Chemotherapy Rechallenge or Reintroduction Compared to Regorafenib or Trifluridine/Tipiracil for Pretreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Propensity Score Analysis of Treatment Beyond Second Line (Proserpyna Study).

BACKGROUND: The optimal treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) beyond second line is still questioned. Besides the standard of care agents (regorafenib, REG, or trifluridine/tipiracil, FTD/TPI), chemotherapy rechallenge or reintroduction (CTr/r) are commonly considered in clinical practice, despite weak supporting evidence. The prognostic performance of CTr/r, REG and FTD/TPI in this setting are herein evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PROSERpYNa is a multicenter, observational, retrospective study, in which patients with refractory mCRC, progressing after at least 2 lines of CT, treated with CTr/r, REG or FTD/TPI, are considered eligible and were enrolled in 2 independent data sets (exploratory and validation). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS); secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (RR) and safety. A propensity score adjustment was accomplished for survival analyses. RESULTS: Data referring to patients treated between Jan-10 and Jan-19 from 3 Italian institutions were gathered (341 and 181 treatments for exploratory and validation data sets respectively). In the exploratory cohort, median OS (18.5 vs. 6.5 months), PFS (6.1 vs. 3.5 months) and RR (28.6% vs. 1.4%) were significantly longer for CTr/r compared to REG/FTD/TPI. Survival benefits were retained at the propensity score analysis, adjusted for independent prognostic factors identified at multivariate analysis. Moreover, these results were confirmed within the validation cohort analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Although the retrospective fashion, CTr/r proved to be a valuable option in this setting in a real-world context, providing superior outcomes compared to standard of care agents at the price of a moderate toxicity.

Impact of muscle mass loss on outcomes in advanced or metastatic gastric cancer patients receiving a second-line treatment.

OBJECTIVE: Sarcopenia is a frequent disorder among cancer patients. It commonly leads to muscle mass wasting and poor clinical outcomes, even though it is rarely recognized and often undertreated. The relationship between skeletal muscle depletion and chemotherapy toxicity or postoperative complications is well known. The aim of the present study was to analyze the impact of sarcopenia on clinical outcomes of pretreated metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 88 pretreated GC patients were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to their skeletal mass index (SMI): sarcopenic patients with low SMI (≤39 cm2/m2 for women and ≤55 cm2/m2 for men) and non-sarcopenic patients with normal/high SMI value. The two groups were compared according to outcomes and adverse events. RESULTS: Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly higher in patients with normal/high SMI than in those with low SMI (6 vs. 3.5 months, respectively; HR 0.52). Similarly, the overall response rate (ORR) was higher in the subgroup with normal/high SMI (41% vs. 20%; p=0.02). Overall survival (OS) was not significantly different, but multivariate analysis demonstrated that both SMI and performance status were associated with OS. In the sarcopenic group, the patients treated in the second line with paclitaxel and ramucirumab regimen showed a better outcome profile. Overall, adverse events (AEs) were more frequent in the group of patients with low SMI (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Early recognition of sarcopenia may contribute to personalizing second or further lines of treatment in advanced GC and to weigh up the potential risk of serious toxicities.

Final analysis of colorectal cancer patients treated with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid neoadjuvant chemotherapy for unresectable liver metastases.

We have previously reported that neoadjuvant therapy with modified FOLFIRI enabled nearly a third of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) to undergo surgical resection of liver metastases. Here, we present data from the long-term follow-up of these patients. Forty patients received modified FOLFIRI: irinotecan 180 mg m(-2), day 1; folinic acid, 200 mg m(-2); and 5-fluorouracil: as a 400 mg m(-2) bolus, days 1 and 2, and a 48-h continuous infusion 1200 mg m(-2), from day 1. Treatment was repeated every 2 weeks, with response assessed every six cycles. Resected patients received six further cycles of chemotherapy postoperatively. Nineteen (47.5%) of 40 patients achieved an objective response; 13 (33%) underwent resection. After a median follow-up of 56 months, median survival for all patients was 31.5 months: for non-resected patients, median survival was 24 months and was not reached for resected patients. Median time to progression was 14.3 and 5.2 months for all and non-resected patients, respectively. Median disease-free (DF) survival in resected patients was 52.5 months. At 2 years, all patients were alive (8 DF), and at last follow-up, eight were alive (6 DF). Surgical resection of liver metastases after neoadjuvant treatment with modified FOLFIRI in CRC patients achieved favourable survival times.

Schedule-dependent activity of 5-fluorouracil and irinotecan combination in the treatment of human colorectal cancer: in vitro evidence and a phase I dose-escalating clinical trial.

Several schedules of 5-fluorouracil (FU) and irinotecan (IRI) have been shown to improve overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Preclinical evidence suggests that the sequential administration of IRI and FU produces synergistic activity, although their clinical use has not been fully optimised. We investigated the interaction between short-term exposure to SN-38, the active metabolite of IRI, and prolonged exposure to FU in human CRC HT-29 cells and observed that the synergism of action between the two agents can be increased by extending the time of cell exposure to FU and reducing the interval between administration of the two agents. Based on these findings, we performed a phase I trial in 25 advanced CRC patients using a modified IRI/FU regimen as first-line therapy and evaluated three dose levels of IRI (150-300 mg/m(2)) and two of continuous infusion of FU (800-1000 mg/m(2)) in a 3-weekly schedule. The most severe grade III-IV toxicities were neutropoenia in four cycles and diarrhoea in three. One patient achieved complete response (4%), 12 a partial response (48%), the overall response rate was 52% (+/-20, 95% CI); seven of 25 patients had stable disease (28%), the overall disease control was 80% (+/-16, 95% CI). This modified IRI/FU schedule is feasible and exhibits potentially interesting clinical activity.

Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: To identify the most effective of two combinations, irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) and irinotecan/cisplatin, in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, for investigation in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive irinotecan [80 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.)], FA (500 mg/m2 i.v.) and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU (2000 mg/m2 i.v.), weekly for 6 weeks with a 1-week rest, or irinotecan (200 mg/m2 i.v.) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 i.v.), on day 1 for 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were eligible for analysis in the per-protocol population. The overall response rate in the irinotecan/5-FU/FA arm (n=59) was 42.4%, with a complete response rate of 5.1%. Corresponding figures for the irinotecan/cisplatin arm (n=56) were 32.1% and 1.8%, respectively. The median time to progression was 6.5 months (irinotecan/5-FU/FA) and 4.2 months (irinotecan/cisplatin) (P < 0.0001), with median survival times of 10.7 and 6.9 months, respectively (P=0.0018). The major toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia, which was more pronounced with irinotecan/cisplatin than with irinotecan/5-FU/FA (65.7% versus 27%). Diarrhea was the main grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity with both irinotecan/5-FU/FA (27.0%) and irinotecan/cisplatin (18.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Both combinations were active, with acceptable safety profiles. Irinotecan/5-FU/FA was selected as the most effective combination for investigation in a phase III trial in advanced gastric cancer.

Long-term follow-up of a pilot phase II study with neoadjuvant epidoxorubicin, etoposide and cisplatin in gastric cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The prognosis in T3-T4 or N+ gastric cancer is dismal, and the role of adjuvant therapy remains uncertain. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy could improve both resectability and survival. Here, we report the results of the long-term follow-up of a pilot study aimed at evaluating a neoadjuvant treatment in a group of patients carefully staged by computed tomography (CT), endoscopic ultrasound and laparoscopy. METHODS: Twenty-five stage II-III patients with histologically proven gastric adenocarcinoma were enrolled in the study. All patients gave informed consent and were thoroughly staged. Patients were treated with epidoxorubicin (40 mg/m2 i.v.) on days 1 and 4, etoposide (VP-16; 100 mg/m2) on days 1, 3 and 4 and cisplatinum (80 mg/m2) on day 2, every 21-28 days for 3 pre-operative cycles before CT clinical restaging followed by laparotomy and D2 gastrectomy. Three further cycles of chemotherapy were planned after radical surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients received the planned pre-operative chemotherapy and underwent surgical resection; total (13 patients) or subtotal (7 patients) R0 D2 gastrectomy was possible in 20 patients. One patient died as a result of gastric bleeding. Perioperative complications occurred in 5 patients (failure of anastomosis in 1 patient and wound infection in the other 4). The pathologic response rate included 7 partial responses (29.1%) and 10 patients with stable disease (41.7%). The main toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia (68%), which occurred more frequently during the postoperative chemotherapy, and fatigue (68%). Fever or infection, however, were never observed. The median disease-free survival was 37 months, and median survival has not been reached after 40 months of median follow-up. One-, 2- and 3-year survival rates were 80, 64 and 60%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The notable long-term survival in the present study suggests a comparison between the neoadjuvant approach, including new drug combinations, and adjuvant chemo- or chemoradio-therapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

Neoadjuvant treatment of unresectable liver disease with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid in colorectal cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to observe the effects of neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) on the resection rate and survival of colorectal cancer patients with initially unresectable hepatic metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy comprising irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) administered intravenously (i.v.) on day 1, FA 200 mg/m(2) i.v. on days 1 and 2, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2) i.v. bolus on days 1 and 2, and 5-FU 1200 mg/m(2) as a continuous 48-h i.v. infusion on day 1. The treatment was repeated every 2 weeks and response was assessed every 12 weeks (six cycles). RESULTS: The objective response rate to chemotherapy was 47.5% (n = 19), with two complete responses and disease stabilization in 11 (27.5.%) patients. Responses were unconfirmed for 11 patients undergoing surgery within 2 weeks. Treatment was well tolerated and adverse events were typical of the chemotherapy agents used. Twenty-seven (67.5%) patients reported hematological toxicity (35.0% grade 3/4) and 14 (35.0%) reported gastrointestinal toxicity (12.5% grade 3/4). Thirteen patients (32.5%) underwent potentially curative liver resection following chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was particularly effective in patients with large metastases on entry to the study. The median time to progression is 14.3 months and, at a median follow-up of 19 months, all patients are alive. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant therapy with irinotecan combined with 5-FU/FA enabled a significant proportion of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases to undergo surgical resection. The effects of treatment on survival have yet to be determined.

Weekly gemcitabine and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study.

OBJECTIVE: In this phase I-II study we explored the potential of the combination of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in order to determine the toxicity profile in pancreatic cancer. The efficacy of this drug combination was studied as a secondary endpoint. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Two dose levels of GEM and two dose levels of 5-FU were evaluated in three cohorts of patients who received GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), or GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,250 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, respectively. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 10% of the cycles. Non-myelosuppressive toxicities included fatigue (22%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (12%) and grade 1 liver toxicity. There was no limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Two patients experienced a partial response (9.5 +/- 12.6%) and 12 patients had stable disease (57.1 +/- 21.2%). Seven of the 14 symptomatic patients improved their disease-related symptoms and 4 of the 8 patients evaluable for clinical benefit had a clinically beneficial response (50 +/- 34.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (range 2-28), median survival was 11 months (range 3-32+), and the actuarial 1-year survival rate 33%. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of GEM combined with 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU shows a good safety profile at the dose levels evaluated. Some partial responses had also been achieved, disregarding the dose level of the two drugs. Survival confirms the activity of this drug combination.

Predictive value of thymidylate synthase expression in resected metastases of colorectal cancer.

Recent investigations have focused on the prognostic value of thymidylate synthase (TS) assessment in metastases of colorectal carcinoma (CRC). In order to evaluate the prognostic impact of TS expression after resection of metastases of colorectal cancer followed by systemic adjuvant chemotherapy, we performed an immunohistochemical characterisation of TS in the primary tumours and in the corresponding radically resected hepatic and pulmonary metastases. An additional objective was to compare the levels of TS in primary and metastatic disease. TS expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry using the monoclonal antibody TS 106. The study population consisted of 60 patients: 48 underwent liver and 12 lung resection. All of them received adjuvant chemotherapy after metastasectomy according to the Mayo Clinic schedule. In the 49 evaluable primary tumours, TS score was high in 53% and low in 47% of patients, while in the 60 metastatic samples TS immunostaining was high in 33% and low in 67%. There was a significantly smaller number of high TS expressors in metastatic than in primary tumours (P<0.04). No correlation was observed between TS expression and the site of the metastasis. TS status did not significantly correlate with the median disease-free interval (DFI) after metastasectomy, although this parameter was longer for patients with low TS immunoreactivity in the resected metastases than for those with high TS lesions (19.6 versus 13.8 months). Patients with high TS levels, however, had a significantly shorter median overall survival (OS) (27.6 months) than those with low TS expression (36.3 months) (P<0.008). TS status in the resected metastases confirmed its independent prognostic value in the multivariate analysis and was the only prognostic marker of OS in the subgroup of patients with resected liver metastases. These results suggest that high TS levels in resected metastases of colorectal cancer are associated with a poor outcome after surgery and 5-FU adjuvant therapy; therefore, a prospective assessment of TS levels in resected colorectal metastases could be useful to define which patients will most likely benefit from 5-FU adjuvant therapy after metastasectomy. Chemotherapeutic agents that target TS may not be the appropriate adjuvant treatment after metastasectomy for patients with a high TS expression in the resected metastases of colorectal cancer.

Bolus and infusional 5-fluorouracil combined with cisplatin in advanced gastric cancer.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is the main drug used in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Combination chemotherapy is not always superior to 5-FU alone, especially when biomodulators are also administered. In an attempt to exploit all the cytotoxic mechanisms of 5-FU, we carried out a pilot study with a double route of administration of 5-FU (intravenous bolus and continuous infusion) and a multiple modulation of 5-FU by methotrexate (MTX), 6S-leucovorin (6S-LV) and cisplatin (CDDP). A group of 30 patients affected by advanced gastric cancer was treated with MTX 50 mg/m2 and 5-FU 400 mg/m2 as an i.v. bolus on day 1, followed by a 5 day i. v. continuous infusion of 5-FU 600 mg/m2/day and 6S-LV 100 mg/m2/day; on day 3 CDDP 100 mg/m2 was also administered. The regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. Six partial responses (20+/-14. 3%), 12 stable diseases (40+/-17.5%) and 12 progression (40+/-17.5%) were observed in an intent-to-treat analysis. Median survival was 7 months. All responding patients had performance status 0-1. Grade 3-4 toxicity was mainly gastrointestinal, but grade 3-4 anemia and leucopenia were also recorded. The schedule has low activity. The use of different modulators and way of administration of 5-FU does not provide advantages in advanced gastric cancer.

Vinorelbine and alternating cisplatin and ifosfamide in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

In order to explore the activity of a combination of vinorelbine (VNL) and alternating cisplatin (CDDP) and ifosfamide (IFX) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a phase II study was performed. Seventy chemoradiotherapy naive patients with NSCLC, stage IIIA, IIIB and IV disease, PS (ECOG)

A phase II study of irinotecan alternated with five days bolus of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in first-line chemotherapy of metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This multicenter phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy of the alternating schedule of irinotecan (CPT-11) with bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) in first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven metastatic colorectal cancer, and at least one bidimensionally measurable lesion, aged 18-70, with performance status < or = 2, normal baseline biological values and no prior chemotherapy (or only adjuvant chemotherapy completed > or = 6 months before study entry) were selected. Treatment was irinotecan 350 mg/m2, i.v., day 1, alternating with leucovorin 20 mg/m2 i.v. and 5-FU 425 mg/m2, i.v. daily for five consecutive days, day 22-26 (Mayo Clinic regimen). One alternating cycle was to be performed every six weeks. Patients were evaluated for efficacy every alternating cycle. Treatment was administered until five alternating cycles, disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (28 chemotherapy-naïve and five with prior adjuvant treatment completed > 1 year prior to accrual) were enrolled. The objective response rate (RR) was 30% (95% CI: 16-49; 10 patients/33; nine partial response and one complete response). All responses were reviewed by an independent external review committee. An additional 49% of patients had stable disease. The median survival was 16 months, the one year survival amounted to 58% and the median progression free survival was 7.2 months. Relative dose intensity was nearly 90% for both drugs. Grade 3-4 diarrhea and neutropenia were the most frequent severe toxic events, seen in 24% and 64% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The alternating schedule of CPT-11 350 mg/m2 with five days bolus of 5-FU and low dose LV is an active and feasible regimen as front-line therapy for metastatic CRC. It is well tolerated, without evidence of overlapping toxicity. The response rate appears promising with regard to that expected with either single agent. This regimen warrants further assessment in randomized trials.

Cytofluorimetric evaluation of DNA ploidy in the diagnosis of bladder cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to investigate the relationship between urinary cytology, traditional indexes of malignancy of bladder carcinoma and DNA-ploidy (diploid, near-diploid, aneuploid). METHODS: 52 specimens of bladder cancers (transitional cell carcinoma) were obtained from 46 patients at TURB and from 6 patients at radical cystectomy. In every specimen the nuclear content of DNA was investigated using the cytofluorimetric method. Cells were processed in standard fashion for flow cytometry with propidium iodide staining; cellular suspension was obtained mechanically. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were used as diploid standard. Bladder cytology was performed in every patient. RESULTS: A relationship between DNA-ploidy and histological malignancy was observed. The largest portion of near-diploid neoplasm was observed in stage T1, grade G2 malignancies. In some cases negative bladder cytology occurred together with aneuploid DNA content, whilst in other cases positive bladder cytology occurred together with diploid DNA content. In consequence there is not always a relationship between bladder cytology and DNA-ploidy. CONCLUSIONS: Since observed correlations may point out some neoplasms with particular biological behaviour, follow-up of near-diploid malignancies is of great interest.

Treatment of patients with advanced gastric carcinoma with a 5-fluorouracil-based or a cisplatin-based regimen: two parallel randomized phase II studies.

BACKGROUND: Although many drug combination therapies have been proposed, there is no standard therapy for patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. The superiority of combination therapy over monochemotherapy has not been demonstrated convincingly. To explore the role of monochemotherapy, the authors evaluated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), modulated by 6S-leucovorin (6S-LV) and a cisplatin-containing regimen, which was comprised of epirubicin, etoposide, and cisplatin with the addition of the reversal agent lonidamine (EEP-L). METHODS: After stratification according to performance status (PS) and resection of the primary tumor, 72 patients with advanced gastric carcinoma were randomized to 2 parallel Phase II trials with 5-FU/6S-LV and EEP-L, respectively. Thirty-six patients in Study A received bolus 6S-LV, 100 mg/m2, followed by bolus 5-FU, 370 mg/m2, on Days 1-5 and 36 others in Study B received epirubicin, 30 mg/m2, on Days 1 and 5; etoposide, 100 mg/m2, on Days 1, 3, and 5; cisplatin, 30 mg/m2, on Days 2 and 4; and lonidamine, 150 mg/day. RESULTS: There were 6 partial responses (18.2%) (95% confidence interval [CI] +/- 13.2) in Study A and 7 partial responses (21.9%) (95% CI +/- 14.3) in Study B. Partial responses were more frequent in patients with resected tumors or with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS of 0-1. The median duration of response was 8.8 and 8.3 months, respectively, in Study A and Study B. The median survival reached 8 months in Study A and 9 months in Study B. In the whole population of patients survival was significantly higher in patients with a PS of 0-1 (P < 0.05). Patients with a PS of 0-1 and a resected tumor had the significantly longest survival both in EEP-L treated patients and in all evaluable patients in the two studies. The most frequent World Health Organization Grade 3-4 toxic effects were gastrointestinal in Study A and hematologic in Study B. No treatment-related death was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of 5-FU, modulated with 6S-LV, is moderate in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma, similar to cisplatin-containing regimens. PS and other prognostic factors could influence the response rate, which does not appear to be a reliable parameter for evaluating the outcome of chemotherapy trials.

Carboplatin-oral etoposide personalized dosing in elderly non-small cell lung cancer patients. Gruppo Oncologico Cooperativo Sud-Italia.

The toxicity and therapeutic activity, including the effect on quality of life, of the carboplatin-oral etoposide combination, given with an intrapatient dose escalation, was tested in 38 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients aged over 70 years, and in 8 younger patients with a performance status of 2. In the absence of grade 3-4 toxicity, doses were escalated as follows: first course (carboplatin AUC 4; etoposide 50 mg twice daily orally days 1-14); second course (carboplatin AUC 5; etoposide 50 mg twice daily orally days 1-14); third course (carboplatin AUC 5; etoposide 50 mg twice daily orally days 1-21). A total of 141 chemotherapy cycles were delivered. The treatment was, in general, well tolerated and no toxic deaths occurred. More than 60% of patients received 100% of the planned dose intensity. Transient grade 4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia occurred in 6 and 2 patients, respectively, but only 2 patients had to be hospitalised because of fever. All patients were evaluated for activity on an 'intention to treat basis'. Ten partial responses and 20 stable disease were recorded, for an overall response rate of 22% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 11-36). 9/38 (24%; 95% CI = 12-41) elderly patients obtained a partial response. The median response duration was 4 months. A quality of life improvement was observed in 19 of the 46 enrolled patients (41%; 95% CI = 27-57), and 15/46 (33%; 95% CI = 19-48) showed a performance status improvement. The quality of life score improved in 17/38 (45%) elderly patients. 8/10 responders and 11/20 patients with stable disease showed a concomitant improvement in quality of life. At a median potential follow-up of 16 months (range 2-21), 31 patients had had progression of disease and 23 had died, for a median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of 5 and 10 months, respectively. The median survival time was 11 months in the elderly patients. The median time to subjective impairment (TSI) was 6 months (7 months in the elderly group). One-year estimated TTP, TSI and OS rates were 22, 29 and 41%, respectively. At multivariate Cox analysis, a > 25% improvement in the quality of life score was more predictive of a better survival outcome than the response achievement.

Effect of cisplatin in advanced colorectal cancer resistant to 5-fluorouracil plus (S)-leucovorin.

Modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is currently being investigated in advanced colorectal cancer. In an attempt to improve the results obtainable for the association of 5-FU and leucovorin, we decided to add cisplatin to 5-FU and (6S)-leucovorin (S-LV) after disease progression. The hypothesis was that a pharmacological enhancement of the efficacy of 5-FU would result in responses in 5-FU-unresponsive patients or in a second response in previously responding patients. A group of 28 5-FU+S-LV-pretreated patients, with advanced measurable colorectal cancer, were treated with 80 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, 80 mg/m2 S-LV and 370 mg/m2 5-FU as an i. v. bolus for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. We obtained 3 partial responses (response rate: 11 +/- 11%), while 11 patients had stable disease (39 +/- 18%). Among the 3 responders, 1 patient had earlier achieved a partial response, a second stable disease and 1 had disease progression after the previous 5-FU+S-LV treatment. The median survival time for all 28 patients was 11 months. Toxicity was minimal and consisted of mild and reversible gastrointestinal symptoms and myelosuppression. We believe that further studies must be carried out to establish the real impact of the synergism between cisplatin, 5-FU and S-LV in untreated patients.

"In situ" echo-guided extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones. Methods and results with Dornier MPL 9000.

In 285 patients with prevesical ureteral stone and 247 with upper ureteral stone, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) was performed with the Dornier MPL 9000 ultrasonographic targeting device. All these stones were treated "in situ" and without regional or general anaesthesia. At 3-month follow-up 96.8% of the patients treated for prevesical stone and 95.5% of those with upper ureteral stone were stone-free. ESWL was repeated once or twice in 99 cases; the average number of sessions was 1.2 for all patients (similar for prevesical and upper ureteral stones). Sparse use of ureteral stenting (6.2% of cases) did not seem to reduce the efficacy of ESWL or increase complications or need for retreatment. Intravenous fentanyl analgesia was given to 40.9% of the patients and intravenous infusion of a furosemide solution was employed in many cases to give adequate dilation of the urinary tract. In situ echo-guided ureteral ESWL is simple, safe and efficacious and can be the technique of choice for sonographically detectable ureteral stone.

Salvage chemotherapy with mitoxantrone and mitomycin with or without methotrexate in advanced breast cancer.

Thirty-three patients with advanced and refractory breast cancer were treated with two mitoxantrone-containing regimens (mitoxantrone plus mitomycin and mitoxantrone plus mitomycin plus methotrexate). All patients had received previous chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF); cyclophosphamide, adriamycin and fluorouracil (CAF); or CMF and CAF. Partial response occurred in five patients (15 +/- 12%), stable disease occurred in 15 patients (45 +/- 17%) and progressive disease occurred in 13 patients (40 +/- 17%). The median duration of response was 5 months. The median actuarial survival was 11 months. Toxicity was mild, even in patients who had previously received anthracyclines; generally it was mainly hematological. We thus recommend mitoxantrone-containing regimens as salvage chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer.