Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Sleep Breath ; 28(1): 459-465, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37550557

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Sexual dysfunction and sleep problems are common in women. Nevertheless, the relationship between sleep problems and sexual dysfunction during pregnancy has yet to be fully clarified. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between sleep problems and sexual dysfunction in pregnant women. METHODS: The study had a cross-sectional design and the sample was determined by employing the G*Power program on the basis of the findings of a related study. Taking the correlation value between the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) into account, it was found that the minimum sample size was 219 pregnant women. Healthy pregnant women who were literate, did not have a diagnosed psychiatric disease, did not have a mental disability or communication problems, were in the gestation period, were not restricted by their doctors in terms of engaging in sexual activity, and who were willing to participate were included. The study included those pregnant women who consecutively attended the NST polyclinic in a maternity hospital in a province in the Black Sea region of Turkey between January 2022 and August 2022. The Sociodemographic Information Form, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the ISI, and the FSFI were used to collect data. RESULTS: A total of 220 pregnant women took part. The women had a mean age of 27.4 ± 6.3. Of the pregnant women, all had poor sleep quality: 61% had insomnia problems; 30% had sexual dysfunction. When the relationships between the PSQI, ISI and FSFI were examined, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the mean PSQI and ISI scores (p = 0.000). A statistically significant negative correlation was determined between the mean ISI and FSFI scores (p = 0.044). According to the multiple regression analysis, age did not significantly predict sexual function (ß = -0.112; t = -1.639; p = 0.103); insomnia severity predicted sexual function negatively (ß = -0.146; t = -2.136; p = 0.034). The explained variance was 2.6%. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that sleep quality as measured by the PSQI does not correlate with female sexual dysfunction in pregnant women. However, severity of insomnia does correlate with sexual dysfunction.


Asunto(s)
Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Mujeres Embarazadas , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Inicio y del Mantenimiento del Sueño/epidemiología , Turquía/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/epidemiología
2.
Sleep Breath ; 25(4): 2127-2134, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33566234

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Restless leg syndrome (RLS) is a movement disorder which constitutes the most common and major risk group during pregnancy. The purpose of this study was to determine prevalence and severity of RLS during pregnancy and to investigate the effect of RLS on quality of life in pregnant women. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in antenatal clinics of four different public hospitals. Data collected were pregnancy assessment form, RLS diagnostic criteria form, RLS severity scale, and SF-12 quality of life scale. RESULTS: Among 718 pregnant women, mean age was 28.3±5.9 years (range 19 to 45). According to the diagnostic criteria of RLS, RLS prevalence was 22% (n=159). Of the 159 women with RLS, 41% had moderate severity and 40% had severe RLS. Prevalence of RLS in pregnant women increased with gestational week, working time during pregnancy, weight before pregnancy, total weight gain during pregnancy, and pre-pregnancy body mass index. Physical health scores, physical functioning scores, pain scores, emotional role difficulty scores, and social function scores were significantly lower in the pregnant women with RLS than without RLS (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately one-fifth of the pregnant women had RLS, mostly in the third trimester, and the severity of RLS was predominantly moderate and severe. Pregnant women with RLS had poorer quality of life than pregnant women without RLS.


Asunto(s)
Complicaciones del Embarazo , Calidad de Vida , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Gravedad del Paciente , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Complicaciones del Embarazo/fisiopatología , Prevalencia , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/epidemiología , Síndrome de las Piernas Inquietas/fisiopatología , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA