Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
1.
J Clin Med ; 12(8)2023 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37109166

RESUMEN

Introduction-The purpose of this study was to determine the relative impact of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors in the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), with a particular focus on maternal preconception body mass index (BMI) and age, two important determinants of insulin resistance. Understanding the factors that contribute most to the current escalation of GDM rates in pregnant women could help to inform prevention and intervention strategies, particularly in areas where this female endocrine disorder has an elevated prevalence. Methods-A retrospective, contemporary, large population of singleton pregnant women from southern Italy who underwent 75 g OGTT for GDM screening was enrolled at the Endocrinology Unit, "Pugliese Ciaccio" Hospital, Catanzaro. Relevant clinical data were collected, and the characteristics of women diagnosed with GDM or with normal glucose tolerance were compared. The effect estimates of maternal preconception BMI and age as risk factors for GDM development were calculated through correlation and logistic regression analysis by adjusting for potential confounders. Results-Out of the 3856 women enrolled, 885 (23.0%) were diagnosed with GDM as per IADPSG criteria. Advanced maternal age (≥35 years), gravidity, reproductive history of spontaneous abortion(s), previous GDM, and thyroid and thrombophilic diseases, all emerged as non-modifiable risk factors of GDM, whereas preconception overweight or obesity was the sole potentially modifiable risk factor among those investigated. Maternal preconception BMI, but not age, had a moderate positive association with fasting glucose levels at the time of 75 g OGTT (Pearson coefficient: 0.245, p < 0.001). Abnormalities in fasting glucose drove the majority (60%) of the GDM diagnoses in this study. Maternal preconception obesity almost tripled the risk of developing GDM, but even being overweight resulted in a more pronounced increased risk of developing GDM than advanced maternal age (adjusted OR for preconception overweight: 1.63, 95% CI 1.320-2.019; adjusted OR for advanced maternal age: 1.45, 95% CI 1.184-1.776). Conclusions-Excess body weight prior to conception leads to more detrimental metabolic effects than advanced maternal age in pregnant women with GDM. Thus, in areas in which GDM is particularly common, such as southern Italy, measures aiming to counteracting maternal preconception overweight and obesity may be efficient in reducing GDM prevalence.

2.
Minerva Endocrinol (Torino) ; 47(4): 379-387, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103458

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Achieving optimal glycemic targets is the main therapeutic goal in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus. HbA1c is the reference biomarker for monitoring glycemic control; however, in specific conditions affecting erythrocyte turnover or in patients on multiple daily injection (MDI) insulin regimens, the determination of glycated albumin (GA) may be preferable. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors represent a novel class of antidiabetic drugs that lower plasma glucose concentrations quickly, with insulin-independent mechanisms. Herein, we explored the role of GA in predicting the short-term response to SGLT-2 inhibitors as add-on to MDI insulin. METHODS: Sixteen patients with long-standing, poorly controlled T2D on MDI insulin starting an SGLT-2 inhibitor were subjected to plasma GA and HbA1c measurements at 30 days intervals for up to 3 months in order to examine the temporal changes of these glycemic biomarkers. RESULTS: At the end of the study, grossly coincident with the life span of erythrocytes, a significant decrease in median HbA1c was observed, (from 8.7 [range: 8.2-9.3%] at baseline to 7.2 [range: 7.0-7.9%]), with the advantage of less insulin dose requirements. However, significant, and incremental reductions in median GA determinations could be already evident after 30 days (-3.5 [range: -7.5, -2.5%]) and 60 days (-6.4 [range: -10.5, -4.7%]) from the start of SGLT-2 inhibitor treatment and persisted for up to 3 months (-8.6 [range: -12.1, 6.1%]). The decrements of HbA1c observed at the 3-month visit were highly correlated with the concurrent absolute reductions of plasma GA (ρ=0.550, P=0.027), whereas a borderline significance could be demonstrated with reference to reductions in plasma GA at 30 and 60 days. CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by the small number of participants, these preliminary findings suggest that GA, rather than HbA1c, could represent a useful and reliable biomarker in T2D to monitor the early glucose-lowering effects of antidiabetic drugs with rapid onset of action, such as SGLT-2 inhibitors and MDI insulin.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2 , Humanos , Biomarcadores , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hemoglobina Glucada , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Proyectos Piloto , Albúmina Sérica/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico
3.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 21(1): 692, 2021 Oct 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34627198

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) incidence is increasing worldwide. It represents a major risk factor for adverse foetal-maternal outcomes. Awareness among women in regard to GDM-related risks (in particular foetus ones) has been proven to have an impact on compliance with recommendations. Therefore we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of our post-diagnosis counselling, that informs affected women of the GDM related risks for complications, in determining an adequate level of understanding. METHOD: This is a cohort study involving 400 women undergoing the 24-28 weeks 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. Two hundred women diagnosed with GDM received the post-diagnosis counselling (treatment group) and two hundred women diagnosed without did not receive any counselling (control group). Both populations were surveyed with a 5 question questionnaire regarding their awareness about GDM foetal-maternal related risks. Their level of education about GDM foetal-maternal related risks, estimated according to the number of correct answers, was scored as: primary (score 0-1), secondary (score 2-3) or tertiary (score 4-5). RESULTS: Most of the women in the treatment group after receiving the post-diagnosis counselling have demonstrated a secondary level of education 132/200 (66%). Their mean level of awareness was higher in comparison to the control group 2.6 ± 1.8 (SD) versus 2.14 ± 1.8 (SD) p value = 0.012. In particular, they've demonstrated to be more aware of the risks for the foetus to become macrosomic (p = 0.004) or to die in utero (p = 0.0001). A high level of education and to have had previous pregnancies positively affected correct answers. CONCLUSIONS: Our post-diagnosis counselling has played a role in improving women awareness about GDM foetal-maternal related risks. Future study will explore the impact of women's level of awareness on glycaemic control.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Italia , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Embarazo , Atención Prenatal/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
4.
J Clin Med ; 10(5)2021 Mar 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33801192

RESUMEN

AIMS AND METHODS: The aim of this monocentric retrospective observational study was to evaluate the 18-month safety and effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) dulaglutide (DU) 1.5 mg/once weekly as an add-on to metformin (MET) or MET plus conventional insulin secretagogues in a study cohort with excess body weight and type 2 diabetes (T2D). Comparative efficacy versus liraglutide (LIRA) 1.2-1.8 mg/once daily in a study sample naïve to GLP-1 RAs, frequency matching for age, gender, T2D duration, degree of glycemic impairment, cardiovascular comorbidities, and medications, was addressed as a secondary aim. Clinical and biochemical data for efficacy outcomes and information on drug discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) were collected from digital records. RESULTS: Initial analysis included 126 overweight and obese T2D patients (48.4% females). Out of these, 13 discontinued DU due to moderate-severe gastrointestinal AEs after a mean follow-up of 6 (4 standard deviations (SD)) months, while 65 completed 18 months of continuous therapy. At 6 months, there was a significant mean HbA1c reduction of -0.85% (1.17 SD) with respect to baseline values (p < 0.001), which remained stable during 18 months follow-up. These results were accompanied by a moderate weight loss sustained over time, with a mean reduction of -2.0% (4.3 SD) at 6 months and -1.3% (4.8 SD) at 18 months (p = 0.091). At univariate analysis, a negative correlation between baseline body mass index (BMI) and risk of drug discontinuation due to gastrointestinal AEs was observed. The protective effect of obesity against drug discontinuation was confirmed by logistic regression analysis. Neither gender, nor age, nor T2D duration, nor concomitant conventional insulin secretagogue use, nor switching to DU from other GLP-1 RAs influenced its long-term effectiveness. However, higher baseline HbA1c values emerged as predictors of clinically relevant efficacy outcomes, either in terms of HbA1c reduction ≥ 0.5% or body weight loss ≥ 5%. The efficacy outcomes were corroborated by head-to-head comparison with LIRA, a GLP-1 RA with durable beneficial effects on glycemic control and body weight in real-world experiences. With the advantage of once-weekly administration, at 18-month follow-up, a significantly larger fraction of patients on DU therapy reached glycemic targets (HbA1c ≤ 7.0%) when compared to those on LIRA: from 14.8% at baseline (both groups) to 64.8% with DU and 42.6% with LIRA (p = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS: Although limited by a retrospective design and lack of constant up-titration for LIRA to the highest dose, these findings indicate that the beneficial responses to DU on a background of MET or MET plus insulin secretagogues are durable, especially in the presence of obesity and greater HbA1c impairment.

5.
J Diabetes Res ; 2020: 5393952, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33015192

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Screening strategies for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) earlier than 24-28 weeks of gestation should be considered to prevent adverse pregnancy outcomes. Nonetheless, there is uncertainty about which women would benefit most from early screening and which screening strategies should be offered to women with GDM. The Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS) recommendations on selective screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation are effective in preventing fetal macrosomia in high-risk (HR) women, but the appropriateness of timing and effectiveness of these recommendations in medium- (MR) and low-risk (LR) women are still controversial. Patients and Methods. We retrospectively enrolled 769 consecutive singleton pregnant women who underwent both anomaly scan at 19-21 weeks of gestation and screening for GDM at 16-18 and/or 24-28 weeks of gestation, in agreement with the NHS recommendations and risk stratification criteria. Comparison of maternal characteristics, fetal biometric parameters at anomaly scan (head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC), femur length (FL), estimated fetal weight (EFW)), and neonatal birth weight (BW) percentile among risk groups was examined. RESULTS: 219 (28.5%) women were diagnosed with GDM, while 550 (71.5%) were normal glucose-tolerant women. Out of 164 HR women, only 62 (37.8%) underwent the recommended early screening for GDM at 16-18 weeks of gestation. AC and EFW percentiles, as well as neonates' BW percentiles, were significantly higher in HR women diagnosed with GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation with respect to normal glucose-tolerant women, as well as MR and LR women who tested positive for GDM. Comparative analysis between MR and LR women with GDM and women with normal glucose tolerance revealed significant differences in both AC and EFW percentiles (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in neonatal BW percentiles. CONCLUSION: In MR and LR women with GDM, a mild acceleration of fetal growth can be detected at the time of anomaly scan. However, in these at-risk categories, the NHS recommendations for screening and treatment of GDM at 24-28 weeks of gestation are still effective in normalizing BW and preventing fetal macrosomia, thus supporting a risk factor-based selective screening program for GDM.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Macrosomía Fetal/prevención & control , Atención Prenatal/organización & administración , Diagnóstico Prenatal/métodos , Adulto , Antropometría , Peso al Nacer , Glucemia/análisis , Femenino , Fémur/fisiopatología , Desarrollo Fetal , Peso Fetal , Edad Gestacional , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Italia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Resultado del Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Aumento de Peso
6.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32456064

RESUMEN

Patients with diabetes have been reported to have enhanced susceptibility to severe or fatal COVID-19 infections, including a high risk of being admitted to intensive care units with respiratory failure and septic complications. Given the global prevalence of diabetes, affecting over 450 million people worldwide and still on the rise, the emerging COVID-19 crisis poses a serious threat to an extremely large vulnerable population. However, the broad heterogeneity and complexity of this dysmetabolic condition, with reference to etiologic mechanisms, degree of glycemic derangement and comorbid associations, along with the extensive sexual dimorphism in immune responses, can hamper any patient generalization. Even more relevant, and irrespective of glucose-lowering activities, DPP4 inhibitors and GLP1 receptor agonists may have a favorable impact on the modulation of viral entry and overproduction of inflammatory cytokines during COVID-19 infection, although current evidence is limited and not univocal. Conversely, SGLT2 inhibitors may increase the likelihood of COVID-19-related ketoacidosis decompensation among patients with severe insulin deficiency. Mindful of their widespread popularity in the management of diabetes, addressing potential benefits and harms of novel antidiabetic drugs to clinical prognosis at the time of a COVID-19 pandemic deserves careful consideration.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Glucemia , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Diabetes Mellitus , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/efectos adversos , Insulina , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/virología , SARS-CoV-2
7.
J Diabetes Res ; 2019: 3971060, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31781664

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: SGLT-2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter-2) inhibitors are a novel class of oral hypoglycemic agents for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Herein, we aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of SGLT-2 inhibitors in a Southern Italy population of subjects affected by T2DM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 408 diabetic patients treated with one of the three SGLT-2 inhibitors currently available in Italy (dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin), either alone or in combination with other antidiabetic drugs, were retrospectively assessed at baseline, during, and after 18 months of continuous therapy. RESULTS: Treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors resulted in a median decrease in HbA1c of 0.9%, with a percentage of decrement of 12 in relation to the baseline value, followed by a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in fasting plasma glucose. Variations in HbA1c occurred independently of the baseline clinical or biochemical characteristics. In addition, treatment with SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced body weight (P < 0.008) and decreased diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.004). With regard to safety outcomes, 66 patients out of 91 stopped SGLT-2 inhibitors during follow-up because of chronic or recurring genital infections, while the rest experienced other adverse events, such as urinary tract infections, polyuria, nausea, hypotension, dizziness, acute coronary event, worsening of glycemic control status, and rapid deterioration of renal function. CONCLUSION: In our patients' population, the glycometabolic effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors were durable and comparable to those observed in multicenter randomized controlled trials. This notwithstanding safety concerns must be raised regarding the frequent occurrence of genitourinary infections and the risk of a rapid decline of renal function in patients with evidence of volume depletion and/or receiving other medications which can adversely affect kidney function.


Asunto(s)
Compuestos de Bencidrilo/administración & dosificación , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Canagliflozina/administración & dosificación , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Glucósidos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/efectos adversos , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/metabolismo , Canagliflozina/efectos adversos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Esquema de Medicación , Duración de la Terapia , Femenino , Glucósidos/efectos adversos , Hemoglobina Glucada/metabolismo , Humanos , Italia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
8.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31569431

RESUMEN

Background-The first trimester combined test (FTCT) is an effective screening tool to estimate the risk of fetal aneuploidy. It is obtained by the combination of maternal age, ultrasound fetal nuchal translucency (NT) measurement, and the maternal serum markers free ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-hCG) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A). However, conflicting data have been reported about the association of FTCT, ß-hCG, or PAPP-A with the subsequent diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Research design and methods-2410 consecutive singleton pregnant women were retrospectively enrolled in Calabria, Southern Italy. All participants underwent examinations for FTCT at 11-13 weeks (plus 6 days) of gestation, and screening for GDM at 16-18 and/or 24-28 weeks of gestation, in accordance with current Italian guidelines and the International Association Diabetes Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) glycemic cut-offs. Data were examined by univariate and logistic regression analyses. Results-1814 (75.3%) pregnant women were normal glucose tolerant, while 596 (24.7%) were diagnosed with GDM. Spearman univariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between FTCT values and subsequent GDM diagnosis (ρ = 0.048, p = 0.018). The logistic regression analysis showed that women with a FTCT <1:10000 had a major GDM risk (p = 0.016), similar to women with a PAPP-A <1 multiple of the expected normal median (MoM, p = 0.014). Conversely, women with ß-hCG ≥2.0 MoM had a reduced risk of GDM (p = 0.014). Conclusions-Our findings indicate that GDM susceptibility increases with fetal aneuploidy risk, and that FTCT and its related maternal serum parameters can be used as early predictors of GDM.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Primer Trimestre del Embarazo , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Gonadotropina Coriónica Humana de Subunidad beta/sangre , Diabetes Gestacional/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Edad Materna , Medida de Translucencia Nucal , Embarazo , Proteína Plasmática A Asociada al Embarazo/análisis
9.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31892206

RESUMEN

Background: Liraglutide is the first glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) based on the human GLP-1 sequence, with potential weight loss benefits, approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus. Herein, we aimed to assess the 5-year effectiveness of Liraglutide in the management of weight and glycometabolic control in a Southern Italian cohort of overweight/obese T2D patients, who were naïve to GLP-1 RAs. Patients and Methods: Forty overweight or obese patients treated with Liraglutide at doses up to 1.8 mg/day, in combination with one or more oral antidiabetic agents, were retrospectively assessed at baseline, during, and after 60 months of continuous therapy. Results: After 5 years of Liraglutide treatment, body weight decreased from 92.1 ± 20.5 kg to 87.3 ± 20.0 Kg (p < 0.001), with a mean reduction of 5.0 ± 7.0 Kg and a body mass index (BMI) decrement of -2.0 ± 3.1 Kg/m2. On Spearman's univariate analysis, change in body weight was correlated with female gender and baseline BMI. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) decreased from 7.9 ± 0.9% at baseline to 7.0 ± 0.7% at the end of the study period (p < 0.001), followed by a significant reduction in fasting plasma glucose. No significant differences emerged in other biochemical parameters, despite a trend toward improvement in lipid profile. Notwithstanding encouraging effects on several markers of cardiovascular disease (CVD), increments in the 5- and 10-year risk for the first atherosclerotic cardiovascular event were documented, as four incident cases of myocardial infarction. Conclusions: Prolonging treatment with Liraglutide can lead to durable benefits in relation to weight and glycemic control, with a greater impact on women. These results extend and corroborate previous observations, suggesting that gender per se may modulate the response to Liraglutide. Despite favorable effects on some established CVD risks factors, the long-term role of Liraglutide in primary prevention of CVD in patients with T2D remains controversial.


Asunto(s)
Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Liraglutida/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30558120

RESUMEN

Background: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a strong risk factor for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) and the postpartum period is crucial for early treatment in at-risk women. However, despite recommendations, only a fraction of women undergo a postpartum screening for glucose intolerance (ppOGTT). The present study aims to verify the reason(s) for poor adherence in our population. Research design and methods: This retrospective study includes 451 women in which GDM was diagnosed between 2015⁻2016. During 2017, we verified by phone interview how many women underwent ppOGTT at 6⁻12 weeks postpartum, as recommended by the Italian guidelines. The non-compliant women were asked about the reason(s) for failing to screen. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney test and the 2-tailed Fisher exact test were used to compare continuous and categorical features, respectively, among women performing or non-performing ppOGTT. Results: Out of 451 women with GDM diagnosis, we recorded information from 327. Only 97 (29.7%) performed ppOGTT. The remaining 230 women (70.3%) provided the following explanation for non-compliance: (1) newborn care (30.4%); (2) misunderstood importance (28.3%); (3) oversight (13.0%); (4) unavailability of test reservation in the nearest centers (10.4%); (5) normal glycemic values at delivery (8.3%); (6) discouragement by primary care physician (5.6%). Conclusions: In our population, most women with recent GDM failed to perform ppOGTT. Our results indicated that the prominent barriers could potentially be overcome.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Posnatal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Estudios Longitudinales , Tamizaje Masivo/psicología , Atención Posnatal/psicología , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28786350

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a major health concern that seems to be influenced by seasonality. OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of seasonality on the incidence of GDM in an Italian population. METHOD: This is a retrospective cohort study of 5,473 pregnant women attending the Operative Unit of Diabetes, who underwent GDM screening by means of the 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), during the period from August 2011 to December 2016. Screening was performed at 16-18 or 24-28 weeks&apos; gestation, following the Health Italian Minister guidelines. All blood samples were undertaken in the Hospital itself, under the same temperature conditions, and analyzed in the nearby biochemical laboratory. Statistical analysis was performed by SPSS software. RESULTS: 1,559 of 5,473 enrolled women (28.5%) were affected by GDM. The incidence of GDM was significantly higher during the summer season (33.7%) (P<0.001), and significantly lower during the winter (23.3%), compared with spring (P=0.035) and fall seasons (P=0.002). When the year was divided on a 24-hr temperature basis into two parts only, the warm half and the cold half, GDM was considerably lower in cold months compared to warm ones (P<0.0001). No difference was observed between the medians of fasting glycemia throughout the four seasons; instead, serum glucose levels at 1-h and 2-h after OGTT were higher in summer than in spring, autumn and winter. Results from multiple linear regression analysis supported the hypothesis that glucose levels at 1-h and 2-h following OGTT could be influenced by ambient temperature. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that seasonal changes may influence variations in glucose tolerance during pregnancy, with GDM incidence increasing during the summer and declining during cold months.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Estaciones del Año , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Gestacional/sangre , Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Humanos , Incidencia , Italia/epidemiología , Embarazo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Temperatura , Factores de Tiempo
12.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 10(5): 315-23, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27268754

RESUMEN

AIMS: The Italian National Institute of Health has recently introduced a selective screening based on the risk profile of pregnant women, which while recommending against screening of women at low risk (LR) for GDM, it recommends an early test for women at high risk (HR) for GDM. Herein, we assessed the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of this screening and developed a new index that improves these requirements. METHODS: We retrospectively enrolled 3974 pregnant women. GDM was diagnosed with a 2h 75-g OGTT at 16-18 weeks (early test) or 24-28 weeks of gestation, according to the IADPSG guidelines. RESULTS: 55.6% of HR women had GDM, although only 38.4% underwent early screening. Among 2654 women at medium risk, 20.9% had GDM; paradoxically, among 770 LR women, that would not have been screened, 26.6% received a GDM diagnosis. Based on these unsatisfactory results, we elaborated the Capula's index, that reduced both screening tests (p<0.001) and potentially undetected GDM cases (p<0.001), and corrected the paradoxical prevalence estimates of GDM obtained with the current Italian guidelines. Also, Capula's index improved correlation of GDM risk profile with obstetric and neonatal adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Capula's index improves accuracy of selective screening for GDM.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Gestacional/diagnóstico , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Adulto , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diabetes Gestacional/economía , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiología , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/economía , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa/normas , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Embarazo , Prevalencia , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
13.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 17(7): 468-74, 2015 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25844858

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liraglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analog recently approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of liraglutide versus glimepiride, as adjunct treatments to metformin, in achieving glycemic control in Italian patients with T2DM uncontrolled by metformin alone. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-nine diabetes patients treated with metformin plus liraglutide (1.8 mg) or glimepiride (4 mg) were retrospectively assessed at baseline, during, and after 18 months of continuous therapy. RESULTS: Treatment with liraglutide resulted in mean decreases in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of -1.4%, when compared with glimepiride (-0.4%) (P < 0.001), and was followed by a significant reduction (P < 0.001) in fasting plasma glucose. Variations in HbA1c occurred independently from weight loss, which was significantly reduced (P < 0.001) in liraglutide-treated patients. The percentage of subjects reaching HbA1c levels below 7% or ≤ 6.5% was significantly different between the two treated groups (P < 0.001). Treatment with liraglutide reduced waist circumference (WC) (P < 0.001) and decreased both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) (P < 0.001). It is interesting that the study also showed the impact of female gender in predicting a better glycemic response to liraglutide (P = 0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Liraglutide was more effective than glimepiride in reducing HbA1c levels in treated patients with T2DM. This was evident in both genders, but particularly in women. Furthermore, liraglutide reduced body weight, WC, and BP, which are critical risk factors for cardiovascular disease.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipoglucemiantes/administración & dosificación , Liraglutida/administración & dosificación , Metformina/administración & dosificación , Compuestos de Sulfonilurea/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Glucemia/análisis , Automonitorización de la Glucosa Sanguínea , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Peso Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ayuno/sangre , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales , Resultado del Tratamiento , Circunferencia de la Cintura/efectos de los fármacos
14.
ISRN Endocrinol ; 2013: 387495, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24093064

RESUMEN

Recent Italian guidelines exclude women <35 years old, without risk factors for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), from screening for GDM. To determine the effectiveness of these measures with respect to the International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria, we evaluated 2,448 pregnant women retrospectively enrolled in Calabria, southern Italy. GDM was diagnosed following the IADPSG 2010 criteria. Among 538 women <35 years old, without risk factors, who would have not been tested according to the Italian guidelines, we diagnosed GDM in 171 (31.8%) pregnants (7.0% of total pregnants). Diagnosis was made at baseline (55.6%), 1 hour (39.8%), or 2 hours (4.7%) during OGTT. Despite of appropriate treatment, GDM represented a risk factor for cesarean section, polyhydramnios, increased birth weight, admission to neonatal intensive care units, and large for gestational age. These outcomes were similar to those observed in GDM women at high risk for GDM. In conclusion, Italian recommendations failed to identify 7.0% of women with GDM, when compared to IADPSG criteria. The risk for adverse hyperglycaemic-related outcomes is similar in low-risk and high-risk pregnants with GDM. To limit costs of GDM screening, our data suggest to restrict OGTT to two steps (baseline and 1 hour).

15.
ISRN Endocrinol ; 2013: 182505, 2013.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23956870

RESUMEN

Postpartum screening is critical for early identification of type 2 diabetes in women previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Nevertheless, its rate remains disappointingly low. Thus, we plan to examine the rate of postpartum glucose tolerance test (ppOGTT) for Italian women with GDM, before and after counseling, and identify demographic, clinical, and/or biochemical predictors of adherence. With these aims, we retrospectively enrolled 1159 women with GDM, in Calabria, Southern Italy, between 2004 and 2011. During the last year, verbal and written counseling on the importance of followup was introduced. Data were analyzed by multiple regression analysis. A significant increase of the return rate was observed following introduction of the counseling [adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 5.17 (95% CI, 3.83-6.97), P < 0.001]. Interestingly, previous diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) emerged as the major predictor of postpartum followup [AOR 5.27 (95% CI, 3.51-8.70), P < 0.001], even after stratification for the absence of counseling. Previous diagnosis of GDM, higher educational status, and insulin treatment were also relevant predictors. Overall, our data indicate that counseling intervention is effective, even if many women fail to return, whereas PCOS represents a new strong predictor of adherence to postpartum testing.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA