Clavulanic acid sensitization seems more involved in cutaneous than systemic reactions in amoxicilline-clavulanate drug reactions.

Summary: BLs allergy is considered a major health issue, as BLs are the most frequently involved in drug allergic reactions. Amoxicillin (AX) is the most frequently involved drug in sensitization among all BLs. AX is commercialized alone or combined to clavulanic acid (CLA) in order to increase the antibiotic spectrum. The growing prescriptions of AX-CLA formulations contributed to increase the role of CLA as an allergy inducer. At present, little is known about the clinical characteristics of hypersensitivity reactions to clavulanate. The aim of this study was to assess the difference in the prevalence of cutaneous vs systemic reactions in patients who had a documented history of allergic reactions to amoxicillin-clavulanate and tested positive for clavulanate or penicillin/amoxicillin. Our study suggests that patients who presented only muco-cutaneous reactions were more often sensitized to CLA rather than AX.

Influencing factors on the safety and effectiveness of venom immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The safety profile of venom immunotherapy (VIT) is a relevant issue and considerable differences in safety and efficacy of VIT have been reported. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers during VIT, which has already been published. For a second analysis, data concerning premedication and venom preparations in relation to systemic adverse events (AE) during the up-dosing phase and the first year of the maintenance phase were evaluated as well as the outcome of field stings and sting challenges. METHODS: The study was conducted as an open, prospective, observational, multicenter study. In total, 1,425 patients were enrolled and VIT was performed in 1,342 patients. RESULTS: Premedication with oral antihistamines was taken by 52.1% of patients during the up-dosing and 19.7% of patients during the maintenance phase. Taking antihistamines had no effect on the frequency of systemic AE (p=0.11) but large local reactions (LLR) were less frequently seen (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.58-0.96; p=0.02). Aqueous preparations were preferentially used for up-dosing (73.0%) and depot preparations for the maintenance phase (64.5%). The type of venom preparation neither had an influence on the frequency of systemic AE nor on the effectiveness of VIT (p=0.26 and p=0.80, respectively), while LLR were less frequently seen when depot preparations were used (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with oral antihistamines during VIT significantly reduces the frequency of LLR but not systemic AE. All venom preparations used were equally effective and did not differ in the frequency of systemic AE.

IgE-mediated reactivity to non-specific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP): clinical implications and management ‒ consensus document of the Association of Italian Territorial and Hospital Allergists and Immunologists (AAIITO).

Summary: The primary cause of adult-onset food allergy in Mediterranean countries is IgE-mediated reactivity to non-specific Lipid Transfer Protein (nsLTP), with a prevalence of 9.5% in Italy. nsLTP is heat- and pepsin-stable due to its 3D structure, causing severe allergic reactions, even anaphylaxis. It's conserved across plants and a "panallergen" due to homologous forms in various vegetable foods. Found in Rosaceae fruits' skin, it's categorized into nsLTP1 (9 kDa) and nsLTP2 (7 kDa), representing 93% and 7% of the molecules described to date, respectively. Pru p 3 (nsLTP1) from peach is a primary sensitizer, binding more epitopes than other homologs. Cross-reactivity varies in sensitized patients, influenced by IgE levels. Clinical manifestations range from none to various symptoms. Managing patients sensitized to nsLTP without clinical allergy is a challenge. Sensitization hierarchy usually starts with peach, then expands through Prunoideae, Rosaceae, and other foods. Clinical symptoms don't always expand across LTPs. Patients can tolerate some nsLTP-containing foods and consuming them may maintain tolerance. The absence of guidelines led to the Associazione Allergologi Immunologi Italiani Territoriali e Ospedalieri (AAIITO) creating a consensus-based document. Strategies involve avoidance, self-injectable adrenaline, verification through in vivo and in vitro testing, considering cofactors, and peeling fruits. In localized reactions, abstinence is recommended if specific IgE is high. Concurrent pollinosis may complicates diagnosis, but may help management since symptoms are often less severe. Asymptomatic patients are advised to continue normal diets while considering cofactors and total IgE levels. Management strategies should be case-specific, based on expert Consensus Document.

Clinical severity of LTP syndrome is associated with an expanded IgE repertoire, FDEIA, FDHIH, and LTP mono reactivity.

Summary: Background. LTP allergy is often a challenge for clinicians. We evaluated a multiplex diagnostic approach with diverse cofactors to stratify LTP syndrome risk. Methods. Of the 1,831 participants screened with 'Allergy Explorer-ALEX-2', 426 had reactions to at least one LTP. Data was gathered and recorded via an electronic database. Results. Reactivity to peach Pru p 3 was found in 77% of individuals with LTP allergy. Higher levels of specific IgE and concurrent sensitization to more than 5 molecules (50% of all LTP-sensitised participants, 62% of symptomatic cases) were significantly associated with an increased risk of severe reactions (p = 0.001). Several cofactors, either alone or in combination, also influenced patients' clinical outcomes. Some cofactors increased the risk of severe reactions, such as mono reactivity to LTP in 44.6% of cases (p = 0.001), FDEIA in 10.8% of patients (p = 0.001), and FDNIH in 11.5% (p = 0.005). On the other hand, reactivity to PR10 (24.2%; p = 0.001), profilin hypersensitivity (10.3%; p = 0.001), and/or atopic dermatitis (16.7%; p = 0.001) had a mitigating effect on symptom severity. Conclusions. Clinical severity of LTP syndrome is associated with an expanded IgE repertoire in terms of the number of LTP components recognized and increased IgE levels in individual molecules. Ara h 9, Cor a 8, and Mal d 3 showed the strongest association with clinical severity. In addition, several cofactors may either exacerbate (FDEIA, FDHIH, and LTP monoreactivity) or ameliorate (atopic dermatitis and co-sensitization to profilin and/or PR10) individual patient outcomes. These factors may be utilized for the daily clinical management of LTP syndrome.

Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization in an allergic pregnant woman post-vascular scaffolds implantation.

Summary: The use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) desensitization for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) is growing, but no data are available on desensitization protocol in patients with ASA sensitivity and CAD during pregnancy. This case report shows that ASA desensitization protocol during pregnancy could be safe and effective in a tertiary centre with a multidisciplinary team.

Why lipid transfer protein allergy is not a pollen-food syndrome: novel data and literature review.

Summary: Background.Based on the cross-reactivity between pollen lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) and the peach LTP, Pru p 3, it has been suggested that the pollen might initiate the LTP sensitization process. Objective. To establish whether LTP allergy can be considered as a pollen-food syndrome. Methods. The literature was reviewed and new data of component-resolved diagnosis from Italy obtained by both ISAC immunoassay and ImmunoCAP on large populations of LTP hypersensitive patients were provided and analyzed. Results. Among Pru p 3 reactors, patients positive for Art v 3 and Pla a 3 largely exceeded those sensitized to the respective major pollen allergens, Art v 1 and Pla a 1/Pla a 2. Pru p 3 reactivity remained stable around 80-90% at all ages, whereas Art v 3 and Ole e 7 recognition was missing in younger patients. Pru p 3 IgE exceeded IgE specific for pollen LTP at all ages. Inhibition studies carried out on LTP reactors showed that commercial extracts of mugwort and plane pollen were unable to inhibit significantly Pru p 3 IgE reactivity. In follow-up studies, baseline Pru p 3 IgE levels exceeded Art v 3 IgE levels in 84% of those sensitized to both allergens, and all patients positive to only one LTP allergen at baseline were sensitized to Pru p 3. Further, most of the patients who did not show any LTP reactivity at baseline became exclusive Pru p 3 reactors. On ImmunoCAP singleplex Pru p 3 IgE levels exceeded Art v 3 IgE levels in 89% of cases (p less than 0.0001). Most literature data were in keeping with these new observations. Conclusions. The evidence for LTP syndrome being a pollen-food syndrome is presently very thin. Our data do not rule out the possible sensitization to the protein, via the airways or the skin.

Sensitization to Gibberellin-Regulated Protein (Peamaclein) Among Italian Cypress Pollen-Sensitized Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peach gibberellin-regulated protein (peamaclein) has recently emerged as a relevant food allergen in cypress pollen-hypersensitive patients. Objective: We investigated monosensitization to peamaclein among Italian cypress pollen-allergic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 835 cypress pollen-hypersensitive patients from 28 Italian allergy centers underwent a thorough work-up to determine food-allergic reactions and performed skin prick testing with a commercial peach extract containing peamaclein. IgE to rPru p 3 was measured in peach reactors, and those with negative results were enrolled as potentially monosensitized to peamaclein. IgE reactivity to rPru p 7 was evaluated using immunoblot and an experimental ImmunoCAP with rPru p 7. RESULTS: Skin prick tests were positive to peach in 163 patients (19.5%); however, 127 (77.9%) were excluded because they reacted to Pru p 3. Twenty-four patients (14.7%) corresponding to 2.8% of the entire study population) were considered potentially monosensitized to peamaclein. No geographic preference was observed. Seventeen of the 24 patients (70.8%) had a history of food allergy, mainly to peach (n=15). Additional offending foods included other Rosaceae, citrus fruits, fig, melon, tree nuts, and kiwi. On peach immunoblot, only 3 of 18 putative peamaclein-allergic patients reacted to a band at about 7 kDa; an additional 4 patients reacted at about 50-60 kDa. Ten of 18 patients (56%) had a positive result for Pru p 7 on ImmunoCAP. CONCLUSION: Allergy and sensitization to peamaclein seem rare in Italy. Most patients react to peach, although other Rosaceae fruits and several citrus fruits may also be offending foods. Peach and cypress pollen probably also share cross-reacting allergens other than peamaclein.

Recommendations for the Use of Tryptase in the Diagnosis of Anaphylaxis and Clonal Mastcell Disorders.

Summary: Tryptase is a serin-protease produced and released by mast cells after IgE-mediated or non-IgE mediated stimuli. We here review the various aspects related to the molecular characteristics of the enzyme and its biological effects, the genetic basis of its production and the release kinetics. Recommendations for the clinical use of tryptase measurement developed by a task force of Società Italiana di Patologia Clinica e Medicina di Laboratorio and Associazione Allergologi Immunologi Italiani Territoriali e Ospedalieri are given on the best procedure for a correct definition of the reference values in relation to the inter-individual variability and to the correct determination of tryptase in blood and other biological liquids, in the diagnosis of anaphylaxis (from drugs, food, insect sting, or idiophatic), death from anaphylaxis (post mortem assessment) and cutaneous or clonal mastcell disorders.

Favorable Prognosis of Wheat Allergy in Adults.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Wheat ingestion can lead to disorders such as IgE-mediated food allergy and wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA), both of which are associated with impaired quality of life and significant morbidity. Allergy to wheat is relatively benign in children, although its natural history in adults is still unknown. Objective: We used placebo-controlled challenge to evaluate the natural history of wheat hypersensitivity in atopic patients with adultonset wheat allergy. METHODS: We enrolled 13 patients from an initial cohort of adult patients with IgE-mediated wheat allergy (mean age, 40 years). After diagnosis, the patients observed a wheat-free diet and were followed as outpatients for 5 years to evaluate wheat exposure. Wheat-IgEtiters were determined at the end of follow-up, and a second wheat-challenge was performed. RESULTS: Ten out of 13 patients took part in the study. The mean period of wheat avoidance was 4.2 years. Three patients had spontaneously reintroduced wheat before the second evaluation, after a mean (IQR) of 28 (18-36) months, with only mild gastrointestinal discomfort at reintroduction. At the end of follow-up, 9 of the 10 patients were wheat-tolerant. Two patients had a history of WDEIA. We observed a reduction in IgE levels, with median (IQR) IgE falling from 2.77 (0.35-100) kU/L at diagnosis to 0.88 (0.1-20.8) kU/L. The association between IgE and a negative challenge result was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: IgE-mediated wheat allergy in adults is benign and represents a temporary break in gastrointestinal tolerance. Future studies may improve our knowledge of wheat allergens, routes of and factors leading to sensitization, and prognostic biomarkers.

Hymenoptera Venom Allergy: Management of Children and Adults in Clinical Practice.

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who experience a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the emergency followed by an accurate diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy. Some epidemiological studies highlight our poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high-quality hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and quality of life of allergic patients. Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy is currently the most effective form of allergen-based immunotherapy, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of hymenoptera venom-allergic children and adults was prepared by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus document is to review the scientific evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, and management of patients allergic to hymenoptera venom. Thus, we can improve our knowledge of the disease and promote good clinical practices. The present document provides practical suggestions for correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, and strategies for patient care.

Favorable prognosis of wheat allergy in adults

Background: Wheat ingestion can lead to disorders such as IgE-mediated food allergy and wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis (WDEIA), both of which are associated with impaired quality of life and significant morbidity. Allergy to wheat is relatively benign in children, although its natural history in adults is still unknown. Objective: We used placebo-controlled challenge to evaluate the natural history of wheat hypersensitivity in atopic patients with adult-onset wheat allergy. Methods: We enrolled 13 patients from an initial cohort of adult patients with IgE-mediated wheat allergy (mean age, 40 years). After diagnosis, the patients observed a wheat-free diet and were followed as outpatients for 5 years to evaluate wheat exposure. Wheat-IgE titers were determined at the end of follow-up, and a second wheat-challenge was performed. Results: Ten out of 13 patients took part in the study. The mean period of wheat avoidance was 4.2 years. Three patients had spontaneously reintroduced wheat before the second evaluation, after a mean (IQR) of 28 (18-36) months, with only mild gastrointestinal discomfort at reintroduction. At the end of follow-up, 9 of the 10 patients were wheat-tolerant. Two patients had a history of WDEIA. We observed a reduction in IgE levels, with median (IQR) IgE falling from 2.77 (0.35-100) kU/L at diagnosis to 0.88 (0.1-20.8) kU/L. The association between IgE and a negative challenge result was not statistically significant.Conclusion: IgE-mediated wheat allergy in adults is benign and represents a temporary break in gastrointestinal tolerance. Future studies may improve our knowledge of wheat allergens, routes of and factors leading to sensitization, and prognostic biomarkers

Introducción: La ingesta de trigo puede originar varias patologías como alergia alimentaria mediada por IgE y la anafilaxia inducida por ejercicio previa ingesta de trigo. Todas ellas originan un descenso en la calidad de vida y una importante morbilidad. La alergia a trigo es relativamente benigna en niños, sin embargo, su historia natural en adultos es aún desconocida. Objetivo: Evaluamos la historia natural de la hipersensibilidad al trigo de inicio en la edad adulta en pacientes atópicos confirmado mediante pruebas de exposición oral. Métodos: Se incluyeron 13 pacientes de una cohorte de pacientes adultos (edad media 40 años) con alergia a trigo mediada por IgE. Tras el diagnóstico los pacientes siguieron una dieta exenta de trigo y fueron seguidos durante 5 años para valorar su tolerancia tras la exposición al trigo. Al final del seguimiento se determinaron los valores de IgE específica a trigo y se realizó una segunda provocación oral con trigo. Resultados: 10 de los 13 pacientes tomaron parte en el estudio. La duración media del periodo de no ingesta de trigo fue de 4,2 años. 3 pacientes reintrodujeron por iniciativa propia la ingesta de trigo antes de la segunda evaluación, después de un periodo medio de 28 meses (RIQ 18-36 meses), presentando solo leves síntomas gastrointestinales. Al final del seguimiento, 9/10 pacientes toleraron la ingesta de trigo. 2 pacientes tenían historia de anafilaxia inducida por ejercicio. Se observó una disminución de los valores de IgE específica desde una mediana de 2,77 kU/l (RIQ 0,35-100 kU/L) en el momento del diagnóstico hasta 0,88 kU/l (RIQ 0,1-20,8 Ku/L) al final del seguimiento. No se observó correlación entre los valores de IgE específica y los resultados de la tolerancia final. Conclusión: La alergia a trigo mediada por IgE en adultos es una patología benigna y representa una interrupción temporal de la tolerancia gastrointestinal. Futuros estudios podrían mejorar nuestro conocimiento sobre los alérgenos del trigo, rutas y factores que llevan a la sensibilización, y biomarcadores de pronóstico

Hymenoptera venom allergy: management of children and adults in clinical practice

Hymenoptera venom allergy is an epidemiologically underestimated condition and a major cause of morbidity worldwide. Preventing future allergic reactions in patients who experience a systemic reaction is based on the correct management of the emergency followed by an accurate diagnosis, prescription of adrenaline autoinjectors, and, where indicated, specific venom immunotherapy. Some epidemiological studies highlight our poor knowledge of this disease and the frequent inadequacy of its management. Moreover, they emphasize the importance of such a life-saving treatment as specific immunotherapy. The availability of high-quality hymenoptera venom extracts for diagnostic and therapeutic use has dramatically improved the prognosis and quality of life of allergic patients. Subcutaneous venom immunotherapy is currently the most effective form of allergen-based immunotherapy, with a carry-over effect lasting up to several years after its interruption. This report on the management of hymenoptera venom-allergic children and adults was prepared by a panel of Italian experts. The main objective of this consensus document is to review the scientific evidence related to diagnosis, therapy, and management of patients allergic to hymenoptera venom. Thus, we can improve our knowledge of the disease and promote good clinical practices. The present document provides practical suggestions for correct diagnosis, prescription of emergency therapy and immunotherapy, and strategies for patient care

La alergia al veneno de himenópteros es una condición subestimada epidemiológicamente que representa una causa importante de morbilidad en todo el mundo. La prevención de reacciones alérgicas futuras en pacientes que han desarrollado una reacción sistémica se basa en el manejo correcto de la emergencia, seguido de un diagnóstico correcto, la prescripción de autoinyectores de adrenalina y, en el caso de estar indicada, la prescripción de inmunoterapia específica con veneno (VIT). Varios estudios epidemiológicos destacan el escaso conocimiento de esta enfermedad y un frecuente tratamiento insuficiente. Además, enfatizan la importancia de la inmunoterapia específica, un tratamiento que puede salvar la vida del paciente. La disponibilidad de extractos de veneno de himenóptera de alta calidad para uso diagnóstico y terapéutico ha mejorado drásticamente el pronóstico y la calidad de vida de estos enfermos. La VIT subcutánea representa la forma más efectiva de inmunoterapia con alérgeno actualmente disponible, con una eficacia persistente que dura hasta varios años después de su interrupción. Este consenso sobre la evaluación clínica tanto de niños como de adultos alérgicos al veneno de himenópteros ha sido elaborado por un panel de expertos italianos. Su objetivo principal es revisar la evidencia científica disponible en el diagnóstico, la terapia y la evaluación clínica de los pacientes alérgicos al veneno de himenópteros con el propósito de mejorar el conocimiento sobre esta enfermedad y promover buenas prácticas clínicas. Se incluyen sugerencias prácticas para un diagnóstico correcto, la prescripción de terapia de emergencia e inmunoterapia, así como estrategias para el manejo de los pacientes

Allergy to LTP: to eat or not to eat sensitizing foods? A follow-up study.

Summary: Background. Follow-up data about the onset of novel food allergies in patients allergic to lipid transfer protein (LTP) are missing. We investigated the occurrence of novel allergies over time in LTP hypersensitive patients. Methods. Sixty-seven LTP-allergic patients recommended to avoid foods responsible for systemic reactions and encouraged to eat other sensitizing foods avoiding the association with known co-factors, were re-evaluated after ≥ 1 year to assess the occurrence of allergy to novel foods. IgE to rPru p 3, rBet v 1, and r Phl p 12 were measured. Results. At baseline, the most frequent offending foods were Rosaceae / Prunoideae, tree nuts, and peanut. Most patients reacted to > 1 food, and 77% experienced systemic allergic reactions. Those monosensitized to LTP showed a higher prevalence of food-induced systemic reactions than patients co-sensitized to profilin and/or PR-10 (p < 0.01). Baseline Pru p 3 IgE levels did not differ between patients with local symptoms or systemic symptoms. 1-16 years after the baseline evaluation 18/67 (27%) patients had experienced new food allergies; 8 and 10 reported local or systemic symptoms following the ingestion of previously tolerated foods. Again, most new allergies were caused by Rosaceae / Prunoideae, tree nuts, and peanut. The clinical evolution did not depend on baseline total IgE, co-sensitization to PR-10 and/or profilin, or Pru p 3 IgE levels. Conclusions.Rosaceae / Prunoideae, nuts and peanut are the most frequent cause of new food allergies in the long term. Their exclusion from patient's diets at baseline should be considered on an individual basis.

EAACI guidelines on allergen immunotherapy: Hymenoptera venom allergy.

Hymenoptera venom allergy is a potentially life-threatening allergic reaction following a honeybee, vespid, or ant sting. Systemic-allergic sting reactions have been reported in up to 7.5% of adults and up to 3.4% of children. They can be mild and restricted to the skin or moderate to severe with a risk of life-threatening anaphylaxis. Patients should carry an emergency kit containing an adrenaline autoinjector, H1 -antihistamines, and corticosteroids depending on the severity of their previous sting reaction(s). The only treatment to prevent further systemic sting reactions is venom immunotherapy. This guideline has been prepared by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology's (EAACI) Taskforce on Venom Immunotherapy as part of the EAACI Guidelines on Allergen Immunotherapy initiative. The guideline aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for the use of venom immunotherapy, has been informed by a formal systematic review and meta-analysis and produced using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) approach. The process included representation from a range of stakeholders. Venom immunotherapy is indicated in venom-allergic children and adults to prevent further moderate-to-severe systemic sting reactions. Venom immunotherapy is also recommended in adults with only generalized skin reactions as it results in significant improvements in quality of life compared to carrying an adrenaline autoinjector. This guideline aims to give practical advice on performing venom immunotherapy. Key sections cover general considerations before initiating venom immunotherapy, evidence-based clinical recommendations, risk factors for adverse events and for relapse of systemic sting reaction, and a summary of gaps in the evidence.

The clinical relevance of lipid transfer protein.

Despite a huge number of studies, many aspects of the lipid transfer protein (LTP) syndrome, the most frequent primary food allergy in Mediterranean countries, remain unclear. Its peculiar geographical distribution, along with the extreme variability of its clinical expression, makes this type of food allergy something unique in the panorama of IgE-mediated food-induced allergic reactions. This review article tried to summarize the current knowledge about the most important aspects of LTP sensitization and allergy, along with the importance of positive and negative co-factors in the clinical expression of the syndrome as well as the issues regarding the cross-reactivity between LTPs present in botanically related and unrelated foods. Further, the possible absence of the protein from some plant foods is discussed.