Risk Factors for Anticoagulant-Associated Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage has a high mortality rate, and many factors can cause intracranial hemorrhage. Until now, systematic reviews and assessments of the certainty of the evidence have not been published. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review to identify risk factors for anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage. The protocol for this systematic review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022316750). All English studies that met the inclusion criteria published before January 2022 were obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality and evidence of the included studies. Risk factors for intracranial hemorrhage were used as the outcome index of this review. Random or fixed-effect models were used in statistical methods. I2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: Of 7322 citations, we included 20 studies in our analysis. For intracranial hemorrhage, moderate-certainty evidence showed a probable association with race, Glasgow Coma Scale, stroke, leukoaraiosis, cerebrovascular disease, tumor, atrial fibrillation, previous bleeding, international normalized ratio, serum albumin, prothrombin time, diastolic blood pressure, and anticoagulant. Low-certainty evidence may be associated with age, cerebral microbleeds, smoking, alcohol intake, platelet count, and antiplatelet drug. In addition, we found very low-certainty evidence that there may be little to no association between the risk of intracranial hemorrhage and hypertension and creatinine clearance. Leukoaraiosis, cerebral microbleeds, cerebrovascular disease, and international normalized ratio are not included in most risk assessment models. CONCLUSIONS: This study informs risk prediction for anticoagulant-associated intracranial hemorrhage and informs guidelines for intracranial hemorrhage prevention and future research.

Severe Bleeding Risk of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for Stroke Prevention and Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: We aimed to determine the safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: A systematic search of four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting severe bleeding events in patients taking DOACs or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In this frequency-based network meta-analysis, odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were used for reporting. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated. RESULTS: Twenty-three RCTs met the inclusion criteria, and a total of 87,616 patients were enrolled. The bleeding safety of DOACs for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: fatal bleeding: edoxaban (SUCRA,80.2), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,68.3), apixaban (SUCRA,48.5), dabigatran (SUCRA,40.0), VKAs (SUCRA,12.9); major bleeding: dabigatran (SUCRA,74.0), apixaban (SUCRA,71.5), edoxaban (SUCRA,66.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,22.7), VKAs (SUCRA,15.4); gastrointestinal bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA,55.9), VKAs (SUCRA,53.7), edoxaban (SUCRA,50.5), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,50.4), dabigatran (SUCRA,39.5); intracranial hemorrhage: dabigatran (SUCRA,84.6), edoxaban (SUCRA,74.1), apixaban (SUCRA,65.8), rivaroxaban (SUCRA,24.4), VKAs (SUCRA,1.1). CONCLUSION: Based on current evidence, for stroke prevention and treatment in patients with AF, the most safe DOAC is edoxaban in terms of fatal bleeding; dabigatran in terms of major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage and apixaban in terms of gastrointestinal bleeding. However, given the nature of indirect comparisons, more high-quality evidence from head-to-head comparisons is still needed to confirm them.

The Bridge Between Ischemic Stroke and Gut Microbes: Short-Chain Fatty Acids.

Short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) are monocarboxylates produced by the gut microbiota (GM) and result from the interaction between diet and GM. An increasing number of studies about the microbiota-gut-brain axis (MGBA) indicated that SCFAs may be a crucial mediator in the MGBA, but their roles have not been fully clarified. In addition, there are few studies directly exploring the role of SCFAs as a potential regulator of microbial targeted interventions in ischemic stroke, especially for clinical studies. This review summarizes the recent studies concerning the relationship between ischemic stroke and GM and outlines the role of SCFAs as a bridge between them. The potential mechanisms by which SCFAs affect ischemic stroke are described. Finally, the beneficial effects of SFCAs-mediated therapeutic measures such as diet, dietary supplements (e.g., probiotics and prebiotics), fecal microbiota transplantation, and drugs on ischemic brain injury are also discussed.

Direct oral anticoagulants for venous thromboembolism in cancer patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including dabigatran, apixaban, rivaroxaban, and edoxaban, for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with cancer is unclear. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from the establishment to November 30, 2021. In the frequency-based network meta-analysis, the odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval was reported. The relative ranking probability of each group was generated based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). RESULTS: We included 15 randomized controlled trials involving a total of 6162 patients. Apixaban reduced the risk of VTE compared with low-molecular heparin [OR = 0.53, 95% CI (0.32, 0.89)]. The efficacy of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: apixaban (SUCRA, 81.0), rivaroxaban (73.0), edoxaban (65.9), dabigatran (51.4), warfarin (30.8), and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) (27.4). Edoxaban increased the risk of major bleeding compared with LMWH [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.04, 3.22)]. The safety of drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding-apixaban (SUCRA, 68.5), LMWH (55.1), rivaroxaban (53.0), warfarin (35.9), dabigatran (29.2), edoxaban (16.5) and clinically relevant non-major bleeding-LMWH (73.0), apixaban (57.8), edoxaban (45.8), rivaroxaban (35.3), and warfarin (10.8). CONCLUSIONS: For preventing and treating VTE, in terms of VTE occurrence and major bleeding, apixaban had the lowest risk; in terms of clinically relevant non-major bleeding, LMWH had the lowest risk, followed by apixaban. Generally, apixaban is the most efficient and safest DOAC and presents better efficacy and relatively low bleeding risk among the VTE prevention and treatment drugs for patients with cancer.

Risk of nonmajor bleeding upon use of direct oral anticoagulants for preventing and treating venous thromboembolism: A network meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are associated with bleeding. Patients often stop taking DOACs due to nonmajor bleeding, which may lead to venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence. We aimed to determine the risk of nonmajor bleeding using different DOACs to prevent and treat VTE. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception until January 6, 2021. The incidence of clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding and minor bleeding was investigated. In frequentist-based network meta-analysis, we analyzed the odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI and the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA). RESULTS: Twenty-seven randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (involving 64,493 patients) were included. For preventing VTE, the risk for clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by that for low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH), dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The risk for minor bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by that for rivaroxaban, LMWH, dabigatran, and edoxaban. For treating VTE, the risk for clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding was also lowest for apixaban, followed by that for edoxaban, vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), and rivaroxaban. The risk for minor bleeding was lowest for apixaban, followed by that for rivaroxaban and VKAs. CONCLUSIONS: Regardless of whether it was used for preventing or treating VTE, apixaban had the lowest risk of nonmajor bleeding. This suggests that apixaban may have a lower risk of nonmajor bleeding than other anticoagulants and may help provide some clinical reference for choosing a more appropriate drug for the patient.

Changes in the Gut Microbiota May Affect the Clinical Efficacy of Oral Anticoagulants.

The mechanism underlying large individual differences in the response to oral anticoagulants has not been fully clarified, and the influence of the intestinal microbiome on exogenous drug metabolism has gradually become an area of increased research interest. However, there has been no research into the influence of the gut microbiota on the pharmacokinetics of oral anticoagulants. Therefore, our study is the first to investigate the effect of the intestinal flora on oral anticoagulant metabolism and the associated mechanism. Antibiotics affected the diversity and abundance of the intestinal flora. Compared with the control group, the bioavailability of warfarin and rivaroxaban were significantly increased in the amoxicillin-treated group, whereas the bioavailability of dabigatran increased and subsequently decreased. Compared with the control group, the expression of P-glycoprotein (P-gp), CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP3A4, and nuclear receptor, PXR, were altered in the amoxicillin -treated groups. This trend was consistent with the pharmacokinetic results. Changes in the intestinal flora can affect the expression of liver drug enzymes and P-gp, as well as affect the transport and metabolism of oral anticoagulants (e.g., warfarin, dabigatracin, and rivaroxaban), leading to differences in the efficacy of oral anticoagulants. This study revealed a novel mechanism for influencing individual differences in the treatment efficacy of oral anticoagulants.

Effects and Mechanism of Action of Panax notoginseng Saponins on the Pharmacokinetics of Warfarin.

BACKGROUD: The interactions between Chinese herbs and drugs pose a great challenge to the combined clinical application of Chinese herbs and drugs. Chinese medicinal products contain complex pharmacologically active components that may influence the in vivo processes of drugs in a variety of ways. In China, drugs based on Panax ginseng total saponins (PNS) are often combined with warfarin for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of Panax notoginseng saponins (PNS) on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin and its mechanism. METHOD: Blood was collected for the determination of the prothrombin time (PT) and international normalized ratio (INR) from rats treated with warfarin alone or with warfarin + PNS. The plasma concentration of warfarin was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Western blot was used to detect the expression of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes. RESULTS: When warfarin and PNS were co-administered, the PT and INR increased compared to when warfarin was given alone. 72 hours after administration, compared to the warfarin alone group, the warfarin + low-dose PNS, warfarin + medium-dose PNS, and warfarin + high-dose PNS groups showed 110%, 122%, and 126% increases in PT, respectively (all P < 0.05), as well as 111%, 124%, and 128% increases in INR (all P < 0.05). Compared with the warfarin alone group, the clearance rate (CL/F) of warfarin in the warfarin + low-dose PNS, warfarin + medium-dose PNS, and warfarin + high-dose PNS groups was 10% (P > 0.05), 23% (P < 0.05), and 33% (P < 0.05) lower, respectively, while the systemic exposure (area under the concentration-time curve, AUC0-t) increased by 106% (P > 0.05), 119% (P < 0.05), and 134% (P < 0.05), respectively, and the blood concentration of warfarin incresed by 112%, 113%, and 114%, respectively (all P > 0.05). After combined treatment of HepG2 cells with warfarin + PNS, CYP1A2 expression was upregulated (P < 0.05) and CYP3A4 was downregulated (P < 0.05) but there was no effect on CYP2C9. In animal experiments, PNS had different effect on the expression of CYP1A2 in different doses. While a low dose of PNS resulted in downregulated CYP1A2 expression (P < 0.05), a medium dose resulted in upregulation (P < 0.05), and CYP1A2 expression was not significantly affected by a high dose of PNS (P > 0.05). Meanwhile, PNS at all doses downregulated the expression of CYP3A4 (P < 0.05) but had no effect on the expression of CYP2C9 (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: PNS can increase the blood concentration of warfarin, as well as the exposure time, and it can enhance the anticoagulant effect of warfarin by inhibiting the expression of the liver enzyme CYP3A4.

Editor's Choice - Severe Bleeding Risks of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in the Prevention and Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the severe bleeding safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE). METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched up to 6 January 2021. The incidence of severe bleeding (major, gastrointestinal [GI], intracranial, and fatal) was investigated. Using frequentist network meta-analysis, interventions that were not compared directly could be compared indirectly by the 95% confidence interval (CI), making the search results more intuitive. Based on surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA), the relative ranking probability of each group was generated. RESULTS: Thirty-one randomised controlled trials (76 641 patients) were included. For the treatment of VTE, the risk of major bleeding with apixaban was significantly lower than dabigatran (odds ratio [OR] 2.10, 95% CI 1.07 - 4.12) and edoxaban (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.36 - 5.15). The safety of the drugs was ranked from highest to lowest as follows: major bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA 98.0), rivaroxaban (SUCRA 69.6), dabigatran (SUCRA 50.7), edoxaban (SUCRA 26.5), and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; SUCRA 5.1); GI bleeding: apixaban (SUCRA 80.7), rivaroxaban (SUCRA 66.8), edoxaban (SUCRA 62.3), VKAs (SUCRA 34.4), and dabigatran (SUCRA 5.8); intracranial bleeding: rivaroxaban (SUCRA 74.4), edoxaban (SUCRA 70.4), dabigatran (SUCRA 58.2), apixaban (SUCRA 44.4), and VKAs (SUCRA 5.6); fatal bleeding: edoxaban (SUCRA 82.7), rivaroxaban (SUCRA 59.2), dabigatran (SUCRA 48.6), apixaban (SUCRA 43.0), and VKAs (SUCRA 16.3). For the prevention of VTE, the risk of major bleeding with apixaban was significantly lower than rivaroxaban (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.02 - 4.52). Among the four types of bleeding, apixaban had the lowest bleeding risk among DOACs (major bleeding: SUCRA 81.6; GI bleeding: SUCRA 75.4; intracranial bleeding: SUCRA 64.1; fatal bleeding: SUCRA 73.6). CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of VTE, in terms of major bleeding and GI bleeding, apixaban had the lowest bleeding risk; in terms of intracranial bleeding, rivaroxaban had the lowest bleeding risk; in terms of fatal bleeding, edoxaban had the lowest bleeding risk. For the prevention of VTE, apixaban had the lowest bleeding risk.

Efficacy and safety of app-based remote warfarin management during COVID-19-related lockdown: a retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to explore the effectiveness, and safety of internet-based warfarin management during the pandemic. In this single-center retrospective cohort study, we compared the safety and efficacy of online warfarin management using a smartphone app (the Alfalfa app) versus conventional outpatient clinic management from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020. Patients in the online management group used the Alfalfa app to communicate coagulation test results and other relevant information to a doctor or clinical pharmacist, who then responded with the dose adjustment plan and the date of the next blood test. The outcomes examined were the time in therapeutic range (TTR), incidence of clinical events (i.e., bleeding events, thrombotic events, warfarin-related emergency department visits, and warfarin-related hospital admissions), and the distribution of international normalized ratio (INR) values. Data from 117 patients were analyzed in this study. TTR was significantly higher in the online group than in the offline group (61.0% vs. 39.6%, P < 0.01). Incidence of major bleeding events, thrombotic events, and warfarin-related hospital admissions were comparable between the online and offline groups. However, minor bleeds (5.3% vs. 28.3%, P < 0.01) and warfarin-related emergency department visits (1.8% vs. 23.3%, P = 0.02) were significantly fewer in the online group than in the offline group. The proportion of INR values in the therapeutic range (53.8% vs. 40.1%, P < 0.01) was significantly higher in the online group. Warfarin management using the Alfalfa app appears to be a safe and effective method for warfarin management when patients cannot physically visit hospitals for follow-up.

Effect of Traditional Plus Virtual Reality Rehabilitation on Prognosis of Stroke Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Virtual reality technology has begun to be gradually applied to clinical stroke rehabilitation. The study aimed to evaluate the effect of traditional plus virtual reality rehabilitation on motor function recovery, balance, and activities of daily living in stroke patients. METHOD: Studies published in English before October 2020 were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. This study used RevMan 5.3 software for meta-analysis. RESULT: A total of 21 randomized controlled trials were included, which enrolled 619 patients. Traditional plus virtual reality rehabilitation is better than traditional rehabilitation in upper limb motor function recovery measured by Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (mean difference = 3.49, 95% confidence interval = 1.24 to 5.73, P = 0.002) and manual dexterity assessed by Box and Block Test (mean difference = 6.59, 95% confidence interval = 3.45 to 9.74, P < 0.0001). However, there is no significant difference from traditional rehabilitation in activities of daily living assessed by Functional Independence Measure (mean difference = 0.38, 95% confidence interval = -0.26 to 1.02, P = 0.25) and balance assessed by Berg Balance Scale (mean difference = 2.18, 95% confidence interval = -0.35 to 4.71, P = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: Traditional plus virtual reality rehabilitation therapy is an effective method to improve the upper limb motor function and manual dexterity of patients with limb disorders after stroke, and immersive virtual reality rehabilitation treatment may become a new option for rehabilitation after stroke.

Impact of mobile health and telehealth technology on medication adherence of stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Background Stroke patients have low medication adherence after discharge, which leads to a high recurrence rate and poor disease control. Various strategies have been explored to enhance medication adherence in this patient population. Aim To evaluate the effects of mobile health (mHealth) and telehealth technology on medication adherence in stroke patients. Method All English studies that met the inclusion criteria published before September 2021 were obtained from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Two researchers independently screened articles, extracted data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies. All articles were about randomized controlled trials. Medication adherence was used as the outcome index of this review. Random or fixed-effect models were used in statistical methods. I2 statistics were used to evaluate heterogeneity. Results A total of ten studies met the inclusion criteria, covering 2151 stroke patients. Compared with the Usual Care group, the medication adherence scores of the mHealth technology group were better (standard mean deviation 0.67, 95% confidence interval, CI [0.49, 0.85], P < 0.001). The medication adherence ratio of the mHealth technology group was higher (odds ratio, OR, 2.81, 95% CI [1.35, 5.85], P = 0.006). Subgroup analysis showed that application and messaging interventions were more effective than the telephone call intervention (OR 4.05, 95% CI [2.10, 7.80], P < 0.001). The shorter the interval of the intervention, the better the medication adherence of patients (OR 4.24, 95% CI [2.30, 7.81], P < 0.001). Conclusion Compared with Usual Care, mHealth can effectively improve the medication adherence of stroke patients.

The Value of Mobile Health in Improving Breastfeeding Outcomes Among Perinatal or Postpartum Women: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is essential for maintaining the health of mothers and babies. Breastfeeding can reduce the infection rate and mortality in newborns, and can reduce the chances of overweight and obesity in children and adolescents. For mothers, a longer duration of breastfeeding can reduce the risk of breast cancer, ovarian cancer, and type 2 diabetes. Although breastfeeding has many benefits, the global breastfeeding rate is low. With the progress of time, the popularity of mobile devices has increased rapidly, and interventions based on mobile health (mHealth) may have the potential to facilitate the improvement of the breastfeeding status. OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to analyze the existing evidence to determine whether mHealth-based interventions can improve the status of breastfeeding. METHODS: We systematically searched multiple electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, WanFang, and Vip ) to identify eligible studies published from 1966 to October 29, 2020. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying the influence of mHealth on breastfeeding. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool was used to examine the risk of publication bias. RevMan 5.3 was used to analyze the data. RESULTS: A total of 15 RCTs with a total sample size of 4366 participates met the inclusion criteria. Compared with usual care, interventions based on mHealth significantly increased the postpartum exclusive breastfeeding rate (odds ratio [OR] 3.18, 95% CI 2.20-4.59; P<.001), enhanced breastfeeding self-efficacy (mean difference [MD] 8.15, 95% CI 3.79-12.51; P=.002; I2=88%), reduced health problems in infants (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.90; P=.01; I2=0%), and improved participants' attitudes toward breastfeeding compared with usual care (MD 3.94, 95% CI 1.95-5.92; P<.001; I2=0%). There was no significant difference in the initiation of breastfeeding within an hour of birth between the intervention group and the usual care group (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.55-2.90; P=.59). In addition, subgroup analysis was carried out according to different subjects and publication times. The results showed that the breastfeeding rate was not limited by the types of subjects. The breastfeeding rate based on mHealth at 1 month and 2 months after delivery did not change over the time of publication (2009 to 2020), and the breastfeeding rate based on mHealth at 3 months and 6 months after delivery gradually increased with time (2009 to 2020). CONCLUSIONS: Interventions based on mHealth can significantly improve the rate of postpartum exclusive breastfeeding, breastfeeding efficacy, and participants' attitudes toward breastfeeding, and reduce health problems in infants. Therefore, encouraging women to join the mHealth team is feasible, and breastfeeding-related information can be provided through simple measures, such as text messages, phone calls, and the internet, to improve the health of postpartum women and their babies.

Efficacy of Mobile Health in Patients With Low Back Pain: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Low back pain is one of the most common health problems and a main cause of disability, which imposes a great burden on patients. Mobile health (mHealth) affects many aspects of people's lives, and it has progressed rapidly, showing promise as an effective intervention for patients with low back pain. However, the efficacy of mHealth interventions for patients with low back pain remains unclear; thus, further exploration is necessary. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of mHealth interventions in patients with low back pain compared to usual care. METHODS: This was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials designed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis) statement standard. We searched for studies published in English before October 2020 in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. Two researchers independently scanned the literature, extracted data, and assessed the methodological quality of the included studies. Bias risks were assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool. We used RevMan 5.4 software to perform the meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 9 studies with 792 participants met the inclusion criteria. The simultaneous use of mHealth and usual care showed a better reduction in pain intensity than usual care alone, as measured by the numeric rating scale (mean difference [MD] -0.85, 95% CI -1.29 to -0.40; P<.001), and larger efficacy in reducing disability, as measured by the Rolland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (MD -1.54, 95% CI -2.35 to -0.73; P<.001). Subgroup analyses showed that compared with usual care, mHealth using telephone calls significantly reduced pain intensity (MD -1.12, 95% CI -1.71 to -0.53; P<.001) and disability score (MD -1.68, 95% CI -2.74 to -0.63; P<.001). However, without the use of telephone calls, mHealth had no obvious advantage over usual care in improving pain intensity (MD -0.48, 95% CI -1.16 to 0.20; P=.16) and the disability score (MD -0.41, 95% CI -1.88 to 1.05; P=.58). The group that received a more sensitive feedback intervention showed a significantly reduced disability score (MD -4.30, 95% CI -6.95 to -1.69; P=.001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of simultaneous mHealth and usual care interventions has better efficacy than usual care alone in reducing pain intensity and disability in patients with low back pain. Moreover, the results of subgroup analysis revealed that mHealth using telephone calls might play a positive role in improving pain intensity and disability in patients with low back pain.