Simulating Healthy Participant Pharmacokinetics for Renal and Hepatic Impairment Studies: Retrospective Assessment of the Approach.

The recruitment of a parallel, healthy participants (HPs) arm in renal and hepatic impairment (RI and HI) studies is a common strategy to assess differences in pharmacokinetics. Limitations in this approach include the underpowered estimate of exposure differences and the use of the drug in a population for which there is no benefit. Recently, a method was published by Purohit et. al. (2023) that leveraged prior population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) modeling-based simulation to infer the distribution of exposure ratios between the RI/HI arms and HPs. The approach was successful, but it was a single example with a robust model having several iterations of development and fitting to extensive HP data. To test in more studies and models at different stages of development, our catalogue of RI/HI studies was searched, and those with suitable properties and from programs with available models were analyzed with the simulation approach. There were 9 studies included in the analysis. Most studies were associated with models that would have been available at the time (ATT) of the study, and all had a current, final model. For 3 studies, the HP PK was not predicted well by the ATT (2) or final (1) models. In comparison to conventional analysis of variance (ANOVA), the simulation approach provided similar point estimates and confidence intervals of exposure ratios. This PopPK based approach can be considered as a method of choice in situations where the simulation of HP data would not be an extrapolation, and when no other complicating factors are present.

Integrating Clinical Variability into PBPK Models for Virtual Bioequivalence of Single and Multiple Doses of Tofacitinib Modified-Release Dosage Form.

Tofacitinib is a potent, selective inhibitor of the Janus kinase (JAK) family of kinases with a high degree of selectivity within the human genome's set of protein kinases. Currently approved formulations for tofacitinib citrate are immediate-release (IR) tablets, modified-release (MR) tablets, and IR solution. A once daily MR microsphere formulation was developed for use in pediatric patients. Demonstration of bioequivalence (BE) between the 10 mg once daily (q.d.) MR microsphere formulation and 5 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) IR solution is needed to enable the exposure-response analyses-based bridging to support regulatory approval. To assess BE between MR microsphere and IR solution, an innovative approach was utilized with physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) virtual BE trials (VBE) in lieu of a clinical BE trial. A PBPK model was developed to characterize the absorption of different formulations of tofacitinib using Simcyp ADAM module. VBE trials were conducted by simulating PK profiles using the verified PBPK model and integrating the clinically observed intrasubject coefficient of variation (ICV) where BE was assessed with a predetermined sample size and prespecified criteria. The VBE trials demonstrated BE between IR solution 5 mg b.i.d. and MR microsphere 10 mg q.d. after a single dose on day 1 and after multiple doses on day 5. This research presents an innovative approach that incorporates clinically observed ICV in PBPK model-based VBE trials, which could reduce unnecessary drug exposure to healthy volunteers and streamline new formulation development strategies.

Pharmacokinetic Profile of Brepocitinib with Topical Administration in Atopic Dermatitis and Psoriasis Populations: Strategy to Inform Clinical Trial Design in Adult and Pediatric Populations.

INTRODUCTION: Topical brepocitinib, a tyrosine kinase (TYK)2/Janus kinase (JAK)1 inhibitor, is in development for psoriasis (PsO) and atopic dermatitis (AD). Quantitative analyses of prior clinical trial data were used to inform future clinical trial designs. METHODS: Two phase 2b studies in patients with AD and PsO were used to characterize the amount of topical brepocitinib and the resultant systemic trough concentration (CTrough) using a linear mixed-effects regression (LMER). This model was used to predict brepocitinib systemic CTrough for higher treated body surface areas (BSAs) in adults and children. Information from non-clinical and clinical trials with oral brepocitinib was leveraged to set safety thresholds. This combined approach was used to inform future dose-strength selection and treated BSA limits. RESULTS: Data from 256 patients were analyzed. Patient type, dose strength, and frequency had significant impacts on the dose-exposure relationship. Systemic concentration in patients with PsO was predicted to be 45% lower than in patients with AD from the same dose. When topically applied to the same percentage BSA, brepocitinib systemic exposures are expected to be comparable between adults and children. The systemic steady-state exposure after 3% once daily and twice daily (2 mg/cm2) cream applied to less than 50% BSA in patients with AD and PsO, respectively, maintains at least a threefold margin to non-clinical safety findings and clinical hematologic markers. CONCLUSION: The relationship between the amount of active drug applied and brepocitinib systemic CTrough, described by LMER, may inform the development strategy for dose optimization in the brepocitinib topical program.

Moving Beyond Boundaries: Utilization of Longitudinal Exposure-Response Model for Bounded Outcome Score to Inform Decision Making in the Accelerated Drug Development Paradigm.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: As drug development scientists strive to accelerate availability of therapies for patients, model-informed drug development (MIDD) plays an important role in contextualizing existing information and facilitating decision making. This paper describes an example of MIDD, where modeling and simulation informed decision making in the circumstance of a combined phase 2b and single pivotal study for ritlecitinib (JAK3/TEC family kinases inhibitor). METHODS: Longitudinal exposure-response (ER) modeling was conducted to describe ritlecitinib efficacy in alopecia areata patients. The Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score (a continuous bounded outcome [CBO] score [0-100]) was used as the efficacy response. The average concentration during the time interval between two adjacent SALT scores was used as the exposure metric driving efficacy. RESULTS: The developed model well described the longitudinal SALT profile of ritlecitinib as well as the frequency of boundary data. The CBO model indicated tested doses in the phase 2b/3 clinical trial are in the ascending region of ER and contextualized a loading dose effect that impacted onset of efficacy without long-term benefit. It also identified disease severity as the only covariate impacting efficacy. The model-based simulation further informed impact of treatment interruption on the loss of efficacy in the absence of a dedicated treatment withdrawal study. Results indicated temporary treatment interruption ≤ 6 weeks is not expected to result in significant loss of efficacy. CONCLUSION: The CBO modeling approach and simulation supported the single pivotal trial strategy and guided dose selection in the accelerated drug development program of ritlecitinib, which can be applied to many indications where efficacy is measured on a bounded scale.

Virtual Bioequivalence Assessment of Ritlecitinib Capsules with Incorporation of Observed Clinical Variability Using a Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model.

Ritlecitinib, an orally available Janus kinase 3 and tyrosine kinase inhibitor being developed for the treatment of alopecia areata (AA), is highly soluble across the physiological pH range at the therapeutic dose. As such, it is expected to dissolve rapidly in any in vitro dissolution conditions. However, in vitro dissolution data showed slower dissolution for 100-mg capsules, used for the clinical bioequivalence (BE) study, compared with proposed commercial 50-mg capsules. Hence, a biowaiver for the lower 50-mg strength using comparable multimedia dissolution based on the f2 similarity factor was not possible. The in vivo relevance of this observed in vitro dissolution profile was evaluated with a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model. This report describes the development, verification, and application of the ritlecitinib PBPK model to translate observed in vitro dissolution data to an in vivo PK profile for ritlecitinib capsule formulations. Virtual BE (VBE) trials were conducted using the Simcyp VBE module, including the model-predicted within-subject variability or intra-subject coefficient of variation (ICV). The results showed the predicted ICV was predicted to be smaller than observed clinical ICV, resulting in a more optimistic BE risk assessment. Additional VBE assessment was conducted by incorporating clinically observed ICV. The VBE trial results including clinically observed ICV demonstrated that proposed commercial 50-mg capsules vs clinical 100-mg capsules were bioequivalent, with > 90% probability of success. This study demonstrates a PBPK model-based biowaiver for a clinical BE study while introducing a novel method to integrate clinically observed ICV into VBE trials with PBPK models. Trial registration: NCT02309827, NCT02684760, NCT04004663, NCT04390776, NCT05040295, NCT05128058.

Evolution of Ritlecitinib Population Pharmacokinetic Models During Clinical Drug Development.

BACKGROUND: Ritlecitinib is an oral Janus kinase 3/tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma family inhibitor undergoing parallel clinical development for alopecia areata, vitiligo, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, and rheumatoid arthritis. OBJECTIVE: As studies read out simultaneously, strategic planning of population pharmacokinetic model development and evaluation is required to ensure timely decisions. METHODS: Data from healthy participants and patients from 12 clinical trials between December 2014 and July 2021 were included: seven phase I studies in healthy participants and organ impairment, five phase II/III studies in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, ulcerative colitis, alopecia areata, and vitiligo. Population pharmacokinetic models consisted of stepwise procedures to accommodate data availability and the model's application to answering clinical development questions. At each iteration of the model update, parameters of the next model were re-estimated by leveraging previous information and new data. RESULTS: Three model development lifecycle iterations of the ritlecitinib population pharmacokinetic model were conducted to support alopecia areata, vitiligo, and ulcerative colitis study readouts. Initial structural modeling based on healthy participant data (and some rheumatoid arthritis and alopecia areata data) in iteration 1 provided a platform for comprehensive covariate testing during iteration 2, and model evaluation and implementation of the frequentist prior approach in iteration 3. The final model was a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and direct-response non-stationary clearance and bioavailability driven by concentrations in the peripheral compartment. CONCLUSIONS: The present approach demonstrated the evolution of three population pharmacokinetic models with accumulating data, addressed clinical drug development questions related to systemic exposures of ritlecitinib, and informed the approved product label. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02309827, NCT02684760, NCT02958865, NCT02969044, NCT03232905, NCT03732807, NCT04016077, NCT03715829, NCT04037865, NCT04004663, NCT04634565, NCT02974868.

Utilization of Rosuvastatin and Endogenous Biomarkers in Evaluating the Impact of Ritlecitinib on BCRP, OATP1B1, and OAT3 Transporter Activity.

PURPOSE: Ritlecitinib, an inhibitor of Janus kinase 3 and tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma family kinases, is in development for inflammatory diseases. This study assessed the impact of ritlecitinib on drug transporters using a probe drug and endogenous biomarkers. METHODS: In vitro transporter-mediated substrate uptake and inhibition by ritlecitinib and its major metabolite were evaluated. Subsequently, a clinical drug interaction study was conducted in 12 healthy adult participants to assess the effect of ritlecitinib on pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin, a substrate of breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1), and organic anion transporter 3 (OAT3). Plasma concentrations of coproporphyrin I (CP-I) and pyridoxic acid (PDA) were assessed as endogenous biomarkers for OATP1B1 and OAT1/3 function, respectively. RESULTS: In vitro studies suggested that ritlecitinib can potentially inhibit BCRP, OATP1B1 and OAT1/3 based on regulatory cutoffs. In the subsequent clinical study, coadministration of ritlecitinib decreased rosuvastatin plasma exposure area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf) by ~ 13% and maximum concentration (Cmax) by ~ 27% relative to rosuvastatin administered alone. Renal clearance was comparable in the absence and presence of ritlecitinib coadministration. PK parameters of AUCinf and Cmax for CP-I and PDA were also similar regardless of ritlecitinib coadministration. CONCLUSION: Ritlecitinib does not inhibit BCRP, OATP1B1, and OAT3 and is unlikely to cause a clinically relevant interaction through these transporters. Furthermore, our findings add to the body of evidence supporting the utility of CP-I and PDA as endogenous biomarkers for assessment of OATP1B1 and OAT1/3 transporter activity.

A plain language summary on ritlecitinib treatment for adults and adolescents with alopecia areata.

WHAT IS THIS SUMMARY ABOUT?: This is a summary of the results of the ALLEGRO phase 2b/3 clinical trial, originally published in The Lancet. ALLEGRO-2b/3 looked at how well and safely the study medicine, ritlecitinib, works in treating people with alopecia areata ('AA' for short). The immune system protects your body from outside invaders such as bacteria and viruses. AA is an autoimmune disease, meaning a disease in which one's immune system attacks healthy cells of the body by mistake. In AA, the immune system attacks hair follicles, causing hair to fall out. AA causes hair loss ranging from small bald patches to complete hair loss on the scalp, face, and/or body. Ritlecitinib is a medicine taken as a pill every day, by mouth, that is approved for the treatment of severe AA. It blocks processes that are known to play a role in causing hair loss in patients with AA. WHAT WERE THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY?: Adults and adolescents (12 years and older) took part in the ALLEGRO-2b/3 study. They either took ritlecitinib for 48 weeks or took a placebo (a pill with no medicine) for 24 weeks. Participants taking placebo later switched to taking ritlecitinib for 24 weeks. The study showed that participants taking ritlecitinib had more hair regrowth on their scalp after 24 weeks than those taking the placebo. Hair regrowth was also seen on the eyebrows and eyelashes in participants taking ritlecitinib. Hair regrowth continued to improve to week 48 with continued ritlecitinib treatment. In addition, more participants taking ritlecitinib reported that their AA had 'moderately' or 'greatly' improved after 24 weeks than those taking the placebo. Similar numbers of participants taking ritlecitinib or placebo had side effects after 24 weeks. Most side effects were mild or moderate. WHAT DO THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY MEAN?: Ritlecitinib was an effective and well-tolerated treatment over 48 weeks for people with AA. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03732807 (phase 2b/3 ALLEGRO study).

Efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib in adults and adolescents with alopecia areata: a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2b-3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata is characterised by non-scarring loss of scalp, face, or body hair. We investigated the efficacy and safety of ritlecitinib, an oral, selective dual JAK3/TEC family kinase inhibitor, in patients with alopecia areata. METHODS: In this randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 2b-3 trial done at 118 sites in 18 countries, patients aged 12 years and older with alopecia areata and at least 50% scalp hair loss were randomly assigned to oral ritlecitinib or placebo once-daily for 24 weeks, with or without a 4-week loading dose (50 mg, 30 mg, 10 mg, 200 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg, or 200 mg loading dose followed by 30 mg), followed by a 24-week extension period during which ritlecitinib groups continued their assigned doses and patients initially assigned to placebo switched to ritlecitinib 50 mg or 200 mg loading dose followed by 50 mg. Randomisation was done by use of an interactive response system and was stratified by baseline disease severity and age. The sponsor, patients, and investigators were masked to treatment, and all patients received the same number of tablets to maintain masking. The primary endpoint was Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score 20 or less at week 24. The primary endpoint was assessed in all assigned patients, regardless of whether they received treatment. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03732807. FINDINGS: Between Dec 3, 2018, and June 24, 2021, 1097 patients were screened and 718 were randomly assigned to receive ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg (n=132), 200 mg + 30 mg (n=130), 50 mg (n=130), 30 mg (n=132), 10 mg (n=63), placebo to 50 mg (n=66), or placebo to 200 mg + 50 mg (n=65). 446 (62%) of 718 patients were female and 272 (38%) were male. 488 (68%) were White, 186 (26%) were Asian, and 27 (4%) were Black or African American. Of 718 patients randomly assigned, 104 patients discontinued treatment (34 withdrew, 19 adverse events [AEs], 12 physician decision, 12 lack of efficacy, 13 lost to follow up, five rolled over to long-term study transfer, four pregnancies, two protocol deviations, one declined to attend follow-up due to COVID-19, one attended last visit very late due to COVID-19, and one non-compliance). At week 24, 38 (31%) of 124 patients in the ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg group, 27 (22%) of 121 patients in the 200 mg + 30 mg group, 29 (23%) of 124 patients in the 50 mg group, 17 (14%) of 119 patients in the 30 mg group, and two (2%) of 130 patients in the placebo group had a response based on SALT score 20 or less. The difference in response rate based on SALT score 20 or less between the placebo and the ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg group was 29·1% (95% CI 21·2-37·9; p<0·0001), 20·8% (13·7-29·2; p<0·0001) for the 200 mg + 30 mg group, 21·9% (14·7-30·2; p<0·0001) for the 50 mg group, and 12·8% (6·7-20·4; p=0·0002) for the 30 mg group. Up to week 48 and including the follow-up period, AEs had been reported in 108 (82%) of 131 patients in the ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg group, 105 (81%) of 129 patients in the 200 mg + 30 mg group, 110 (85%) of 130 patients in the 50 mg group, 106 (80%) of 132 patients in the 30 mg group, 47 (76%) of 62 patients in the 10 mg group, 54 (83%) of 65 patients placebo to ritlecitinib 200 mg + 50 mg in the extension period, and 57 (86%) of 66 patients in the placebo to 50 mg group. The incidence of each AE was similar between groups, and there were no deaths. INTERPRETATION: Ritlecitinib was effective and well tolerated in patients aged 12 years and older with alopecia areata. Ritlecitinib might be a suitable treatment option for alopecia areata in patients who are candidates for systemic therapy. FUNDING: Pfizer.

Leveraging Prior Healthy Participant Pharmacokinetic Data to Evaluate the Impact of Renal and Hepatic Impairment on Ritlecitinib Pharmacokinetics.

Ritlecitinib is a selective, covalent, irreversible inhibitor of Janus kinase 3 (JAK3) and the tyrosine kinase expressed in hepatocellular carcinoma (TEC) family kinases. Pharmacokinetics and safety of ritlecitinib in participants with hepatic (Study 1) or renal (Study 2) impairment were to be characterized from two phase I studies. Due to a study pause caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the study 2 healthy participant (HP) cohort was not recruited; however, the demography of the severe renal impairment cohort closely matched the study 1 HP cohort. We present results from each study and two innovative approaches to utilizing available HP data as reference data for study 2: a statistical approach using analysis of variance and an in silico simulation of an HP cohort created using a population pharmacokinetics (POPPK) model derived from several ritlecitinib studies. For study 1, the observed area under the curve for 24-h dosing interval and maximum plasma concentration for HPs and their observed geometric mean ratios (participants with moderate hepatic impairment vs HPs) were within 90% prediction intervals from the POPPK simulation-based approach, thereby validating the latter approach. When applied to study 2, both the statistical and POPPK simulation approaches demonstrated that patients with renal impairment would not require ritlecitinib dose modification. In both phase I studies, ritlecitinib was generally safe and well tolerated. These analyses represent a new methodology for generating reference HP cohorts in special population studies for drugs in development with well-characterized pharmacokinetics in HPs and adequate POPPK models. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04037865 , NCT04016077 , NCT02309827 , NCT02684760 , and NCT02969044 .

Evaluation of the effect of ritlecitinib on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine in healthy participants.

AIMS: This clinical study was conducted to evaluate the impact of ritlecitinib on the pharmacokinetics of caffeine, a cytochrome P450 1A2 (CYP1A2) substrate. METHODS: In this single-centre, single-arm, open-label, fixed-sequence study, healthy participants received a single 100-mg dose of caffeine on 2 separate occasions: on Day 1 of Period 1 as monotherapy and on Day 8 of Period 2 after oral administration of ritlecitinib 200 mg once daily for 8 days. Serial blood samples were collected and analysed using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by using a noncompartmental method. Safety was monitored by physical examination, vital signs, electrocardiograms and laboratory assessments. RESULTS: Twelve participants were enrolled and completed the study. Coadministration of caffeine 100 mg in the presence of steady-state levels of ritlecitinib (200 mg once daily) increased caffeine exposure compared with caffeine given alone. Area under the curve to infinity and maximum concentration of caffeine increased by approximately 165 and 10%, respectively, when coadministered with ritlecitinib. The ratios of the adjusted geometric means (90% confidence interval) for caffeine area under the curve to infinity and maximum concentration were 265.14% (234.12-300.26%) and 109.74% (103.90-15.91%), respectively, when caffeine was coadministered with steady-state ritlecitinib (test) compared with its administration alone (reference). Multiple doses of ritlecitinib when coadministered with a single dose of caffeine were generally safe and well tolerated in healthy participants. CONCLUSION: Ritlecitinib is a moderate inhibitor of CYP1A2 and can increase systemic exposures of CYP1A2 substrates.

Evaluation of the Impact of Ritlecitinib on Organic Cation Transporters Using Sumatriptan and Biomarkers as Probes.

Ritlecitinib, an inhibitor of Janus kinase 3 and hepatocellular carcinoma family kinases, is in development as potential treatment for several inflammatory diseases. In vitro studies presented ritlecitinib as an inhibitor of hepatic organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, renal transporters OCT2 and multidrug and toxin extrusion (MATE) proteins 1/2K using multiple substrates, and ritlecitinib's major inactive metabolite M2, as an inhibitor of OCT1. A clinical interaction study with an OCT1 drug probe (sumatriptan) and relevant probe biomarkers for OCT/MATE was conducted to assess the effect of ritlecitinib on these transporters in healthy adult participants. The selectivity of sumatriptan for OCT1 was confirmed through a series of in vitro uptake assays. A simple static model was used to help contextualize the observed changes in sumatriptan area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC). Coadministration of a single 400-mg dose of ritlecitinib increased sumatriptan AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUCinf ) by ≈30% relative to a single 25-mg sumatriptan administration alone. When administered 8 hours after a ritlecitinib dose, sumatriptan AUCinf increased by ≈50% relative to sumatriptan given alone. Consistent with OCT1 inhibition, the AUC from time 0 to 24 hours of isobutyryl-L-carnitine decreased by ≈15% after ritlecitinib. Based on the evaluation of the renal clearance of N1 -methylnicotinamide, ritlecitinib does not exert clinically meaningful inhibition on renal OCT2 or MATE1/2K. This study confirmed that ritlecitinib and M2 are inhibitors of OCT1 but not OCT2 or MATE1/2K in healthy adults.

Population PK and PD Analysis of Domagrozumab in Pediatric Patients with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

Myostatin, a negative regulator of skeletal muscle growth, is a therapeutic target in muscle-wasting diseases. Domagrozumab, a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody, binds myostatin and inhibits activity. Domagrozumab was investigated in a phase II trial (NCT02310763) as a potential treatment for boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling is vital in clinical trial design, particularly for determining dosing regimens in pediatric populations. This analysis sought to establish the PK/PD relationship between free domagrozumab and total myostatin concentrations in pediatric patients with DMD using a prior semimechanistic model developed from a phase I study in healthy adult volunteers (NCT01616277) and following inclusion of phase II data. The refined model was developed using a multiple-step approach comprising structural, random effects, and covariate model development; assessment of model adequacy (goodness-of-fit); and predictive performance. Differences in PKs/PDs between healthy adult volunteers and pediatric patients with DMD were quantitatively accounted for and evaluated by predicting myostatin coverage (the percentage of myostatin bound by domagrozumab). The final model parameter estimates and semimechanistic target-mediated drug disposition structure sufficiently described both domagrozumab and myostatin concentrations in pediatric patients with DMD, and most population parameters were comparable with the prior model (in healthy adult volunteers). Predicted myostatin coverage for phase II patients with DMD was consistently > 90%. Baseline serum myostatin was ~ 65% lower than in healthy adult volunteers. This study provides insights into the regulation of myostatin in healthy adults and pediatric patients with DMD. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT01616277 and NCT02310763.

Harnessing formulation and clinical pharmacology knowledge for efficient pediatric drug development: Overview and discussions from M-CERSI pediatric formulation workshop 2019.

A pediatric formulation workshop entitled "Pediatric Formulations: Challenges of Today and Strategies for Tomorrow" was held to advance pediatric drug product development efforts in both pre-competitive and competitive environments. The workshop had four main sessions discussing key considerations of Formulation, Analytical, Clinical and Regulatory. This paper focuses on the clinical session of the workshop. It provides an overview of the discussion on the interconnection of pediatric formulation design and development, clinical development strategy and pediatric clinical pharmacology. The success of pediatric drug product development requires collaboration of multi-disciplinary teams across the pharmaceutical industry, consortiums, foundations, academia and global regulatory agencies. Early strategic planning is essential to ensure alignment among major stakeholders of different functional teams. Such an alignment is particularly critical in the collaboration between formulators and clinical pharmacology teams.

Randomized phase 2 trial and open-label extension of domagrozumab in Duchenne muscular dystrophy.

We report results from a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, 2-period trial (48 weeks each) of domagrozumab and its open-label extension in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Of 120 ambulatory boys (aged 6 to <16 years) with DMD, 80 were treated with multiple ascending doses (5, 20, and 40 mg/kg) of domagrozumab and 40 treated with placebo. The primary endpoints were safety and mean change in 4-stair climb (4SC) time at week 49. Secondary endpoints included other functional tests, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics. Mean (SD) age was 8.4 (1.7) and 9.3 (2.3) years in domagrozumab- and placebo-treated patients, respectively. Difference in mean (95% CI) change from baseline in 4SC at week 49 for domagrozumab vs placebo was 0.27 (-7.4 to 7.9) seconds (p = 0.94). There were no significant between-group differences in any secondary clinical endpoints. Most patients had ≥1 adverse event in the first 48 weeks; most were mild and not treatment-related. Median serum concentrations of domagrozumab increased with administered dose within each dose level. Non-significant increases in muscle volume were observed in domagrozumab- vs placebo-treated patients. Domagrozumab was generally safe and well tolerated in patients with DMD. Efficacy measures did not support a significant treatment effect. Clinicaltrials.gov identifiers: NCT02310763 and NCT02907619.

Predictors of Systemic Exposure to Topical Crisaborole: A Nonlinear Regression Analysis.

Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. Results from 2 randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase 3 studies showed that twice-daily crisaborole in children and adults with mild to moderate atopic dermatitis was efficacious and well tolerated. Initial pharmacokinetics (PK) studies of crisaborole indicated absorption with measurable systemic levels of crisaborole. The current analysis was conducted to correlate steady-state systemic exposure parameters with ointment dose and identify covariates impacting PK parameters in healthy participants and patients with atopic dermatitis or psoriasis. A nonlinear regression analysis was conducted using ointment dose and noncompartmental PK parameters at steady state (area under the curve [AUCss ] and maximum concentration [Cmax,ss ]). PK data were available from 244 participants across 6 clinical studies (AUCss , N = 239; Cmax,ss , N = 241). Disease condition had the greatest impact on slope in both models, corresponding to 2.5-fold higher AUCss and Cmax,ss values at a given ointment dose in patients with atopic dermatitis or psoriasis relative to healthy participants. Disease severity, race/ethnicity, and sex had marginal effects on AUCss and Cmax,ss . Systemic exposures were similar across age groups ≥2 years of age when the same percentage of body surface area (%BSA) was treated. Predictive performance plots for AUCss and Cmax,ss for different age groups demonstrated that the models adequately describe the observed data. Model predictions indicated that systemic exposure to crisaborole in pediatric patients (2-17 years) is unlikely to exceed systemic exposure in adults (≥18 years), even at the highest possible ointment dose corresponding to a %BSA of 90.

Safety, Effectiveness, and Pharmacokinetics of Crisaborole in Infants Aged 3 to < 24 Months with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: A Phase IV Open-Label Study (CrisADe CARE 1).

BACKGROUND: Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a nonsteroidal phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor for the treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis (AD). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, effectiveness, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of crisaborole in infants aged 3 to < 24 months with mild-to-moderate AD in an open-label study. METHODS: Infants (3 to < 24 months) with Investigator's Static Global Assessment (ISGA) of mild (2) or moderate (3) and percentage of treatable body surface area (%BSA) ≥ 5 received crisaborole twice daily for 28 days; a cohort with moderate AD per ISGA and %BSA ≥ 35 were included in a PK analysis. Endpoints included safety (primary), efficacy, and PK (exploratory). RESULTS: Included were 137 infants total (mean age [SD], 13.6 months [6.42]), with 21 in the PK cohort (12.7 months [6.58]). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported for 88 (64.2%) patients (98.9% rated as mild/moderate). TEAEs were considered treatment-related for 22 patients (16.1%); most frequently reported were application site pain (3.6%), application site discomfort (2.9%), and erythema (2.9%). ISGA clear/almost clear with ≥ 2-grade improvement at day 29 was achieved by 30.2% of patients. From baseline to day 29, mean percentage change in Eczema Area and Severity Index score was - 57.5%, and mean change in Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure total score was - 8.5. Crisaborole systemic exposures in infants were characterized and, based on nonlinear regression analysis, were comparable with that in patients aged ≥ 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this open-label study, crisaborole was well tolerated and effective in infants (3 to < 24 months) with mild-to-moderate AD with systemic exposures similar to patients aged ≥ 2 years. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03356977.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a skin disease that causes inflamed and itchy skin. Crisaborole is an ointment that is approved to treat patients aged 2 years and older with mild-to-moderate AD. This clinical trial studied crisaborole in infants with mild-to-moderate AD who were 3 to under 24 months old. These infants were treated with crisaborole twice a day for 28 days. The trial studied crisaborole's safety, effectiveness, and absorption into the bloodstream. In total, 137 infants were treated. Although side effects of some sort occurred in about two-thirds of patients, only 1 in 6 patients experienced side effects that were attributed to crisaborole. When these side effects did occur, these were mainly pain, discomfort, or redness where crisaborole was applied. Fewer than 1 in 25 patients experienced each side effect where crisaborole was applied. The doctors saw improvement in the AD symptoms of some patients at day 29 of the study compared to the beginning of the study. Crisaborole blood-level measurements in this age group were consistent with those seen in patients aged 2 years and older. Overall, crisaborole was considered well tolerated and effective in infants (3 to under 24 months old) with mild-to-moderate AD. Safety, Effectiveness, and Pharmacokinetics of Crisaborole in Infants Aged 3 to < 24 Months with Mild-to-Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: An Open-Label, Phase 4 Study (MP4 40891 MB).