Digital Thermal Necrosis Resulting in Amputation After Removing a Tungsten Carbide Ring With a High-Speed Metal Burr: A Case Report.

CASE: A 41-year-old man removed a tungsten carbide ring from his left index finger by cutting it off with a high-speed metal burr. The patient presented two days later with a pink and perfused left index finger with circumferential dry gangrene along the area of the ring, active flexor and extensor tendon excursion, and decreased sensation distally. Within 24 hours, the wound developed into wet gangrene and diffuse cyanosis requiring amputation. CONCLUSION: After reviewing previously documented methods to remove tungsten carbide rings, the authors conclude clinicians should be cognizant of the potential complications associated with the use of a high-speed metal burr.

Effects of vancomycin and tobramycin on compressive and tensile strengths of antibiotic bone cement: A biomechanical study.

Purpose: This study aims to compare the compressive and tensile strengths of bone cement mixed with various concentrations of vancomycin, tobramycin, and combinations of the two. Methods: 12 mm × 6 mm antibiotic bone cement samples were created by vacuum mixing 0-4 g of vancomycin, tobramycin, and combinations of the two in 0.5 g increments per one pouch (40 g) of Palacos LV cement. An Instron 3369 Universal Testing System was used to determine the compressive and tensile strengths. Results: Compressive and tensile strengths of the bone cement without antibiotics were 118 ± 4 MPa and 30.3 ± 12 MPa, respectively. 4 g of vancomycin alone decreased the compressive strength to 108 ± 4 MPa (p-value 0.001) and decreased the tensile strength beginning at 2 g which yielded a strength of 28.1 ± 12 MPa (p-value 0.016). Tobramycin alone decreased the tensile strength beginning at 1.5 g yielding a strength of 27.7 ± 7 MPa (p-value 0.003). Although it decreased compressive strength at 1 g to 117 ± 7 MPa (p-value 0.002), it demonstrated variable effects with increasing concentrations. A combination of vancomycin and tobramycin decreased both the compressive (111 ± 5 MPa, p-value 0.014) and tensile (27.9 ± 8 MPa, p-value 0.007) strengths beginning at 1 g each. Conclusions: Various combinations of vancomycin and tobramycin affect the compressive and tensile strengths of bone cement. Clinicians should be diligent when mixing these antibiotics in bone cement to prevent possible failure of the constructs.

Ten-Year Outcomes of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion : A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and comparative retrospective cohort studies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the 10-year outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) with those of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: ACDF is the gold standard for the treatment of CDDD. However, the loss of motion at the operative level may accelerate adjacent segment disease (ASD). The preservation of motion with CDA attempts to prevent this complication of cervical fusion. Short-term and mid-term data reveal comparable results for CDA versus ACDF; however, long-term results are unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review with meta-analysis was performed to determine if CDA had improved outcomes compared with ACDF at 10-year follow-up. PubMed and Web of Science database searches through 2023 were performed to identify randomized controlled trials and comparative retrospective cohort studies involving treatment of one-level or two-level CDDD. RESULTS: Six studies were eligible for analysis. CDA had significantly improved neck disability index and visual analog scale scores but lower Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores compared to ACDF at 10-year follow-up ( P < 0.05). None of these results met minimal clinically important differences. CDA had significantly fewer secondary surgeries and adverse events compared to ACDF ( P <0.05). There were no significant differences in neurological success. CONCLUSIONS: The authors found that significantly fewer secondary surgeries and adverse events were seen after CDA than after ACDF at 10-year follow-up. CDA had statistically, but not clinically, improved neck disability index and visual analog scale scores but lower Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores in comparison to ACDF. CDA was not significantly different from ACDF in terms of a successful neurological outcome.