Prediction of clinical pharmacokinetics of AMG 181, a human anti-α 4 ß 7 monoclonal antibody for treating inflammatory bowel diseases.

The purpose of this study was to predict a safe starting dose of AMG 181, a human anti-α 4 ß 7 antibody for treating inflammatory bowel diseases, based on cynomolgus monkey pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data. A two-compartment model with parallel linear and target-mediated drug disposition for AMG 181 PK in cynomolgus monkey was developed. The estimated parameters were allometrically scaled to predict human PK. An E max PD model was used to relate AMG 181 concentration and free α 4 ß 7 receptor data in cynomolgus monkey. AMG 181 clinical doses were selected based on observed exposures at the no adverse effect level of 80 mg·kg(-1) in monkeys, the predicted human exposures, and AMG 181 concentration expected to produce greater than 50% α 4 ß 7 receptor occupancy in humans. The predicted human AMG 181 clearance and central volume of distribution were 144 mL·day(-1) and 2900 mL, respectively. The estimated EC50 for free α 4 ß 7 receptor was 14 ng·mL(-1). At the 0.7 mg starting dose in humans, the predicted exposure margins were greater than 490,000 and AMG 181 concentrations were predicted to only briefly cover the free α 4 ß 7 receptor EC10. Predictions for both C max and AUC matched with those observed in the first-in-human study within the 7 mg subcutaneous to 420 mg intravenous dose range. The developed model aided in selection of a safe starting dose and a pharmacological relevant dose escalation strategy for testing of AMG 181 in humans. The clinically observed human AMG 181 PK data validated the modeling approach based on cynomolgus monkey data alone.

Clinical pharmacology of AMG 181, a gut-specific human anti-α4ß7 monoclonal antibody, for treating inflammatory bowel diseases.

AIMS: AMG 181 pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD), safety, tolerability and effects after single subcutaneous (s.c.) or intravenous (i.v.) administration were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Healthy male subjects (n= 68) received a single dose of AMG 181 or placebo at 0.7, 2.1, 7, 21, 70 mg s.c. (or i.v.), 210 mg s.c. (or i.v.), 420 mg i.v. or placebo. Four ulcerative colitis (UC) subjects (n= 4, male : female 2:2) received 210 mg AMG 181 or placebo s.c. (3:1). AMG 181 concentration, anti-AMG 181-antibody (ADA), α4 ß7 receptor occupancy (RO), target cell counts, serum C-reactive protein, fecal biomarkers and Mayo score were measured. Subjects were followed 3-9 months after dose. RESULTS: Following s.c. dosing, AMG 181 was absorbed with a median tmax ranging between 2-10 days and a bioavailability between 82% and 99%. Cmax and AUC increased dose-proportionally and approximately dose-proportionally, respectively, within the 70-210 mg s.c. and 70-420 mg i.v. ranges. The linear ß-phase t1/2 was 31 (range 20-48) days. Target-mediated disposition occurred at serum AMG 181 concentrations of less than 1 µg ml(-1) . The PD effect on α4 ß7 RO showed an EC50 of 0.01 µg ml(-1) . Lymphocytes, eosinophils, CD4+ T cells and subset counts were unchanged. AMG 181-treated UC subjects were in remission with mucosal healing at weeks 6, 12 and/or 28. The placebo-treated UC subject experienced colitis flare at week 6. No ADA or AMG 181 treatment-related serious adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: AMG 181 has PK/PD, safety, and effect profiles suitable for further testing in subjects with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Measurement of in vivo therapeutic mAb concentrations: comparison of conventional serum/plasma collection and analysis to dried blood spot sampling.

BACKGROUND: Development of an alternative sampling method that uses small amounts of whole blood, such as dried blood spots (DBS), would be an advance in the quantitative assay field. Previously, we assessed the ability to quantitate therapeutic monoclonal antibodies present in DBS compared with a typical serum sample-based method, and concluded that measurements in DBS were reproducible and yielded methods that met requirements for precision, accuracy and sensitivity. The goal herein was to assess the measurement of therapeutic antibodies in DBS compared with serum and plasma in vivo. RESULTS: Comparison of DBS versus serum in Sprague-Dawley rats and DBS versus plasma in cynomolgus monkeys for measurement of antibody concentrations revealed a two- to three-fold difference in exposure between the samples. CONCLUSION: Overall, there was good correlation between DBS versus serum and DBS versus plasma, but there was a discrepancy in DBS exposures, presumably attributable to hematocrit and recovery effects.

Off-target platelet activation in macaques unique to a therapeutic monoclonal antibody.

AMG X, a human neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) against a soluble human protein, caused thrombocytopenia, platelet activation, reduced mean arterial pressure, and transient loss of consciousness in cynomolgus monkeys after first intravenous administration. In vitro, AMG X induced activation in platelets from macaque species but not from humans or baboons. Other similar mAbs against the same pharmacological target failed to induce these in vivo and in vitro effects. In addition, the target protein was known to not be expressed on platelets, suggesting that platelet activation occurred through an off-target mechanism. AMG X bound directly to cynomolgus platelets and required both the Fab and Fc portion of the mAb for platelet activation. Binding to platelets was inhibited by preincubation of AMG X with its pharmacological target or with anti-human Fc antibodies or by preincubation of platelets with AMG X F(ab')(2) or human immunoglobulin (IVIG). AMG X F(ab')(2) did not activate platelets. Thus, platelet activation required both recognition/binding of a platelet ligand with the Fab domain and interaction of platelet Fc receptors (i.e., FcγRIIa) with the Fc domain. These findings reflect the complexity of the mechanism of action of mAbs and the increasing awareness of potential for unintended effects in preclinical species.

Assessment of DBS technology for the detection of therapeutic antibodies.

BACKGROUND: Quantitating levels of therapeutic proteins in serum or plasma is critical for determining exposure levels and establishing pharmacokinetic parameters. Traditionally, whole blood is not used, mostly due to its inability to be frozen and potential issues with assay interference. To investigate the ability to reproducibly quantitate therapeutic antibodies present in dried blood spots (DBS) compared with a typical serum sample-based method, we used ELISA and electrochemiluminescence immunoassays to measure therapeutic drug levels present in DBS samples. RESULTS: Measurements of antibody therapeutics in DBS were reproducible, yielding methods that are precise, accurate and met expected sensitivity requirements compared with plasma-based methods. CONCLUSIONS: DBS are a viable alternative to the use of conventional serum or plasma samples for quantitative therapeutic antibody measures.