Outcomes for patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction and cerebral infarction in the United States: insights from the National Inpatient Sample.

This study aims to determine the frequency and impact of concomitant cerebral infarction and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and association with in-hospital outcomes. We analyzed the nationally representative data from National Inpatient Sample between 2016 and 2019. We used multiple logistic regressions to determine the impact of sustaining a cerebral infarction or AMI on in-hospital mortality and linear regression to evaluate length of stay and hospitalization costs. A total of 2,396,450 admissions for cerebral infarction, 4,098,904 admissions for AMI and 130,635 admissions for both conditions were identified. The in-hospital mortality was 7.2% overall: 5.6% for patients with cerebral infarction, 7.7% for patients with AMI and 19.9% for patients with both conditions (p < 0.001). The median length of stay was 4 days, 3 days and 7 days for cerebral infarction, AMI and when both occurred together, respectively (p < 0.001). The median total healthcare cost for cerebral infarction, AMI and when both occurred was US$10,647, $15,735 and $23,290, respectively (p < 0.001). After adjustments for potential confounders, in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 4.07, 95% CI 3.93-4.21], length of stay (aOR 3.95 95% CI 3.85-4.04), and hospitalization cost (regression coefficient 15,480 95% CI 15,135-15,825) were greater for patients with AMI and cerebral infarction compared to admission for cerebral infarction only. Cerebral infarction and AMI during the same hospitalization occurs in 5% of admissions with cerebral infarction and 3% of admission with AMI and is associated with significant increase in mortality, length of stay and cost compared to admissions with either condition alone.

The Effect of Ticagrelor on Platelet Reactivity in Patients with Clopidogrel Resistance Undergoing Neuroendovascular Procedures.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Suboptimal platelet inhibition by clopidogrel (clopidogrel resistance) may be associated with high rates of stent thrombosis and ischemic events. Our objective was to determine if ticagrelor, a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, can result in platelet inhibition in patients with clopidogrel resistance. METHODS: A thromboelastography-platelet mapping assay was used in all patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures requiring oral clopidogrel. In patients with suboptimal platelet inhibition (<60%) on clopidogrel, ticagrelor was imitated after an oral bolus of 180 mg followed by 90 mg twice daily and the platelet mapping assay was repeated. The primary endpoint was hemorrhagic complications classified as major (hemoglobin decrease >5 g/dL or intracranial hemorrhage with deficits), minor (hemoglobin decrease 3-5 g/dL or intracranial hemorrhage without residual deficits), or insignificant. RESULTS: Suboptimal platelet inhibition on clopidogrel was seen in 70 of 106 patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures. There was a significantly higher magnitude of platelet inhibition with ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with clopidogrel resistance (mean ± SD: 85.90 ± 10.74% vs. 29.26 ± 17.71%; P < .001); 50 of 70 patients showed optimal inhibition. Two patients had major (fatal) hemorrhagic events (both received either intravenous thrombolytics and/or eptifibatide infusion). Three patients had minor hemorrhagic events, and two patients had insignificant hemorrhagic events. Four of seven hemorrhagic events occurred in patients with optimal response to clopidogrel, two occurred in patients with suboptimal response to ticagrelor, and one occurred in a patient with optimal response to ticagrelor. CONCLUSIONS: Oral ticagrelor can augment platelet inhibition in patients who have clopidogrel resistance.

The 100 Most Influential Papers in the Field of Thrombolytic Therapy: A Bibliometric Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bibliometric analyses are used by researchers and research funding agencies to help determine areas of greatest interest, and consequently which topics and domains warrant increased research attention. Bibliometric analyses have similarly been published in a number of clinical subspecialties concerning areas of specific medical interest; however, a thorough literature search revealed that such a study has been absent in the field of thrombolytics to date. To bridge this gap, we conducted a citation analysis of the 100 most influential articles on thrombolytics. METHODS: Scopus was selected as the database of choice. Two independent researchers explored the database to extract relevant articles. The articles were ranked according to the number of citations, and a sequential list of the top 100 original articles was prepared in descending order. A detailed analysis was carried out to identify trends and uncover significant discriminators. A second list containing the top 10 review articles was also separately prepared. RESULTS: The 100 most-cited articles regarding thrombolytics were published between 1973 and 2015, with the most articles (n = 29) published in the 5-year period extending from 1996 to 2000. The total number of citations of these 100 most-cited articles ranged from a low of 389 to a high of 6971, with a median of 612.5 citations. These 100 most-cited articles originated from 26 different countries, with more than half from the USA (n = 54), followed by the next most popular countries of origin Germany (n = 20) and France (n = 15). The New England Journal of Medicine (n = 26) and The Lancet (n = 26) contributed the majority of the articles. CONCLUSION: Our analysis provides insight into the span of research activity and the nature of inquiry dealing with 'thrombolytic therapy,' with the hope that such analysis may help to effectively guide future research. Our analysis also yielded a list of the most highly cited and presumably most impactful guideline articles within this field, for distinct consideration.