Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
World Neurosurg ; 176: e265-e272, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37207724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diversion of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is a common neurosurgical procedure for control of intracranial pressure (ICP) in the acute phase after traumatic brain injury (TBI), where medical management is insufficient. CSF can be drained via an external ventricular drain (EVD) or, in selected patients, via a lumbar (external lumbar drain [ELD]) drainage catheter. Considerable variability exists in neurosurgical practice on their use. METHODS: A retrospective service evaluation was completed for patients receiving CSF diversion for ICP control after TBI, from April 2015 to August 2021. Patients were included whom fulfilled local criteria deeming them suitable for either ELD/EVD. Data were extracted from patient notes, including ICP values pre/postdrain insertion and safety data including infection or clinically/radiologically diagnosed tonsillar herniation. RESULTS: Forty-one patients were retrospectively identified (ELD = 30 and EVD = 11). All patients had parenchymal ICP monitoring. Both modalities affected statistically significant decreases in ICP, with relative reductions at 1, 6, and 24 hour pre/postdrainage (at 24-hour ELD P < 0.0001, EVD P < 0.01). Similar rates of ICP control failure, blockage and leak occurred in both groups. A greater proportion of patients with EVD were treated for CSF infection than with ELD. One event of clinical tonsillar herniation is reported, which may have been in part attributable to ELD overdrainage, but which did not result in adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The data presented demonstrate that EVD and ELD can be successful in ICP control after TBI, with ELD limited to carefully selected patients with strict drainage protocols. The findings support prospective study to formally determine the relative risk-benefit profiles of CSF drainage modalities in TBI.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Hipertensión Intracraneal , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Encefalocele , Estudios Prospectivos , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/cirugía , Hipertensión Intracraneal/etiología , Hipertensión Intracraneal/cirugía , Drenaje/métodos , Presión Intracraneal
2.
Crit Care Nurs Clin North Am ; 33(1): 47-59, 2021 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33526198

RESUMEN

The risk of rebleeding is greatest between 2 and 12 hours and is associated with increased risk of mortality and long-term dependent survival. Aneurysms should be secured within 48 hours of diagnosis. However, delays occur because of diagnosis and transfer of patients. Ninety-six hours is the current time it can take until treatment. The challenges for this service continue to be access to and sharing of diagnostic imaging, repatriation back to district general hospitals to continue treatment (eg, for rehabilitation), access to neurorehabilitation, and access to psychological and neurocognitive support.


Asunto(s)
Enfermería en Neurociencias/normas , Enfermeras Clínicas/psicología , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/terapia , Humanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Enfermeras Clínicas/organización & administración , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/epidemiología , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/fisiopatología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Reino Unido
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA