p=0.001). Conclusion: Age >60 years and physical/mental disabilities can predict development of critical COVID-19 in the Iranian population. Also, the presence of renal, heart, or liver failure might predict both COVID-19 hospitalization and length of hospital stay.

Role of chest CT scan in atypical cardiac trauma management: Left ventricle injury by a nail gun.

We report a case of an accidental penetrating cardiac trauma with a nail gun. A 28-year-old man was repairing a sofa with a nail gun when a nail was misfired to his chest. At the time of his presentation, he underwent chest CT scan, showing the nail as a sharp hyperdense foreign body penetrating the chest wall passing through the lower lobe of the left lung and finally the anterior aspect of left ventricle cavity. This report highlights the utility of the chest CT scan to detect trajectory of the misfired nail accurately and instantaneously in a hemodynamically stable patient to assist in the surgery plan.

Severe and life-threatening COVID-19-related mucocutaneous eruptions: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: Earlier diagnosis and the best management of virus-related, drug-related or mixed severe potentially life-threatening mucocutaneous reactions of COVID-19 patients are of great concern. These patients, especially hospitalised cases, are usually in a complicated situation (because of multi-organ failures), which makes their management more challenging. In such consultant cases, achieving by the definite beneficial management strategies that therapeutically address all concurrent comorbidities are really hard to reach or even frequently impossible. METHODS: According to the lack of any relevant systematic review, we thoroughly searched the databases until 5 October 2020 and finally found 57 articles including 93 patients. It is needed to know clinical presentations of these severe skin eruptions, signs and symptoms of COVID in these patients, time of skin rash appearance, classifying drug-related or virus-related skin lesions, classifying the type of skin rash, patients' outcome and concurrent both COVID-19 therapy and skin rash treatment. RESULT: Severe and potential life-threatening mucocutaneous dermatologic manifestations of COVID-19 usually may be divided into three major categories: virus-associated, drug-associated, and those with uncertainty about the exact origin. Angioedema, vascular lesions, toxic shock syndrome, erythroderma, DRESS, haemorrhagic bulla, AGEP, EM, SJS and TEN, generalised pustular figurate erythema were the main entities found as severe dermatologic reactions in all categories. CONCLUSION: We can conclude vascular injuries may be the most common cause of severe dermatologic manifestations of COVID-19, which is concordant with many proposed hypercoagulation tendencies and systemic inflammatory response syndrome as one of the most important pathomechanisms of COVID-19 so the skin may show these features in various presentations and degrees.

Varicella-Zoster Scar Treatments: A Tertiary Review.

Chickenpox is a highly communicable disease caused by Varicella Zoster Virus. Varicella rash commonly evolves into permanent depressed scars, documented in up to 18% of post varicella patients, leaving life-long cosmetic issues for patients. Although there is a lot of reviews on depressed scars, the viral etiology and the unique scar morphology of post varicella scar discriminate it from other depressed scars. Therefore it is required to assess the efficacy of scar removal modalities on these scars, specifically. Yet, despite the prevalence, there is no comprehensive review on chickenpox scars' treatment, particularly. This review provides an overview and categorization of efficacy and adverse events of various methods used in the treatment of post varicella skin scars. A comprehensive literature search was performed on major databases, including all papers related to post varicella scar treatment until 2020. The results were categorized into topical treatment with tretinoin, systemic medical treatments with topiramate and isotretinoin, non-invasive procedures including chemical peelings, micro-needling and laser, invasive procedures including dermal grafting and subcision-suction method, and combination therapies. According to literature, chemical peeling with trichloroacetic acid was the most frequently used method in the treatment of chickenpox scar, revealing moderate to excellent response in patients. However, there is insufficient evidence to accurately compare the efficacy of other modalities on these scars specifically.