New insights into the oncological risk in heart transplant recipients: could skin tumors represent a marker of increased risk for solid neoplasm?

BACKGROUND: Solid organ transplant recipients are at increased risk for skin cancers due to immune-suppressive therapies. However, little is known about the risk and the characteristics of neoplasms in heart transplant recipients (HTRs). The aim of this study is to delineate the incidence of different skin tumors in HTRs and to correlate it with the incidence of other malignancies, including solid tumors and hematological neoplasms. METHODS: Patients who underwent to HTRs between January 1991 and November 2021 were retrieved. Clinical data on immunosuppressive therapies, skin tumors, solid and hematological neoplasms were obtained. HTRs with skin tumors were included in group A, while patients with no evidence of skin tumors during the follow-up were included in group B. RESULTS: One hundred and eight patients were retrieved. A significant increase in solid tumors was observed in group A, while no significant difference in hematological neoplasms was detected between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: HTRs with skin tumors showed a significantly higher incidence of solid neoplasms. In most of the cases the skin tumor preceded the onset of the solid neoplasm, suggesting that the skin tumor could represent a 'marker' of immunosuppression eventually leading to the development of an internal malignancy.

Right Heart Catheterization in Patients with Advanced Heart Failure: When to Perform? How to Interpret?

Right heart catheterization is an established cornerstone of advanced heart failure management, as a clear understanding of the patient's hemodynamic status offers insight into diagnosis, prognosis, and management. In this review, the authors will describe the role of right heart catheterization in the diagnosis and management of shock, in the context of left ventricular assist devices, in the assessment of heart transplant candidacy, and also explore future directions of implantable monitoring devices for pulmonary artery and left atrial pressure monitoring.

Interplay of coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound in predicting long-term outcomes after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) remains the major cause of late graft-related death after heart transplantation (HT). Identification of patients at risk of cardiovascular events has relevant implications in appropriately guiding resources and intensity of follow-up. In this context, the prognostic relevance of serial coronary imaging long-term after HT is unexplored. METHODS: Recipients with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and coronary angiography performed 1 and 5 years after HT were monitored for subsequent 1 to 10 years to analyze the association of serial coronary imaging with cardiovascular death and major cardiovascular events (MACEs). RESULTS: Included were 131 patients. The MACE incidence was 31.8 per 1,000 patient-years, and cardiovascular mortality was 17.4 per 1,000 patient-years. Progression of coronary lesions detected by angiography and changes in IVUS-defined parameters, including an increase in maximal intimal thickness (MIT) ≥0.35 mm and vascular remodeling, predicted MACE occurrence. However, only MIT change ≥0.35 mm also predicted cardiovascular mortality. Among patients with normal or stable angiography, an MIT change ≥0.35 mm identified those with a significantly higher MACE rate (80 vs 13 events/1,000 patient-years). Worsening metabolic parameters appeared associated with the increasing severity of CAV development. CONCLUSIONS: Combined imaging analysis of progression of angiographic lesions and IVUS-detected MIT between 1 and 5 years post-HT allows discriminating patients at high, intermediate, and low risk for adverse long-term cardiovascular outcomes. The metabolic syndrome milieu is confirmed as a key risk factor for long-term CAV progression and adverse prognosis.

Cyclosporine lowering with everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplant recipients: long-term follow-up of the SHIRAKISS randomized, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity negatively impacts long-term outcome after heart transplantation (HT). We previously reported 1-year results from a randomized study showing that cyclosporine-lowering strategies based on everolimus or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) are equally effective for reducing progression of renal dysfunction. It is unknown whether this efficacy could be maintained over the long term. METHODS: Thirty-four recipients 1 to 4 years after HT and with 25 to 60 ml/min of creatinine clearance (CrCl) were randomized to everolimus with a very low dose (C(0): 50 to 90 ng/ml, n = 17) or MMF with low dose of cyclosporine (C(0): 100 to 150 ng/ml, n = 17). Follow-up was prolonged up to 3 years, and calculated CrCl was the main efficacy measure. RESULTS: Cyclosporine was maintained at 70% and 30% lower than baseline in the everolimus and MMF arms, respectively, throughout the 3-year study period. CrCl remained stable in the everolimus patients (+7% from baseline; p = 0.7), but improved in the MMF patients (+20% from baseline; p < 0.01), with a trend toward improved values compared with everolimus patients (46 ± 12 vs 56 ± 15 ml/min; p = 0.06). Subgroup analysis revealed that baseline proteinuria markedly influenced the renal function response to everolimus: whereas in patients with baseline proteinuria CrCl significantly worsened (-20%; p = 0.04), it improved in those without (+15%; p = 0.03). Safety was comparable between the two study arms. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine nephrotoxicity improved after a prolonged dose reduction in patients receiving MMF. The everolimus-based strategy provided a similar benefit only to patients without baseline proteinuria. While raising caution against the universal use of everolimus for kidney protection, our long-term results support the need for customized approaches in the management of drug toxicities in maintenance HT recipients.