Predictive Value of HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES Bleeding Risk Scores After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Various scoring systems have been developed to assess the risk of bleeding in medical settings. HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES risk scores are commonly used to estimate bleeding risk in patients receiving anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation, but data on their predictive value in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are limited. METHODS: This study evaluated and compared the predictive abilities of the HAS-BLED and HEMORR2HAGES bleeding risk scores in all-comer patients undergoing PCI. The PARIS score, specifically designed for patients undergoing PCI, was used as a comparator. The scores were calculated at baseline and compared with the occurrence of events during a 2-year clinical follow-up period. Between 2015 and 2017, all consecutive patients undergoing PCI we re prospectively enrolled and divided into risk tertiles based on bleeding risk scores. The primary end points were hierarchical major bleeding events, defined by Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 through 5, and patient-oriented composite end points according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium classification, which were assessed during the 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: A total of 1,080 patients completed the follow-up period. Two years after index, 189 patients (17.5%) had experienced any bleeding, with 48 events (4.4%) classified as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium types 3 to 5. All bleeding risk scores showed statistically significant predictive ability for bleeding events. The HEMORR2HAGES score (C statistic, 0.73) was more effective than the HAS-BLED score (C statistic, 0.66; P = .07) and the PARIS score (C statistic, 0.66; P = .06) in predicting risk of major bleeding. Patients in high-risk bleeding groups also experienced a higher incidence of patient-oriented composite end points. CONCLUSIONS: The HEMORR2HAGES, HAS-BLED, and PARIS risk scores exhibited good predictive abilities for bleeding events following PCI. Patients at high risk of bleeding also demonstrated increased ischemic risk and higher mortality during the 2-year follow-up period.

Experience with a novel high frequency optical coherence tomography device for intracoronary imaging: a case series.

Introduction: Intravascular imaging, especially optical coherence tomography (OCT), has significantly improved percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), yet its routine clinical application faces challenges. This case series introduces the Gentuity® High-Frequency Optical Coherence Tomography (HF-OCT), a novel device designed to enhance intracoronary imaging with a significantly faster pullback and smaller catheter size, potentially offering enhanced navigability in complex lesions. We aimed to assess the image quality of Gentuity® HF-OCT in complex vessel conditions, as well as presenting a case series to illustrate the application of the device in various clinical scenarios. Methods: In this case series, we included all patients who underwent intracoronary HF-OCT imaging at our center. The primary endpoint was image quality assessed by clear image length (CIL). Image quality was assessed in relation to (1) lesion severity assessed by minimum lumen area (MLA); (2) vessel size, differentiating between larger (diameter ≥ 4 mm) and smaller vessel segments; (3) pre- vs. post-PCI conditions, and (4) vessel tortuosity, categorized into none, moderate, and severe. Results: Twenty-four HF-OCT runs from 14 patients were included. No significant differences in CIL were observed across lesion severity terciles (p = 0.449), between small and large vessel segments [mean CIL% difference 1.3%; confidence interval (CI), -9.3 to 11.8; p = 0.802], and pre- vs. post-PCI conditions (mean CIL difference -3.9 mm; CI, -14.0 to 6.1; p = 0.373). Vessel tortuosity significantly impacted image quality, with clear reductions in CIL observed in cases of moderate (74.8; CI, 73.5 to 76.0; vs. 63.9; CI, 56.2 to 71.5; p = 0.043) and severe tortuosity (74.8; CI, 73.5 to 76.0; vs. 65.0; CI, 62.1 to 67.9; p = 0.002) compared to vessels with no tortuosity. Overall, the HF-OCT demonstrated excellent catheter deliverability and crossability, with very satisfactory image quality and no significant adverse events. Conclusion: The Gentuity® HF-OCT is a new OCT device capable of navigating both small- and large-diameter vessels, with similar image quality, but vessel tortuosity seems to have an impact on image quality. It appears to be as usable as conventional OCT for pre-PCI diagnosis and OCT-guided PCI, potentially bringing additional benefits in terms of deliverability, lesion crossover and ease of use in routine clinical practice.

Proximal optimization technique and percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: POTENTIAL-LM.

BACKGROUND: Optimal stent deployment in left main (LM) bifurcation is paramount, and incomplete stent apposition may cause major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Bench studies show that the proximal optimization technique (POT) provides the best stent apposition. AIMS: We aimed to investigate the impact of POT on clinical outcomes in patients treated for unprotected LM (ULM) disease at our institution. METHODS: We identified 162 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ULM coronary disease in the Cardio-FR database. Out of these, 99 (61%) had undergone POT, while 63 patients were treated without POT. The primary outcome was the bifurcation-oriented composite endpoint (BOCE) of cardiac death, target-bifurcation myocardial infarction and target-bifurcation revascularization at maximal follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age was 76 years, and 69% presented with acute coronary syndrome. Mean follow-up was 2.25 years (822 days). The BOCE occurred in 43 (27%) of which 20 (20%) in the POT group and 23 (37%) in the no-POT group (p = 0.009). Cardiac death occurred in 15 (15%) patients in the POT- and 17 (27%) in no-POT group (p = 0.26). Target bifurcation revascularization occurred in 4 (4%) patients in the POT- and 6 (10%) patients in the no-POT group (p = 0.19). POT In the multivariate analysis, POT was the strongest parameter and was associated with BOCE, cardiac death, occurrence of any revascularization and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSION: The POT improves clinical outcomes. These findings strongly support the systematic use of POT in patients undergoing ULM-PCI.

Clinical outcomes after unprotected left main coronary artery occlusion: A retrospective multicentre cohort analysis.

AIMS: Unprotected left main coronary artery (ULMCA) occlusion is a rare and disastrous condition with scarce data on presentation and outcomes. Herein, we report data on patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome due to ULMCA occlusion at four different institutions. METHODS: This is an international multicentre observational study. Baseline characteristics were retro- and prospectively collected. Clinical follow-up was prospective. The primary outcome was in-hospital death. Patients surviving the index hospitalization were compared with nonsurvivors to find predictors of survival. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 55 patients. Eight patients (15%) died in the cath lab, and 23 (42%) died in hospital. Three (6%) deaths were noncardiac and due to major bleeding. Thirty-two (58%) patients survived the index hospitalization and were discharged. These patients were followed for a median of 17.5 months during which three cardiac deaths occurred. Repeat revascularization was performed in 25% (n = 8). Overall mortality at maximum follow-up was 47% (n = 26). The only significant predictor for hospital survival was left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio [OR]: 1.10 (per 1 point increase); 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02-1.19; p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: ULMCA occlusion carries a high short-term mortality. Patients who survive index hospitalization have similar mortality rates as compared with other st elevation myocardial infarction patients.

A mouth watering case of Mycoplasma salivarium native mitral valve endocarditis: 'case report'.

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasma salivarium is part of our commensal oral flora and readily resides in dental plaque. Although considered indolent, few case reports have documented its pathogenic potential in humans. To this day no case of Mycoplasma salivarium infectious endocarditis has ever been described. CASE PRESENTATION: Our report describes a challenging case of Mycoplasma salivarium endocarditis, with a patient presenting with oligoarticular joint swelling, and later on in the course of his disease developed signs of right-sided heart failure. The diagnosis was initially mistaken for septic gonarthritis and was later established on the basis of echocardiography and eubacterial PCR of joint fluid. CONCLUSION: This report describes a first documented case of Mycoplasma salivarium culture negative endocarditis that was successfully treated with targeted antimicrobial therapy. Specific antimicrobial therapy targeting Mycoplasma spp, lead to clinical improvement, with radiological regression of the lesion and the resolution of the serum inflammation biomarkers.

Is the folk medicine known as "The Secret" efficient in reducing bleeding after percutaneous coronary procedures?: a double-blinded, randomised trial.

AIM: Percutaneous coronary interventions require an arterial approach and administration of antithrombotic drugs. This may lead to bleeding complications. The aim of this study was to test whether "The Secret" - a pagan prayer - is effective in reducing post-interventional bleeding. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Monocentric, tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: From January to July 2022, 200 patients (aged >18 years) undergoing elective coronary angiography were included in the study. INTERVENTION: The intervention group received "The Secret" in addition to the normal procedure. The control group was treated according to standard practice. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of in-hospital bleeding according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) consensus definition. RESULTS: The rate of bleeding was similar in both groups ("The Secret" group vs control group) with 16% versus 14% (p=0.69) of BARC 1, 12% versus 13% (p=0.81) of BARC 2, and 0% versus 0% of BARC 3 and 5 (p=1.00). Most (76%) of the participants believed that "The Secret" would be efficient in preventing bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates no effect on bleeding after percutaneous coronary procedures. A large majority of our study population believe that "The Secret" can have a positive effect on their hospital care.

Five-year angiographic, OCT and clinical outcomes of a randomized comparison of everolimus and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

AIMS: To compare 5-year angiographic, optical coherence tomography (OCT), and clinical outcomes between patients treated with bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) and drug-eluting stents (DES). METHODS: The EverBio-2 trial (Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold) was a single-center, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial in which 240 patients were randomly allocated (1:1:1) to BVS, everolimus-eluting (EES) or biolimus-eluting (BES) DES. Clinical follow-up was scheduled up to 5 years. All patients, alive and who did not have repeat revascularization of the target lesion during follow-up were asked to return for angiographic follow-up at 5 years. RESULTS: Five-year angiographic follow-up was completed in 122 patients (51%) and OCT analysis was performed in 86 (36%) patients. In-stent late lumen loss was similar in both groups with 0.50 ± 0.38 mm in BVS versus 0.58 ± 0.36 mm in EES/BES, p = 0.20. Clinical follow-up was complete in 232 patients (97%) at 5 years. The rate of the device-oriented endpoint was 22% in the BVS and 18% in the EES/BES group (p = 0.49). The patient-oriented composite endpoint occurred in 40% of BVS- and 43% of EES/BES-treated patients (p = 0.72) at 5 years. No acute coronary syndrome due to stent thrombosis was detected after 2 years. Complete BVS strut resorption was observed at 5 years in the OCT subgroup. CONCLUSION: Five-year clinical outcomes were similar between BVS and DES patients as well as angiographic outcomes in a selected subgroup. However, a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn because the EverBio-2 trial was not powered for clinical and angiographic endpoints at 5 years of follow-up.

Ischemic and Bleeding Outcomes According to the Academic Research Consortium High Bleeding Risk Criteria in All Comers Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Background: The Academic Research Consortium have identified a set of major and minor risk factors in order to standardize the definition of a High Bleeding Risk (ACR-HBR). Aims: The aim of this study is to stratify the bleeding risk in patients included in the Cardio-Fribourg registry, according to the Academic Research Consortium for High Bleeding Risk (ACR-HBR) definition, and to report ischemic and hemorrhagic events at 2-year of clinical follow-up. Methods: Between 2015 and 2017, consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively included in the Cardio-Fribourg registry. Patients were considered high (HBR) or low (LBR) bleeding risk depending on the ARC-HBR definition. Primary endpoints were hierarchical major bleeding events as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) grade 3-5, and ARC patient-oriented major adverse cardiac events (POCE) at 2-year follow-up. Results: Follow-up was complete in 1,080 patients. There were 354 patients in the HBR group (32.7%) and 726 patients in the low-bleeding risk (LBR) group (67.2%). At 2-year follow-up, cumulative BARC 3-5 bleedings were higher in HBR (10.5%) compared to LBR patients (1.5%, p < 0.01) and the impact of HBR risk factors was incremental. At 2-year follow-up, POCE were more frequent in HBR (27.4%) compared to LBR group (18.2%, <0.01). Overall mortality was higher in HBR (14.0%) vs. LBR (2.9%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: ARC-HBR criteria appropriately identified a population at a higher risk of bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention. An increased risk of bleeding is also associated with an increased risk of ischemic events at 2-year follow-up.

Bleeding Risk Profile in Patients on Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Prospective 24 Months Cohort Study.

Background: The Academic Research Consortium has identified a set of major and minor risk factors in order to standardize the definition of a high bleeding risk (ACR-HBR). Oral anticoagulation is a major criterion frequently observed. Aims: The objective of this study is to quantify the risk of bleeding in patients on oral anticoagulation with at least one additional major ACR-HBR criteria in the Cardio-Fribourg Registry. Methods: Between 2015 and 2017, consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were prospectively included in the Cardio-Fribourg registry. The study population included patients with ongoing long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) and planned to receive triple antithrombotic therapy. Patients were divided in two groups: patients on OAC with at least one additional major ACR-HBR criteria vs. patients on OAC without additional major ACR-HBR criteria. The primary endpoint was any bleeding during the 24-month follow-up. Secondary bleeding endpoint was defined as Bleeding Academic Research Classification (BARC) ≥3. Results: Follow-up was completed in 142 patients at high bleeding risk on OAC, of which 33 (23%) had at least one additional major ACR-HBR criteria. The rate of the primary endpoint was 55% in patients on OAC with at least one additional ACR-HBR criteria compared with 14% in patients on OAC without additional ACR-HBR criteria (hazard ratio, 3.88; 95%CI, 1.85-8.14; p < 0.01). Patients with additional major ACR-HBR criteria also experienced significantly higher rates of BARC ≥ 3 bleedings (39% at 24 months). Conclusion: The presence of at least one additional ACR-HBR criterion identifies patients on OAC who are at very high risk of bleeding after percutaneous coronary intervention.

Handheld ECG Tracking of in-hOspital Atrial Fibrillation (HECTO-AF): A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent and causes substantial morbidity through AF-related strokes. Given the increasing prevalence of AF, screening methods are of interest given the potential to initiate timely appropriate anticoagulation. Aims: The HECTO-AF trial aims to determine the efficacy of AF screening with a single-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) handheld device in naïve in-hospital patients. Methods: The HECTO-AF is a single-center, open label, randomized controlled trial. Patients admitted to the general internal medicine ward of the University and Hospital Fribourg without previous diagnosis of AF were invited to participate in a screening program with a 1:1 allocation to either the screening group with intermittent single-lead handheld ECG recordings vs. a control group undergoing detection of AF as per routine clinical practice. The primary outcome was the prevalence of newly diagnosed AF during the hospital stay. Enrolment was terminated for poor patient recruitment and apparent futility before a sufficient sample for powered efficacy comparisons was enrolled. Results: A total of 804 patients were included of whom 381 were allocated to the intervention and 423 to the control group. Mean age was 65 ± 16 and 464 (58%) were male. Median CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3 (13% heart failure, 57% hypertension, 19% diabetes mellitus, 14% prior stroke/transient ischemic attack, and 29% arterial disease) and all CHA2DS2-VASc risk factors were equally distributed between groups. The incidence of newly detected AF was 1.4% over a median of 6 hospitalized days. Seven patients (1.8%) were diagnosed with AF in the intervention group vs. 3 (0.7%) in the control group (p = 0.20). Conclusion: There was a trend toward a higher AF detection over a median of 6 hospitalized days in the intervention group, but a definitive conclusion cannot be drawn due to the early termination of the present study. Systematic screening for AF in the hospital setting is resource-consuming, and of uncertain clinical benefit. The interpretation of single-lead handheld ECG is challenging and may result in inaccurate AF diagnosis. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier [NCT03197090].

[COVID-19 and myocardial injury]. / Covid-19 et atteintes myocardiques.

SARS-CoV-2 affects the cardiovascular system triggering a proinflammatory response which results in direct and indirect myocardial injury. The objective of this article is to describe the underlying mechanisms and clinical implications.

Le système cardiovasculaire est largement affecté par le coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. La maladie à coronavirus 2019 (Covid-19) peut déclencher une réaction inflammatoire intense, responsable de lésions myocardiques directes et indirectes chez environ un quart des patients hospitalisés. L'objectif de cet article est de décrire les mécanismes sous-jacents aux atteintes cardiovasculaires et de discuter les potentielles implications cliniques.

Impact of first medical contact to revascularisation time on long-term clinical outcomes in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients.

Increased age impacts the first medical contact to revascularisation delay in patients with STEMI. Patients with shorter treatment delays (<90 minutes after first medical contact) have significantly lower major adverse cardiac events rates at 3 years.

Spontaneous Recanalization of Coronary Thrombus in a Patient With Polycythemia Vera.

Spontaneous recanalized coronary thrombi (SRCT), a rare and under-diagnosed entity, are old thrombus formations characterized by multiple communicating channels. We report the case of a 72-year-old female patient who presented with SRCT in the context of polycythemia vera. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is the diagnostic method of choice. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.).

Handheld ECG Tracking of in-hOspital Atrial Fibrillation The HECTO-AF trial Clinical Study Protocol.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is frequent and causes great morbidity in the aging population. While initial events may be symptomatic, many patients have silent AF and are at risk of ischemic embolic complications. Timely detection of asymptomatic patients is paramount. The HECTO-AF trial aims to investigate the efficacy of an electrocardiogram (ECG) handheld device for the detection of AF in patients in hospital without a prior diagnosis of AF. METHODS/DESIGN: The "Handheld ECG tracking of in-hospital atrial fibrillation" (HECTO-AF) study is a single-center, open-label, randomized controlled trial. The study population consists of all adult patients admitted to a general medicine ward of the University and Hospital of Fribourg throughout the study period. The study will enroll 1600 patients with 1:1 ratio allocation to either the detection group with one-lead handheld ECG recordings twice daily and extra recordings in the case of palpitations, versus a control group undergoing detection of AF as per routine clinical practice. Recordings will be self-performed after dedicated training, and will be independently adjudicated through a specific web-based interface. All enrolled patients will be followed clinically at 1, 2 and 5 years to assess the occurrence of AF, death, non-fatal stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction and bleeding. The primary outcome is incidence of newly detected AF during the hospital stay. Secondary outcomes are incidence of AF, cardiovascular death, stroke, myocardial infarction and bleeding complications at 1, 2 and 5 years. DISCUSSION: HECTO-AF is an independent randomized study aiming to detect the incidence of silent AF in all-comers hospitalized in general medicine wards. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03197090 . Registered on 23 June 2017. Local ethical Committee (CER-VD) registration number: 2017-01594. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.

Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure With the Ultraseal Device: Insights From the Initial Multicenter Experience.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the Ultraseal device for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) (Cardia, Eagan, Minnesota) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation at high bleeding risk. BACKGROUND: The Ultraseal device is a novel bulb-and-sail designed LAAC device, with an articulating joint enabling conformability to heterogeneous angles and shapes of appendage anatomy. METHODS: This was a multicenter study including consecutive patients undergoing LAAC with the Ultraseal device at 15 Canadian and European sites. Periprocedural and follow-up events were systematically collected, and transesophageal echocardiography at 45 to 180 days post-procedure was routinely performed in all centers but 3. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients (mean age 75 ± 8 years; mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 5 ± 2; mean HAS-BLED score 4 ± 1) were included. The device was successfully implanted in 97% of patients. A major periprocedural adverse event occurred in 3 (2.4%) patients (clinically relevant pericardial effusion [n = 1], stroke [n = 1], device embolization [n = 1]). Ninety percent of patients were discharged on single or dual antiplatelet therapy. Follow-up transesophageal echocardiography was available in 89 (73%) patients, with no cases of large (>5 mm) residual leak and 5 (5.6%) cases of device-related thrombosis (all successfully treated with anticoagulation therapy). At a median follow-up of 6 (interquartile range: 3 to 10) months, the rates of stroke and transient ischemic attack were 0.8% and 0.8%, respectively, with no systemic emboli. None of the events occurred in patients with device-related thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: In this initial multicenter experience, LAAC with the Ultraseal device was associated with a high implant success rate and a very low incidence of periprocedural complications. There were no late device-related clinical events and promising efficacy results were observed regarding thromboembolic prevention at midterm follow-up. Larger studies are further warranted to confirm the long-term safety and efficacy of this novel device.

Multianalysis with optical coherence tomography and vasomotion in everolimus-eluting stents and everolimus-eluting biovascular scaffolds: the MOVES trial.

Aims: To compare endothelium-dependent vasomotor function and vascular healing 15 months after implantation of two new-generation drug-eluting stents and biovascular scaffolds (BVS). Methods and results: A total of 28 patients previously treated with a SYNERGY stent (bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES)), a PROMUS stent (persistent polymer everolimus-eluting stents (PP-EES)) or an ABSORB (BVS) underwent control coronary angiography, 15 months after implantation, coupled with optical coherence tomography imaging and supine bicycle exercise. Intracoronary nitroglycerin was administered after exercise testing. Coronary vasomotor response was assessed using quantitative coronary angiography at rest, during supine bicycle exercise and after nitroglycerin. The primary end point was the percent change in mean lumen diameter compared with baseline. Secondary end points were strut coverage and apposition.There were no significant differences in vasomotor response between the three treatment groups. Patients with PP-EES showed significant vasoconstriction of the proximal peristent segment at maximum exercise (P=0.02). BP-EES (2.7%, 95% CI 0 to 5.5) and BVS (3.2%, 95% CI 0 to 6.7) showed less uncovered struts than PP-EES (12.1%, 95% CI 2.9 to 21.3, P=0.02 and 0.09, respectively). Complete strut apposition was more frequently seen with BP-EES (99.6%, 95% CI 99.2 to 100) than with BVS (98.9%, 95% CI 98.2 to 99.6, P=0.04) or PP-EES (95.0%, 95% CI 91.6 to 98.5, P=0.001). Conclusion: BVS and thin strut BP-EES have a reassuring vasomotion profile, suggesting minimal endothelial dysfunction 15 months after implantation.

Midterm clinical outcomes with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable scaffolds versus everolimus-eluting metallic stents for percutaneous coronary interventions: a meta-analysis of randomised trials.

bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) versus an everolimus-eluting metallic stent (EES) for percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a meta-analysis of aggregate data by searching Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane databases and proceedings of international meetings for randomised trials reporting the clinical outcomes beyond one year of patients treated with BVS versus EES. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were target lesion failure (TLF) and definite/probable stent (scaffold) thrombosis (ST), respectively. Secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary efficacy outcome (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction [MI], and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularisation [ID-TLR]). A total of 5,583 patients randomly received BVS (n=3,261) or EES (n=2,322) in seven trials. Weighted median follow-up was 26.6 months. Patients treated with BVS versus EES showed a higher risk of TLF (odds ratio [OR] 1.35, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.65; p=0.0028) due to a higher risk of target vessel MI (OR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.21-2.33; p=0.008) and ID-TLR (OR 1.42, 95% CI: 1.10-1.84; p=0.007) though the risk for cardiac death was not statistically different (OR 0.89, 95% CI: 0.55-1.43; p=0.56). Patients treated with BVS versus EES showed a higher risk of definite/probable ST (OR 3.24, 95% CI: 1.92-5.49; p<0.0001), particularly in the period beyond one year after implantation (OR 4.03, 95% CI: 1.49-10.87; p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: At midterm follow-up, patients treated with BVS as compared to those treated with EES display a higher risk of target lesion failure and scaffold thrombosis.

Comparison of everolimus- and biolimus-eluting coronary stents with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Two-year clinical outcomes of the EVERBIO II trial.

BACKGROUND: Data from randomized controlled trials have shown that the ABSORB BVS is non-inferior to Cobalt Chromium everolimus-eluting stents at 2years. METHODS & RESULTS: The EVERBIO II trial (Comparison of Everolimus- and Biolimus-Eluting Coronary Stents with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold) is a single-center, assessor-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolling 240 patients with an allocation ration of 1:1:1 conducted at University and Hospital Fribourg, Switzerland. The studied devices were an everolimus-eluting persistent polymer stent (EES), a biolimus-eluting stent with bioabsorbable polymer (BES) and a fully bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS). Clinical end points collected at 9months, 12months, and 2years, were academic research consortium defined composites, device thrombosis and target-vessel revascularization. Clinical follow-up at 2years was available in 96% (N=77) of patients in the EES group, in 100% (N=80) in the BES and 99% (N=77) in the BVS group. The device-oriented composite end point of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction and target-lesion revascularization occurred in 13 (16%) patients treated with EES, in 7 (9%) patients treated with BES and in 16 (21%) patients treated with BVS. There was no significant difference when the metallic stents were compared to the BVS (p=0.12). There was one late scaffold thrombosis throughout the trial in the BVS group, and no definite stent thrombosis in either EES or BES treated patients. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis shows no significant differences with regard to clinical outcomes at 2years between BVS and the best-in-class metallic DES. Event rates were numerically higher in BVS-treated patients. However, when BVS were compared to BES alone, the occurrence of device related adverse events was significantly increased.

Late thrombotic events after bioresorbable scaffold implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

AIMS: To compare the long-term safety and efficacy of bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) with everolimus-eluting stent (EES) after percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing clinical outcomes of patients treated with BVS and EES with at least 24 months follow-up was performed. Adjusted random-effect model by the Knapp-Hartung method was used to compute odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The primary safety outcome of interest was the risk of definite/probable device thrombosis (DT). The primary efficacy outcome of interest was the risk of target lesion failure (TLF). Five randomized clinical trials (n = 1730) were included. Patients treated with Absorb BVS had a higher risk of definite/probable DT compared with patients treated with EES (OR 2.93, 95%CI 1.37-6.26, P = 0.01). Very late DT (VLDT) occurred in 13 patients [12/996 (1.4%, 95%CI: 0.08-2.5) Absorb BVS vs. 1/701 (0.5%, 95%CI: 0.2-1.6) EES; OR 3.04; 95%CI 1.2-7.68, P = 0.03], 92% of the VLDT in the BVS group occurred in the absence of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Patients treated with Absorb BVS had a trend towards higher risk of TLF (OR 1.48, 95%CI 0.90-2.42, P = 0.09), driven by a higher risk of target vessel myocardial infarction and ischaemia-driven target lesion revascularization. No difference was found in the risk of cardiac death. CONCLUSION: Compared with EES, the use of Absorb BVS was associated with a higher rate of DT and a trend towards higher risk of TLF. VLDT occurred in 1.4% of the patients, the majority of these events occurred in the absence of DAPT.