Intraligamentous synovial osteochondroma of the ligamentum teres: a series of 14 cases.

BACKGROUND: The ligamentum teres (LT) is covered by synovium. It acts as a stabilizer of the hip and as such it has been compared to the ACL of the knee joint. Pathologic changes occur in the LT with aging and osteoarthritis (OA), including degeneration, occasional chondroid metaplasia, and synovial chondromatosis are well-recognized in the literature. However, there are no reports of intraligamentous synovial osteochondroma occuring in the LT. METHODS: We reviewed the pathology reports of 542 osteoarthritic femoral arthroplasty specimens between January 2016 and December 2018. The LT was examined histologically in 55 cases because it was abnormal on gross examination. RESULTS: A single synovial osteochondroma, ranging in size from 0.4-1.7 cm in diameter, was present in the body of the LT in 14 cases (9 males; 5 females, aged 34 to 81 years), representing 2.6% of 542 arthroplasty cases. Ten of the osteochondromas had bone marrow fat without hematopoietic elements, 1 had hematopoietic elements, and 3 had no marrow among the bony trabeculae. Radiographically, all cases had moderate to severe osteoarthritis with no mention of an abnormality of LT. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first report of intraligamentous synovial osteochondroma in the LT in osteoarthritis patients undergoing hip arthroplasty. It provides further support for microscopic examination of arthroplasty specimens for histologic abnormalities. Further prospective study is needed to determine if this lesion contributes adversely to the development or progression of osteoarthritis and if it is a reactive or neoplastic process.

Patient Reported Outcomes After Conversion vs. Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Matched Analysis.

Background: Conversion total hip arthroplasty (cTHA) is increasingly utilized as a salvage procedure for complications associated with fracture fixation around the hip and acetabulum and for failed hip preservation surgery. While primary THA (pTHA) has a high success rate, little is known about outcomes following conversion THA. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient reported outcomes (PROs) and complication rates following conversion THA compared to primary THA. Methods: Patients that underwent cTHA or pTHA from 2015-2020 at a large tertiary referral academic center were retrospectively identified. THA patients were propensity matched in a 1:1 fashion by age, body mass index (BMI), and sex. Pain scores and PROMIS physical function (PF), pain interference (PI), and depression (DA) scores were compared at preoperative and final postoperative follow up timepoints using independent t-tests. Differences in complication and reoperation rates between cohorts were assessed using chi square analysis. Results: A total of 118 THAs (59 cTHA, 59 pTHA) were included in this analysis with an average follow up of 21.3 months. cTHAs were most commonly performed following hip fracture fixation (50.8%). The conversion cohort had significantly longer lengths of stay (3.6 days vs 1.9 days, p<0.01) and greater use of revision-type implants (39.0% vs 0.0%, p<0.01) compared to pTHA. There was no significant difference in complication rates (cTHA = 15.3%, pTHA = 8.5%; p=0.26), with intraoperative fracture being the most common for both. Primary and conversion THA groups also experienced similar reoperation rates (cTHA = 5.1%, pTHA = 6.8%; p=0.70). No significant differences in PROs at final follow up were identified between groups. Conclusion: Patients undergoing cTHA required increased utilization of revision hip implants and had longer lengths of stay, but had comparable complication and reoperation rates, and ultimately demonstrated similar improvements in PROMIS scores compared to a matched cohort of pTHA patients. Level of Evidence: III.

Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Our purpose was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate complication and revision rates for periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PPDFF) treated with: (1) ORIF using periarticular locking plates (ORIF), (2) retrograde intramedullary nail (IMN), and (3) distal femoral replacement (DFR). METHODS: Systematic review of the literature was performed to identify eligible studies (N = 52). Identified treatment groups were: ORIF (N = 1205 cases), IMN (N = 272 cases), and DFR (N = 353 cases). Median follow-up was 30 months (range 6-96 months). Primary outcomes were: (1) major complication rates and (2) reoperation rates over the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes were incidence of deep infection, periprosthetic fracture, mortality over the follow-up period, 1-year mortality, non-union, malunion, delayed union, and hardware failure. Data for primary and secondary outcomes were pooled and unadjusted analysis was performed. Meta-analysis was performed on subset of individual studies comparing at least two of three treatment groups (N = 14 studies). Odds-ratios and their respective standard errors were determined for each treatment group combination. Maximum likelihood random effects meta-analysis was conducted for primary outcomes. RESULTS: From the systematic review, major complication rates (p = 0.55) and reoperation rates (p = 0.20) were not significantly different between the three treatment groups. DFR group had a higher incidence of deep infection relative to IMN and ORIF groups (p = 0.03). Malunion rates were higher in IMN versus ORIF (p = 0.02). For the meta-analysis, odds of major complications were not significantly different between IMN versus DFR (OR 1.39 [0.23-8.52]), IMN versus ORIF (OR 0.86 [0.48-1.53]), or the ORIF versus DFR (OR 0.91 [0.52-1.59]). Additionally, odds of a reoperation were not significantly different between IMN versus DFR (OR 0.59 [0.08-4.11]), IMN versus ORIF (OR 1.26 [0.66-2.40]), or ORIF versus DFR (OR 0.91 [0.51-1.55]). CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in major complications or reoperations between the three treatment groups. Deep infection rates were higher in DFR relative to internal fixation, malunion rates were higher in IMN versus ORIF, and periprosthetic fracture rates were higher in DFR and IMN versus ORIF.

The Treatment of Periprosthetic Distal Femoral Fractures After Total Knee Replacement: A Critical Analysis Review.

Periprosthetic distal femoral fracture after total knee arthroplasty carries substantial morbidity and mortality regardless of fixation technique. Surgical treatment is favored in most patients compared with conservative therapy because of high rates of nonunion, malunion, and reoperation after casting or bracing. Internal fixation techniques including retrograde intramedullary nailing and locked plating are favored for surgical treatment in most fractures when bone stock in the distal fragment allows for appropriate fixation. In the setting of deficient distal femoral bone stock or femoral component loosening, revision arthroplasty with distal femoral replacement is the favored technique. Further studies with regard to the use of intramedullary nailing, locked plating, and distal femoral replacement are necessary to refine the indications for each technique and to define the use of combinations of these fixation techniques.

The Impact of Total Hip Arthroplasty Surgical Approach on Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Computer Adaptive Tests of Physical Function and Pain Interference.

BACKGROUND: The present study examines Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Computer Adaptive Test (CAT) scores for domains of physical function (PF) and pain interference (PI) in patients undergoing elective THA from either a direct anterior or posterior surgical approach. METHODS: A total of 1358 patients who underwent THA at our institution from 1/1/2015 to 12/1/2018 were identified. Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, PROMIS CAT PF and PI data were collected at the last preoperative visit as well as 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1-2 years postoperatively. Literature-derived minimum clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMIS CAT PF metric with regard to THA was used for data comparison. RESULTS: Four hundred nine patients were included in the final analysis. Fifty-one percent underwent a posterior approach, and 49% underwent a direct anterior approach. Both approaches led to a significant improvement in PROMIS CAT PF and PI scores. Patients undergoing a direct anterior approach had significantly higher preoperative and postoperative PROMIS CAT PF scores as well as significantly lower preoperative PROMIS CAT PI scores. Each approach yielded similar interval improvements of PROMIS CAT PF and PI. One hundred three direct anterior approach THA patients (51%) and 119 posterior approach THA patients (57.5%) achieved PROMIS PF MCID at 1- to 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSION: Neither the direct anterior nor posterior THA surgical approach conferred an advantage to postoperative improvements of PROMIS CAT PF and PI scores. Adult reconstructive surgeons should continue to execute the direct anterior or posterior THA surgical approaches based upon personal preference. Despite surgeon confidence in THA, the potential for further innovation exists given the number of THA patients who failed to achieve PROMIS PF MCID.